[EL] Informational benefit outweighed by cost?

[Steve Hoersting]

Kim Strassel has another piece in today's *WSJ* intimating that
the compelled disclosure of independent, non-corrupting speech poses too
high a cost on speech rights for too little benefit in voter information --
especially absent a meaningful exemption available not just to Vandersloot,
for whom it is too late, but to other would-be funders noticing this
treatment, and eager to seek an exemption as John Doe or Jane Doe.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304070304577396412560038208.html

-- 
Stephen M. Hoersting
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120511/9bdf8975/attachment.html>