[EL] Does 269-269 worsen the faithless elector problem?

[Smith, Brad]

I’ve never quite understood why, if you favor the electoral college, there is any reason to worry about “faithless” electors. And given that there has never been a “faithless” elector that mattered (and little reason to think any “faithless” elector would have remained “faithless” if it had), I think there is even less reason to worry about it.

Bradley A. Smith
Josiah H. Blackmore II/Shirley M. Nault
  Professor of Law
Capital University Law School
303 East Broad Street
Columbus, OH 43215
(614) 236-6317
bsmith at law.capital.edu<mailto:bsmith at law.capital.edu>
http://www.law.capital.edu/faculty/bios/bsmith.asp

From: law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu [mailto:law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu] On Behalf Of JBoppjr at aol.com
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2012 12:02 PM
To: john at johnkoza.com; derek.muller at gmail.com; law-election at UCI.EDU
Subject: Re: [EL] Does 269-269 worsen the faithless elector problem?

Here is the Uniform Faithful Presidential Electors Act.

Click here: Faithful Presidential Electors Act<http://www.uniformlaws.org/Act.aspx?title=Faithful%20Presidential%20Electors%20Act>


I was on the Drafting Committee and I think it is an admirable bipartisan effort worthy of adoption. We ran it by the National Popular Vote people and this Uniform Law works even if that is adopted.

We believe it would fix the unfaithful elector problem as well as fix other potential problems such as vacancies, etc.

Thank you for recommending it, John  Jim Bopp

In a message dated 10/26/2012 11:43:42 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, john at johnkoza.com<mailto:john at johnkoza.com> writes:
State legislatures should give some attention to, and pass, the Uniform Law Commission’s “Uniform Faithful Presidential Electors Act.”  The Act has several of the features of North Carolina’s current law. The Act provides a statutory remedy in the event a presidential elector fails to vote in accordance with the voters of his or her state. The Act has a state-administered pledge of faithfulness, with any attempt by an elector to submit a vote in violation of that pledge, effectively constituting resignation from the office of elector. The proposed uniform law calls for the election of both electors and alternate electors. The Act provides a mechanism for filling a vacancy created for that reason or any other.


Dr. John R. Koza
Box 1441
Los Altos Hills, California 94023 USA
Phone: 650-941-0336
Fax: 650-941-9430
Email: john at johnkoza.com<mailto:john at johnkoza.com>
URL: www.johnkoza.com<http://www.johnkoza.com/>
URL: www.NationalPopularVote.com<http://www.nationalpopularvote.com/>

From: Derek Muller [mailto:derek.muller at gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 5:15 PM
To: Election Law
Subject: [EL] Does 269-269 worsen the faithless elector problem?

Dear all,

Perhaps one of you knows the answer to this problem. If the electoral vote is tied at 269, the race is thrown to the House of Representatives, where, it is assumed, Mitt Romney would win.

But, I imagine that there would be a significant amount of canvassing of Mr. Romney's electors by Barack Obama's team in an attempt to win over just one of those electors and break the tie. After all, we would likely know most of the electors shortly after November 6, but the electors would not cast ballots until December 17.

Additionally, the contingent election in the 12th Amendment allows for the top three electoral vote-getters to be voted on in the House. If it's 269-269, isn't there a great incentive for, say, one of Mr. Obama's electors to vote for Jill Stein, or one of Mr. Romney's electors to vote for Gary Johnson or Ron Paul? Then, we might have an even more absurd contingent election: 269 electoral votes for Mr. Obama; 268 electoral votes for Mitt Romney; 1 vote for Ron Paul; top three thrown into the House. (Which adds an additional problem: what if there are several candidates who each receive a single castaway electoral vote? Who wins the coveted third slot before the House if Ms. Stein, Mr. Johnson, and Mr. Paul all receive 1 electoral vote?)

Best,

Derek

Derek T. Muller
Associate Professor of Law
Pepperdine University School of Law
24255 Pacific Coast Hwy.
Malibu, CA 90263
+1 310-506-7058
SSRN Author Page: http://ssrn.com/author=464341


_______________________________________________
Law-election mailing list
Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu<mailto:Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu>
http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20121026/6076af0d/attachment.html>