[EL] Electionlawblog news and commentary 5/27/11

[john.k.tanner at gmail.com]

The gist of the decision, per my quick read of only the specified pages, is that the corporate contributions were of sums below the threshold that congress has decided are not corrupting, and if they aren't corrupting when made by individuals, they can't be corrupting when made by corporations or unions.  
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-----Original Message-----
From: Edward Still <still at votelaw.com>
Sender: law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu
Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 18:26:39 
To: law-election at uci.edu<law-election at uci.edu>
Subject: Re: [EL] Electionlawblog news and commentary 5/27/11

_______________________________________________
Law-election mailing list
Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election