[EL] Check out Brewer, other GOP officials critical of redistricting map
JBoppjr at aol.com
JBoppjr at aol.com
Fri Oct 7 06:18:16 PDT 2011
Very interesting and I am glad to know this. Where can we find this
analysis?
When the House Republicans in Indiana proposed a commission, I helped them
design it to drain the politics out of it. Ultimately, I felt comfortable
with it -- even though I have been very concerned about commissions in the
past. The House Democrats, then in a majority, refused and now the
Republicans, who gained the majority in 2010, have done the redistricting
themselves. Jim Bopp
In a message dated 10/7/2011 9:13:33 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
nicholas.stephanopoulos at gmail.com writes:
In the last cycle, at the congressional level, the handful of states that
use commissions had plans with an average pro-Republican bias of 2%. At the
state legislative level, the larger number of states that use commissions
had plans with an average pro-Republican bias of 4%. So commissions don't
appear to have a systematic pro-Democratic slant, and if anything the
opposite might be the case (though the sample size is too small to know for sure,
and these figures include all commissions, not just nonpartisan
commissions).
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Aaron Blake <_BlakeA at washpost.com_
(mailto:BlakeA at washpost.com) > wrote:
I think that map also favors Dems, if only slightly. Latham was drawn in
with King and has to move districts to challenge Boswell, and the district
is swing, but 2/3 of it is Boswell's territory.
Aaron Blake
The Washington Post
The Fix
_www.PostPolitics.com_ (http://www.postpolitics.com/)
_blakea at washpost.com_ (mailto:blakea at washpost.com)
_twitter.com/FixAaron_ (http://twitter.com/FixAaron)
_202.503.4669_ (tel:202.503.4669)
From: _john.k.tanner at gmail.com_ (mailto:john.k.tanner at gmail.com)
To: _JBoppjr at aol.com_ (mailto:JBoppjr at aol.com) ,
_law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu_
(mailto:law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu) , _rhasen at law.uci.edu_ (mailto:rhasen at law.uci.edu) ,
_law-election at uci.edu_ (mailto:law-election at uci.edu)
Date: 10/07/2011 08:52 AM
Subject: Re: [EL] Check out Brewer, other GOP officials
critical of redistricting map
Sent by: _law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu_
(mailto:law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu)
____________________________________
Iowa?
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-----Original Message-----
From: _JBoppjr at aol.com_ (mailto:JBoppjr at aol.com)
Sender: _law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu_
(mailto:law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu)
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 08:48:49
To: <_rhasen at law.uci.edu_ (mailto:rhasen at law.uci.edu) >;
<_law-election at uci.edu_ (mailto:law-election at uci.edu) >
Subject: [EL] Check out Brewer,
other GOP officials critical of redistricting map
_______________________________________________
Law-election mailing list
_Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu_
(mailto:Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu)
_http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election_
(http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election)
_______________________________________________
Law-election mailing list
_Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu_
(mailto:Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu)
_http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election_
(http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election)
_______________________________________________
Law-election mailing list
_Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu_
(mailto:Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu)
_http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election_
(http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20111007/8d1e341e/attachment.html>
View list directory