[EL] ELB News and Commentary 3/24/12

JBoppjr at aol.com JBoppjr at aol.com
Sat Mar 24 06:09:59 PDT 2012


Thanks to Rick for informing us of another multi-million dollar corporate  
expenditure to corrupt the judiciary:
 
_It’s Not Every Day the  Severability Doctrine Makes the NY Times Op-Ed 
Page_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=32064)  
 
Fortunately, if "corporations are not people" any more, we won't have to  
hear from the NYTimes any more. See New York Times v.  Sullivan. 
 
And their evil effort to use their vast corporate wealth to  corrupt the 
judiciary can be stopped. Jim Bopp
 
 
In a message dated 3/24/2012 12:46:00 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
rhasen at law.uci.edu writes:

 
_Update on the South  Carolina Voter ID Voting Rights Act Challenge_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=32108)  
Posted  on _March 23, 2012 9:27 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=32108)  
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)   
 
_Here_ 
(http://txredistricting.org/post/19807390090/meanwhile-in-the-south-carolina-voter-id-case) . 
 
 
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=32108&title=Update%20on%20the%20South%20Carolina%20Voter%20ID%20Voting%20Rights%2
0Act%20Challenge&description=) 


Posted in _voter id_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=9) , _Voting Rights 
Act_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15)   | Comments Off 

 
_“Obama’s Small-Dollar  Percentage Down Slightly in February; Santorum’s 
Stayed High; Romney’s Stayed  Low”_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=32105)  
Posted  on _March 23, 2012 4:59 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=32105)  
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)   
 
The Campaign Finance Institute has issued _this  press release_ 
(http://cfinst.org/Press/PReleases/12-03-22/Obama’
s_Small-Dollar_Percentage_Down_Slightly_in_February_Santorum’s_Stayed_High_Romney’s_Stayed_Low.aspx) . 
 
 
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=32105&title=“Obama’
s%20Small-Dollar%20Percentage%20Down%20Slightly%20in%20February;%20Santorum’s%20Stayed%20High;%20Romney’s%20Stayed%20Low”&description=) 


Posted in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10)   | 
Comments Off 

 
_Minnesota Voter ID  Amendment Would End, Without Notice, Same Day Voter 
Registration_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=32101)  
Posted  on _March 23, 2012 4:10 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=32101)  
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)   
 
Ending same day voter registration is not part of the ballot language for a 
 constitutional amendment establishing a voter id requirement, leading 
Minn.  Secretary of State Mark Ritchie _to call  it_ 
(https://twitter.com/#!/mritchie/status/183296071458504704)  a “Trojan horse.” 
Minnesota’s voter id proposal looks like a _false  solution_ 
(http://www.amazon.com/Fraudulent-Fraud-Squad-Understanding-ebook/dp/B00795X5XI/ref=zg_bs_1
57417011_9)  to a non-existent problem. 
 
 
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=32101&title=Minnesota%20Voter%20ID%20Amendment%20Would%20End,%20Without%20Notice,
%20Same%20Day%20Voter%20Registration&description=) 


Posted in _election  administration_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18) , 
_The Voting Wars_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60) , _voter id_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=9)   | Comments Off 

 
_Lessig Responds to  Critics About Supporting Roemer While Holding AE 
Leadership Position_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=32098)  
Posted  on _March 23, 2012 4:06 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=32098)  
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)   
 
Go to the bottom of the comments on _this  post_ 
(http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2012/03/22/neutrality-americans-elect-leader-tweets-his-h
eart-out-for-buddy-roemer/)  at Irregular Times. From my read of Lessig’s 
comments, it appears  that AE is touting him as part of their leadership in 
ways that are  inconsistent with his own understanding of his role: “My only 
activity with  them has been to raise criticisms and concerns with their 
management. I helped  people concerned about the voting technology get access 
to the staff. I have  raised concerns about how they frame priorities.” 
 
