[EL] Nothing unusual here?

[Rich,William D]

The story fails to distinguish between an interpreter appointed by the board of elections and a person of the voter's choosing who is assisting the voter.  Official interpreters, who are appointed by the board of elections, may provide to voters only the kind of assistance that may be provided by the poll workers.  A person of the voter's choosing is not so constrained.  It's not clear from the story whether the "Democratic interpreters" were official interpreters appointed by the board of elections or merely persons of the voters' choosing who were assisting the voter.

Bill Rich

Prof. William D. Rich
Univ. of Akron School of Law
Akron, OH 44325-2901


Sent from my iPad

On Oct 27, 2012, at 1:09 PM, "Steve Hoersting" <hoersting at gmail.com<mailto:hoersting at gmail.com>> wrote:

http://www.humanevents.com/2012/10/26/is-voter-fraud-being-committed-in-ohio/

--
Stephen M. Hoersting

_______________________________________________
Law-election mailing list
Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu<mailto:Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu>
http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20121027/d4a48571/attachment.html>