[EL] Why attacking super PACs won't work
JBoppjr at aol.com
JBoppjr at aol.com
Thu Aug 2 10:58:23 PDT 2012
I certainly agree with the headline (but don't tell the Dems that, I don't
want them to stop trying), but I don't agree with this:
Fifty-one percent of those tested said super PACs didn’t help one candidate
more than the other — far more than the 16 percent who said they helped
Romney more and the 15 percent who said they aided Obama more. (The correct
answer, of course, is that _they have been helping Romney more — by a lot_
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/post/how-super-pacs-are-saving-mi
tt-romney/2012/07/23/gJQA1zKX5W_blog.html) .)
The question was about "outside groups" and I think the general public
thinks everyone other than a candidate is an outside group. This means labor
unions, advocacy groups, 527s, Super PACs, and maybe even political parties
and the media. When you throw all of these together, the Reps are only
currently benefiting from the spending of Super PACs and maybe slightly by
political parties. Republicans are getting crushed by labor union and media
spending. No wonder the reformers are only really targeting Super PACs.
This also gives me an opportunity to grip about the label "outside
groups." In other words, this label suggests that citizens are intruders who
interfere with elections. Actually our system is based on the notion that the
election is held among the citizens so they are hardly outside the process.
"Independent groups" would be more accurate and less of a pejorative, but
reformers like "outside groups" because they are the ones they want to
shut down, i.e. the citizens. Jim
In a message dated 8/2/2012 12:42:03 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
rhasen at law.uci.edu writes:
_“Why attacking super PACs won’t work “_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37949)
Posted on _August 2, 2012 9:32 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37949)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
The Fix_ reports_
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/post/why-attacking-super-pacs-wont-work/2012/08/01/gJQAmKmYQX_blog.html) . _Nick
Confessore_ (https://twitter.com/nickconfessore/status/231063805432561664) : “
Disagree w/_ at TheFix_ (https://twitter.com/TheFix) here. 40% can define super
PAC as groups that can take unlimited $? That’s pretty good!”
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37949&title=“Why%20attacking%20super%20PACs%20won’t%20work%20“&description=)
Posted in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10) |
Comments Off
_“Dark Money Groups Gone Wild”_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37947)
Posted on _August 2, 2012 9:29 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37947)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
_Andy Kroll_
(http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/08/irs-fec-political-groups-gone-wild) on why its “open season” for secret outside groups.
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37947&title=“Dark%20Money%20Groups%20Gone%20Wild”&description=)
Posted in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10) , _tax
law and election law_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=22) | Comments Off
_“Campaign Finance in the Hybrid Realm of Recall Elections”_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37944)
Posted on _August 2, 2012 9:26 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37944)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
Beth Garrett has posted _this draft_
(http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2116546) on SSRN (forthcoming, Minnesota Law Review). Here
is the abstract:
In the ever-evolving jurisprudence of campaign finance, one principle has
endured: the rules governing candidate elections are analyzed differently
from the rules governing ballot measures because the latter elections have
been found not to implicate the state’s legitimate interest in combatting
quid pro quo corruption. It should now be apparent to even a casual observer
of the initiative process, however, that candidates are very involved in
ballot measures; they use initiatives to influence turnout in elections in
which they are also running, and they resort to initiatives to adopt policy
change they cannot enact through the traditional legislative system. The
clear relationship between candidates and direct democracy is formally present
in a context of growing salience: recalls. In this article, I use recall
elections as a way to consider the current state of campaign finance
jurisprudence as it relates to all the mechanisms of direct democracy; recalls
provide a different framework to assess campaign finance rules because they
are explicitly hybrid elections, combining a ballot question about the recall
of an official and, sometimes simultaneously, the election of a successor.
Part I will lay out the structure of the recall process, particularly in
California and Wisconsin, the two states in which statewide recalls of
governors have shaken the political establishment and caught the attention of
the nation. Part II will analyze the constitutional issues raised by campaign
finance regimes that include contribution limitations affecting recall
elections, particularly in light of Citizens United v. Federal Election
Commission. Part III will extend this analysis and argue that the conclusions
reached about permissible regulatory structures in the context of recalls
implicate the way states and municipalities regulate money in ballot measure
campaigns generally.
I read an earlier draft of this paper and highly recommend it. Beth’s
statements about equality in campaign finance at the end of the paper are
especially notable.
