[EL] ELB News and Commentary 5/15/12
JBoppjr at aol.com
JBoppjr at aol.com
Tue May 15 05:16:33 PDT 2012
Regarding this post:
_“Sen. Alexander’s Solution: Throw Gas on the Fire”_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=34229)
Posted on _May 14, 2012 11:15 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=34229)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
_Meredith McGehee_
(http://www.clcblog.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=455:sen-alexanders-solution-throw-gas-on-the-fire) : “
Recently, Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) proposed eliminating limits on
contributions to political candidates as the solution to the current campaign finance
mess. He says unlimited contributions to candidates won’t further empower
the wealthy; they will just create more political speech. And he said this
with a straight face!”
If contributions to a Super PAC pose the same danger of corruption as do
contributions to candidates, as the "reformers insist," then why not let the
money go directly to candidates. At least candidates are accountable to
the voters, when Super PACs are not. And candidates will become relevant
again, while now they are becoming less so. (I said this with just a sly
smile.) Jim Bopp
In a message dated 5/15/2012 12:29:33 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
rhasen at law.uci.edu writes:
_“Two witnesses say Edwards did not have to report $900k”_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=34254)
Posted on _May 14, 2012 9:26 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=34254) by
_Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
_The latest_
(http://www.newsobserver.com/2012/05/14/2063715/edwards-campaign-treasurer-saw.html) : “Two witnesses with a wealth of knowledge about
campaign finance laws testified in the John Edwards trial Monday that the
$900,000 at the heart of the case went to personal expenses for the candidate –
and therefore should not be subject to public reporting or campaign
finance caps. The jury heard from one of the witnesses – a former Edwards ca
mpaign treasurer. But the other, a former Federal Election Commission chairman,
testified outside the presence of the jury. The judge limited what he can
say if he’s called to the stand later in front of jurors…Judge Catherine
Eagles dealt the defense a blow Monday when she severely restricted what
Scott Thomas, a former Federal Election Commission chairman, could talk about
if he faces the jury. Thomas, who put in 37 years with the government
agency that oversees campaign finance compliance and the issues related to it,
took the stand Monday after the judge sent the jury home for the day. In a
legal proceeding that must take place outside the jury’s presence, Thomas
offered a glimpse of what he might say if called to testify. ‘These are
intensely personal by their very nature,’ Thomas said of the $900,000 in
payments used to support Hunter when she was pregnant with Edwards’ child, who is
now 4.”
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=34254&title=“
Two%20witnesses%20say%20Edwards%20did%20not%20have%20to%20report%20$900k”&description=)
Posted in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10) ,
_campaigns_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59) , _chicanery_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=12) , _John Edwards_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=17) |
Comments Off
_“The Public Eye: Capital-area voter fraud suspects have criminal histories
”_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=34251)
Posted on _May 14, 2012 9:18 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=34251) by
_Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
_SacBee_
(http://www.sacbee.com/2012/05/13/4486043/public-eye-bounty-hunting-at-heart.html) : “The owner and an employee of a company accused of
fraudulent _voter registration_ (http://topics.sacbee.com/voter+registration/)
drives in _Sacramento County _
(http://topics.sacbee.com/Sacramento+County/) have been convicted of crimes of deception in the past. The owner of
Momentum Political Services, Monica Harris, has an extensive criminal history,
including a _prison sentence _ (http://topics.sacbee.com/prison+sentence/)
for stealing from a family she befriended and buying a van with funds
stolen from a youth agency, court records show. Two of her victims called Harris
a ‘professional con artist.’…Jill LaVine, Sacramento County’s registrar
of voters, has turned over evidence of what she called registration fraud to
the California Secretary of State’s Office. She said that at least
one-fourth of the 31,000 registration cards submitted by Harris and her
circulators since September have been rejected for inaccuracies. Momentum Political
Services was hired by the _Republican Party_
(http://topics.sacbee.com/Republican+Party/) of Sacramento County to conduct _voter registration_
(http://topics.sacbee.com/voter+registration/) drives. LaVine said her office
found numerous examples of people of having their political party affiliation
switched to Republican against their wishes.”
