[EL] SCOTUS grants cert in Arizona's proof of citizenship case

Mon Oct 15 07:48:38 PDT 2012

That's right, Ned -- only the question of whether the NVRA preempts the
registration requirement.  Question presented:

(1) Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in creating a new, heightened
preemption test under Article I, Section 4, Clause 1 of the U.S.
Constitution (“the Elections Clause”) that is contrary to the Supreme
Court’s authority and conflicts with other circuit court decisions; and (2)
whether the Ninth Circuit erred in holding that under that test the
National Voter Registration Act preempts an Arizona law that requests
persons who are registering to vote to show evidence that they are eligible
to vote.

Here's the DOJ Brief in the CTA9, arguing in favor of preemption:

*http://tinyurl.com/8fgbptd*

On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Foley, Edward <foley.33 at osu.edu> wrote:

>  SCOTUSblog is reporting that the Court granted cert in this case:
> http://moritzlaw.osu.edu/electionlaw/litigation/gonzalez.php (if anyone
> is looking for the most recent Ninth Circuit documents in this case that’s
> been around for a long while, they are towards the top, and here’s the link
> to the Ninth Circuit’s en banc opinion:
> http://moritzlaw.osu.edu/electionlaw/litigation/documents/opinion_002.pdf)
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> SCOTUSblog has the cert stage briefs in the Supreme Court:
> http://www.scotusblog.com/2012/10/petitions-to-watch-conference-of-october-12-2012/ (We’ll be adding those to the EL at Mpage as soon as we get a chance.)
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> It looks to me like the only part of the case on which cert has been
> granted concern’s Arizona’s proof of citizenship requirement at time of
> registration, and not the other portion of the case—which concerned
> Arizona’s version of a polling place voter ID law.  If this is an incorrect
> understanding of the cert grant, please let me know. ****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks, Ned****
>
> ** **
>
> Edward B. Foley****
>
> Director, *Election Law @ Moritz*****
>
> Chief Justice Thomas J. Moyer Professor for the Administration of Justice
> and the Rule of Law****
>
> ** **
>
> The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law****
>
> (614) 292-4288; foley.33 at osu.edu****
>
> Website: www.electionlaw.osu.edu ****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu [mailto:
> law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu] *On Behalf Of *Rick Hasen
> *Sent:* Saturday, October 13, 2012 11:51 PM
> *To:* law-election at UCI.edu
> *Subject:* [EL] ELB News and Commentary 10/14/12****
>
> ** **
>  Ohio Files SCOTUS Reply Brief in Ohio Early Voting Case, Skirting Bush
> v. Gore <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=41643> ****
>
> Posted on October 13, 2012 8:48 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=41643>
> by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3> ****
>
> You can find the brief here<http://sblog.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/12A338-Ohio-reply-brief-10-13-12.pdf>(via
> SCOTUSBlog <http://www.scotusblog.com/2012/10/last-weekend-voting-urged/>).
> Yesterday I wrote <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=41599> about how the
> Obama campaign brief relied upon equal protection principles from Bush v.
> Gore.  Here is the response of the state:****
>
> Respondents’ attempt to avoid this problem by analogizing to Bush v. Gore,
> 531 U.S. 98 (2000), and Dunn v. Blumstein, 405 U.S. 330 (1972), also fails.