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37944&title=“
Campaign%20Finance%20in%20the%20Hybrid%20Realm%20of%20Recall%20Elections”&description=)
Posted in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10) ,
_recall elections_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=11) | Comments Off
_“FEC should encourage small donations by text message”_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37942)
Posted on _August 2, 2012 9:22 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37942)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
WaPo _oped_
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/fec-should-encourage-small-donations-by-text-message/2012/07/31/gJQAs6skNX_story.html) .
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37942&title=“FEC%20should%20encourage%20small%20donations%20by%20text%20message”
&description=)
Posted in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10) |
Comments Off
_“Further Review for Secret Donations”_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37940)
Posted on _August 2, 2012 9:21 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37940)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
NYT _editorial_
(http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/02/opinion/the-irs-finally-takes-on-secret-campaign-donations.html?_r=1&smid=pl-share) .
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37940&title=“Further%20Review%20for%20Secret%20Donations”&description=)
Posted in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10) , _tax
law and election law_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=22) | Comments Off
_“Kansas county works to make sure everyone may vote; County will produce
its own voter ID cards for eligible resident”_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37938)
Posted on _August 2, 2012 9:20 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37938)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
That’s the lead story in this week’s _Electionline Weekly._
(http://www.electionline.org/index.php/electionline-weekly?showall=&limitstart=)
I’m not so sure that variations by county in the availability of voter id
are a good (or constitutional) idea.
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37938&title=“
Kansas%20county%20works%20to%20make%20sure%20everyone%20may%20vote;%20County%20will%20produce%20its%20own%20voter%20ID%20cards%20for%20eligible%
20resident”&description=)
Posted in _election administration_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18) ,
_The Voting Wars_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60) , _voter id_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=9) | Comments Off
_“2012 Election Will Be Costliest Yet, With Outside Spending a Wild Card”
_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37935)
Posted on _August 2, 2012 9:15 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37935)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
_Center for Responsive Politics_
(http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2012/08/2012-election-will-be-costliest-yet.html) : “The 2012 presidential and
congressional elections will be the most expensive on record, the nonpartisan
_Center for Responsive Politics_ (http://www.opensecrets.org/) estimates —
though not by much. The Center predicts, based on data from 18 months of
fundraising and spending, that the elections will cost $5.8 billion, an
increase of 7 percent from the 2008 cost of $5.4 billion. But outside spending,
which is soaring while presidential candidate spending declines, is a wild
card that makes predictions tricky.”
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37935&title=“
2012%20Election%20Will%20Be%20Costliest%20Yet,%20With%20Outside%20Spending%20a%20Wild%20Card”&description=)
Posted in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10) |
Comments Off
_Buddy Roemer Wants Gary Johnson in the Presidential Debates_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37932)
Posted on _August 2, 2012 9:12 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37932)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
See _here_
(http://us2.campaign-archive1.com/?u=5ae5cbeb872e363926c378876&id=a007effa97&e=797f2da53f) . I cannot imagine the circumstances in which
the Romney campaign would agree to that.
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37932&title=Buddy%20Roemer%20Wants%20Gary%20Johnson%20in%20the%20Presidential%20D
ebates&description=)
Posted in _campaigns_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59) | Comments Off
_FCC Political Ad Database Goes Live_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37929)
Posted on _August 2, 2012 9:09 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37929)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
>From the Sunlight Foundation:
Today, broadcast TV stations in the top 50 media markets will begin
uploading information to this site — _https://stations.fcc.gov/_
(http://organizing.sunlightfoundation.com/page/m/64f588f4/28885e2d/33be8ab8/6802e813/442586404
/VEsE/) .
Writes Keenan Steiner on the _Reporting Group blog_
(http://organizing.sunlightfoundation.com/page/m/64f588f4/28885e2d/33be8ab8/6802e812/442586404/VEsF
/) :
The FCC has demonstrated the online portal for the broadcasters in recent
weeks. The online system allows stations to simply drag and drop files onto
the FCC’s web portal, or upload them via file-sharing programs such as
DropBox. “We’re working hard to comply,” said Julie Hoover, a New York-based
spokeswoman for ABC-owned stations. At one presentation, the chief of the
FCC’s media bureau William Lake said, “We fully expect that the TV stations
will find it easier, not harder, to use the new online filing system.”
….
