[EL] The Alderman Convinced Them - Did Chick-fil-A Need Socialist Workers?

[Jeff Hauser]

Jim, do you think employers (a) currently have or do not have the ability
to fire workers for political opinions, and if you think they do, (b) what
do you do to try to protect workers' speech rights? cf.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/susanadams/2012/09/04/talking-politics-at-work-can-get-you-fired/

On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 3:19 PM, <JBoppjr at aol.com> wrote:

> **
> Since we have been told authoritatively that harassment and retribution
> against people for their political speech does not exist, then this does
> not exist.  Back to the reeducation camp for you, Steve.  Jim
> Bopp
>
>  In a message dated 9/20/2012 1:46:27 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
> hoersting at gmail.com writes:
>
> So, the Alderman Joe Moreno convinced Chick-fil-A to reverse its position
> on political donations. Moreno is, as the article puts it, "the Chicago
> politician who had been blocking the company's move there."
>
>
> http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/sep/19/chick-fil-a-no-longer-will-fund-traditional-marria/
>
>
> Nothing to see here.... It's still *all upside* to shining the proverbial
> light on "dark money." Bring on the DISCLOSE Act, version 3.0.
>
> --
> Stephen M. Hoersting
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Law-election mailing list
> Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
> http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Law-election mailing list
> Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
> http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120920/89d0ee0d/attachment.html>