> Opp. 24. Those cases triggered heightened scrutiny because they did involve
> disenfranchisement. In Bush, the varying vote counting standards had “led
> to unequal evaluation of ballots in various respects.” 531 U.S. at 106
> (emphasis added). Likewise, the Tennessee residency standard in Dunn
> “completely bar[red] from voting all residents not meeting the fixed
> durational standards,” thus “denying some citizens the right to vote” for
> illegitimate reasons. 405 U.S. at 336. Both cases, then, fundamentally
> interfered with the right to vote either by failing to count a lawfully
> cast ballot or by refusing to allow an eligible voter to cast one in the
> first place. Neither circumstance is present here. Stay App. 24-27.****
>
> How odd to characterize Bush v. Gore as a case in which the state
> “fail[ed] to count a lawfully cast ballot.”****
>
> The brief does not otherwise grapple with the “arbitrary and disparate
> treatment” language of Bush v. Gore, which is the key to the Obama
> campaign’s argument.****
>
> [image: Share]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D41643&title=Ohio%20Files%20SCOTUS%20Reply%20Brief%20in%20Ohio%20Early%20Voting%20Case%2C%20Skirting%20Bush%20v.%20Gore&description=>
> ****
>
> Posted in election administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>, The
> Voting Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>, voting<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=31>
> | Comments Off ****
>   “Fired RNC consultant preps get-out-the-vote campaign”<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=41641>
> ****
>
> Posted on October 13, 2012 8:37 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=41641>
> by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3> ****
>
> LA Times:<http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-fired-rnc-consultant-canvassing-campaign-20121012,0,2171682.story>“The political consultant fired by the Republican National Committee amid
> fraud allegations in Florida is now hiring workers for a voter canvassing
> operation this fall in as many as 30 states, his spokesman said. Nathan
> Sproul, whose career as a GOP<http://www.latimes.com/topic/politics/parties-movements/republican-party-ORGOV0000004.topic>get-out-the-vote consultant has been dogged by reports of fraudulent
> registrations, has been advertising for $15-an-hour workers for
> ‘conservative voter identification’ in Virginia, Wisconsin and Iowa.”****
>
> [image: Share]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D41641&title=%E2%80%9CFired%20RNC%20consultant%20preps%20get-out-the-vote%20campaign%E2%80%9D&description=>
> ****
>
> Posted in campaigns <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>, chicanery<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=12>,
> voter registration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=37>, voting<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=31>
> | Comments Off ****
>   “Prop. 30 inspires voter registration drives aimed at students”<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=41638>
> ****
>
> Posted on October 13, 2012 8:31 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=41638>
> by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3> ****
>
> The LA Times reports<http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-students-vote-20121014,0,1522296.story>,
> with the subhead: “Gov. Jerry Brown’s tax hike measure is being touted as
> the only way to avoid tuition increases this year at California’s public
> universities. Some predict a higher-than-usual turnout.”****
>
> [image: Share]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D41638&title=%E2%80%9CProp.%2030%20inspires%20voter%20registration%20drives%20aimed%20at%20students%E2%80%9D&description=>
> ****
>
> Posted in campaigns <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>, voter
> registration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=37>, voting<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=31>
> | Comments Off ****
>   Arizona Presidential Poll Has Two Minor Party Presidential Candidates
> Totaling 5% Support, More than Double the Difference Between Obama and
> Romney <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=41635> ****
>
> Posted on October 13, 2012 8:29 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=41635>
> by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3> ****
>
> We will see if this will hold.<http://www.scribd.com/doc/109920743/RMP-2012-III-01>
> ****
>
> [image: Share]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D41635&title=Arizona%20Presidential%20Poll%20Has%20Two%20Minor%20Party%20Presidential%20Candidates%20Totaling%205%25%20Support%2C%20More%20than%20Double%20the%20Difference%20Between%20Obama%20and%20Romney&descr>
> ****
>
