[EL] ELB News and Commentary 1/19/12
JBoppjr at aol.com
JBoppjr at aol.com
Thu Jan 19 05:53:14 PST 2012
Actually, Rick is only partially correct on this:
"After and following Citizens United, the courts (most importantly in
Speechnow) and the FEC provided a blessing for independent only expenditure
committees (Super PACs) to collect unlimited sums from individuals, labor
unions, and corporations."
The first federal court of appeals to legalize Super FACs was the Fourth
Circuit in 2008, years before Citizens United. The case, North Carolina
Right to Life v. Leake, was a challenge to North Carolina's $4,000 individual
contribution limit to IE-only PACs. The limit was struck down by the 4th
Circuit under Buckley and MCFL. Citizens United reaffirmed the central
rationale of Buckley, MCFL and Leake that IEs do not corrupt and did add to the
mix unlimited corporate and labor union contributions to Super PACs. Even
without CU, Super PACs would have emerged, but with only unlimited individual
contributions. Jim Bopp
In a message dated 1/19/2012 12:13:53 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
rhasen at law.uci.edu writes:
_Super PACS May Be the Story of the Day…._
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28243)
Posted on _January 18, 2012 8:57 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28243)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
but absolutely don’t miss this_ interactive explainer_
(http://motherjones.com/politics/2012/01/interactive-explainer-republican-governors-association-
money-machine) from Mother Jones about how the Republican Governors
Association has effectively moved around money in state races, shielding many
(often corporate) contributors from effective disclosure.
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28243&title=Super%20PACS%20May%20Be%20the%20Story%20of%20the%20Day…
.&description=)
Posted in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10) |
Comments Off
_“The Influence Industry: Activist groups want to undo ruling that led to ‘
super PAC’ frenzy”_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28240)
Posted on _January 18, 2012 7:47 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28240)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
Dan Eggen _reports_
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/the-influence-industry-activist-groups-want-to-undo-ruling-that-led-to-super-pac-frenzy/2012
/01/18/gIQADUCR9P_story.html) for WaPo.
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28240&title=“
The%20Influence%20Industry:%20Activist%20groups%20want%20to%20undo%20ruling%20that%20led%20to%20‘super%20PAC’%20frenzy”&description=)
Posted in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10) |
Comments Off
_New CRS Report_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28238)
Posted on _January 18, 2012 7:46 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28238)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
_Contemporary developments in presidential elections (Jan. 9)_
(http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42139.pdf)
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28238&title=New%20CRS%20Report&description=)
Posted in _Uncategorized_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1) | Comments
Off
_“‘Super PACs’ dominate the political landscape”_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28235)
Posted on _January 18, 2012 7:44 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28235)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
LAT _reports_
(http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-super-pacs-20120119,0,1538469.story) .
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28235&title=“‘Super%20PACs’%20dominate%20the%20political%20landscape”
&description=)
Posted in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10) |
Comments Off
_“The Sudden Emergence of Super PACs”_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28232)
Posted on _January 18, 2012 4:47 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28232)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
To the Point’s Reporter’s Notebook _talks to_
(http://www.kcrw.com/news/programs/tp/tp120117the_south_carolina_r/) Chris Frates, David Keating and
Paul Ryan.
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28232&title=“The%20Sudden%20Emergence%20of%20Super%20PACs”&description=)
Posted in _Uncategorized_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1) | Comments
Off
_“Will Jon Stewart go to jail for running Stephen Colbert’s super PAC?”_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28229)
Posted on _January 18, 2012 4:42 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28229)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
The Christian Science Monitor _reports_
(http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Elections/Vox-News/2012/0118/Will-Jon-Stewart-go-to-jail-for-running-Stephen-Colbe
rt-s-super-PAC) .
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28229&title=“
Will%20Jon%20Stewart%20go%20to%20jail%20for%20running%20Stephen%20Colbert’s%20super%20PAC?”&description=)
Posted in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10) |
Comments Off
_“California could be model for ‘super PAC’ disclosure”_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28227)
Posted on _January 18, 2012 4:39 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28227)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
The San Jose Mercury News _reports_
(http://www.mercurynews.com/breaking-news/ci_19768783) .