 
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=32098&title=Lessig%20Responds%20to%20Critics%20About%20Supporting%20Roemer%20Whil
e%20Holding%20AE%20Leadership%20Position&description=) 


Posted in _third parties_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=47)   | Comments 
Off 

 
_“Photo ID marches on,  but critics vow litigation”_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=32095)  
Posted  on _March 23, 2012 3:59 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=32095)  
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)   
 
_The  latest_ 
(http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/article/Photo-ID-marches-on-but-critics-vow-litigation-3430780.php)  from Minnesota. 
 
 
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=32095&title=“Photo%20ID%20marches%20on,%20but%20critics%20vow%20litigation”
&description=) 


Posted in _election  administration_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18) , 
_The Voting Wars_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60) , _voter id_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=9) , _Voting Rights Act_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15)   | Comments Off 

 
_Will Buddy Roemer Pick  Abramoff or Lessig as His VP Choice on AE Ticket?_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=32092)  
Posted  on _March 23, 2012 3:25 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=32092)  
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)   
 
Or maybe someone else.  Roemer _has  promised_ 
(http://www.politico.com/politicoinfluence/0312/politicoinfluence225.html)  we will be “shocked, pleased 
and surprised.” 
 
 
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=32092&title=Will%20Buddy%20Roemer%20Pick%20Abramoff%20or%20Lessig%20as%20His%20VP
%20Choice%20on%20AE%20Ticket?&description=) 


Posted in _Uncategorized_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1)   | Comments 
Off 

 
_“Romney’s road to  nomination paved by dedicated delegate counter”_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=32089)  
Posted  on _March 23, 2012 2:03 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=32089)  
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)   
 
WaPo offers_  this profile_ 
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/romneys-road-to-nomination-paved-by-dedicated-delegate-counter/2012/03/20/gIQAKAWaRS
_story.html)  of Katie Biber Chen.  See also this _brief  GQ profile_ 
(http://www.gq.com/news-politics/blogs/death-race/2012/03/the-weekly-power-list-03
0912.html)  in which I am quoted on the importance of Biber’s work for  
Romney. 
 
 
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=32089&title=“Romney’
s%20road%20to%20nomination%20paved%20by%20dedicated%20delegate%20counter”&description=) 


Posted in _election law biz_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=51)   | 
Comments Off 

 
_“Republican primary  turnout rebounds, is up overall”_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=32086)  
Posted  on _March 23, 2012 1:45 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=32086)  
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)   
 
The Fix _reports._ 
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/post/republican-primary-turnout-rebounds-is-up-overall/2012/03/23/gIQAOeCNWS_blog.html) 
 
 
 
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=32086&title=“Republican%20primary%20turnout%20rebounds,%20is%20up%20overall”
&description=) 


Posted in _political parties_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=25) ,  
_primaries_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=32)   | Comments Off 

 
_“Congressional  Redistricting Matters, and It’s Hurting This Country: a 
Response to Michael  Barone”_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=32083)  
Posted  on _March 23, 2012 1:42 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=32083)  
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)   
 
FairVote _responds_ 
(http://www.fairvote.org/congressional-redistricting-matters#.T2zgK9nwDAJ) . 
 
 
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=32083&title=“Congressional%20Redistricting%20Matters,%20and%20It’
s%20Hurting%20This%20Country:%20a%20Response%20to%20Michael%20Barone”&description=) 


Posted in _redistricting_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=6)   | Comments 
Off 

 
_“Mistrial declared in  Troy ballot fraud trial”_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=32079)  
Posted  on _March 23, 2012 9:00 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=32079)  
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)   
 
I had missed _this  development_ 
(http://www.benningtonbanner.com/local/ci_20167729/mistrial-declared-troy-voting-fraud-trial) . 
 
 
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=32079&title=“Mistrial%20declared%20in%20Troy%20ballot%20fraud%20trial”
&description=) 


Posted in _chicanery_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=12)   | Comments Off 

 
_Shorter Dahlia  Lithwick_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=32076)  
Posted  on _March 23, 2012 8:55 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=32076)  
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)   
 
Conservatives _will  uphold_ (http://www.slat
e.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2012/03/the_supreme_court_is_more_concerned_with_the_politic
s_of_the_health_care_debate_than_the_law_.single.html)  health care now to 
dismantle affirmative action and Voting Rights  Act later. 
_Similar  thoughts_ 
(http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/18/health-care-reform-supreme-court-obamacare_n_1354804.html)  from Mike Sacks. 
 
