[EL] ELB News and Commentary 7/11/12

JBoppjr at aol.com JBoppjr at aol.com
Wed Jul 11 05:35:04 PDT 2012


 
_“RNC Court Challenge to  Aggregate Contribution Limits Opposed by Reformers
”_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=36747)  
Posted on  _July 10, 2012 12:11 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=36747)  
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)  
 
_Press  release_ 
(http://www.campaignlegalcenter.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1786:july-10-2012-rnc-court-challenge-to-aggregate-con
tribution-limits-opposed-by-reformers-&catid=63:legal-center-press-releases&
Itemid=61) : “Today, the Campaign Legal Center, together with Democracy 21, 
 filed an _amici  brief_ 
(http://www.campaignlegalcenter.org/attachments/CLC__D21_Amici_Brief_7-10-12.pdf)  in the U.S. District Court for the District 
of Columbia to defend the  aggregate contribution limits against a 
challenge brought by the Republican  National Committee (RNC) and Shaun McCutcheon. 
Despite clear Supreme Court  precedent upholding aggregate contribution 
limits, plaintiffs in McCutcheon  v. FEC challenge both the $70,800 aggregate 
limit on contributions to  non-candidate committees and the $46,200 aggregate 
limit on contributions to  candidate committees in a two-year election cycle.
” 
And the sun came up in the morning.  Jim Bopp

 
 
In a message dated 7/11/2012 12:14:31 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
rhasen at law.uci.edu writes:

 
_“Snyder says no”_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=36779)   
Posted  on _July 10, 2012 9:12 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=36779)  
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)   
 
_Metro Times_ (http://metrotimes.com/news/snyder-says-no-1.1341627)  on  
the voter id veto in Michigan. 
 
 
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=36779&title=“Snyder%20says%20no”&description=) 


Posted in _election  administration_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18) , 
_The Voting Wars_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60) , _voter id_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=9)   | Comments Off 

 
_Second Annual Supreme  Court Term in Review Program at UC Irvine_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=36776)  
Posted  on _July 10, 2012 8:56 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=36776)  
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)   
 
Second Annual Supreme Court Term in Review Program 
Tuesday, July 17, 2012
12:00 – 1:30 P.M. 
University of California, Irvine School of Law _(Map)_ 
(http://law.uci.edu/directions.html)  
This exciting and entertaining program reviews the Supreme Court’s key  
cases decided in the Fall 2011 term, with an all-star panel of Supreme Court  
journalists and academics.    Panelists  
    *   _Jess  Bravin_ (http://blogs.wsj.com/law/jess-bravin/) , The Wall 
Street Journal  
    *   _Jennifer Chacón_ 
(http://www.law.uci.edu/faculty/page1_j_chacon.html) , UCI Law  
    *   _Erwin Chemerinsky_ 
(http://www.law.uci.edu/faculty/page1_e_chemerinsky.html) , UCI Law  
    *   _Marcia Coyle_ 
(http://www.law.uci.edu/calendar/Marcia_Coyle_bio.pdf) , The National Law Journal  
    *   _Robert Pushaw_ 
(http://law.pepperdine.edu/academics/faculty/default.php?faculty=robert_pushaw) , Pepperdine University School of Law  
    *   Moderated by _Rick Hasen_ 
(http://www.law.uci.edu/faculty/page1_r_hasen.html) , UCI Law 
This program is free and open to the public, but please _RSVP online_ 
(https://ucisl.ejoinme.org/MyEvents/2012SupremeCourtTerminReview/tabid/367315/Defa
ult.aspx) , as space is limited. 
CLE credit will be available. The event will also be webcast, with viewers  
able to submit questions via Twitter, using the hash tag  #ucilawscotus at 
the end of your question. 
 
 
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=36776&title=Second%20Annual%20Supreme%20Court%20Term%20in%20Review%20Program%20at
%20UC%20Irvine&description=) 


Posted in _Supreme Court_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29)   | Comments 
Off 

 
_“Obama campaign shrugs  off reports of Romney’s fundraising advantage”_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=36773)  
Posted  on _July 10, 2012 8:44 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=36773)  
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)   
 
_A  change_ 
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/obama-campaign-shrugs-off-reports-of-romneys-fundraising-advantage/2012/07/10/gJQAlcvTbW_story.html)
  of pace. 
 
 
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=36773&title=“Obama%20campaign%20shrugs%20off%20reports%20of%20Romney’
s%20fundraising%20advantage”&description=) 


Posted in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10)   | 
Comments Off 

 
_“Marc Morial, Cedric  Richmond ask Justice to block effort to keep 
Bernette Johnson from becoming  chief justice”_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=36770)  
Posted  on _July 10, 2012 8:40 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=36770)  
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)   
 
_The  latest _ 
(http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2012/07/ask_justice_department_to_bloc.html) from Louisiana. 
 
