[EL] Mitt's returns & Obama's records

Sun Aug 19 20:40:22 PDT 2012

Responding, reluctantly, to the sentence addressed to me;  the hunch of a Las Vegas expert may be grist for political scandal seekers in this overwrought season, but seems remote from any real legal issue. The site you directed me to piles speculation upon speculation.  Both parties may do this, but this list serve generally covers real legal issues related to elections.

Sent from my iPhone
 And, Brian Landsberg, if the future president claimed to be a foreign national, that might have implications for election law, wouldn't it? For an interesting explanation of this theory, see <http://www.theblaze.com/contributions/obama%e2%80%99s-college-classmate-the-obama-scandal-is-at-columbia/> http://www.theblaze.com/contributions/obama%e2%80%99s-college-classmate-the-obama-scandal-is-at-columbia/.

Of course, that whole theory might be rubbish. President Obama might have listed himself as a U.S. citizen when he attended Columbia, and he may have completely innocent reasons for not wanting anyone to see his records. Or perhaps he just thinks it's nobody's business. Regardless, Mr. Obama won't release the records. And, that is his right: there is no law requiring him to release these records. My original email was to highlight the hypocrisy of the president, who refuses to release his own records while demanding that Mr. Romney release records he, likewise, is not required to release. I also wanted to highlight the hypocrisy of the media, which is engaged in a full-court-press vetting of Mr. Romney, but has left many questions about Mr. Obama unvetted and unanswered.

Finally, Ms. Rogers, the "U. of Columbia" was obviously meant to be Columbia University. I was typing quickly, on an iPhone, and simply got the name wrong.

Joe
___________________
Joseph E. La Rue
cell: 480.272.2715
email: <mailto:joseph.e.larue at gmail.com> joseph.e.larue at gmail.com<mailto:joseph.e.larue at gmail.com>

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information or otherwise be protected by law. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.

On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Brian Landsberg <<mailto:blandsberg at pacific.edu>blandsberg at pacific.edu<mailto:blandsberg at pacific.edu>> wrote:
Finally, one might hope, what does this have to do with election law?  Nothing, I would venture.

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 19, 2012, at 3:41 PM, "Estelle Rogers" <<mailto:erogers at projectvote.org>erogers at projectvote.org<mailto:erogers at projectvote.org>> wrote:

Not to mention, what is the U. of Columbia?  And if the records from said institution, whatever and wherever it is, are so interesting to Mr. La Rue, why weren't they sought the first time Obama ran for elective office, or the second, or the third?  And why, pray tell, haven't you asked for the President's kindergarten transcript?  Who knows what evil is lurking there?

Estelle Rogers
Sent from my iPad

On Aug 19, 2012, at 6:06 PM, "henry weinstein" <<mailto:henryelliotweinstein at gmail.com><mailto:henryelliotweinstein at gmail.com>henryelliotweinstein at gmail.com<mailto:henryelliotweinstein at gmail.com>> wrote:

Pardon my curiosity but just what sort of fraud do you have in mind regarding Obama's Columbia records? His grades from his time at Occidental College (the college he attended before transferring to Columbia)? His grades at Columbia?

On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 5:31 AM, Joe La Rue <<mailto:joseph.e.larue at gmail.com><mailto:joseph.e.larue at gmail.com><mailto:joseph.e.larue at gmail.com>joseph.e.larue at gmail.com<mailto:joseph.e.larue at gmail.com>> wrote:
Interesting theory the Guardian has about Mitt. Of course, they fail to say that Mitt has no legal obligation to release the tax returns Obama wants. Regardless, I have a proposition: how about Mitt agree to release the returns, right after Obama releases his records from the U of Columbia, including his admissions records. He's been hiding those with nary a word from the media. Some of us think there must be a reason he's hiding them. There are several non-Birther theories to explain why Obama doesn't want us to see those records, each of which, if true, might derail the President's re-election (and at least one of which would implicate the president in fraud). So, let's see media calls for Obama to release his records, too. Then Mitt can release his returns. Sound fair?

“Mitt Romney’s tax returns: the ‘voter fraud’ theory”<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=38771>
Posted on August 17, 2012 9:01 pm<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=38771> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

The Guardian <http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/aug/17/mitt-romney-tax-returns-voter-fraud-theory?newsfeed=true> reports with the subhead: “There has been much speculation about why Romney refuses to disclose earlier tax returns. Could it be as simple as an address?”

_______________________________________________
Law-election mailing list
<mailto:Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu><mailto:Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu><mailto:Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu>Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu<mailto:Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu>
<http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election><http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election><http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election>http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election

--
Henry Weinstein
Writer, Teacher
cell phone 323-445-7006<tel:323-445-7006>
_______________________________________________
Law-election mailing list
<mailto:Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu><mailto:Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu>Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu<mailto:Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu>
<http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election><http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election>http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
_______________________________________________
Law-election mailing list
<mailto:Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu>Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu<mailto:Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu>
<http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election>http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election

_______________________________________________
Law-election mailing list
<mailto:Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu>Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu<mailto:Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu>
<http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election>http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120820/34a3fff6/attachment.html>