[For] stations covered by the rule, ad buys made prior to [today] don’t
have to be posted online, meaning that records of millions of dollars already
spent, much of it by groups do not disclose donors, will still be
gathering dust in station file cabinets. Stations have six months to post records
of those ads. And stations outside the scope of the FCC order — those not
affiliated with the four major networks (including Spanish-language stations)
and those not in the 50 top broadcast markets — don’t have to begin
posting their public files online for another two years.
In addition, the files that the FCC does post this year will be in PDF
format. That means users seeking to track the spending of particular interest
groups or campaigns potentially will have to sift through hundreds of
files.
William Lake, the chief of the FCC’s media bureau, called putting the
files in machine-readable format — which would enable easy searching, sorting
and downloading — a “long-term goal.” For now, the agency would rely on
third parties to “actively develop ways, including crowdsearching, to make
documents more searchable.”
To ensure that we know what political ads are airing in every media market
across the U.S., the Sunlight Foundation started the _Political Ad Sleuth_
(http://organizing.sunlightfoundation.com/page/m/64f588f4/28885e2d/33be8ab8/
6802e81c/442586404/VEsC/) project. Our goal is to create am easy-to-use,
searchable and sortable online database on political TV ad buys — both those
posted by the FCC and those that are not. We are seeking volunteers —
journalists, citizen journalists and interested citizens — to help with this
project. More information on how to help and access training is available at
_http://politicaladsleuth.sunlightfoundation.com/_
(http://organizing.sunlightfoundation.com/page/m/64f588f4/28885e2d/33be8ab8/6802e81c/442586404/VEsD/)
.
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37929&title=FCC%20Political%20Ad%20Database%20Goes%20Live&description=)
Posted in _Uncategorized_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1) | Comments
Off
_“Ohio Election Laws are Not So Gloomy”_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37927)
Posted on _August 2, 2012 9:09 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37927)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
Brad Smith has written _this oped_
(http://news.cincinnati.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/201208020753/EDIT/308020061) in the Cincinnati Enquirer.
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37927&title=“Ohio%20Election%20Laws%20are%20Not%20So%20Gloomy”&description=)
Posted in _election administration_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18)
| Comments Off
_“President Obama’s Self-Donation”_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37925)
Posted on _August 2, 2012 9:04 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37925)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
The Daily Show takes on President Obama giving $5,000 to his campaign.
_The Daily Show with Jon Stewart_ (http://www.thedailyshow.com/) Mon –
Thurs 11p / 10c _President Obama’s Self-Donation_
(http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-august-1-2012/president-obama-s-self-donation)
_www.thedailyshow.com_ (http://www.thedailyshow.com/) _Daily Show Full Episodes_
(http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/) _Political Humor & Satire Blog_
(http://www.indecisionforever.com/) _The Daily Show on Facebook_
(http://www.facebook.com/thedailyshow)
Of course, under Buckley v. Valeo the President could spend unlimited sums
of his own money on his campaign.
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37925&title=“President%20Obama’s%20Self-Donation”&description=)
Posted in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10) ,
_election law "humor"_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=52) | Comments Off
_“Kochs Take Tip From Soros Investing in Voter Registration”_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37921)
Posted on _August 2, 2012 9:00 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37921)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
Interesting Bloomberg _report_ (http://bloom.bg/NKagss) .
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37921&title=“
Kochs%20Take%20Tip%20From%20Soros%20Investing%20in%20Voter%20Registration”&description=)
Posted in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10) ,
_campaigns_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59) , _voter registration_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=37) | Comments Off
_“MacArthur Foundation to Team with Election Academy, Dana Chisnell to
Promote Field Guides for Ensuring Voter Intent”_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37919)
Posted on _August 2, 2012 8:59 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37919)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
Big news from _Doug Chapin_
(http://blog.lib.umn.edu/cspg/electionacademy/2012/08/macarthur_foundation_to_team_w.php?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=t
witter&utm_campaign=Feed:+HHHElections+(The+Election+Aacdemy)) : “I am
delighted to announce that the _John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation_
(http://www.macfound.org/) has notified us of their intention to make a
grant to be used by the Election Academy and usability expert Dana Chisnell
to produce and promote a series of _Field Guides for Ensuring Voter Intent_
(http://civicdesigning.org/fieldguides/) .”
