[EL] ELB News and commentary 6/24/11

Fri Jun 24 08:18:52 PDT 2011

These statements would be much funnier if not for the concerted efforts by some to discredit the Court with aspersions of unethical conduct.

D. Eric Lycan
Steptoe & Johnson PLLC
P.O. Box 910810, Lexington, KY 40591-0810
Overnight
1010 Monarch Street, Suite 250, Lexington, KY 40513
O: 859-219-8213 F: 304-933-8715 C: 859-621-8888

Eric.Lycan at Steptoe-Johnson.com
www.steptoe-johnson.com<http://www.steptoe-johnson.com/>

From: law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu [mailto:law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu] On Behalf Of Allen Dickerson
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 10:22 AM
To: 'Sean Parnell'; law-election at uci.edu
Subject: Re: [EL] ELB News and commentary 6/24/11

Apparently it's a trend:

"Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, writing for the four moderates on the court, dissented from Justice Scalia's broader analysis and sought a much narrower holding."

(A comment on Wal-Mart v. Dukes, courtesy of yesterday's New York Times via Above The Law).  http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/21/opinion/21tue1.html?_r=1

From: law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu [mailto:law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu] On Behalf Of Sean Parnell
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 9:51 AM
To: law-election at uci.edu
Subject: Re: [EL] ELB News and commentary 6/24/11

I found this amusing in the Atlantic piece by Garrett Epps:

"...Justice John Paul Stevens--a moderate-conservative Republican..."

I don't believe I'd ever read that before.

Sean Parnell
President
Center for Competitive Politics
http://www.campaignfreedom.org
http://www.twitter.com/seanparnellccp
124 S. West Street, #201
Alexandria, VA  22310
(703) 894-6800 phone
(703) 894-6813 direct
(703) 894-6811 fax

From: law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu [mailto:law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu] On Behalf Of Rick Hasen
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 12:30 AM
To: law-election at uci.edu
Subject: [EL] ELB News and commentary 6/24/11

Want More Flavor About the Brooklyn Fraud Described in the 1984 Grand Jury Report, the Collusion of Election Officials, and Prosecutions for Impersonation Vote Fraud?<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=19584>
Posted on June 23, 2011<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=19584> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Jim Sleeper's recollections<http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/10/31/treat_or_trick_elections_offic/index.php> jibe with the grand jury report and the NY Times reporting at the time.  Sleeper's story <http://jimsleeper.com/articles/scoops&revelations/Vender%20Beatty.pdf> from the Village Voice in that period notes some impersonation fraud and some convictions:

[cid:image001.png at 01CC325F.E3FFDD20]<http://electionlawblog.org/wp-content/uploads/beatty.png>The Brooklyn example is not looking like such a great one of impersonation voter fraud going on without notice of diligent elected officials.

[cid:image002.png at 01CC325F.E3FFDD20]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D19584&title=Want%20More%20Flavor%20About%20the%20Brooklyn%20Fraud%20Described%20in%20the%201984%20Grand%20Jury%20Report%2C%20the%20Collusion%20of%20Election%20Officials%2C%20and%20Prosecutions%20for%20Imperson>
Posted in election administration<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>, fraudulent fraud squad<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=8>, Uncategorized<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1>, voter id<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=9> | Comments Off
Two from FollowtheMoney.org<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=19579>
Posted on June 23, 2011<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=19579> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Best practices<http://www.followthemoney.org/press/ReportView.phtml?r=444> for state campaign finance disclosure and a 50-state survey<http://www.followthemoney.org/content/bestpractices/index.phtml>.
[cid:image002.png at 01CC325F.E3FFDD20]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D19579&title=Two%20from%20FollowtheMoney.org&description=>
Posted in campaign finance<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10> | Comments Off
"National Political Committees Must Return Donations from Stanford"<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=19576>
Posted on June 23, 2011<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=19576> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Bloomberg reports<http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-06-22/u-s-political-committees-must-return-1-7-million-in-stanford-donations.html>: "Five Democratic and Republican national political committees must return more than $1.7 million in contributions received from indicted financier R. Allen Stanford to his court-appointed receiver, a federal judge ruled."

