[EL] Senate hearing on Elections

John Tanner john.k.tanner at gmail.com
Wed Dec 19 09:15:11 PST 2012


If agency registration were automatic even to the limited extent that
drivers license registration is automatic it would reach currently
under-registered populations, no?

On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Doug Hess <douglasrhess at gmail.com> wrote:

> It's important to remember that "automated" and "modernized" are
> adjectives that everybody can applaud, like "accountability" in school
> reform, but the devil is in the details. If automated systems are designed
> such that unregistered populations disproportionately benefit, thus
> increasing the fairness of elections in one important respect, than that's
> great. If these changes end up having the unintended consequence of easing
> registration disproportionately for those already disproportionately
> registered, then it's a step backwards. :)
>
> Several agencies have shown that the NVRA's voter registration sections
> can be implemented effetively the old fashioned way, data monitoring is
> they key thing (among others). Of course, automating all of the
> NVRA-covered agencies at once and equally well would be great, especially
> as more and more people conduct business with agencies on-line (although
> the digital gap presumably remains noticable).
> Douglas R. Hess, PhD
> Washington, DC
> ph. 202-277-6400
> douglasrhess at gmail.com
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:39 AM, <john.k.tanner at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> As long as NYRA registration is something extra for agency employees to
>> do, there will be serious problems.  If. On the other hand, NVRA. Agency
>> registration were completely automatic, it could largely replace the
>> current antiquated registration system (and save a lot of money)
>> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Doug Hess <douglasrhess at gmail.com>
>> Sender: law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu
>> Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 11:34:48
>> To: Election Law<Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu>
>> Subject: [EL] Senate hearing on Elections
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Law-election mailing list
>> Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
>> http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20121219/e30842e4/attachment.html>


View list directory