 
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=36770&title=“
Marc%20Morial,%20Cedric%20Richmond%20ask%20Justice%20to%20block%20effort%20to%20keep%20Bernette%20Johnson%20from%20becoming%20chief%20justice”
&description=) 


Posted in _Department of  Justice_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=26) , 
_Voting Rights Act_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15)   | Comments Off 

 
_Watch Out If Texas  Loses on Voting Rights Act Claim in Voter ID Case_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=36767)  
Posted  on _July 10, 2012 8:31 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=36767)  
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)   
 
J. Christian Adams _reports_ 
(http://pjmedia.com/jchristianadams/2012/07/10/texas-voter-id-on-life-support/)   that it is looking a lot like Texas is 
not going to be able to prove an  absence of discriminatory intent or effect 
as to its voter id law. 
Sound like good news for voter id proponents, right?  Not so fast. 
The judges have put off Texas’s backup argument—-that if their law 
violates  section 5 of the Voting Right Act, then the act itself is  
unconstitutional. 
As the Texas Redistricting Blog_  explains,_ 
(http://txredistricting.org/post/26649926862/photo-id-trial-starts-monday)  “The trial, however, will not 
address claims by the State of  Texas that the preclearance requirements of 
section 5 of the Voting Rights Act  are unconstitutional – an issue the 
court will take up in separate proceedings  only if the court finds grounds to 
deny preclearance.” 
Assume, as seems fairly likely, that if the 3 judge panel reaches the  
issue, it will reject Texas’s constitutional argument. That could  lead—still—
to a fast-track emergency appeal to the Supreme Court, which could  rule to 
allow Texas to use its i.d. in the upcoming election (pending a full,  later 
Supreme Court hearing on the question) because it will be likely that  Texas 
will succeed on the merits of proving the unconstitutionality of section  
5. 
This is fairly likely scenario I now think. 
 
 
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=36767&title=Watch%20Out%20If%20Texas%20Loses%20on%20Voting%20Rights%20Act%20Claim
%20in%20Voter%20ID%20Case&description=) 


Posted in _Department of  Justice_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=26) , 
_Supreme Court_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29) , _The Voting Wars_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60) , _voter id_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=9) , _Voting Rights Act_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15)   | 
Comments Off 

 
_AG Holder, Going Off  Script at NAACP Convention, Calls Voter ID Laws “
Poll Taxes”_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=36763)  
Posted  on _July 10, 2012 3:02 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=36763)  
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)   
 
See_  here._ 
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/ag-holder-vows-to-enforce-voting-rights-act-in-dispute-over-texas-photo-id-requirement/2012/07/10/g
JQA6VsnaW_story.html)  
It is a position courts have rejected, and analogous to Jim Crow language I 
 believe is unhelpful in the voter id debate. 
But it is becoming clearer, as I argue in _The  Voting Wars_ 
(http://www.amazon.com/Voting-Wars-Florida-Election-Meltdown/dp/0300182031/ref=sr_1_cc_2?s=
aps&ie=UTF8&qid=1329286945&sr=1-2-catcorr) , that perhaps the biggest 
function of the debate over  voter i.d./voter fraud these days is to fire up the 
base and fundraise (on  both sides of the aisle). 
 
 
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=36763&title=AG%20Holder,%20Going%20Off%20Script%20at%20NAACP%20Convention,%20Call
s%20Voter%20ID%20Laws%20“Poll%20Taxes”&description=) 


Posted in _election  administration_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18) , 
_The Voting Wars_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60) , _voter id_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=9) , _Voting Rights Act_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15)   | Comments Off 

 
_AFL-CIO response to  WSJ article on Union Political Activities_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=36759)  
Posted  on _July 10, 2012 1:36 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=36759)  
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)   
 
Read it _here_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/wp-content/uploads/Wall-Street-Journal-response.pdf) . 
UPDATE: _More_ 
(http://www.aflcio.org/Blog/Other-News/Wall-Street-Journal-Compares-Union-Political-Spending-to-Corporate-Donations)   in this blog 
post. 
 
 
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=36759&title=AFL-CIO%20response%20to%20WSJ%20article%20on%20Union%20Political%20Ac
tivities&description=) 


Posted in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10)   | 
Comments Off 

 
_“As court fight looms  over voter ID, those who have none fear losing voice
”_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=36756)  
Posted  on _July 10, 2012 12:42 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=36756)  
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)   
 
If you read one thing about voter id this week, _read  this_ 
(http://www.statesman.com/news/texas-politics/as-court-fight-looms-over-voter-id-those-2412
608.html?viewAsSinglePage=true) . 
 
 
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=36756&title=“
As%20court%20fight%20looms%20over%20voter%20ID,%20those%20who%20have%20none%20fear%20losing%20voice”&description=) 


Posted in _election  administration_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18) , 
_The Voting Wars_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60) , _voter id_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=9) , _Voting Rights Act_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15)   | Comments Off 

 
_“Holder, at N.A.A.C.P.  Event, Criticizes Voter ID Laws”_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=36754)  
Posted  on _July 10, 2012 12:41 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=36754)  
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)   
 
NYT’s “The Caucus” _reports_ 
(http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/07/10/holder-at-n-a-a-c-p-event-criticizes-voter-id-laws/) . 
 
