[EL] ELB News and Commentary 11/4/11

Fri Nov 4 07:56:04 PDT 2011

FEC Commissioner McGahn says that the FEC has some "secret law" that the  
House Committee may subpoena. For all the government transparency buffs, is 
this  something that needs to be made public?  It would also be helpful to 
know  what is in these secret documents.  Could someone who worked at the FEC 
and  saw these comment on that?  Jim Bopp

_Click  here: House Committee Threatens to Subpoena FEC Records : Roll Call 
Lobbying  & Influence_ 
(http://www.rollcall.com/news/house_committee_threatens_to_subpoena_fec_records-210021-1.html?pos=hbtxt)  

In a message dated 11/4/2011 10:46:08 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
rhasen at law.uci.edu writes:

_The Ninety-Nine  Percent_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=25035)  
Posted  on _November 4, 2011 7:43 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=25035) 
 by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)   

Yesterday I began the unit on campaign finance in my election law seminar,  
and many of the students’ reacton papers pointed with admiration to a quote 
 from John S. Shockley, Money in Politics: Judicial Roadblocks to Campaign  
Finance Reform, 10 Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly 679 (1983),  which 
appears in an annotated footnote in Buckley v. Valeo.   Here’s what John 
wrote: 
If one agrees with the Court that being able to spend only $25,000 to  
$50,000 annually on campaigning is in fact a substantial restraint upon  
constitutional expression, what does this say about the rights of the  ninety-nine 
percent of the American electorate who cannot expend even this  ‘
substantially restrained’ amount? Since their ability to speak is  presumably 
restrained even more, where are they to look for the protection  of their First 
Amendment rights?
It is good to know that John’s work has stood the test of time, and his 99% 
 reference was entirely prescient! 

(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=25035&title=The%20Ninety-Nine%20Percent&description=) 

Posted in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10)   | 
Comments Off 

_Justice Stevens on  Redistricting and Courts in the Political Thicket_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=25033)  
Posted  on _November 4, 2011 7:39 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=25033) 
 by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)   

>From the SCOTUSblog i_nterview_ 
(http://www.scotusblog.com/2011/11/an-interview-with-justice-stevens/#more-131024) : 
Question: Let me ask you a more substantive question, arising  from your 
discussion of Reynolds v. Simsand the voting rights cases  that the Warren 
Court decided.  One thing that you have long urged is  that the Court ought to 
care a lot more than it does about partisan  gerrymandering. 
Justice Stevens: Absolutely. 
Question:   And at the same time, of course, you also  have argued that the 
Court should stay out of politics in certain  instances.  I wonder how you 
would envision the Court getting involved  in something as crass and 
divisive as partisan gerrymandering while  maintaining the public perception of 
political independence. 
Justice Stevens:  Well it goes back to the fundamental  equal protection 
principle that government has the duty to be  impartial.  When it’s engaged in 
districting it should be  impartial. 
Nowadays, the political parties acknowledge that they are deliberately  
trying to gerrymander the districts in a way that will help the majority. I  
just read a newspaper article the other day about the Maryland  redistricting, 
which is designed to help the Democrats.  That’s  outrageously 
unconstitutional in my judgment.  The government cannot  gerrymander for the purpose of 
helping the majority party; the government  should be redistricting for the 
purpose of creating appropriate legislative  districts.  And the government 
ought to start with the notion that  districts should be compact and 
contiguous as statutes used to require. 
Question:   And you think that if the Court got  involved in reviewing 
these kinds of redistricting plans that there would be  a way to fend off 
accusations that the Court is choosing sides in political  warfare? 
Justice Stevens:  Oh absolutely.  If the Court  followed neutral principles 
in whatever rules they adopted, the rules would  apply equally to the 
Republicans and Democrats.  I think that line of  cases would generate a body of 
law such as the one-person, one-vote cases  that would be administered in a 
neutral way.  This is one of my major  disappointments in my entire career: 
that I was so totally unsuccessful in  persuading the Court on something so 
obviously correct.  Indeed, I  think that the Court’s failure to act in this 
area is one of the things that  has contributed to the much greater 
partisanship in legislative bodies now  that wasn’t true years ago when I worked on 
a sub-committee of the House  Judiciary Committee.

(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=25033&title=Justice%20Stevens%20on%20Redistricting%20and%20Courts%20in%20the%20Po
litical%20Thicket&description=) 

Posted in _redistricting_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=6) , _Supreme 
Court_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29)   | Comments Off 

_“A coalition of voters  file first N.C. redistricting lawsuit”_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=25031)  
Posted  on _November 4, 2011 7:35 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=25031) 
 by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)   

_Here_ 
(http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/a_coalition_of_voters_file_first_nc_redistricting_lawsuit) . 

