[EL] NYC system a model?

Fri Mar 9 09:02:05 PST 2012

While the problems with New York's public financing system lend themselves to any number of snarky comments, there is a serious observation to be made that the public financing system seems to have eliminated corruption except where it is the greatest problem - among the candidates and elected officials themselves.  It demonstrates that (1) the presence of outside "special interests" in election campaigns is not the cause of corruption and (2) that eliminating "special interest" money from candidates' campaigns and the need for candidates to seek out contributions does not avoid corruption or the appearance of corruption.

This is not to say that a "special interest" may not be corrupt. But, it is to say that compelled financing of election campaigns by the public is not a solution to the problem of corruption in politics.

John J. White, Jr.
white at lfa-law.com<mailto:white at lfa-law.com>
(425) 822-9281 ext. 321
The contents of this message and any attachments may contain confidential information and be protected by the attorney-client privilege, work product doctrine or other applicable protection.  If you are not the intended recipient or have received this message in error, please notify the sender and promptly delete the message.  Thank you for your assistance.

Tax Advice Notice: IRS Circular 230 requires us to advise you that, if this communication or any attachment contains any tax advice, the advice is not intended to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. A taxpayer may rely on professional advice to avoid federal tax penalties only if the advice is reflected in a comprehensive tax opinion that conforms to stringent requirements. Please contact us if you have any questions about Circular 230 or would like to discuss our preparation of an opinion that conforms to these IRS rules.

From: law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu [mailto:law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu] On Behalf Of Smith, Brad
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 5:17 AM
To: law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
Subject: Re: [EL] NYC system a model?

Mark's criteria strikes me as rather rigged criteria for measuring success. Tax financed elections are supposed to reduce corruption. But when there remain numerous episodes of corruption, we're told we can't count that as a failure of tax financing unless the corruption specifically involves violation of the tax financing system rules.

Applying that logic to traditional systems of voluntary financing, we would only find corruption when someone specifically broke the rules regulating the campaign finance system - making corruption rare, indeed.

What we prefer to look for is evidence that tax financed systems acheive their stated goals, and typically stated as a primary goal is limiting corruption. The record is very weak. There are probably few governing bodies in the country more plagued by corruption than the NYC Council. Unless having a tax financed system is in and of itself the goal, regardless of whether it leads to better government, it's hard to see why New York's system would be a model anyone would want to import.

Bradley A. Smith

Josiah H. Blackmore II/Shirley M. Nault

   Professor of Law

Capital University Law School

303 E. Broad St.

Columbus, OH 43215

614.236.6317

http://law.capital.edu/faculty/bios/bsmith.aspx

________________________________
From: law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu [law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu] on behalf of Mark Schmitt [schmitt.mark at gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 12:15 AM
To: law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
Subject: Re: [EL] NYC system a model?
For all the "multitudes," Liu seems to be the only case that's mainly about fraud or corruption in the public financing system itself. The others are perhaps waste (use of campaign funds, from both public and private sources, after the election), or corrupt pols like Larry Seabrook who had been stealing money from every pot available (mainly putting council money through nonprofits he controlled, which is the classic NYC model) for three decades, and who also happened to participate in the public funding system. Seabrook, Pedro Espada, etc were crooks long before there was public financing.

The Center for Competitive Politics "case studies" of Arizona, NY and Maine are mostly similar -- How is the Fiesta Bowl scandal a public-financing scandal? A bunch of politicians received reimbursed contributions that were illegal under state and federal law. The recipients included state officials who participated in the system, some who hadn't, and some who were federal electeds who weren't even eligible.

Most of these incidents, especially those in New York, were caught and prosecuted because good public financing systems have, or should have, really capable, tough enforcement agencies. The New York City Campaign Finance Board has won all kinds of awards from the Council on Government Ethics Laws, and candidates consider the board merciless. If the FEC were one-third as independent and competent as the NYC CFB, we'd probably see a lot more identifiable corruption in federal politics, because they'd be acting on many more complaints.

The alternative hypothesis that better fits the NYC and other "case studies" would be that, in states and cities that have public financing, there's more public support for strong and independent enforcement agencies, because they are safeguarding public dollars. And therefore, much more misuse of funds and corruption is caught and known.

