[EL] query

[Steve Hoersting]

Professor:

I know of no such cases. But they would be covered by the reasoning of *
Bluman,* which did not turn on direct candidate contact vs. independence,
but rather on who is included in the crucible that is American politics
(and who is not).

- Steve

On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Frank Askin <faskin at kinoy.rutgers.edu>wrote:

> Now that the Supreme Court (in Baumin) has upheld the prohibition of
> direct contributions by foreign nationals, is there any litigation over
> independent expenditures by them?  See
> 110.20(f) and 2 USC 441(e).   FRANK
>
>
> Prof. Frank Askin
> Distinguished Professor of Law       and Director
> Constitutional Litigation Clinic
> Rutgers Law School/Newark
> (973) 353-5687
> _______________________________________________
> Law-election mailing list
> Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
> http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
>



-- 
Stephen M. Hoersting
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120925/981a5869/attachment.html>