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=34251&title=“
The%20Public%20Eye:%20Capital-area%20voter%20fraud%20suspects%20have%20criminal%20histories”&description=)
Posted in _chicanery_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=12) , _voter
registration_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=37) | Comments Off
_Americans Elect Admits Its Selection Process Has Failed; New Procedures
Coming_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=34248)
Posted on _May 14, 2012 9:08 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=34248) by
_Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
The following press release arrived via email:
A Statement by Americans Elect CEO Kahlil Byrd
12:01 A.M., MAY 15, 2012 - Over the past two years, Americans Elect has
focused on achieving three clear goals:
· Gaining nationwide ballot access for a third presidential ticket to
compete in the 2012 race;
· Holding the first ever nonpartisan secure national online primary
at AmericansElect.org; and
· Fielding a credible, balanced, unaffiliated ticket for the 2012
presidential race.
Through the efforts of thousands of staffers, volunteers, and leadership,
Americans Elect has achieved every stated operational goal. Despite these
efforts, as of today, no candidate has reached the national support
threshold required to enter the “Americans Elect Online Convention” this June.
(Read a detailed summary of the AE process _here_
(http://americanselect.us2.list-manage.com/track/click?u=4f8e77da91c818387f856f7b6&id=10e6535d29&e=69e689
3bc7) and the full rules _here_
(http://americanselect.us2.list-manage.com/track/click?u=4f8e77da91c818387f856f7b6&id=cd06f64e7e&e=69e6893bc7) .)
Because of this, under the rules that AE delegates ratified, the primary
process would end today. There is, however, an almost universal desire among
delegates, leadership and millions of Americans who have supported AE to
see a credible candidate emerge from this process.
Every step of the way, AE has conferred with its community before making
major decisions. We will do the same this week before determining next steps
for the immediate future. AE will announce the results of these
conversations on Thursday, May 17.
As always, we thank everyone who has participated in this effort and will
honor the work, efforts and trust so many people have placed in Americans
Elect.
###
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=34248&title=Americans%20Elect%20Admits%20Its%20Selection%20Process%20Has%20Failed
;%20New%20Procedures%20Coming&description=)
Posted in _ballot access_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=46) ,
_primaries_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=32) , _third parties_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=47) | Comments Off
_“Watchdogs Challenge Latest Attempt by Outside Group to Skirt Disclosure
Laws”_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=34245)
Posted on _May 14, 2012 8:06 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=34245) by
_Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
_Release_
(http://www.campaignlegalcenter.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1717:may-11-2012-watchdogs-challenge-latest-attempt-by-outsid
e-group-to-skirt-disclosure-laws&catid=63:legal-center-press-releases&Itemid
=61) : “Today, the Campaign Legal Center, together with Democracy 21,
filed _comments_
(http://www.campaignlegalcenter.org/attachments/FEC_PROCEEDINGS/CLC_D21_Comments_on_AOR_2012-19_AFF_5_11_12_2.pdf) urging the Federal
Election Commission (FEC) to reject an attempt by America Future Fund (AFF) to
avoid filing electioneering communications reports and disclosing donors
for a series of proposed ads. In Advisory Opinion Request 2012-19, AFF asks
the agency whether eight submitted television advertisements would trigger
the reporting requirements for electioneering communications.”
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=34245&title=“
Watchdogs%20Challenge%20Latest%20Attempt%20by%20Outside%20Group%20to%20Skirt%20Disclosure%20Laws”&description=)
Posted in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10) |
Comments Off
_“May 16 Court Simulation to Test Principles of Election Law “_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=34241)
Posted on _May 14, 2012 7:52 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=34241) by
_Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
_Important event_
(http://law.wm.edu/news/stories/2012/election-litigation.php) at William and Mary:
The _Election Law Program_
(http://law.wm.edu/academics/intellectuallife/researchcenters/electionlaw/index.php) , a joint project of the College of
William & Mary and the _National Center for State Courts_
(http://www.ncsc.org/) , will present an election litigation simulation at the Judicial
Conference of Virginia in Norfolk, Va., on May 16. The simulation is the first in
a series of moot court proceedings intended to highlight issues in state
election laws in advance of the 2012 elections and to educate judges about
why election law litigation is unique. The series is made possible by
generous grant support from the Deer Creek Foundation. Reporters are welcome to
attend.
“State election statutes are often vague. Often, problems in election law
statutes go unnoticed. It typically takes a perilously close election to
test the strength of such statutes. The Election Law Program, with the help
of Professor Edward Foley of the Mortiz College of Law, has come up with a
war gaming mechanism to do just that,” said _Rebecca Green_
(http://web.wm.edu/law/faculty/bios/professorsofpractice/green-912.php?svr=law) , Professor
of the Practice of Law at William & Mary Law School and Coordinator of the
Election Law Program.