 
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=32076&title=Shorter%20Dahlia%20Lithwick&description=) 


Posted in _Supreme Court_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29)   | Comments 
Off 

 
_How I Would Like To  Reverse Citizens United: A More Modest Proposal_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=32073)  
Posted  on _March 23, 2012 8:42 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=32073)  
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)   
 
Unlike Larry’s _broader  dreams_ 
(http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/03/an-open-letter-to-the-citizens-against-i-citizens-united-i/254902/
) , I _discuss evidence_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=31998)  showing 
Super  PACs and 501c4s can corrupt, and this is a basis to overturn Citizens  
United 
Then again, Larry is trying to foment a popular movement.  I just need  the 
change of one Justice on the Supreme Court. 
 
 
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=32073&title=How%20I%20Would%20Like%20To%20Reverse%20Citizens%20United:%20A%20More
%20Modest%20Proposal&description=) 


Posted in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10)   | 
Comments Off 

 
_“An Open Letter to the  Citizens Against Citizens United”_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=32070)  
Posted  on _March 23, 2012 8:37 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=32070)  
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)   
 
Larry Lessig _blogs_ 
(http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/03/an-open-letter-to-the-citizens-against-i-citizens-united-i/254902/)   at the 
Atlantic.  What does he want? 
I believe the Court’s reasoning was mistaken. But to respond to its  
mistake with a declaration that “corporations are not persons” alone  is also a 
mistake. Citizens United would be reversed by  granting Congress the explicit 
power to limit independent expenditures. And  that is the call that these 
citizen movements need to be making, whatever  else they ask for as well. 
So these are the first changes that this democracy needs: 
    1.  Citizen-funded elections — elections funded by  citizens, not 
corporations (for whether or not a corporation is a  person, no one has ever 
suggested corporations are federal citizens), and  elections funded by all 
citizens, not just a tiny fraction of the  1 percent;  
    2.  Limits on independent expenditures — whether by individuals  or 
corporations, Congress must have the power to make sure this important  
political speech doesn’t dominate our democracy, and thereby distract our  
representatives from a dependence “upon the People alone;”  
    3.  An express recognition in our constitution that only persons  are 
persons — that when the Declaration of Independence spoke of entities  “
endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights,” it was  speaking of 
natural persons only. 
These changes would restore a dependence upon “the People alone.” They  
are the changes that these movements should be pushing.
 
 (http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.
org/?p=32070&title=“
An%20Open%20Letter%20to%20the%20Citizens%20Against%20Citizens%20United”&description=) 


Posted in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10)   | 
Comments Off 

 
_The Democracy Deficit  Widens at Americans Elect_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=32067)  
Posted  on _March 23, 2012 7:23 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=32067)  
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)   
 
_NOLA_ 
(http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2012/03/is_americans_elect_the_adjustm.html) : 
Meanwhile, there are four Feb. 29 postings on the Americans Elect site,  
under the heading “_board decisions_ 
(http://www.americanselect.org/board-decisions) ,”  indicating changes to the bylaws and pre-convention rules that, 
it says,  have been posted for delegates review. But it is not apparent what 
the  changes are or where any more detailed explanation of the changes can 
be  found for purposes of review. Next to each of the four items, it says, “
this  decision has been approved,” and if you roll your cursor over the 
question  mark alongside, it says, “This decision was unanimously approved by the 
 Board and is not subject to delegate review.” It is not clear from the 
site  when the board was vested with that power…. 
On the site’s _news page_ (http://www.americanselect.org/news) , there is 
notice of  another meeting of the board, by telephone, to be held today “to 
vote on the  following items: adoption of amendments to the Pre-Convention 
Rules, to post  the Post-Election Rules on the website for public comment and 
to adopt  amendments to the Bylaws,” but no other specifics are  provided.
 
