[EL] more news 7/16/12

Rick Hasen rhasen at law.uci.edu
Mon Jul 16 14:38:28 PDT 2012


    DISCLOSE Act Senate Debate on Cloture Coming Momentarily
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37027>

Posted on July 16, 2012 2:36 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37027> by 
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

You should be able to watch here <http://www.senate.gov/floor/index.htm> 
(click on live floor proceedings).

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D37027&title=DISCLOSE%20Act%20Senate%20Debate%20on%20Cloture%20Coming%20Momentarily&description=>
Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10> | 
Comments Off


    "Suppressing the vote, state by state; The evidence is overwhelming
    that recent photo ID laws are politically motivated."
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37024>

Posted on July 16, 2012 2:34 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37024> by 
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

LA Times editorial. 
<http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/editorials/la-ed-voter-id-laws-20120716,0,6515750.story>

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D37024&title=%E2%80%9CSuppressing%20the%20vote%2C%20state%20by%20state%3B%20The%20evidence%20is%20overwhelming%20that%20recent%20photo%20ID%20laws%20are%20politically%20motivated.%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10> | 
Comments Off


    To the Point on Big Money is 2012 Election
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37022>

Posted on July 16, 2012 2:33 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37022> by 
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>


        Big Money and Secret Money in the 2012 Campaign
        <http://www.kcrw.com/news/programs/tp/tp120716big_money_and_secret>
        (12:07PM)

It's a game-changing year in the election business. This is the first 
presidential campaign season operating under new rules about donations, 
which allow unlimited funds to flow in from corporations, unions and 
individuals. It's being called "dark" money, because much of it remains 
anonymous. Throw in all the costs related to this year's elections, both 
presidential and congressional, and some observers are putting the price 
tag at between six and twelve billion dollars. Whatever happened to 
campaign finance reform?


          Guests:

  * *Ken Vogel* <http://www.kcrw.com/people/vogel_ken?role=guest>:
    Politico.com, @kenvogel <http://twitter.com/kenvogel>
  * *Bob Biersack* <http://www.kcrw.com/people/biersack_bob?role=guest>:
    Center for Responsive Politics, @OpenSecretsDC
    <http://twitter.com/OpenSecretsDC>
  * *David Keating*
    <http://www.kcrw.com/people/keating_david?role=guest>: Club for
    Growth, @campaignfreedom <http://twitter.com/campaignfreedom>
  * *Elizabeth Wilner*
    <http://www.kcrw.com/people/wilner_elizabeth?role=guest>: Kantar
    Media, @CMAGAdFacts <http://twitter.com/CMAGAdFacts>

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D37022&title=To%20the%20Point%20on%20Big%20Money%20is%202012%20Election&description=>
Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10> | 
Comments Off


    "WyLiberty Attorneys File Motion for Preliminary Injunction in Free
    Speech v. Federal Election Commission"
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37019>

Posted on July 16, 2012 2:17 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37019> by 
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Press release 
<http://wyliberty.org/feature/wyliberty-attorneys-file-motion-for-preliminary-injunction-in-free-speech-v-federal-election-commission/>: 
"WyLiberty attorneys filed a motion for preliminary injunction 
<http://wyliberty.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Free-Speech-PI-Motion.pdf> 
in /Free Speech v. Federal Election Commission/ (/FEC/) 
<http://wyliberty.org/legal-center/free-speech-v-federal-election-commission/>, 
a case that began in Wyoming federal court last month.  The motion calls 
for a nationwide injunction against campaign finance regulations that 
require grassroots groups to register and report with the federal 
government just to criticize it."

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D37019&title=%E2%80%9CWyLiberty%20Attorneys%20File%20Motion%20for%20Preliminary%20Injunction%20in%20Free%20Speech%20v.%20Federal%20Election%20Commission%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10> | 
Comments Off


    "BREAKING NEWS: State high court declines to rehear city's appeal in
    ballot case" <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37017>

Posted on July 16, 2012 2:17 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37017> by 
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

The latest <http://www.aspendailynews.com/section/home/153961> from 
Aspen, Colorado.