You can access the judge's order here<http://electionlawblog.org/wp-content/uploads/Janvey-Order.pdf>.
[cid:image002.png at 01CC325F.E3FFDD20]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D19576&title=%E2%80%9CNational%20Political%20Committees%20Must%20Return%20Donations%20from%20Stanford%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaign finance<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>, chicanery<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=12> | Comments Off
"The Hatch Act: Showcasing the Absurdity of Congress"<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=19573>
Posted on June 23, 2011<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=19573> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Jeff Patch blogs<http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/politics/168179-the-hatch-act-showcasing-the-absurdity-of-congress>.
[cid:image002.png at 01CC325F.E3FFDD20]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D19573&title=%E2%80%9CThe%20Hatch%20Act%3A%20Showcasing%20the%20Absurdity%20of%20Congress%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in conflict of interest laws<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=20> | Comments Off
"Constitutional Myth #5: Corporations Have the Same Free-Speech Rights as Individuals"<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=19570>
Posted on June 23, 2011<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=19570> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Garrett Epps blogs<http://m.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2011/06/constitutional-myth-5-corporations-have-the-same-free-speech-rights-as-individuals/240874/> on Danielczyk.
[cid:image002.png at 01CC325F.E3FFDD20]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D19570&title=%E2%80%9CConstitutional%20Myth%20%235%3A%20Corporations%20Have%20the%20Same%20Free-Speech%20Rights%20as%20Individuals%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaign finance<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10> | Comments Off
"House Votes Not to Confer More Power on Feckless FEC"<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=19567>
Posted on June 23, 2011<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=19567> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

This item<http://www.clcblog.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=423:house-votes-not-to-confer-more-power-on-feckless-fec-6-23-11> appears on the CLC Blog.
[cid:image002.png at 01CC325F.E3FFDD20]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D19567&title=%E2%80%9CHouse%20Votes%20Not%20to%20Confer%20More%20Power%20on%20Feckless%20FEC%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in Election Assistance Commission<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=34>, federal election commission<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=24> | Comments Off
NC Governor Vetoes Voter ID Law<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=19564>
Posted on June 23, 2011<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=19564> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Another<http://wkzo.com/news/articles/2011/jun/23/north-carolina-governor-vetoes-voter-photo-id-bill/> Democratic governor vetoes a voter id law passed by a Republican legislature.
[cid:image002.png at 01CC325F.E3FFDD20]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D19564&title=NC%20Governor%20Vetoes%20Voter%20ID%20Law&description=>
Posted in voter id<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=9> | Comments Off
1984 New York Grand Jury Report on Voter Fraud Now Available<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=19560>
Posted on June 23, 2011<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=19560> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Thanks to the hard work of the UCI Law librarians, and the cooperation of the Brooklyn District Attorney's office, I am pleased to provide a link to Kings County grand jury report, In the Matter of Confidential Investigation R84-11<http://electionlawblog.org/wp-content/uploads/1984_grand_jury_report-r84-11.pdf>.

This is the report I tried <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=19393> to get<http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/06/election_expert_cant_find_report_on_1984_voter_impersonation_case_cited_by_von_spakovsky.php> from Hans von Spakovsky and the Heritage Foundation with no success.  von Spakovsky had relied on the grand jury report in an effort to justify voter identification requirements. (He wrote<http://electionlawblog.org/archives/012191.html>: "One doesn't have to look far to find instances of fraudulent ballots cast in actual elections by 'voters' who were the figments of active imaginations. In 1984, a district attorney in Brooklyn, N.Y. (a Democrat), released the findings of a grand jury that reported extensive registration and impersonation fraud between 1968 and 1982.")