(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=25031&title=“
A%20coalition%20of%20voters%20file%20first%20N.C.%20redistricting%20lawsuit”&description=) 

Posted in _redistricting_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=6) , _Voting 
Rights Act_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15)   | Comments Off 

_“Cain Has Long Ties To  Koch Brothers-Linked Group”_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=25028)  
Posted  on _November 4, 2011 7:32 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=25028) 
 by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)   

NPR _reports_ (http://www.npr.org/2011/11/04/142006513/cain-has-long-t
ies-to-koch-brothers-linked-group) . 

(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=25028&title=“Cain%20Has%20Long%20Ties%20To%20Koch%20Brothers-Linked%20Group”
&description=) 

Posted in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10)   | 
Comments Off 

_“County in Colo. has  high number on inactive voters”_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=25025)  
Posted  on _November 4, 2011 7:27 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=25025) 
 by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)   

The Washington Independent _reports_ 
(http://washingtonindependent.com/115234/county-in-colo-has-high-number-on-inactive-voters) . 

(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=25025&title=“County%20in%20Colo.%20has%20high%20number%20on%20inactive%20voters”
&description=) 

Posted in _election  administration_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18)  
| Comments Off 

_“Will Florida’s Dual  Election System Breathe Life into Bush v. Gore?”_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=25022)  
Posted  on _November 4, 2011 7:25 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=25022) 
 by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)   

Dan Smith _blogs_ 
(http://electionsmith.wordpress.com/2011/11/04/will-floridas-dual-election-system-breathe-life-into-bush-v-gore/) . 

(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=25022&title=“Will%20Florida’
s%20Dual%20Election%20System%20Breathe%20Life%20into%20Bush%20v.%20Gore?”&description=) 

Posted in _election  administration_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18)  
| Comments Off 

_“Election Law as  Elective of Choice”_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=25019)  
Posted  on _November 4, 2011 7:24 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=25019) 
 by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)   

Kirsten Nussbaumer has posted _this  draft_ 
(http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1950416)  on SSRN (forthcoming, St. Louis University 
Law Review  symposium on teaching election law).  Here is the abstract: 
This article, an invited contribution to a symposium on teaching election  
law, presents election law as a field that is fundamentally, inescapably  
interdisciplinary in nature and, on that account, of special value for our  
students. The interplay of doctrinal reasoning, empirical political science,  
and humanistic inquiry that characterizes election law is well-suited for  
both the traditional law school classroom and a practicum in election  law.

(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=25019&title=“Election%20Law%20as%20Elective%20of%20Choice”&description=) 

Posted in _pedagogy_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=23)   | Comments Off 

_“GOP cries foul on  winner-take-all bill”_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=25016)  
Posted  on _November 4, 2011 7:12 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=25016) 
 by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)   

Republicans _work hard_ 
(http://www.omaha.com/article/20111104/NEWS01/711049881/0)   to eliminate congressional seat allocation of electoral votes in 
Nebraska just  as they try to implement such a system in Pennsylvania. 

(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=25016&title=“GOP%20cries%20foul%20on%20winner-take-all%20bill”&description=) 

Posted in _electoral college_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=44)   | 
Comments Off 

_“Congressional  Democrats seek to curb tough state voter-screening laws”_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=25012)  
Posted  on _November 3, 2011 9:41 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=25012) 
 by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)   

McClatchy _reports_ 
(http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/11/03/2486155/congressional-democrats-seek-to.html) . 

(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=25012&title=“
Congressional%20Democrats%20seek%20to%20curb%20tough%20state%20voter-screening%20laws”&description=) 

Posted in _election  administration_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18) , 
_The Voting Wars_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60)   | Comments Off 

_“When an Oversight  Hearing Becomes an Oversight”_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=25009)  
Posted  on _November 3, 2011 9:15 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=25009) 
 by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)   

Meredith McGehee _blogs_ 
(http://www.clcblog.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=438:when-an-oversight-hearing-becomes-an-oversight-11-3-11
) . 

(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=25009&title=“When%20an%20Oversight%20Hearing%20Becomes%20an%20Oversight”
&description=) 

Posted in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10)   | 
Comments Off 

_“What is the Justice  Department doing about Southern voting rights?”_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=25007)  
Posted  on _November 3, 2011 9:13 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=25007) 
 by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)   

_This  item_ 
(http://www.southernstudies.org/2011/11/what-is-the-justice-department-doing-about-southern-voting-rights.html)  appears at “Facing South.”