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37919&title=“
MacArthur%20Foundation%20to%20Team%20with%20Election%20Academy,%20Dana%20Chisnell%20to%20Promote%20Field%20Guides%20for%20Ensuring%20Voter%20Int
ent”&description=)
Posted in _election administration_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18) ,
_voting_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=31) | Comments Off
_“Why GOP’s Southern Strategy Moved North; The scariest voter-ID laws
might be the ones that aren’t in solidly red states.”_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37916)
Posted on _August 2, 2012 8:44 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37916)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
Edward Wyckoff Williams has written _this piece _
(http://www.theroot.com/views/why-gop-s-southern-strategy-moved-north?wpisrc=root_lightbox) for The
Root.
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37916&title=“Why%20GOP’
s%20Southern%20Strategy%20Moved%20North;%20The%20scariest%20voter-ID%20laws%20might%20be%20the%20ones%20that%20aren’
t%20in%20solidly%20red%20states.”&description=)
Posted in _election administration_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18) ,
_The Voting Wars_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60) , _voter id_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=9) | Comments Off
_The Voting Wars Book Website Now Updated_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37913)
Posted on _August 2, 2012 8:41 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37913)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
Check it out at _thevotingwars.com_ (http://thevotingwars.com/) .
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37913&title=<i>The%20Voting%20Wars</i>%20Book%20Website%20Now%20Updated&descripti
on=)
Posted in _The Voting Wars_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60) |
Comments Off
_“Tea Party Aims to Apply Its Touch to the Senate G.O.P.”_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37909)
Posted on _August 1, 2012 9:44 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37909)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
_NYT_
(http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/02/us/politics/tea-party-influence-could-reshape-senate-republicans.html?_r=1&hp) : “The Tea Party is very much
alive in the drive for Republican control of the Senate, portending a
potential shake-up in the mind-set of the chamber. The easy Republican primary
victory in Texas on Tuesday of _Ted Cruz_
(http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/01/us/politics/cruz-defeats-dewhurst-for-gop-nomination-in-texas-senate-race.ht
ml) , the 41-year-old Sarah Palin-blessed upstart, virtually assured the
latest Tea Party candidate a seat in the chamber next year. And he will not
be alone when it comes to those backed by the movement, which propelled
Republicans to control of the House in 2010. Among 17 contested Senate races
and in Texas, more than half a dozen of the Republican candidates — or those
currently running ahead in their primaries — are Tea Party-embraced. The
infusion of new conservative blood could alter the complexion of the Senate,
increasing the sorts of conflicts between moderates and far-right
Republicans disinclined toward compromise that have characterized the House for two
years.”
See also this WaPo article, _Thompson locked in a three-way fight for
Wisconsin’s GOP Senate nomination_
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/thompson-in-a-three-way-fight-for-wisconsins-gop-senate-nomination/2012/08/01/gJQA
iaLAQX_story.html) .
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37909&title=“
Tea%20Party%20Aims%20to%20Apply%20Its%20Touch%20to%20the%20Senate%20G.O.P.”&description=)
Posted in _legislation and legislatures_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=27) , _political polarization_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=68) |
Comments Off
_“Obama’s Lawyer Calls for FEC Ruling To Spur Contributions by Text
Message”_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37906)
Posted on _August 1, 2012 9:25 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37906)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
_Bloomberg BNA_
(http://news.bna.com/mpdm/MPDMWB/split_display.adp?fedfid=27479557&vname=mpebulallissues&jd=a0d3x2n5v8&split=0) :
President Obama’s top campaign lawyer, Robert Bauer, is pressing the
Federal Election Commission to approve quickly a new advisory opinion that could
encourage wireless companies to allow campaign contributions by text
messaging….
The FEC is set to discuss the issue at an Aug. 2 commission meeting, but a
vote on a new advisory opinion is not expected at the meeting. Further
action by the commission could come in the days or weeks after the meeting,
according to FEC officials….
According to memos filed by the FEC commissioners documenting “ex parte
communications,” Bauer called the FEC’s three Democratic commissioners plus
the commission’s Republican chairwoman, Caroline Hunter, in late July to
urge prompt action. A memo from Democratic FEC Commissioner Ellen Weintraub
said Bauer “stated his concern” that if the commission did not respond
quickly, campaigns would not be able to receive contributions via text
messaging before this year’s presidential and congressional elections are over.
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37906&title=“Obama’
s%20Lawyer%20Calls%20for%20FEC%20Ruling%20To%20Spur%20Contributions%20by%20Text%20Message”&description=)
Posted in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10) |
Comments Off
_Quote of the Day_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37903)
Posted on _August 1, 2012 9:19 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37903)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
“I enjoy anonymity.”