The case to be used in the May 16 trial involves a malfunctioning voting
machine that could cost the Republican candidate the election. The main
question to be addressed is what authority the court has to “look inside” the
machine to try to retrieve the missing ballots. Two prominent election
attorneys, Stefan Passantino and Jessica Ring Amunson, will argue the fictional
case before a three-judge panel.
Law students Megan Mitchell ’13 and Jim Ogorzalek ’14 have provided
valuable research assistance for the project, writing war game scenarios and
briefs in preparation for the event.
Created in 2005 as a joint venture of the National Center for State Courts
and the College of William & Mary, the Election Law Program seeks to
provide practical assistance to state court judges called upon to resolve
difficult election law disputes. In 2008, the Program published a _manual_
(http://law.wm.edu/academics/intellectuallife/researchcenters/electionlaw/publicatio
nsandwebcourses/index.php) for judges that discusses and analyzes
election law issues and the judicial relief available for election law violations.
The Program also produces a series of _web-based lectures_
(http://law.wm.edu/academics/intellectuallife/researchcenters/electionlaw/publicationsandw
ebcourses/index.php) designed to educate judges and journalists about the
fundamentals of election law.
Editor’s Note: Reporters who cover Virginia elections may benefit from
attending the event. Reporters who wish to attend should contact Professor
Rebecca Green at (757) 221-3851 (_rgreen at wm.edu_ (mailto:rgreen at wm.edu) ).
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=34241&title=“
May%2016%20Court%20Simulation%20to%20Test%20Principles%20of%20Election%20Law%20“&description=)
Posted in _election administration_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18) ,
_The Voting Wars_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60) | Comments Off
_“Judges Throw Out Election Lawsuit “_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=34238)
Posted on _May 14, 2012 3:39 pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=34238) by
_Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
_AP_
(http://www.wltx.com/news/national/article/187360/2/Judges-Throw-Out-Election-Lawsuit-) : “Columbia, SC (WLTX, AP) - A panel of federal judges
threw out a lawsuit dealing with primary ballots sent overseas.”
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=34238&title=“Judges%20Throw%20Out%20Election%20Lawsuit%20“&description=)
Posted in _Uncategorized_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1) | Comments
Off
_Read the Don Siegelman Reply to Cert Petition Opposition_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=34234)
Posted on _May 14, 2012 11:29 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=34234)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
_Here_ (http://electionlawblog.org/wp-content/uploads/siegelman-reply.pdf)
. My earlier coverage is _here_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?s=siegelman)
.
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=34234&title=Read%20the%20Don%20Siegelman%20Reply%20to%20Cert%20Petition%20Opposit
ion&description=)
Posted in _bribery_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=54) , _chicanery_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=12) , _Department of Justice_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=26) | Comments Off
_“How Justice Souter Almost Left the Supreme Court in a Blaze of Glory”_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=34231)
Posted on _May 14, 2012 11:17 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=34231)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
The Atlantic Wire _reports_
(http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2012/05/how-justice-souter-almost-left-supreme-court-blaze-glory/52300/) .
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=34231&title=“
How%20Justice%20Souter%20Almost%20Left%20the%20Supreme%20Court%20in%20a%20Blaze%20of%20Glory”&description=)
Posted in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10) |
Comments Off
_“Sen. Alexander’s Solution: Throw Gas on the Fire”_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=34229)
Posted on _May 14, 2012 11:15 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=34229)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
_Meredith McGehee_
(http://www.clcblog.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=455:sen-alexanders-solution-throw-gas-on-the-fire) : “
Recently, Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) proposed eliminating limits on
contributions to political candidates as the solution to the current campaign finance
mess. He says unlimited contributions to candidates won’t further empower
the wealthy; they will just create more political speech. And he said this
with a straight face!”
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=34229&title=“Sen.%20Alexander’s%20Solution:%20Throw%20Gas%20on%20the%20Fire”
&description=)
Posted in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10) |
Comments Off
_“In new TV ad, Sherman tries to differentiate himself from Berman”_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=34226)
Posted on _May 14, 2012 11:12 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=34226)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
The Jewish Journal _reports_
(http://www.jewishjournal.com/berman_v_sherman/item/in_new_tv_ad_sherman_tries_to_differentiate_himself_from_berman_2012051
4/) .
