[EL] Check out N.Y. Lawmakers Charged in Plot to Buy Spot on Mayoral B...
John Tanner
john.k.tanner at gmail.com
Thu Apr 4 06:15:31 PDT 2013
It is more likely that absent fusion voting, voters would have abandoned
the liberal and conservative parties. As one example, a 1976 law banning
fusion voting in Alabama led directly to the demise of the Alabama Freedom
Democratic Party: the national and state Democratic nominees could no
longer be on their ticket
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Goldfeder, Jerry H.
<jgoldfeder at stroock.com>wrote:
> While Richard makes an excellent point, there is the positive side to
> fusion voting in New York: without it, John Kennedy would not have carried
> New York in 1960, for example. ****
>
> ** **
>
> Jerry H. Goldfeder****
>
> Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP****
>
> 180 Maiden Lane****
>
> New York, NY 10038****
>
> 212-806-5857****
>
> 917-680-3132****
>
> jgoldfeder at stroock.com****
>
> www.stroock.com/goldfeder ****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu [mailto:
> law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu] *On Behalf Of *Richard
> Winger
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 03, 2013 7:25 PM
> *To:* Trevor Potter; Ben Adler
> *Cc:* JBoppjr at aol.com; Kevin.Greenberg at flastergreenberg.com; Election law
> list
> *Subject:* Re: [EL] Check out N.Y. Lawmakers Charged in Plot to Buy Spot
> onMayoral B...****
>
> ** **
>
> I haven't read all the e-mails in this thread, so perhaps I missed
> something, but as far as I know, no one in this discussion has criticized
> the New York election law called Wilson-Pakula, and that law ought to be
> criticized, because it is the real cause of this scandal.
>
> When a state like New York permits fusion, then that state ought to let
> any candidate run in any party's primary, without the need for the
> candidate to beg permission from a handful of party officials. The only
> reason the Wilson-Pakula law of 1947 was passed, as many other news sources
> have noted, was that Congressman Vito Marcantonio could not be defeated for
> Congress without the ability to keep him out of the Democratic and
> Republican primaries. And even after the law went into effect in 1948 and
> kept him out of those primaries, he still got re-elected in November solely
> on the American Party line. It is time to repeal the law. Repealing the
> law would also decrease the tiny handful of people in New York state who
> control the Independence Party nominations process.
>
> Richard Winger
> 415-922-9779
> PO Box 470296, San Francisco Ca 94147****
>
> ** **
>
> ------------------------------
> IRS Circular 230
> Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS in
> Circular 230, we inform you that any tax advice contained in this
> communication (including any attachment that does not explicitly state
> otherwise) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for
> the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or
> (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction
> or matter addressed herein.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Law-election mailing list
> Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
> http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20130404/b3273b7d/attachment.html>
View list directory