[EL] Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project and Independent v. Coordinated Advocacy

[Marty Lederman]

hlpronline.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Cole61.pdf

On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Scarberry, Mark <
Mark.Scarberry at pepperdine.edu> wrote:

> Has anyone commented on the distinction made in Holder v. Humanitarian Law
> Project between independent/non-coordinated advocacy, which is protected,
> and controlled/coordinated advocacy, which is not (or may not be)
> constitutionally protected with regard to the federal law criminalizing
> “provision of ‘material support or resources’ to certain foreign
> organizations that engage in terrorist activity”? The analogy to
> independent versus coordinated campaign speech is interesting. See 130 S.
> Ct. 2705 (2010).****
>
> ** **
>
> Mark S. Scarberry****
>
> Professor of Law****
>
> Pepperdine Univ. School of Law****
>
> _______________________________________________
> Law-election mailing list
> Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
> http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120729/36c9dba8/attachment.html>