–_Foster Friess_
(http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/08/01/13075592-foster-friess-former-santorum-backer-to-trim-super-pac-donations) , on why he
is shifting from giving to super PACs to giving to charities where he can
shield his identity.
_Speech, with no public accountability._
(http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0512/76919.html)
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37903&title=Quote%20of%20the%20Day&description=)
Posted in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10) |
Comments Off
_“Virginia’s Virgil Goode: Could this Man Cost Mitt Romney the Presidency?
”_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37899)
Posted on _August 1, 2012 3:20 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37899)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
_TIME_
(http://swampland.time.com/2012/08/01/virginias-virgil-goode-could-this-man-cost-mitt-romney-the-presidency/#ixzz22KSb9hbq) : “Goode is running
for president on the Constitution Party ticket, and his candidacy has
Republicans sweating: Goode is pulling fully 9% of Virginia’s vote, according
to a mid-July Public Policy Polling survey, leaving Obama ahead of Romney
49% to 35%. In a tight election where Virginia’s 13 electoral college votes
could make or break the Romney’s candidacy, even 2% for Goode could pull
enough Republicans away to hand the historically red state to Obama in
November.”
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37899&title=“Virginia’
s%20Virgil%20Goode:%20Could%20this%20Man%20Cost%20Mitt%20Romney%20the%20Presidency?”&description=)
Posted in _ballot access_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=46) , _third
parties_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=47) | Comments Off
_“Foxes, Henhouses, and Commissions: Assessing the Nonpartisan Model in
Election Administration, Redistricting, and Campaign Finance”_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37896)
Posted on _August 1, 2012 2:04 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37896)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
_Online registration_
(https://ucisl.ejoinme.org/MyEvents/ElectionLawSymposium/tabid/405474/Default.aspx) is now open for _this symposium_
(http://law.uci.edu/election_law_symposium_sept2012.html) which will take place at
UC Irvine Law on September 14. Here is the relevant information:
Foxes, Henhouses, and Commissions:
Assessing the Nonpartisan Model in Election Administration, Redistricting,
and Campaign Finance
Friday, September 14, 2012
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
University of California, Irvine
School of Law, EDU 1111 _(Directions)_ (http://law.uci.edu/directions.html)
For many years, especially since the 2000 presidential election
controversy, scholars have debated whether nonpartisan actors should replace partisan
actors or a bipartisan commission in administering elections, conducting
redistricting, and policing the campaign finance system. Some states
recently have adopted more nonpartisan models, including California’s
redistricting commission and Wisconsin’s Government Accountability Board, although most
states have retained partisan or bipartisan control.
This symposium, sponsored by the _UC Irvine School of Law_
(http://law.uci.edu/) , the _UC Irvine Law Review_
(http://www.law.uci.edu/lawreview/index.html) , and the _UCI Center for the Study of Democracy_
(http://www.democracy.uci.edu/) will offer empirical, legal, normative, theoretical, and
historical perspectives on the use of partisanship in the agencies governing
election administration, redistricting, and campaign finance laws. How should
the success or failure of such institutions be assessed? Are nonpartisan
agencies normatively preferable to partisan and bipartisan agencies in
achieving the goals of the political system? What explains why jurisdictions
adopt or fail to adopt nonpartisan institutions? The symposium will bring
together leading scholars in the field of election law and political science
to consider such questions in the weeks leading up to the presidential
election of 2012.
This event is free and open to the public, but _online registration_
(https://ucisl.ejoinme.org/MyEvents/ElectionLawSymposium/tabid/405474/Default.aspx)
is required.
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37896&title=“
Foxes,%20Henhouses,%20and%20Commissions:%20Assessing%20the%20Nonpartisan%20Model%20in%20Election%20Administration,%20Redistricting,%20and%20Camp
aign%20Finance”&description=)
Posted in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10) ,
_election administration_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18) , _redistricting_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=6) , _The Voting Wars_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60) | Comments Off
_“Think this Congress is bad? Just wait.”_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37893)
Posted on _August 1, 2012 1:58 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37893)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
The Fix _reports_
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/post/think-this-congress-is-bad-just-wait/2012/08/01/gJQAvdTKPX_blog.html) .