(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=25007&title=“
What%20is%20the%20Justice%20Department%20doing%20about%20Southern%20voting%20rights?”&description=) 

Posted in _Department of  Justice_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=26) , 
_Voting Rights Act_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15)   | Comments Off 

_“Wisconsin: AG opinion  says LG would not be automatically included in Gov 
recall”_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=25005)  
Posted  on _November 3, 2011 9:12 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=25005) 
 by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)   

The Recall Elections Blog _reports_ 
(http://recallelections.blogspot.com/2011/11/wisconsin-ag-opinion-says-lg-would-not_03.html) . 

(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=25005&title=“
Wisconsin:%20AG%20opinion%20says%20LG%20would%20not%20be%20automatically%20included%20in%20Gov%20recall”&description=) 

Posted in _recall elections_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=11)   | 
Comments Off 

_“Rokita Questions FEC  Bureaucrats on Refusal to Disclose Enforcement Rules
”_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=25002)  
Posted  on _November 3, 2011 9:09 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=25002) 
 by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)   

See _this  press release_ 
(http://rokita.house.gov/press-release/rokita-questions-fec-bureaucrats-refusal-disclose-enforcement-rules) . 

(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=25002&title=“
Rokita%20Questions%20FEC%20Bureaucrats%20on%20Refusal%20to%20Disclose%20Enforcement%20Rules”&description=) 

Posted in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10)   | 
Comments Off 

_“FEC Urged to Reject  Senator Lee’s Attempt to Create a ‘Super Leadership 
PAC’ in Comments Filed by  Campaign Legal Center & Democracy 21″_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=24999)  
Posted  on _November 3, 2011 9:07 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=24999) 
 by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)   

See _this  press release_ 
(http://www.campaignlegalcenter.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1516:november-3-2011-fec-urged-to-reject-sena
tor-lees-attempt-to-create-a-super-leadership-pac-in-comments-filed-campaign
-legal-center-a-democracy-21&catid=63:legal-center-press-releases&Itemid=61)
 . 

(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=24999&title=“FEC%20Urged%20to%20Reject%20Senator%20Lee’
s%20Attempt%20to%20Create%20a%20‘Super%20Leadership%20PAC’
%20in%20Comments%20Filed%20by%20Campaign%20Legal%20Center%20&%20Democracy%2021″&description=) 

Posted in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10)   | 
Comments Off 

_“House Panel’s  Oversight Hearing on FEC Spotlights Divisions Among 
Commissioners”_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=24996)  
Posted  on _November 3, 2011 9:04 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=24996) 
 by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)   

BNA _reports_ 
(http://news.bna.com/mpdm/MPDMWB/split_display.adp?fedfid=23324090&vname=mpebulallissues&fn=23324090&jd=a0c9q0j4a9&split=0) . 

(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=24996&title=“House%20Panel’
s%20Oversight%20Hearing%20on%20FEC%20Spotlights%20Divisions%20Among%20Commissioners”&description=) 

Posted in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10)   | 
Comments Off 

_“Creating the Voting  Rights Act of 2012″_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=24993)  
Posted  on _November 3, 2011 9:56 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=24993) 
 by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)   

Why Tuesday? is sponsoring _this event_ 
(http://www.whytuesday.org/why-tuesday-2012-kickoff/)  in  D.C. on Tuesday. 

(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=24993&title=“Creating%20the%20Voting%20Rights%20Act%20of%202012″&description=) 

Posted in _Uncategorized_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1)   | Comments 
Off 

_“Voter head to Polls  to Vote on Voting”_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=24991)  
Posted  on _November 3, 2011 9:55 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=24991) 
 by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)   

That’s the lead story in this week’s _Electionline  Weekly_ (
http://www.electionline.org/index.php/electionline-weekly) . 

(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=24991&title=“Voter%20head%20to%20Polls%20to%20Vote%20on%20Voting”&description=) 

Posted in _election  administration_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18)  
| Comments Off 

_“Legal Center Calls  for FEC Overhaul, Submits Congressional Testimony on 
Dysfunctional Agency”_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=24988)   
Posted  on _November 3, 2011 9:54 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=24988) 
 by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)   

See_  this press release_ 
(http://www.campaignlegalcenter.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1514:november-3-2011-legal-center-calls-for-f
ec-overhaul-submits-congressional-testimony-on-dysfunctional-agency&catid=63
:legal-center-press-releases&Itemid=61) .  See also this _NYT  editorial._ 
(http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/03/opinion/having-the-watchdogs-to-tea.html?s
rc=tp)  