> Posted in third parties <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=47> | Comments
> Off ****
>   “Absentee ballots: easy to cast, open to fraud”<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=41632>
> ****
>
> Posted on October 13, 2012 8:24 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=41632>
> by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3> ****
>
> Extensive Miami Herald report:<http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/10/13/3047408/absentee-ballots-easy-to-cast.html>
> ****
>
> “Absentee ballots seem to be prone to manipulation,” said Joe Centorino,
> director of Miami-Dade’s Ethics Commission and a former assistant state
> attorney who prosecuted several vote-fraud cases stemming from Miami’s
> tainted 1997 mayoral election. “Once those ballots go out, there’s no more
> control.”****
>
> But despite the recurring fraud problems, state lawmakers have repeatedly
> loosened the state’s absentee voting rules, making it easier to vote from
> home — while also making vote fraud harder to detect, critics say.****
>
> At the same time, the state has increased scrutiny of in-person voters by
> requiring those voters to provide photo ID at the polling place — a burden
> that absentee voters don’t have to bear.****
>
> “It is clearly easier to vote, with less obstacles, absentee than in
> person at the polls. And there’s more room for shenanigans,” said Murray
> Greenberg, the former Miami-Dade County Attorney who now teaches election
> law at the Florida International University College of Law.****
>
> In recent years, the Republican Party of Florida has aggressively promoted
> high absentee turnout among GOP voters. Republicans have dominated the
> Legislature as it has loosened absentee voting rules and cut the number of
> days for early voting, which tends to favor Democrats.****
>
>  [image: Share]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D41632&title=%E2%80%9CAbsentee%20ballots%3A%20easy%20to%20cast%2C%20open%20to%20fraud%E2%80%9D&description=>
> ****
>
> Posted in absentee ballots <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=53> | Comments
> Off ****
>   “Voter Registration Rolls in 2 States Are Called Vulnerable to Hackers”<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=41628>
> ****
>
> Posted on October 13, 2012 8:19 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=41628>
> by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3> ****
>
> NYT:
> <http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/13/us/politics/cracks-in-maryland-and-washington-voter-databases.html?ref=politics>“Computer
> security experts have identified vulnerabilities in the voter registration
> databases in two states, raising concerns about the ability of hackers and
> others to disenfranchise voters.”****
>
> “They could influence an election with 20,000 votes for less than a penny
> a head,” said J. Alex Halderman, one of the computer scientists who first
> discovered Washington’s loophole. “That would be a great return on
> investment for them.”****
>
> [image: Share]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D41628&title=%E2%80%9CVoter%20Registration%20Rolls%20in%202%20States%20Are%20Called%20Vulnerable%20to%20Hackers%E2%80%9D&description=>
> ****
>
> Posted in voting technology <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=40> | Comments
> Off ****
>   “Colleges Take a Leap Into Voter Registration”<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=41626>
> ****
>
> Posted on October 13, 2012 8:15 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=41626>
> by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3> ****
>
> NYT reports<http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/14/us/politics/more-colleges-take-a-leap-into-voter-registration.html?ref=politics>
> .****
>
> [image: Share]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D41626&title=%E2%80%9CColleges%20Take%20a%20Leap%20Into%20Voter%20Registration%E2%80%9D&description=>
> ****
>
> Posted in voter registration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=37> | Comments
> Off ****
>   “Campaigns Mine Personal Lives to Get Out Vote”<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=41624>
> ****
>
> Posted on October 13, 2012 8:14 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=41624>
> by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3> ****
>
> NYT<http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/14/us/politics/campaigns-mine-personal-lives-to-get-out-vote.html?pagewanted=1&ref=politics>:
> “In the weeks before Election Day, millions of voters will hear from
> callers with surprisingly detailed knowledge of their lives. These callers
> — friends of friends or long-lost work colleagues — will identify
> themselves as volunteers for the campaigns or independent political groups.
