[EL] Check out Could Pennsylvania Republicans end the electoral college as we know

[Josiah Neeley]

I'm not sure I'm following the logic here. If congressional districts were measured in geographic size (i.e. x square miles per district) then the guy would have a point. But they're not. Congressional districts are all have approximately the same number of people in them (there is some difference from state to state, but that's irrelevant to the proposed change). How is being more concentrated supposed to make a district more partisan?  

________________________________________
From: law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu [law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu] on behalf of Bonin, Adam C. [ABonin at cozen.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 8:34 AM
To: 'JBoppjr at aol.com'; 'rhasen at law.uci.edu'; 'law-election at uci.edu'
Subject: Re: [EL] Check out Could Pennsylvania Republicans end the      electoral       college as we know

Put simply, awarding electoral votes by congressional district would be a disaster for Democrats. Democratic voters tend to be much more concentrated in urban areas while Republican voters are typically more spread out. That means that the average blue seat is much bluer than the average red seat is red, which in turn means that there are more Republican-leaning districts than Democratic-inclined CDs.