[EL] Colbert
Steve Hoersting
shoersting at campaignfreedom.org
Wed Jun 29 21:59:17 PDT 2011
Rick,
Republican Commissioners following a path carved by Congress and the Court
is not "obstructionism."
Steve
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 12:52 AM, Rick Hasen <rhasen at law.uci.edu> wrote:
> **
> Breaking News: Stephen Colbert Brings Temporary Bipartisan Harmony to the
> FEC <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=19978>
> Posted on June 29, 2011 <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=19978> by Rick
> Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> An eagle-eyed reader notes a new item<http://fec.gov/agenda/2011/mtgdoc_1138b.pdf>posted in connection with tomorrow’s meeting of the FEC: amendments to Draft
> A <http://fec.gov/agenda/2011/mtgdoc_1138a_and_b.pdf> of the Colbert
> advisory opinion, proposed by five of the six commissioners (all besides
> Republican Commissioner McGahn). This signals that things will go very
> smoothly (and I would guess rather quickly) at tomorrow’s FEC meeting.
>
> The draft comes closer to the position of the Democratic Commissioners
> rather than the Republican Commissioners’ initial position, and it seems to
> lessen the possibility that the Colbert opinion could have (inadvertently)
> opened up a wide expansion of the “press exemption” to further undermine
> campaign finance laws.
>
> Why would the Republican commissioners have agreed to this? The likely
> reason, as my tipster suggests and I agree, is the negative publicity that
> would come to the Republican commissioners had the FEC deadlocked and not
> issued an AO resolving all of Colbert’s issues.
>
> But don’t worry. Once the Colbert circus leaves the FEC tomorrow, the
> agency will go back to its usual partisan deadlocks and Republican
> Commissioner obstructionism, and be as good as dead<http://electionlawblog.org/?s=as+good+as+dead>
> .
> [image: Share]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D19978&title=Breaking%20News%3A%20Stephen%20Colbert%20Brings%20Temporary%20Bipartisan%20Harmony%20to%20the%20FEC&description=>
> Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>,
> chicanery <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=12>, federal election
> commission <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=24> | Comments Off
> --
> Rick Hasen
> Visiting Professor
> UC Irvine School of Law
> 401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000
> Irvine, CA 92697-8000
> 949.824.3072 - office
> 949.824.0495 - fax
> rhasen at law.uci.edu
> http://law.uci.edu/faculty/page1_r_hasen.html
>
> William H. Hannon Distinguished Professor of Law
> Loyola Law School
> http://www.lls.edu/academics/faculty/hasen.html
> http://electionlawblog.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Law-election mailing list
> Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
> http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
>
--
Steve Hoersting
CENTER for COMPETITIVE POLITICS
124 S. West Street
Suite 201
Alexandria, Va. 22314
(703) 894-6800
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20110630/1a530060/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20110630/1a530060/attachment.png>
View list directory