 
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=36754&title=“Holder,%20at%20N.A.A.C.P.%20Event,%20Criticizes%20Voter%20ID%20Laws”
&description=) 


Posted in _Department of  Justice_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=26) , 
_election  administration_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18) , _voter id_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=9) , _Voting Rights Act_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15)   | Comments Off 

 
_“List of 180,000  suspect Florida voters to be made public”_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=36751)  
Posted  on _July 10, 2012 12:22 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=36751)  
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)   
 
The Miami Herald _reports._ 
(http://miamiherald.typepad.com/nakedpolitics/2012/07/list-of-180000-suspect-florida-voters-to-be-made-public.html)  
What’s the over/under on the number of false positives being extremely  
high? 
 
 
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=36751&title=“
List%20of%20180,000%20suspect%20Florida%20voters%20to%20be%20made%20public”&description=) 


Posted in _Uncategorized_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1)   | Comments 
Off 

 
_“RNC Court Challenge  to Aggregate Contribution Limits Opposed by Reformers
”_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=36747)  
Posted  on _July 10, 2012 12:11 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=36747)  
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)   
 
_Press  release_ 
(http://www.campaignlegalcenter.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1786:july-10-2012-rnc-court-challenge-to-aggregate-con
tribution-limits-opposed-by-reformers-&catid=63:legal-center-press-releases&
Itemid=61) : “Today, the Campaign Legal Center, together with Democracy 21, 
 filed an _amici  brief_ 
(http://www.campaignlegalcenter.org/attachments/CLC__D21_Amici_Brief_7-10-12.pdf)  in the U.S. District Court for the District 
of Columbia to defend  the aggregate contribution limits against a 
challenge brought by the  Republican National Committee (RNC) and Shaun McCutcheon.  
Despite clear  Supreme Court precedent upholding aggregate contribution 
limits, plaintiffs in  McCutcheon v. FEC challenge both the $70,800 aggregate 
limit on  contributions to non-candidate committees and the $46,200 aggregate 
limit on  contributions to candidate committees in a two-year election 
cycle.” 
 
 
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=36747&title=“
RNC%20Court%20Challenge%20to%20Aggregate%20Contribution%20Limits%20Opposed%20by%20Reformers”&description=) 


Posted in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10)   | 
Comments Off 

 
_“House Ethics panel  clears Rep. Buchanan”_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=36744)  
Posted  on _July 10, 2012 9:38 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=36744)  
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)   
 
_The  Hill_ 
(http://thehill.com/homenews/house/236975-house-ethics-committee-clears-rep-buchanan) : “The House Ethics Committee on Tuesday cleared Rep. 
Vern Buchanan  (R-Fla.) on charges that he violated House rules by 
intentionally misleading  Congress about his finances.” 
But: 
“The Justice Department is reportedly investigating Buchanan separately on  
at least four counts.” 
 
 
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=36744&title=“House%20Ethics%20panel%20clears%20Rep.%20Buchanan”&description=) 


Posted in _chicanery_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=12) , _ethics  
investigations_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=42)  | Comments Off 

 
_Pam Fessler on the  Opening of the Texas Voter ID Trial_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=36741)  
Posted  on _July 10, 2012 9:13 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=36741)  
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)   
 
_Here_ (http://www.npr.org/2012/07/09/156509342/texas-defends-voter-id-law) 
,  at NPR. 
 
 
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=36741&title=Pam%20Fessler%20on%20the%20Opening%20of%20the%20Texas%20Voter%20ID%20
Trial&description=) 


Posted in _Department of  Justice_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=26) , 
_election  administration_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18) , _The Voting 
Wars_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60) , _voter id_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=9) , _Voting Rights Act_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15)  
 | Comments Off 

 



-- 
Rick Hasen
Chancellor's Professor of Law  and Political Science
UC Irvine School of Law
401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite  1000
Irvine, CA 92697-8000
949.824.3072 - office
949.824.0495 -  fax
_rhasen at law.uci.edu_ (mailto:rhasen at law.uci.edu) 
_http://law.uci.edu/faculty/page1_r_hasen.html_ 
(http://law.uci.edu/faculty/page1_r_hasen.html) 
_http://electionlawblog.org_ (http://electionlawblog.org/) 
Pre-order  The Voting Wars: _http://amzn.to/y22ZTv_ (http://amzn.to/y22ZTv) 
  


_______________________________________________
Law-election  mailing  list
Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120711/77aab49e/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120711/77aab49e/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120711/77aab49e/attachment-0001.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120711/77aab49e/attachment-0002.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120711/77aab49e/attachment-0003.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120711/77aab49e/attachment-0004.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120711/77aab49e/attachment-0005.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120711/77aab49e/attachment-0006.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120711/77aab49e/attachment-0007.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120711/77aab49e/attachment-0008.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120711/77aab49e/attachment-0009.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120711/77aab49e/attachment-0010.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120711/77aab49e/attachment-0011.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120711/77aab49e/attachment-0012.bin>


View list directory