[EL] Breaking News: Summary Reversal in Montana

[Daniel Abramson]

Do you believe it is acceptable for elected officials to act in a manner
that benefits their campaign contributors (or those who make IEs on their
behalf) over other constituents?

On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 3:37 PM, <john.k.tanner at gmail.com> wrote:

> Judges, uniquely among elected officials, are supposed to be neutral
> arbiters.  Other officials are elected to serve particular viewpoints
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Abramson <danielkabramson at gmail.com>
> Sender: law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu
> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 14:57:31
> To: <JBoppjr at aol.com>
> Cc: <law-election at uci.edu>
> Subject: Re: [EL] Breaking News: Summary Reversal in Montana
>
> _______________________________________________
> Law-election mailing list
> Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
> http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120625/0b37bb9b/attachment.html>