> The callers will be guided by scripts and call lists compiled by people —
> or computers — with access to details like whether voters may have visited
> pornography Web sites, have homes in foreclosure, are more prone to drink
> Michelob Ultra than Corona or have gay friends or enjoy expensive
> vacations.”****
>
> More: “The campaigns’ consultants have run experiments to determine if
> embarrassing someone for not voting by sending letters to their neighbors
> or posting their voting histories online is effective. “I’ve had
> half-a-dozen conversations with third parties who are wondering if this is
> the year to start shaming,” said one consultant who works closely with
> Democratic organizations. ‘Obama can’t do it. But the ‘super PACs<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/c/campaign_finance/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier>’
> are anonymous. They don’t have to put anything on the flier to let the
> voter know who to blame.’”****
>
> [image: Share]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D41624&title=%E2%80%9CCampaigns%20Mine%20Personal%20Lives%20to%20Get%20Out%20Vote%E2%80%9D&description=>
> ****
>
> Posted in campaigns <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>, voting<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=31>
> | Comments Off ****
>   “Obama campaign says it surpasses 4 million donors”<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=41621>
> ****
>
> Posted on October 13, 2012 8:06 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=41621>
> by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3> ****
>
> AP reports<http://bigstory.ap.org/article/obama-campaign-says-it-surpasses-4-million-donors#overlay-context=users/rjagodzinski>
> .****
>
> [image: Share]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D41621&title=%E2%80%9CObama%20campaign%20says%20it%20surpasses%204%20million%20donors%E2%80%9D&description=>
> ****
>
> Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>, campaigns<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>
> | Comments Off ****
>   “Romney tries to bury Obama in ads”<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=41618>
> ****
>
> Posted on October 13, 2012 8:03 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=41618>
> by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3> ****
>
> WaPo reports.<http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/decision2012/romney-tries-to-bury-obama-in-ads/2012/10/12/b7712fdc-13c9-11e2-ba83-a7a396e6b2a7_story.html>
> ****
>
> [image: Share]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D41618&title=%E2%80%9CRomney%20tries%20to%20bury%20Obama%20in%20ads%E2%80%9D&description=>
> ****
>
> Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>, campaigns<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>
> | Comments Off ****
>   “Vendors finesse law barring ‘coordination’ by campaigns, independent
> groups” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=41615> ****
>
> Posted on October 13, 2012 8:01 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=41615>
> by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3> ****
>
> Important *WaPo* report:
> <http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/vendors-finesse-law-barring-coordination-by-campaigns-independent-groups/2012/10/13/69dcb848-f6d9-11e1-8398-0327ab83ab91_story.html>“Mitt
> Romney’s presidential campaign and American Crossroads, an allied interest
> group, are barred by federal law from working together on political
> advertising. But it’s perfectly legal for them to hire the same company to
> run Internet ads. That company uses some of the same employees to represent
> the two clients, and the same databases to store information on people it
> will target with ads.”****
>
> [image: Share]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D41615&title=%E2%80%9CVendors%20finesse%20law%20barring%20%E2%80%98coordination%E2%80%99%20by%20campaigns%2C%20independent%20groups%E2%80%9D&description=>
> ****
>
> Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10> | Comments
> Off ****
>   “Ohio voting dispute makes its way to the Supreme Court”<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=41613>
> ****
>
> Posted on October 13, 2012 7:59 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=41613>
> by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3> ****
>
> WaPo reports<http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/decision2012/ohio-voting-dispute-makes-its-way-to-the-supreme-court/2012/10/13/e197333c-1541-11e2-be82-c3411b7680a9_story.html>
> .****
>
> [image: Share]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D41613&title=%E2%80%9COhio%20voting%20dispute%20makes%20its%20way%20to%20the%20Supreme%20Court%E2%80%9D&description=>
> ****
