[EL] ELB News and Commentary 12/19/11

[Edward Still]

It is getting harder to figure out what it is Congressional bills. Take for
example the item below about the disclosure of campaign finance by
government contractors. I just looked at HR 1 (the Omnibus Appropriations
bill). I did a search for the obvious terms (disclose, disclosure,
campaign) and can't find the provision Rep. Eshoo is talking about. The
bill is 384 pages long, so I am not about to read the thing from cover to
cover.

I contacted my good friend Gov. Mitt Romney, and he offers $10,000 to the
first person who finds it and posts the location here.

Edward Still
Edward Still Law Firm LLC
130 Wildwood Parkway, Suite 108, PMB 304
Birmingham AL 35209
205-320-2882 (voice & fax)
  www.votelaw.com/blog
  www.edwardstill.com
  www.linkedin.com/in/edwardstill <http://www.linkedin.com/in/edwardstill>


On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Rick Hasen <rhasen at law.uci.edu> wrote:

>   <http://electionlawblog.org/>
>
>
>
>  “Rep. Eshoo Hails Campaign Finance Disclosure Language in Omnibus
> Spending Bill” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=26706>
> Posted on December 16, 2011 11:36 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=26706>
> by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> The following press release arrived via email:
>
> *Rep. Eshoo Hails Campaign Finance Disclosure Language in Omnibus
> Spending Bill*
>
> * Washington, D.C.—*Rep. Anna G. Eshoo (D-Palo Alto) praised the
> inclusion of improved campaign finance disclosure language in the $900
> billion “omnibus” spending bill that will fund federal government agencies
> through the end of 2012.  The 2012 omnibus legislation removes riders
> attached to previous bills that specifically prohibited any disclosure for
> government contractors. This compromise language allows President Obama to
> move forward with disclosure requirements for contract recipients.
>
> “After President Obama’s draft Executive Order requiring disclosure of
> political spending by companies doing business with the federal government
> was leaked, big business and lobbyists were up in arms,” *said Rep. Anna
> Eshoo*. “In response, House Republicans repeatedly added riders to
> appropriations bills to block any new disclosure requirements over unified
> Democratic opposition.
>
> “Today’s compromise omnibus spending bill leaves the President free to
> require disclosure from any company receiving taxpayer dollars. We should
> all agree that with public dollars come public responsibilities.  In the
> aftermath of the Citizens United decision, it’s even more important for us
> to stand up for transparency and disclosure.  I hope the President takes
> this opportunity to finally issue his long-awaited Executive Order.”
>
> In February, Eshoo offered an amendment to H.R. 1 that mirrors the
> President’s Draft Executive Order which became public in April. On July 28,
> 2011, Rep. Eshoo sent a letter<http://www.washingtonpost.com/r/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2011/07/28/National-Politics/Graphics/2011-7-28%20Disclosure%20Letter%20to%20President%20Obama.pdf>to President Obama, signed by 62 Members of Congress, urging him to
> finalize his Draft Executive Order on Contractors. The letter reads, in
> part:
>
> * “Disclosure will not politicize the procurement process — it will
> improve it.  Political expenditures are already well-known to those that
> make them and to the officials who benefit.  With disclosure, the public
> will have access to this information as well, allowing them to judge
> whether contracts were awarded based on merit.”*
>
> In reaction to the Rep. Eshoo’s proposal and the President’s Draft
> Executive Order, Republicans attached four riders to appropriations bills
> to prohibit any disclosure requirements whatsoever. Each time, Eshoo led
> the opposition to the riders, and offered her own amendment to require
> campaign disclosure. Each time, Republicans blocked the amendment from even
> being voted on.
>
>
>  [image: Share]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D26706&title=%E2%80%9CRep.%20Eshoo%20Hails%20Campaign%20Finance%20Disclosure%20Language%20in%20Omnibus%20Spending%20Bill%E2%80%9D&description=>
>   Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10> | Comments
> Off
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20111219/6eb5506c/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20111219/6eb5506c/attachment.png>