Diligent Dave-A Remembrance, 43 Loyola Los Angeles Law Review
735 (2010). Full Text
Confrontation Stories: Raleigh on the Mayflower, 3 Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 209-21 (2005).
Response, 55 University of Miami Law Review 1101-17 (2001). Symposium: Evidence of Innocence Offered by the Criminal Defendant: “Not So Fast.”
What's the Matter with Evidence?, 25 Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 773-81 (1992). Symposium: Does Evidence Law Matter?
State Adaptation of the Federal Rules: The Pros and Cons, 43 Oklahoma Law Review 293-314 (1990).
UCLA Law School's Faltering Commitment to the Latino Community: The New Admissions Process (with Cesar Chavez et al.), 9 Chicano Law Review 73-96 (1988).
Review Essay: "There'll Always Be England": The Instrumental Ideology of Evidence, 85 Michigan Law Review 1204-1234 (1987).
A Primer on Proof of “Other Crimes,”, 10 CACJ Forum 19-23 (1983).
Review Essay: The Persistence of Progressive Proceduralism, 61 Texas Law Review 929-48 (1983). Reviewing Discovery: A Comparison Between English and American Civil Discovery Law with Reform Proposals, by Julius B. Levine.
The Politics of Federal Rulemaking: The Tangled History of Rule 410 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, 7 CACJ Forum 27-30 (1980).
The Right of Confrontation and the Hearsay Rule: Sir Walter Raleigh Loses Another One, 8 Criminal Law Bulletin 99-144 (1972).
The Preliminary Hearing in Los Angeles: Some Field Findings and Legal-Policy Observations, Part 1 (with Leon Letwin), 18 UCLA Law Review 636-757 (1971). Part 2, 18 UCLA Law Review 916-61 (1971).
The Right of Confrontation and Rules of Evidence: Sir Walter Raleigh Rides Again, 9 Alaska Law Journal 3-31 (1971).
The Right of Confrontation and Rules of Evidence: The Return of the Portuguese Gentleman, 9 Alaska Law Journal 3-17 (1971).
What is "Custodial Interrogation"?: California's Anticipatory Application of Miranda v. Arizona, 14 UCLA Law Review 59-134 (1966).