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D37017&title=%E2%80%9CBREAKING%20NEWS%3A%20State%20high%20court%20declines%20to%20rehear%20city%E2%80%99s%20appeal%20in%20ballot%20case%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in election administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18> | 
Comments Off


    How Many Non-Citizen Voters Actually Removed by Florida Vote Purges?
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37015>

Posted on July 16, 2012 2:15 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37015> by 
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Today on AirTalk 
<http://www.scpr.org/programs/airtalk/2012/07/16/27430/feds-grant-florida-right-to-access-citizens-list-t/> 
Hans von Spakovsky said that Florida officials had removed 50 
non-citizen voters already from the voter rolls.  I said that I was not 
familiar with that statistic, and so I wondered about its veracity. (Why 
would I wonder about the veracity of a claim of election fraud made by 
von Spakvosky? See here <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=19560>, here 
<http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/06/full_indictment_undermines_threat_of_voter_imperso.php>, 
here <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=20953> and here 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=5012>.)

So I wrote to University of Florida professor Dan Smith, who has been 
the go-to person on this issue.  He posted his response 
<http://wp.me/p1udrZ-av> on his blog:

    *You Want Numbers? Florida Secretary of State Voter Purge Netted 10
    "Potential Noncitizens" who may have Voted*

    That's right.

    10

    Out of 11.2 million voters on the official statewide rolls as of
    April 1, 2012.

    Here's some quick analysis...

I'll be interested to know if there is a good source for the 50 person 
total claimed by von Spakovsky.  There may well be. Non-citizen voting 
(unlike voter impersonation fraud) is a real (though small) problem.  
And there are national solutions we could take to fix it. But it would 
be good to get a better handle on the extent of the problem.

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D37015&title=How%20Many%20Non-Citizen%20Voters%20Actually%20Removed%20by%20Florida%20Vote%20Purges%3F&description=>
Posted in election administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>, 
The Voting Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>, voter id 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=9>, voting 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=31> | Comments Off


    "The weakening of state and local parties; The new campaign finance
    regime is taking a toll on state parties."
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37012>

Posted on July 16, 2012 2:06 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37012> by 
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Neil Reiff: 
<http://www.campaignsandelections.com/magazine/us-edition/324462/the-weakening-of-state-and-local-parties.thtml> 
"Way back in May of 2004, I co-authored an article in this magazine that 
warned state and local parties about the new minefield of campaign 
finance created by the then-recently enacted Bipartisan Campaign Reform 
Act (BCRA). Today, these effects still linger for state and local 
parties, and under the new campaign finance regime it's only getting worse."

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D37012&title=%E2%80%9CThe%20weakening%20of%20state%20and%20local%20parties%3B%20The%20new%20campaign%20finance%20regime%20is%20taking%20a%20toll%20on%20state%20parties.%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>, 
political parties <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=25> | Comments Off


    Measuring the Effects of Voter ID Laws?
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37008>

Posted on July 16, 2012 11:37 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37008> 
by Justin Levitt <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=4>

Yesterday, Nate Silver posted a column entitled "Measuring the Effects 
of Voter Identification Laws 
<http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/07/15/measuring-the-effects-of-voter-identification-laws/>" 
on his popular (and informative) FiveThirtyEight 
<http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/> page of the New York Times. 
Rick linked to the column here <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=36976>, 
calling it an "absolute must-read."

If you do, read with caution.  There should really be a question mark 
after the headline.  Two reasons why, after the jump.

Continue reading ? <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37008#more-37008>

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D37008&title=Measuring%20the%20Effects%20of%20Voter%20ID%20Laws%3F&description=>
Posted in voter id <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=9> | Comments Off


    About to Be on KPCC's Airtalk <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37004>

Posted on July 16, 2012 9:55 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37004> by 
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Talking 
<http://www.scpr.org/programs/airtalk/2012/07/16/27430/feds-grant-florida-right-to-access-citizens-list-t/> 
about the Florida voter purge list controversy and the voting wars.