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28227&title=“California%20could%20be%20model%20for%20‘super%20PAC’%20disclosure”
&description=)
Posted in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10) |
Comments Off
_“Rules of the Game: Some Say Nixing Contribution Limits Will Level
Playing Field”_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28225)
Posted on _January 18, 2012 4:38 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28225)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
Eliza’s _latest._
(http://www.rollcall.com/issues/57_81/Some-Say-Nixing-Contribution-Limits-Will-Level-Playing-Field-211595-1.html?pos=olobh)
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28225&title=“
Rules%20of%20the%20Game:%20Some%20Say%20Nixing%20Contribution%20Limits%20Will%20Level%20Playing%20Field”&description=)
Posted in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10) |
Comments Off
_Arlington VA Sends Out Ballots_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28222)
Posted on _January 18, 2012 2:37 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28222)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
See _here_
(https://twitter.com/#!/ArlingtonVotes/status/159752215525998592) . Has Perry announced he won’t go to SCOTUS on VA ballot access?
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28222&title=Arlington%20VA%20Sends%20Out%20Ballots&description=)
Posted in _ballot access_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=46) | Comments
Off
_“Citizens United vs FEC: The End of Democracy As We Know It?”_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28219)
Posted on _January 18, 2012 2:22 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28219)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
Weissman, Bopp _debate_
(http://www.lsba.org/midyear2012/LSBAClassActionCitizensUnitedCLE.pdf) .
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28219&title=“
Citizens%20United%20vs%20FEC:%20The%20End%20of%20Democracy%20As%20We%20Know%20It?”&description=)
Posted in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10) |
Comments Off
_“New S.C. Poll: Colbert Hot, Court-Bashing Not”_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28216)
Posted on _January 18, 2012 1:38 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28216)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
Justice at Stake has issued _this press release_
(http://www.justiceatstake.org/newsroom/press_releases.cfm/new_sc_poll_colbert_hot_courtbashing_not?sh
ow=news&newsID=12371) .
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#u
rl=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28216&title=“New%20S.C.%20Poll:%20Colbert%20Hot,%20Court-Bashing%20Not”
&description=)
Posted in _judicial elections_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=19) |
Comments Off
_Bonus Quote of the Day (Tort Law Edition)_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28213)
Posted on _January 18, 2012 1:24 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28213)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
“[Y]ou always assume the risk of using the student refrigerator.”
UCLAW SBA, responding to a theft of lunches from student fridges (via
_Above the Law_
(http://abovethelaw.com/2012/01/there-is-a-law-school-lunch-thief-running-wild-in-our-midst/#more-127654) ).
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28213&title=Bonus%20Quote%20of%20the%20Day%20(Tort%20Law%20Edition)&description=)
Posted in _Uncategorized_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1) | Comments
Off
_“Ellis: Texas unable to prove ID law won’t discriminate”_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28210)
Posted on _January 18, 2012 12:12 pm_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28210) by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
See _here_
(http://blog.chron.com/texaspolitics/2012/01/ellis-texas-unable-to-prove-id-law-wont-discriminate/) .
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28210&title=“Ellis:%20Texas%20unable%20to%20prove%20ID%20law%20won’
t%20discriminate”&description=)
Posted in _Department of Justice_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=26) ,
_voter id_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=9) , _Voting Rights Act_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15) | Comments Off
_Did Citizens United Lead to Super PACs? Setting the Record Straight_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28207)
Posted on _January 18, 2012 11:42 am_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28207) by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
Salon is out with an _interview today_
(http://www.salon.com/2012/01/18/is_citizens_united_just_misunderstood/singleton/) with Floyd Abrams (noted
First Amendment lawyer and campaign finance law opponent). Abrams _took the
NY Times to task_
(http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/17/opinion/citizens-united-decision.html?_r=1) for blaming the $5 million Adelson contribution to
Super PACs on Citizens United. Abrams says it is Buckley v. Valeo,
recognizing an individual’s right to spend money on elections, not Citizens United,
which is responsible for the emergence of Super PACs.
That’s not the whole story, and misses the relevance of Citizens United.
Here are the main points.
1. Before Citizens United, individuals could indeed spend unlimited sums
on independent advertising directly supporting or opposing candidates. But
that money had to be spent by the individual directly. It could not be
given to a political action committee, which had an individual contribution
cap of $5,000 and could not take corporate or union funding. In many cases,
wealthy individuals did not want to spend their own money on advertising,
which would say “Paid for by Sheldon Adelson” or “Paid for by George Soros”
, so fewer of these ads happened. And corporations or unions could not
play in this way.
2. Before Citizens United, an individual who wanted to spend money to
influence a federal election but who did not want his or her name plastered
across every ad sometimes gave to groups which came to be known as “527s” (for
a particular provision of the tax code). 527s claimed they could take
unlimited money from individuals (and sometimes claimed a right to corporate
and labor union money) on grounds that they were not PACS under the FEC
definition of PACs. These 527s were somewhat successful (George Soros gave
$23 million to try to help pro-Kerry 527s in 2004 get Kerry elected), but a
legal cloud always hung over them. I remember well when Bob Bauer, then
candidate Obama’s lawyer, b_arged in on a pro-Hillary Clinton conference call_
(http://electionlawblog.org/archives/010292.html) to say that people
giving to 527s to support Clinton could face criminal liability.