>
> Posted in election administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>, The
> Voting Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>, voting<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=31>
> | Comments Off ****
>   “Polls, lies and ‘the prediction business’”<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=41610>
> ****
>
> Posted on October 13, 2012 7:45 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=41610>
> by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3> ****
>
> CNN reports<http://edition.cnn.com/2012/10/13/living/polls-uncertainty/index.html?eref=edition>
> .****
>
> [image: Share]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D41610&title=%E2%80%9CPolls%2C%20lies%20and%20%E2%80%98the%20prediction%20business%E2%80%99%E2%80%9D&description=>
> ****
>
> Posted in campaigns <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59> | Comments Off **
> **
>   “Early Voting Rising” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=41607> ****
>
> Posted on October 12, 2012 6:28 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=41607>
> by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3> ****
>
> Michael McDonald blogs<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-p-mcdonald/early-voting-rising_b_1962843.html>
> .****
>
> [image: Share]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D41607&title=%E2%80%9CEarly%20Voting%20Rising%E2%80%9D&description=>
> ****
>
> Posted in Uncategorized <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1> | Comments Off
> ****
>   “Democrats cry foul over voter fraud billboards in Midwestern cities”<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=41604>
> ****
>
> Posted on October 12, 2012 6:06 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=41604>
> by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3> ****
>
> Reuters reports<http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/sns-rt-us-usa-campaign-billboardsbre89c00i-20121012,0,690706.story>
> .****
>
> [image: Share]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D41604&title=%E2%80%9CDemocrats%20cry%20foul%20over%20voter%20fraud%20billboards%20in%20Midwestern%20cities%E2%80%9D&description=>
> ****
>
> Posted in campaigns <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>, The Voting Wars<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>
> | Comments Off ****
>   Emory “Judging Politics” Symposium <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=41602>
> ****
>
> Posted on October 12, 2012 6:05 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=41602>
> by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3> ****
>
> *61 EMORY LAW JOURNAL, NO. 4, PP. 641-944, 2012. * ****
>
> The 2011 Randolph W. Thrower Symposium. Judging Politics: Judges as
> Political Actors, Candidates, and Arbiters of the Political. 61 Emory L.J.
> 641-861 (2012). [H<http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/OneBoxCitation?cit_string=61%20Emory%20L.J.%20641&collection=journals&base=js>
> ][L<http://www.lexis.com/xlink?showcidslinks=on&ORIGINATION_CODE=00142&searchtype=get&search=61%20Emory%20L.J.%20641>
> ][W<http://www.westlaw.com/find/default.asp?cite=61+Emory+L.J.+641&RS=WLW2.05&VR=1.0>
> ]****
>
> Fried, Charles. Balls and strikes. 61 Emory L.J. 641-662 (2012). [H<http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/OneBoxCitation?cit_string=61%20Emory%20L.J.%20641&collection=journals&base=js>
> ][L<http://www.lexis.com/xlink?showcidslinks=on&ORIGINATION_CODE=00142&searchtype=get&search=61%20Emory%20L.J.%20641>
> ][W<http://www.westlaw.com/find/default.asp?cite=61+Emory+L.J.+641&RS=WLW2.05&VR=1.0>
> ]****
>
> NeJaime, Douglas. The legal mobilization dilemma. 61 Emory L.J. 663-736
> (2012). [H<http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/OneBoxCitation?cit_string=61%20Emory%20L.J.%20663&collection=journals&base=js>
> ][L<http://www.lexis.com/xlink?showcidslinks=on&ORIGINATION_CODE=00142&searchtype=get&search=61%20Emory%20L.J.%20663>
> ][W<http://www.westlaw.com/find/default.asp?cite=61+Emory+L.J.+663&RS=WLW2.05&VR=1.0>
> ]****
>
> Epstein, Lee and Andrew D. Martin. Is the Roberts Court especially
> activist? A study of invalidating (and upholding) federal, state, and local
> laws. 61 Emory L.J. 737-758 (2012). [H<http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/OneBoxCitation?cit_string=61%20Emory%20L.J.%20737&collection=journals&base=js>
> ][L<http://www.lexis.com/xlink?showcidslinks=on&ORIGINATION_CODE=00142&searchtype=get&search=61%20Emory%20L.J.%20737>
> ][W<http://www.westlaw.com/find/default.asp?cite=61+Emory+L.J.+737&RS=WLW2.05&VR=1.0>
> ]****
>
> Tamanaha, Brian Z. The several meanings of “politics” in judicial politics
> studies: why “ideological influence” is not “partisanship.” 61 Emory L.J.