(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=24988&title=“
Legal%20Center%20Calls%20for%20FEC%20Overhaul,%20Submits%20Congressional%20Testimony%20on%20Dysfunctional%20Agency”&description=) 

Posted in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10) ,  
_federal election  commission_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=24)  | Comments 
Off 

_CREW FOIA Request to  FEC Republican Commissioners Leads to Claims of 
Improper Ex Parte  Communications_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=24985)  
Posted  on _November 3, 2011 9:49 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=24985) 
 by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)   

See _this  press release_ 
(http://www.citizensforethics.org/press/entry/report-reveals-republican-fec-commissioners-working-with-outside-allies)  about 
_this  report_ (http://crew.3cdn.net/e96220a7af6a2d0143_eum6bx04c.pdf) . 

(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=24985&title=CREW%20FOIA%20Request%20to%20FEC%20Republican%20Commissioners%20Leads
%20to%20Claims%20of%20Improper%20Ex%20Parte%20Communications&description=) 

Posted in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10) ,  
_federal election  commission_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=24)  | Comments 
Off 

_Dan Backer Live Tweets  FEC Congressional Hearing_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=24982)  
Posted  on _November 3, 2011 8:13 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=24982) 
 by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)   

_Here_ (https://twitter.com/#!/DBCapStrategies) . 

(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=24982&title=Dan%20Backer%20Live%20Tweets%20FEC%20Congressional%20Hearing&descript
ion=) 

Posted in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10)   | 
Comments Off 

_“Advocates Seek New  Avenues for Corporate Accountability”_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=24980)  
Posted  on _November 3, 2011 8:12 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=24980) 
 by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)   

Lisa Gilbert has written _this  oped_ 
(http://www.citizenvox.org/2011/11/03/advocates-seek-new-avenues-for-corporate-accountability-citizens-united-fec-
sec/) . 

(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=24980&title=“Advocates%20Seek%20New%20Avenues%20for%20Corporate%20Accountability”
&description=) 

Posted in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10)   | 
Comments Off 

_“Arizona Democrats  Threaten Recall Elections Over Redistricting”_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=24977)  
Posted  on _November 3, 2011 8:07 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=24977) 
 by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)   

The Fix _reports_ 
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/post/arizona-democrats-threaten-recall-elections-over-redistricting/2011/11/02/gIQA9x2FgM
_blog.html) . 

(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=24977&title=“
Arizona%20Democrats%20Threaten%20Recall%20Elections%20Over%20Redistricting”&description=) 

Posted in _recall elections_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=11) ,  
_redistricting_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=6)   | Comments Off 

_“Agency Nullification  at the FEC”_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=24975) 

Posted  on _November 3, 2011 8:06 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=24975) 
 by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)   

Craig Holman and Melanie Sloan have written _this op-ed f_ 
(http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1111/67505.html) or  Politico. 

(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=24975&title=“Agency%20Nullification%20at%20the%20FEC”&description=) 

Posted in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10)   | 
Comments Off 
-- 
Rick Hasen
Professor of Law and Political  Science
UC Irvine School of Law
401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite  1000
Irvine, CA 92697-8000
949.824.3072 - office
949.824.0495 -  fax
_rhasen at law.uci.edu_ (mailto:rhasen at law.uci.edu) 
_http://law.uci.edu/faculty/page1_r_hasen.html_ 
(http://law.uci.edu/faculty/page1_r_hasen.html) 
_http://electionlawblog.org_ (http://electionlawblog.org/) 

_______________________________________________
Law-election  mailing  list
Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20111104/498d03be/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20111104/498d03be/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20111104/498d03be/attachment-0001.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20111104/498d03be/attachment-0002.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20111104/498d03be/attachment-0003.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20111104/498d03be/attachment-0004.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20111104/498d03be/attachment-0005.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20111104/498d03be/attachment-0006.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20111104/498d03be/attachment-0007.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20111104/498d03be/attachment-0008.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20111104/498d03be/attachment-0009.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20111104/498d03be/attachment-0010.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20111104/498d03be/attachment-0011.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20111104/498d03be/attachment-0012.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20111104/498d03be/attachment-0013.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20111104/498d03be/attachment-0014.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20111104/498d03be/attachment-0015.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20111104/498d03be/attachment-0016.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20111104/498d03be/attachment-0017.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20111104/498d03be/attachment-0018.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20111104/498d03be/attachment-0019.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20111104/498d03be/attachment-0020.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20111104/498d03be/attachment-0021.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20111104/498d03be/attachment-0022.bin>