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37893&title=“Think%20this%20Congress%20is%20bad?%20Just%20wait.”&description=)
Posted in _legislation and legislatures_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=27) , _political polarization_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=68) |
Comments Off
_Dave Weigel Reports from Pa Voter ID Trial_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37890)
Posted on _August 1, 2012 1:44 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37890)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
At _Slate._
(http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2012/08/pennsylvania_officials_struggle_to_explain_how_the_state_s_new_voter_id_la
w_would_actually_work_.html) I found one part odd: “The hearing ended
early. There would be no more witnesses for the state and only a few more
witnesses for petitioners. I used the bonus time to meet up with a local
Republican strategist who’d been following the hearings as close as everybody
else and had a low opinion of them. The theory: Any decision in the
Commonwealth Court would be appealed to the state Supreme Court. Why play your aces
when you’ve got a higher-stakes game coming up? Why not just let the
anti-ID crowd put on a parade of sad witnesses for the media?”
But given the temporary 3-3 split on the state Supreme Court, there’s a
decent chance the trial judge’s decision _would be final_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37813) .
UPDATE: _More from Weige_
(http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2012/08/01/voter_id_on_trial_the_hans_von_spakovsky_wars.html) l on Lori Minnite’s
testimony about Hans von Spakovsky’s research.
Here is the Minnite guest post she’s referring to in her tesimony:
_http://electionlawblog.org/?p=23572_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=23572)
And here’s the back story on von Spakovsky stonewalling me on the 1984
grand jury report:
_http://electionlawblog.org/?p=19560_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=19560)
And here are more reasons to think he’s not credible:
See _here_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=19560) , _here_
(http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/06/full_indictment_undermines_threat_of_voter_
imperso.php) , _here_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=20953) and _here_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=5012) .
More about him in the “Fraudulent Fraud Squad” chapter of my new book, The
Voting Wars.
_http://www.amazon.com/Voting-Wars-Florida-Election-Meltdown/dp/0300182031/r
ef=sr_1_cc_2?s=aps&ie=UTF8&qid=1329286945&sr=1-2-catcorr_
(http://www.amazon.com/Voting-Wars-Florida-Election-Meltdown/dp/0300182031/ref=sr_1_cc_2?s=aps
&ie=UTF8&qid=1329286945&sr=1-2-catcorr)
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37890&title=Dave%20Weigel%20Reports%20from%20Pa%20Voter%20ID%20Trial&description=
)
Posted in _election administration_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18) ,
_The Voting Wars_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60) , _voter id_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=9) | Comments Off
_“Philly official says new voter ID law likely to create Election Day ‘
mess’ in city”_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37887)
Posted on _August 1, 2012 1:12 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37887)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
AP _reports_
(http://www.therepublic.com/view/story/6232385f28584eb980398dc6594192ae/PA--Voter-ID) . Closing arguments are tomorrow.
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37887&title=“
Philly%20official%20says%20new%20voter%20ID%20law%20likely%20to%20create%20Election%20Day%20‘mess’%20in%20city”&description=)
Posted in _election administration_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18) ,
_The Voting Wars_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60) , _voter id_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=9) | Comments Off
_Would Ted Cruz’s Birthplace Make Him Unqualified to Be President?_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37884)
Posted on _August 1, 2012 1:01 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37884)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
The LA Times _explores_
(http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-questions-about-the-qualifications-of-ted-cruz-the-gops-newest-star-20120801,0,49927
10.story) . Seems to me this is an excellent time to amend the
Constitution to get rid of this “natural born citizen” requirement. Let the voters
decide.
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37884&title=Would%20Ted%20Cruz’
s%20Birthplace%20Make%20Him%20Unqualified%20to%20Be%20President?&description=)
Posted in _campaigns_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59) | Comments Off
_Great Resource Materials on Pa Voter ID Trial_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37881)
Posted on _August 1, 2012 12:29 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37881)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
_Here_
(http://www.aclupa.org/legal/legaldocket/applewhiteetalvcommonwealt/) , at the ACLU Pa.
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37881&title=Great%20Resource%20Materials%20on%20Pa%20Voter%20ID%20Trial&descripti
on=)
Posted in _election administration_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18) ,
_The Voting Wars_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60) , _voter id_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=9) | Comments Off
_“Sticking Up for the Small Donor”_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37878)
Posted on _August 1, 2012 12:24 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37878)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
_Richard Briffault _
(http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/07/sticking-up-for-the-small-donor/260410/#) in the Atlantic:
Given the current Supreme Court’s unyielding resistance to campaign
spending limits, can anything be done to reduce the power of mega-donors over
elections and, ultimately, over government itself? Yes. We can create an
alternative system of small-donor democracy fueled by small contributions from
ordinary citizens and reinforced by public matching funds. Although the
Supreme Court will not allow big money to be limited, the addiction of elected
officials to large donations can be controlled, if not completely cured, by
making another, more “small-d” democratic source of funds available to
them — the small contributions of millions of non-wealthy voters.