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=34226&title=“
In%20new%20TV%20ad,%20Sherman%20tries%20to%20differentiate%20himself%20from%20Berman”&description=)
Posted in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10) ,
_campaigns_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59) | Comments Off
_Save July 17 for 2d Annual Supreme Court Term in Review Event at UCI Law_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=34223)
Posted on _May 14, 2012 10:17 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=34223)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
_Second Annual Supreme Court Term in Review Program_
(http://www.law.uci.edu/supreme_court_term_review_2012.html)
Tuesday, July 17, 2012
12:00 – 1:30 P.M.
University of California, Irvine School of Law _(Map)_
(http://law.uci.edu/directions.html)
This exciting and entertaining program reviews the Supreme Court’s key
cases decided in the Fall 2011 term, with an all-star panel of Supreme Court
journalists and academics. Panelists
* _Jess Bravin_ (http://blogs.wsj.com/law/jess-bravin/) , The Wall
Street Journal
* _Jennifer Chacón_
(http://www.law.uci.edu/faculty/page1_j_chacon.html) , UCI Law
* _Erwin Chemerinsky_
(http://www.law.uci.edu/faculty/page1_e_chemerinsky.html) , UCI Law
* _Marcia Coyle_
(http://www.law.uci.edu/calendar/Marcia_Coyle_bio.pdf) , The National Law Journal
* _Robert Pushaw_
(http://law.pepperdine.edu/academics/faculty/default.php?faculty=robert_pushaw) , Pepperdine University School of Law
* Moderated by _Rick Hasen_
(http://www.law.uci.edu/faculty/page1_r_hasen.html) , UCI Law
This program is free and open to the public, but please _RSVP online_
(https://ucisl.ejoinme.org/MyEvents/2012SupremeCourtTerminReview/tabid/367315/Defa
ult.aspx) , as space is limited.
CLE credit will be available. The event will also be webcast, with viewers
able to submit questions via Twitter, using the hash tag #ucilawscotus at
the end of your question.
Watch the_ Video of last year’s program_
(http://ocw.uci.edu/lectures/Lecture.aspx?id=677) featuring Chemerinsky, Eastman, Levenson, Lithwick, and
Savage.
Should be a great one this year too!
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=34223&title=Save%20July%2017%20for%202d%20Annual%20Supreme%20Court%20Term%20in%20
Review%20Event%20at%20UCI%20Law&description=)
Posted in _Supreme Court_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29) | Comments
Off
_“Court turns away PR congressional vote lawsuit”_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=34221)
Posted on _May 14, 2012 10:14 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=34221)
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
AP _reports_
(http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_SUPREME_COURT_PUERTO_RICO_VOTING?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT) .
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=34221&title=“Court%20turns%20away%20PR%20congressional%20vote%20lawsuit”
&description=)
Posted in _legislation and legislatures_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=27) , _voting_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=31) | Comments Off
_“In Florida, Registering Voters A Whole New Game”_
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=34218)
Posted on _May 14, 2012 9:29 am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=34218) by
_Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)
NPR _reports_
(http://www.npr.org/2012/05/14/152517589/in-florida-registering-voters-a-whole-new-game) .
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=34218&title=“In%20Florida,%20Registering%20Voters%20A%20Whole%20New%20Game”
&description=)
Posted in _election administration_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18) ,
_The Voting Wars_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60) , _voter
registration_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=37) | Comments Off
--
Rick Hasen
Chancellor's Professor of Law and Political Science
UC Irvine School of Law
401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000
Irvine, CA 92697-8000
949.824.3072 - office
949.824.0495 - fax
_rhasen at law.uci.edu_ (mailto:rhasen at law.uci.edu)
_http://law.uci.edu/faculty/page1_r_hasen.html_
(http://law.uci.edu/faculty/page1_r_hasen.html)
_http://electionlawblog.org_ (http://electionlawblog.org/)
_______________________________________________
Law-election mailing list
Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120515/6df8f06c/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120515/6df8f06c/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120515/6df8f06c/attachment-0001.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120515/6df8f06c/attachment-0002.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120515/6df8f06c/attachment-0003.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120515/6df8f06c/attachment-0004.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120515/6df8f06c/attachment-0005.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120515/6df8f06c/attachment-0006.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120515/6df8f06c/attachment-0007.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120515/6df8f06c/attachment-0008.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120515/6df8f06c/attachment-0009.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120515/6df8f06c/attachment-0010.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120515/6df8f06c/attachment-0011.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120515/6df8f06c/attachment-0012.bin>
View list directory