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D37004&title=About%20to%20Be%20on%20KPCC%E2%80%99s%20Airtalk&description=>
Posted in election administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>, 
The Voting Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>, voter registration 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=37> | Comments Off


    "Senate Choice on DISCLOSE Act Is Clear: Transparency vs. Secret
    Political Slush Funds" <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37001>

Posted on July 16, 2012 9:53 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=37001> by 
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Public Citizen Press Release 
<http://www.citizen.org/pressroom/pressroomredirect.cfm?ID=3659>:

    *Senate Choice on DISCLOSE Act Is Clear: Transparency vs. Secret
    Political Slush Funds*

    /*Will Senate Republicans Again Block Disclosure of Campaign Money?*/

    WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Public Citizen today urged the U.S. Senate to
    pass the DISCLOSE Act (S. 3369) so Americans can learn who is paying
    for elections. In a letter to senators
    <http://www.citizen.org/documents/senate-letter-on-disclose-2012.pdf>,
    Public Citizen urged them to show independence and leadership and
    "provide the type of full disclosure of independent electioneering
    that the Supreme Court envisioned and that all Americans deserve."

    "This is a call to Congress that Public Citizen has made repeatedly
    since the disastrous U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Citizens
    United v. Federal Election Commission, which opened the floodgates
    of secret corporate political money," said Craig Holman, government
    affairs lobbyist for Public Citizen. "We repeat it again: Open the
    books on campaign money."

    Tonight, the Senate will vote on the simple yet critical measure,
    sponsored by U.S. Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), which would
    bring out of the shadows most secret money that has been flooding
    U.S. elections.

    In the last congressional session, Senate Republicans marched in
    lock-step with Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) to filibuster
    the DISCLOSE Act to death. The measure, whose full name is the
    Democracy Is Strengthened by Casting Light On Spending in Elections
    Act, fell short of the 60-vote supermajority required to break the
    filibuster by one vote. Not a single Republican senator voted for
    disclosure -- not even those senators who previously had supported
    full transparency.

    McConnell is on record opposing any disclosure of donors to outside
    political groups and is whipping his colleagues in the Senate to
    kill the DISCLOSE Act again.

    Also today, Public Citizen sent an email to its members and
    supporters urging them to contact their senators to find out their
    position on the DISCLOSE Act. Where the senators stand can be looked
    up on Public Citizen's "whip count" page
    <http://pubc.it/WhpDsc>, which will be updated throughout the day as
    activists report back what they hear from their senators' staff.

    "The public needs to pay attention to which side their senators
    choose," said Lisa Gilbert, acting director of Public Citizen's
    Congress Watch division. "The vote on the DISCLOSE Act is a clear
    and simple choice. We will be watching to see which senators support
    transparency of money in politics and which prefer keeping the flow
    of campaign cash secret and under the table."

    Meanwhile, groups and activists from all over the nation are calling
    on Congress to approve the DISCLOSE Act. Many in the blogosphere are
    joining in a blogothon during the late night vote on Monday and
    through Tuesday, when the measure is likely to be reconsidered. More
    than 150 national, state and local organizations have signed on to a
    coalition letter to the Senate urging approval of the DISCLOSE Act.

    "Public Citizen will continue demanding action until Congress
    finally lifts the veil of secrecy from money in politics," Holman said.

    Read Public Citizen's letter to the Senate in support of the
    DISCLOSE Act
    <http://www.citizen.org/documents/senate-letter-on-disclose-2012.pdf>.

    Read the coalition letter to the Senate on the DISCLOSE Act
    <http://www.citizen.org/documents/disclose-2012-coalition-letter.pdf>.

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D37001&title=%E2%80%9CSenate%20Choice%20on%20DISCLOSE%20Act%20Is%20Clear%3A%20Transparency%20vs.%20Secret%20Political%20Slush%20Funds%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10> | 
Comments Off

-- 
Rick Hasen
Chancellor's Professor of Law and Political Science
UC Irvine School of Law
401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000
Irvine, CA 92697-8000
949.824.3072 - office
949.824.0495 - fax
rhasen at law.uci.edu
http://law.uci.edu/faculty/page1_r_hasen.html
http://electionlawblog.org
Pre-order The Voting Wars: http://amzn.to/y22ZTv
www.thevotingwars.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120716/41c731c2/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120716/41c731c2/attachment.png>


View list directory