3. After and following Citizens United, the courts (most importantly in
Speechnow) and the FEC provided a blessing for independent only expenditure
committees (Super PACs) to collect unlimited sums from individuals, labor
unions, and corporations. The theory was that, per Citizens United, if
independent spending cannot corrupt, then contributions to fund independent
spending cannot corrupt either. (I am _quite_
(http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2011/10/citizens_united_how_justice_kennedy_has
_paved_the_way_for_the_re.single.html) _ critical_
(http://www.cnn.com/2012/01/09/opinion/hasen-super-pacs/index.html?eref=rss_topstories&utm_source=fe
edburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:%20rss/cnn_topstories%20(RSS:%20T
op%20Stories)) of this theory about corruption, but that’s besides the
point here.) So what was once of questionable legality or illegality before
Citizens United is of fully blessed legality after Citizens United. So
Citizens United allowed for independent spending to flourish, in ways that it
could not before.
4. On top of this–and here is where Abrams is right–through no fault of
the Supreme Court in Citizens United, it has become quite easy to evade or
avoid adequate disclosure. Part of this came about because three Republican
Commissioners on the FEC have _embraced an anti-disclosure reading_
(http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2011/01/the_fec_is_a
s_good_as_dead.html) of the statutes and regulations. Part of it
requires a legislative or regulatory response, so that individuals cannot give to
a 501(c)(4) (such as Crossroads GPS or Colbert’s Super PAC SHHH) to shield
their identity as money is transferred to the Super PAC (such as American
Crossroads or the Colbert Super PAC.) Part requires tightening up the time
frame for disclosure of Super PAC contributions. (Most Super PACs now won’
t be disclosing their funding until the presidential nomination on the
Republican side is all but locked up.) But there is _no political will among
Republican Commissioners at the FEC or among Republicans in Congress _
(http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2010/10/show_me_the_don
ors.html) to fix the disclosure problem. Disclosure, which used to be
supported by a bipartisan consensus, has gotten entangled in this morass.
Bottom line: Citizens United has led, indirectly but surely, to the
emergence of Super PACs. But it is up to Congress, not the Supreme Court, to fix
the disclosure problems with Super PACs.
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28207&title=Did%20Citizens%20United%20Lead%20to%20Super%20PACs?%20Setting%20the%2
0Record%20Straight&description=)
Posted in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10) |
Comments Off
_“Scott hires Ken Detzner as new secretary of state”_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28204)
Posted on _January 18, 2012 10:43 am_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28204) by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
_News_
(http://www.postonpolitics.com/2012/01/scott-hires-ken-detzner-as-new-secretary-of-state/) from Florida.
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28204&title=“Scott%20hires%20Ken%20Detzner%20as%20new%20secretary%20of%20state”
&description=)
Posted in _election administration_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18)
| Comments Off
_Did Santorum Beat Gingrich in New Hampshire?_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28201)
Posted on _January 18, 2012 9:29 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28201)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
_Michael McDonald _
(http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-p-mcdonald/second-place-in-nh-democr_b_1213219.html) includes the write-ins and votes in
the Dem. primary and finds some interesting results.
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28201&title=Did%20Santorum%20Beat%20Gingrich%20in%20New%20Hampshire?&description=
)
Posted in _campaigns_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59) | Comments Off
_“Ex-DOJ Voting Section Chief Now Representing South Carolina in Voter ID
Fight”_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28198)
Posted on _January 18, 2012 9:13 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28198)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
_Main Justice_
(http://www.mainjustice.com/2012/01/11/ex-doj-voting-section-chief-now-representing-south-carolina-in-voter-id-fight/) : Christopher
Coates teams up with _Paul Clement_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=27761) in
a case that could _well bring down_
(http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2011/12/the_obama_administration_s_risky_voter_id_mo
ve_threatens_the_voting_rights_act.html) section 5 of the Voting Rights
Act. One of Coates’ former co-workers writes of sadness at this development.
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28198&title=“
Ex-DOJ%20Voting%20Section%20Chief%20Now%20Representing%20South%20Carolina%20in%20Voter%20ID%20Fight”&description=)
Posted in _Supreme Court_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29) , _The
Voting Wars_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60) , _voter id_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=9) , _Voting Rights Act_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15)
| Comments Off
_“Secretaries Of State At Center Of Election Battles”_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28195)
Posted on _January 18, 2012 9:06 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28195)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
NPR _reports_
(http://www.npr.org/2012/01/18/145351397/secretaries-of-state-at-center-of-election-battles) .