> 759-778 (2012). [H<http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/OneBoxCitation?cit_string=61%20Emory%20L.J.%20759&collection=journals&base=js>
> ][L<http://www.lexis.com/xlink?showcidslinks=on&ORIGINATION_CODE=00142&searchtype=get&search=61%20Emory%20L.J.%20759>
> ][W<http://www.westlaw.com/find/default.asp?cite=61+Emory+L.J.+759&RS=WLW2.05&VR=1.0>
> ]****
>
> Hasen, Richard L. Anticipatory overrulings, invitations, time bombs, and
> inadvertence: how Supreme Court justices move the law. 61 Emory L.J.
> 779-799 (2012). [H<http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/OneBoxCitation?cit_string=61%20Emory%20L.J.%20779&collection=journals&base=js>
> ][L<http://www.lexis.com/xlink?showcidslinks=on&ORIGINATION_CODE=00142&searchtype=get&search=61%20Emory%20L.J.%20779>
> ][W<http://www.westlaw.com/find/default.asp?cite=61+Emory+L.J.+779&RS=WLW2.05&VR=1.0>
> ]****
>
> Charles, Guy-Uriel, Daniel L. Chen and Mitu Gulati. Sonia Sotomayor and
> the construction of merit. 61 Emory L.J. 801-861 (2012). [H<http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/OneBoxCitation?cit_string=61%20Emory%20L.J.%20801&collection=journals&base=js>
> ][L<http://www.lexis.com/xlink?showcidslinks=on&ORIGINATION_CODE=00142&searchtype=get&search=61%20Emory%20L.J.%20801>
> ][W<http://www.westlaw.com/find/default.asp?cite=61+Emory+L.J.+801&RS=WLW2.05&VR=1.0>
> ]****
>
> Saidman, Benjamin A. Comment. Designing around a patent injunction:
> developing a comprehensive framework for determining when contempt
> proceedings are appropriate. 61 Emory L.J. 863-902 (2012). [H<http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/OneBoxCitation?cit_string=61%20Emory%20L.J.%20863&collection=journals&base=js>
> ][L<http://www.lexis.com/xlink?showcidslinks=on&ORIGINATION_CODE=00142&searchtype=get&search=61%20Emory%20L.J.%20863>
> ][W<http://www.westlaw.com/find/default.asp?cite=61+Emory+L.J.+863&RS=WLW2.05&VR=1.0>
> ]****
>
> Sharpes, Dustin. Comment. Reintroducing intent into predatory pricing law.
> 61 Emory L.J. 903-943 (2012). [H<http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/OneBoxCitation?cit_string=61%20Emory%20L.J.%20903&collection=journals&base=js>
> ][L<http://www.lexis.com/xlink?showcidslinks=on&ORIGINATION_CODE=00142&searchtype=get&search=61%20Emory%20L.J.%20903>
> ][W<http://www.westlaw.com/find/default.asp?cite=61+Emory+L.J.+903&RS=WLW2.05&VR=1.0>
> ]****
>
> [image: Share]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D41602&title=Emory%20%E2%80%9CJudging%20Politics%E2%80%9D%20Symposium&description=>
> ****
>
> Posted in Uncategorized <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1> | Comments Off
> ****
>
> -- ****
>
> Rick Hasen****
>
> Chancellor's Professor of Law and Political Science****
>
> UC Irvine School of Law****
>
> 401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000****
>
> Irvine, CA 92697-8000****
>
> 949.824.3072 - office****
>
> 949.824.0495 - fax****
>
> rhasen at law.uci.edu****
>
> http://law.uci.edu/faculty/page1_r_hasen.html****
>
> http://electionlawblog.org****
>
> Now available: The Voting Wars: http://amzn.to/y22ZTv****
>
> ** **
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Law-election mailing list
> Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
> http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20121015/8d5b653f/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20121015/8d5b653f/attachment.png>