[EL] Breaking News: Summary Reversal in Montana
JBoppjr at aol.com
JBoppjr at aol.com
Mon Jun 25 13:23:16 PDT 2012
Caperton involves recusal of a judge based on bias against parties. It
has nothing to do with quid-pro-quo corruption in CU. Further, CU rejected
this argument on that grounds. JIm
In a message dated 6/25/2012 1:19:53 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
danielkabramson at gmail.com writes:
Jim,
The problem with the statement that "independent expenditures are never
corrupting as a matter of law" is that it ignores Caperton. Rather than
issue a per curiam decision, it would be more helpful if the Court explained
why the facts alleged by the State of Montana are more similar to the facts in
Citizens United than the facts in Caperton. Without that analysis, we
are left guessing.
Though I think we can assume that judicial elections are somehow
"different" and therefore subject to a different analysis, there Court has never
adequately explained why this should be true.
Daniel
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 7:33 AM, <_JBoppjr at aol.com_
(mailto:JBoppjr at aol.com) > wrote:
The per curiam decision says that "Montana's arguments in support of the
judgment below either were already rejected in Citizens United or failed to
meaningfully distinguish that case." This closes the door on the argument
that unique facts in a certain state can be employed to overturn CU.
Further, it means that independent expenditures are never corrupting as a matter
of law.
Justice Breyer says that there is no prospect that the majority of the
Court will reconsider CU.
This is an excellent result. Jim Bopp
In a message dated 6/25/2012 10:10:43 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
_tokaji.1 at osu.edu_ (mailto:tokaji.1 at osu.edu) writes:
5-4 according to _SCOTUS blog_
(http://electionlawblog.org/wp-admin/www.scotusblog.com) , which is _live-blogging_ (http://scotusblog.wpengine.com/) .
Justice Breyer wrote the dissent.
Daniel Tokaji
Robert M. Duncan/Jones Day Designated Professor of Law
The Ohio State University | Moritz College of Law
55 W. 12th Ave. | Columbus, OH 43210
_614.292.6566_ (tel:614.292.6566) | _tokaji.1 at osu.edu_
(mailto:tokaji.1 at osu.edu)
_______________________________________________
Law-election mailing list
_Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu_
(mailto:Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu)
_http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election_
(http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election)
_______________________________________________
Law-election mailing list
_Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu_
(mailto:Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu)
_http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election_
(http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120625/514fa237/attachment.html>
View list directory