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28195&title=“Secretaries%20Of%20State%20At%20Center%20Of%20Election%20Battles”
&description=)
Posted in _election administration_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18) ,
_The Voting Wars_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60) | Comments Off
_“How Big Money Super PACs are Reshaping the GOP Race”_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28192)
Posted on _January 18, 2012 8:44 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28192)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
PBS News Hour _reports_
(http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/politics/jan-june12/superpacs_01-17.html) .
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electio
nlawblog.org/?p=28192&title=“
How%20Big%20Money%20Super%20PACs%20are%20Reshaping%20the%20GOP%20Race”&description=)
Posted in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10) |
Comments Off
_“Law Blog Fireside: Jenner’s Paul Smith, Redistricting Pro”_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28189)
Posted on _January 18, 2012 8:40 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28189)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
_Here_
(http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2012/01/18/law-blog-fireside-jenners-paul-smith-redistricting-pro/) .
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28189&title=“Law%20Blog%20Fireside:%20Jenner’
s%20Paul%20Smith,%20Redistricting%20Pro”&description=)
Posted in _Uncategorized_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1) | Comments
Off
_“Mitt Romney’s flawed plan to ‘fix’ campaign financing”_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28186)
Posted on _January 18, 2012 8:03 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28186)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
WaPo_ editorializes_
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/mitt-romneys-flawed-plan-to-fix-campaign-financing/2012/01/17/gIQAsfXY6P_story.html) .
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28186&title=“Mitt%20Romney’s%20flawed%20plan%20to%20‘fix’
%20campaign%20financing”&description=)
Posted in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10) |
Comments Off
_Quote of the Day_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28183)
Posted on _January 18, 2012 7:43 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28183)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
By giving corporations free rein to meddle in politics without any
accountability required, just like in the robber baron days, and by defining money
as speech, the court dealt a body blow to American democracy. Candidates
no longer can focus simply on raising money for their campaigns against
other candidates. Because corporations have almost unlimited sums they can put
in with no notice, candidates have to raise protection money in advance
just in case such a campaign is waged against them.
And in many cases, as I have written before, they will pay for protection
by quietly giving companies or other interests what they want legislatively
to avoid a multimillion-dollar slime campaign against them. Supreme Court
Justice Anthony Kennedy, who wrote the majority opinion in Citizens United,
said there could be no corruption in independent spending. What planet does
he live on?
_Norm Ornstein_
(http://www.rollcall.com/issues/57_80/effect_citizens_united_felt_two_years_later-211556-1.html) , in Roll Call, on the second
anniversary of Citizens United. I sounded similar themes _here_
(http://www.cnn.com/2012/01/09/opinion/hasen-super-pacs/index.html?eref=rss_topstories&utm_sou
rce=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:%20rss/cnn_topstories%20(RS
S:%20Top%20Stories)) .
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=28183&title=Quote%20of%20the%20Day&description=)
--
Rick Hasen
Chancellor's Professor of Law and Political Science
UC Irvine School of Law
401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000
Irvine, CA 92697-8000
949.824.3072 - office
949.824.0495 - fax
_rhasen at law.uci.edu_ (mailto:rhasen at law.uci.edu)
_http://law.uci.edu/faculty/page1_r_hasen.html_
(http://law.uci.edu/faculty/page1_r_hasen.html)
_http://electionlawblog.org_ (http://electionlawblog.org/)
_______________________________________________
Law-election mailing list
Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120119/f8292207/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120119/f8292207/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120119/f8292207/attachment-0001.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120119/f8292207/attachment-0002.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120119/f8292207/attachment-0003.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120119/f8292207/attachment-0004.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120119/f8292207/attachment-0005.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120119/f8292207/attachment-0006.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120119/f8292207/attachment-0007.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120119/f8292207/attachment-0008.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120119/f8292207/attachment-0009.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120119/f8292207/attachment-0010.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120119/f8292207/attachment-0011.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120119/f8292207/attachment-0012.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120119/f8292207/attachment-0013.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120119/f8292207/attachment-0014.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120119/f8292207/attachment-0015.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120119/f8292207/attachment-0016.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120119/f8292207/attachment-0017.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120119/f8292207/attachment-0018.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120119/f8292207/attachment-0019.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120119/f8292207/attachment-0020.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120119/f8292207/attachment-0021.bin>
View list directory