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37878&title=“Sticking%20Up%20for%20the%20Small%20Donor”&description=)
Posted in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10) |
Comments Off
_“How Government Hackery Undermines Partisan Hackery”_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37875)
Posted on _August 1, 2012 12:17 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37875)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
Bloomberg View on _Pa. voter i.d._
(http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-08-01/how-government-hackery-undermines-partisan-hackery.html)
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37875&title=“How%20Government%20Hackery%20Undermines%20Partisan%20Hackery”
&description=)
Posted in _election administration_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18) ,
_The Voting Wars_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60) , _voter id_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=9) | Comments Off
_“Statement by Fred Wertheimer: Crossroads GPS Plans to Violate Campaign
Finance Disclosure Law with FEC’s Support”_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37873)
Posted on _August 1, 2012 12:16 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37873)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
_Here_
(http://www.democracy21.org/index.asp?Type=B_PR&SEC={91FCB139-CC82-4DDD-AE4E-3A81E6427C7F}&DE={1BD305ED-279A-4143-A542-9D573EE1AC0D}) .
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37873&title=“
Statement%20by%20Fred%20Wertheimer:%20Crossroads%20GPS%20Plans%20to%20Violate%20Campaign%20Finance%20Disclosure%20Law%20with%20FEC’s%20Support”
&description=)
Posted in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10) , _tax
law and election law_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=22) | Comments Off
_Responding to Kelner, Additional Data Added to CFI Release on Party Data_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37870)
Posted on _August 1, 2012 9:20 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37870)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
In response to Rob Kelner’s post, _The Truth About National Political
Party Fundraising_
(http://www.insidepoliticallaw.com/2012/07/31/the-truth-about-national-political-party-fundraising/) , CFI _has updated _
(http://cfinst.org/Press/PReleases/12-07-30/The_National_Parties_Are_Holding_Their_Own_Fina
ncially_at_the_Eighteen-Month_Mark.aspx) its release.
NOTE: This release has been revised to add the years 1992-1998 to the bar
chart, while leaving the text of the release unchanged. 1992 was the first
election with disclosure of soft money. The purpose of the revision is to
clarify the following point: 2000 and 2002 represented by far the high
points before McCain-Feingold for party fundraising (hard and soft money
combined.) After McCain-Feingold, the parties raised about as much hard money at
18 months between 2004 and 2010 as hard-and-soft money combined in 2000.
They also raised at least 50% more in hard money alone in 2004-2010 than in
hard-and-soft money combined between 1992-1998. In 2012 the parties’ hard
money at eighteen months exceeded hard-plus-soft in 2002. The evidence
therefore shows that national parties after McCain-Feingold quickly rebounded in
their hard money receipts alone to levels that equaled or exceeded their
historic levels of combined hard-plus-soft money.
____________________________________
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37870&title=Responding%20to%20Kelner,%20Additional%20Data%20Added%20to%20CFI%20Re
lease%20on%20Party%20Data&description=)
Posted in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10) |
Comments Off
_“Ethics panel says Rep. Laura Richardson broke federal law, obstructed
probe”_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37867)
Posted on _August 1, 2012 8:49 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37867)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
WaPo _reports_
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/2chambers/post/ethics-panel-says-rep-laura-richardson-broke-federal-law-obstructed-probe/2012/08/01/
gJQAf0FNPX_blog.html) .
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37867&title=“
Ethics%20panel%20says%20Rep.%20Laura%20Richardson%20broke%20federal%20law,%20obstructed%20probe”&description=)
Posted in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10) ,
_chicanery_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=12) , _conflict of interest laws_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=20) , _ethics investigations_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=42) , _legislation and legislatures_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=27) | Comments Off
_“W.H. declines to address off-site meetings”_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37864)
Posted on _August 1, 2012 8:45 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37864)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
Politico _reports_
(http://www.politico.com/politico44/2012/08/wh-declines-to-address-offsite-meetings-130758.html) .
