[EL] Officers Punished for Supporting Eased Drug Laws - NYTimes.com

[John Tanner]

The Border Patrol situation certainly does, assuming that the dismissal was
legal -- which appears highly questionable (read "nuts").

Miller's problem, on the other hand, seems to have been a voluntary excess
of disclosure -- listing his official position/affiliation "for
identification purposes."  Apparently merely signing the petition woudl not
have resulted in a problem

On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 4:38 AM, David A. Holtzman <David at holtzmanlaw.com>wrote:

>  Does this make a case (or help make a case) for non-disclosure of
> signatures and contributions for an effort to legalize marijuana? Does the
> answer apply to a ballot measure and also to a candidacy whose platform
> prominently features a legalization plank?
>
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/03/us/officers-punished-for-supporting-eased-drug-laws.html?_r=1&hp=&pagewanted=all
>
>   - dah
> --
> David A. Holtzman, M.P.H., J.D.
> david at holtzmanlaw.com
>
> Notice: This email (including any files transmitted with it) may be
> confidential, for use only by intended recipients.  If you are not an
> intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this email to an
> intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error
> and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this
> email is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email in error,
> please immediately notify the sender and discard all copies.****
>
> ** **
>
> _______________________________________________
> Law-election mailing list
> Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
> http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20111203/faf4931b/attachment.html>