It is a fascinating read, about what appear to have been the last days of a corrupt Brooklyn Democratic party machine.  Most of the fraud alleged involved the cooperation of election officials or inspectors, or the downright incompetence of election workers.  (One of the most colorful episodes recorded involved party workers hiding in the restroom ceilings at the Brooklyn Board of Elections, waiting to phony up voter registration cards after an election to manufacture evidence for an election contest.)

It is not clear to me why von Spakovsky did not respond to requests to turn over the grand jury report because the report contains the only apparently successful effort in the last 40 years of which I'm aware to actually affect election results through impersonation fraud.  Perhaps the reason is that the way in which the fraud was done almost certainly could not happen today, thanks to basic safeguards put in place by election officials (such as checking the names and addresses of new registrants and ensuring greater security of voter registration materials).  And of course when election officials collude with those committing fraud, a voter i.d. requirement would not help in the slightest.

The fact that most of this fraud took place 40 years ago and nothing like it has been discovered since is a good argument that schemes like these cannot  successfully be done anymore. Vote buying schemes, fraudulent registration schemes, and absentee ballot fraud do get discovered and prosecuted.  There's no reason to think this kind of fraud, if it happened, would not at least occasionally be discovered and prosecuted as well.  At most we find a handful of isolated cases-nothing organized, and certainly nothing to swing elections.

Still, the grand jury report is the best evidence that the Fraudulent Fraud Squad has, and now it will see the light of day.
[cid:image002.png at 01CC325F.E3FFDD20]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D19560&title=1984%20New%20York%20Grand%20Jury%20Report%20on%20Voter%20Fraud%20Now%20Available&description=>
Posted in election administration<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>, fraudulent fraud squad<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=8>, voter id<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=9> | Comments Off
"Romney backers launch super PAC"<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=19557>
Posted on June 23, 2011<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=19557> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

WaPo reports<http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/romney-backers-launch-super-pac/2011/06/22/AGTkGchH_story.html>.
[cid:image002.png at 01CC325F.E3FFDD20]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D19557&title=%E2%80%9CRomney%20backers%20launch%20super%20PAC%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaign finance<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10> | Comments Off
Wonder What the Supreme Court Will Do on Monday in McComish?<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=19554>
Posted on June 23, 2011<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=19554> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Here'<http://www.slate.com/id/2289193/>s the oral argument preview I wrote for Slate, "Rich Candidate Expected to Win Again."

I'll be writing about the McComish decision on Monday, when the decision is expected to be released at 10 am eastern.  Stay tuned.
[cid:image002.png at 01CC325F.E3FFDD20]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D19554&title=Wonder%20What%20the%20Supreme%20Court%20Will%20Do%20on%20Monday%20in%20McComish%3F&description=>
Posted in campaign finance<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10> | Comments Off

--
Rick Hasen
Visiting Professor
UC Irvine School of Law
401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000
Irvine, CA 92697-8000
949.824.3072 - office
949.824.0495 - fax
rhasen at law.uci.edu<mailto:rhasen at law.uci.edu>
http://law.uci.edu/faculty/page1_r_hasen.html

William H. Hannon Distinguished Professor of Law
Loyola Law School
http://www.lls.edu/academics/faculty/hasen.html
http://electionlawblog.org

________________________________
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE:
This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may be protected by legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this e-mail or any attachment is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by returning it to the sender and delete this copy from your system. Thank you for your cooperation.

IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: Recent revisions to IRS Circular 230 require that certain steps be taken by a tax advisor before his or her written tax advice may be relied upon to avoid IRS penalties. Those steps, which generally are time-consuming and result in substantial additional legal fees, were not undertaken in connection with any tax advice which may appear in this communication. Accordingly, this communication was not written or intended by the sender or Steptoe & Johnson PLLC, to be used, and cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed. Further, any written statement contained in this communication relating to a federal tax transaction or matter may not be used by any person to support the promotion or marketing of, or to recommend, any federal tax transaction or matter addressed in this communication.

Steptoe & Johnson PLLC

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20110624/851b4bff/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 409799 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20110624/851b4bff/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: image002.png
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20110624/851b4bff/attachment-0001.png>