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37864&title=“W.H.%20declines%20to%20address%20off-site%20meetings”
&description=)
Posted in _chicanery_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=12) , _legislation
and legislatures_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=27) | Comments Off
_“Crossroads GPS tries to squeak past disclosure window”_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37862)
Posted on _August 1, 2012 8:44 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37862)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
_ at mateagold_ (https://twitter.com/mateagold) : How badly does Crossroads
GPS want to avoid disclosing its donors? This badly: _http://lat.ms/NlKQvm
_ (http://t.co/aubFRMlx)
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37862&title=“Crossroads%20GPS%20tries%20to%20squeak%20past%20disclosure%20window”
&description=)
Posted in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10) |
Comments Off
_“House gives final congressional approval to bill reducing Senate
confirmations”_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37859)
Posted on _August 1, 2012 8:37 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37859)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
_AP_
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/whitehouse/house-gives-final-congressional-approval-to-bill-reducing-senate-confirmations/2012/07/31/gJQAm0
B0NX_story.html) : “The House gave final congressional approval Tuesday to
a bill that would save the slow-paced Senate some time by eliminating the
need for confirming nominees to some 170 executive branch jobs and 3,000
military officer positions. The vote for this rare instance of streamlining
Senate procedures was 261-116. The bill goes to the White House for
President Barack Obama’s signature.”
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37859&title=“
House%20gives%20final%20congressional%20approval%20to%20bill%20reducing%20Senate%20confirmations”&description=)
Posted in _legislation and legislatures_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=27) | Comments Off
_“Federal lawsuit, filed in Des Moines, seeks clarity on campaign
disclosure requirements”_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37854)
Posted on _August 1, 2012 7:39 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37854)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
_IndyStar_ (http://www.indystar.com/article/D2/20120730/NEWS09/120730031) :
When references to “the White House,” “the administration” and “the
government” show up in a political attack ad, do they clearly identify a
political candidate? That’s a question the Federal Election _Commission_
(http://www.indystar.com/article/D2/20120730/NEWS09/120730031#) failed to answer
this summer, and which now is before a federal court judge in Des Moines.
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37854&title=“
Federal%20lawsuit,%20filed%20in%20Des%20Moines,%20seeks%20clarity%20on%20campaign%20disclosure%20requirements”&description=)
Posted in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10) |
Comments Off
--
Rick Hasen
Chancellor's Professor of Law and Political Science
UC Irvine School of Law
401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000
Irvine, CA 92697-8000
949.824.3072 - office
949.824.0495 - fax
_rhasen at law.uci.edu_ (mailto:rhasen at law.uci.edu)
_http://law.uci.edu/faculty/page1_r_hasen.html_
(http://law.uci.edu/faculty/page1_r_hasen.html)
_http://electionlawblog.org_ (http://electionlawblog.org/)
Pre-order The Voting Wars: _http://amzn.to/y22ZTv_ (http://amzn.to/y22ZTv)
_______________________________________________
Law-election mailing list
Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120802/efb3cf1f/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120802/efb3cf1f/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120802/efb3cf1f/attachment-0001.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120802/efb3cf1f/attachment-0002.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120802/efb3cf1f/attachment-0003.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120802/efb3cf1f/attachment-0004.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120802/efb3cf1f/attachment-0005.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120802/efb3cf1f/attachment-0006.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120802/efb3cf1f/attachment-0007.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120802/efb3cf1f/attachment-0008.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120802/efb3cf1f/attachment-0009.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120802/efb3cf1f/attachment-0010.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120802/efb3cf1f/attachment-0011.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120802/efb3cf1f/attachment-0012.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120802/efb3cf1f/attachment-0013.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120802/efb3cf1f/attachment-0014.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120802/efb3cf1f/attachment-0015.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120802/efb3cf1f/attachment-0016.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120802/efb3cf1f/attachment-0017.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120802/efb3cf1f/attachment-0018.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120802/efb3cf1f/attachment-0019.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120802/efb3cf1f/attachment-0020.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120802/efb3cf1f/attachment-0021.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120802/efb3cf1f/attachment-0022.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120802/efb3cf1f/attachment-0023.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120802/efb3cf1f/attachment-0024.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120802/efb3cf1f/attachment-0025.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120802/efb3cf1f/attachment-0026.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Party_18M_Receipts_v2.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 8337 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120802/efb3cf1f/attachment-0027.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120802/efb3cf1f/attachment-0028.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120802/efb3cf1f/attachment-0029.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120802/efb3cf1f/attachment-0030.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120802/efb3cf1f/attachment-0031.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120802/efb3cf1f/attachment-0032.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120802/efb3cf1f/attachment-0033.bin>
View list directory