/Mark Schmitt

(I think this is my first post to this list, but I'm a longtime reader, and sometimes write on campaign finance at TNR and elsewhere.)

Mark Schmitt
Senior Fellow, The Roosevelt Institute<http://www.rooseveltinstitute.org/>
202/246-2350
gchat or Skype: schmitt.mark
twitter: mschmitt9

On 3/8/2012 12:57 PM, Bill Maurer wrote:
Good point.  I guess like Walt Whitman, the NYC model for corruption, fraud, waste and abuse is large.  It contains multitudes.  They can't all fit in 650 words.

From: Smith, Brad [mailto:BSmith at law.capital.edu]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 9:54 AM
To: Bill Maurer; law-election at UCI.edu<mailto:law-election at UCI.edu>
Subject: RE: NYC system a model?

Hey, I'm sure they gave Allison 650 words or so. There are limits.

Bradley A. Smith

Josiah H. Blackmore II/Shirley M. Nault

   Professor of Law

Capital University Law School

303 E. Broad St.

Columbus, OH 43215

614.236.6317<tel:614.236.6317>

http://law.capital.edu/faculty/bios/bsmith.aspx

________________________________
From: Bill Maurer [wmaurer at ij.org<mailto:wmaurer at ij.org>]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 12:44 PM
To: Smith, Brad; law-election at UCI.edu<mailto:law-election at UCI.edu>
Subject: RE: NYC system a model?
Brad,

You're selling the New York system short.  It has so many more avenues for waste and abuse than just those.

http://www.makenolaw.org/blog/8-government/187-fighting-corruption-by-getting-the-taxpayer-to-pay-your-parking-tickets

Bill

From: law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu<mailto:law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu> [mailto:law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu]<mailto:[mailto:law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu]> On Behalf Of Smith, Brad
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 8:05 AM
To: law-election at UCI.edu<mailto:law-election at UCI.edu>
Subject: Re: [EL] NYC system a model?

Ironic that the CFI report should coincide with recent news about more corruption in New York City's tax financed system for campaigns. See http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/unclean_elections_xC5dUPJXIhx5tStDvjARnN#ixzz1oUzlTHh4.

"The arrest of Hou - accused of using straw donors to trigger more matching funds from taxpayers - is merely the latest shoe to drop.

Yet Liu is far from unique. The numerous abuses include everything from City Council candidates collecting public funds for "races" that weren't seriously contested, to labor unions being accused of illegally coordinating efforts with candidates."

Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/unclean_elections_xC5dUPJXIhx5tStDvjARnN#ixzz1oXeyAINm

Bradley A. Smith

Josiah H. Blackmore II/Shirley M. Nault

   Professor of Law

Capital University Law School

303 E. Broad St.

Columbus, OH 43215

614.236.6317<tel:614.236.6317>

http://law.capital.edu/faculty/bios/bsmith.aspx

________________________________
From: law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu<mailto:law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu> [law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu<mailto:law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu>] on behalf of Rick Hasen [rhasen at law.uci.edu<mailto:rhasen at law.uci.edu>]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 11:00 AM
To: law-election at UCI.edu<mailto:law-election at UCI.edu>
Subject: [EL] ELB News and Commentary 3/8/12

"'Small Donors, Big Democracy: New York City's Matching Funds as a Model for the Nation and States' published in Election Law Journal"<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=31225>
Posted on March 8, 2012 7:53 am<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=31225> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

See this press release<http://www.cfinst.org/Press/PReleases/12-03-08/%E2%80%9CSmall_Donors_Big_Democracy_New_York_City%E2%80%99s_Matching_Funds_as_a_Model_for_the_Nation_and_States%E2%80%9D_published_in_Election_Law_Journal.aspx>.
[https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=af8db65044&view=att&th=135f552aa4a60424&attid=0.1&disp=emb&zw]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D31225&title=%E2%80%9C%E2%80%98Small%20Donors%2C%20Big%20Democracy%3A%20New%20York%20City%E2%80%99s%20Matching%20Funds%20as%20a%20Model%20for%20the%20Nation%20and%20States%E2%80%99%20published%20in%20Election%2>
Posted in campaign finance<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10> | Comments Off

_______________________________________________

Law-election mailing list

Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu<mailto:Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu>

http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120309/afc72a70/attachment.html>