 
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=32067&title=The%20Democracy%20Deficit%20Widens%20at%20Americans%20Elect&descripti
on=) 


Posted in _chicanery_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=12) , _third 
parties_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=47)   | Comments Off 

 
_It’s Not Every Day the  Severability Doctrine Makes the NY Times Op-Ed 
Page_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=32064)  
Posted  on _March 23, 2012 7:18 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=32064)  
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)   
 
_Must-read_ 
(http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/23/opinion/the-severability-doctrine.html?_r=1&hp)   Abbe Gluck and Michael Graetz on the severability 
argument in the health care  case.  It concludes: 
It’s not clear why the Obama administration has chosen this course.  
Perhaps it made a strategic choice to raise the stakes of striking down the  
mandate by asking the court to also invalidate the law’s more popular  
provisions. Or it may be concerned that, if the mandate alone is struck  down, there 
would not be enough votes in Congress to pass new provisions to  compensate 
the insurance industry for its loss. But as a legal matter, the  court should 
reject the argument. 
We believe that imposing the mandate was within Congress’s powers to  
regulate commerce and that the legislation should be upheld. But if the  Supreme 
Court strikes the mandate down, the rest of the law should stand,  and 
Congress should have to decide what happens next. 
Why should an unelected court free the insurance industry from having to  
do its own political lobbying work in Congress? Why should the court choose  
whether or not to deny injured and sick Americans health insurance? These  
crucial decisions must be left to our elected officials, who — unlike the  
Supreme Court — can then be held accountable for them by the voting  public.
 
 
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=32064&title=It’
s%20Not%20Every%20Day%20the%20Severability%20Doctrine%20Makes%20the%20NY%20Times%20Op-Ed%20Page&description=) 


Posted in _legislation and  legislatures_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=27) , _statutory  interpretation_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=21)  | 
Comments Off 

 
_Sad News: The NAACP  LDF’s John Payton Has Passed Away_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=32061)  
Posted  on _March 23, 2012 7:16 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=32061)  
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)   
 
_A  leading lawyer_ 
(http://content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2012/03/obama-mourns-naacp-lawyer-payton/1#.T2yFaNnwDAI)  in the civil rights 
and voting rights world. 
 
 
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=32061&title=Sad%20News:%20The%20NAACP%20LDF’
s%20John%20Payton%20Has%20Passed%20Away&description=) 


Posted in _election law biz_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=51)   | 
Comments Off 

 
_“On health care,  Supreme Court loss could be electoral win”_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=32058)  
Posted  on _March 23, 2012 7:09 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=32058)  
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)   
 
The Fix _reports_ 
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/post/on-health-care-supreme-court-loss-could-be-electoral-win/2012/03/22/gIQAresaUS_blog.
html) .  I made a similar argument back in _September._ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=23578)  
 
 
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=32058&title=“
On%20health%20care,%20Supreme%20Court%20loss%20could%20be%20electoral%20win”&description=) 


Posted in _campaigns_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59) , _Supreme 
Court_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29)   | Comments Off 

 



-- 
Rick Hasen
Chancellor's Professor of Law  and Political Science
UC Irvine School of Law
401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite  1000
Irvine, CA 92697-8000
949.824.3072 - office
949.824.0495 -  fax
_rhasen at law.uci.edu_ (mailto:rhasen at law.uci.edu) 
_http://law.uci.edu/faculty/page1_r_hasen.html_ 
(http://law.uci.edu/faculty/page1_r_hasen.html) 
_http://electionlawblog.org_ (http://electionlawblog.org/) 



_______________________________________________
Law-election  mailing  list
Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120324/e0403be0/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120324/e0403be0/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120324/e0403be0/attachment-0001.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120324/e0403be0/attachment-0002.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120324/e0403be0/attachment-0003.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120324/e0403be0/attachment-0004.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120324/e0403be0/attachment-0005.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120324/e0403be0/attachment-0006.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120324/e0403be0/attachment-0007.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120324/e0403be0/attachment-0008.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120324/e0403be0/attachment-0009.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120324/e0403be0/attachment-0010.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120324/e0403be0/attachment-0011.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120324/e0403be0/attachment-0012.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120324/e0403be0/attachment-0013.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120324/e0403be0/attachment-0014.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120324/e0403be0/attachment-0015.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120324/e0403be0/attachment-0016.bin>


View list directory