[EL] "Citizens United poised to destroy judicial impartiality"
Adam Bonin
adam at boninlaw.com
Sat Aug 3 11:37:03 PDT 2013
Perhaps my favorite such example: $1.2M in corporate-funded ads aired in the
final week of Pennsylvania's 2007 election cycle encouraging voters to
"thank" Judge Maureen Lally-Green, who happened to be on the ballot for the
Supreme Court. (Pre-CU, and PA did not allow corporate contributions or
independent expenditures at the time.) Not only did efforts to enjoin the
ads fail (because the ads contained no express advocacy), but the
Commonwealth was ordered to reimburse the sponsor for its legal fees, and
the sponsor was not required to register as a political committee.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bnifj2A7Has
http://articles.philly.com/2008-05-07/news/24989915_1_corbett-spokesman-kevi
n-harley-ads-political-expenditures
Adam C. Bonin
The Law Office of Adam C. Bonin
1900 Market Street, 4th Floor
Philadelphia, PA 19103
(215) 864-8002 (w)
(215) 701-2321 (f)
(267) 242-5014 (c)
adam at boninlaw.com
http://www.boninlaw.com <http://www.boninlaw.com/>
From: law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu
[mailto:law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu] On Behalf Of Smith,
Brad
Sent: Saturday, August 03, 2013 2:19 PM
To: law-election at UCI.edu
Subject: Re: [EL] "Citizens United poised to destroy judicial impartiality"
What I always find odd when I read such commentary as that of Justice Nelson
(1st item below) is the sense that this is somehow new. Is Justice Nelson
unaware that prior to 2010 a majority of states, many of which have an
elected judiciary, allowed unlimited corporate expenditures? That even in
other states and federally, corporations could fund "issue ads," in some
states right up until the election, in a few only more than some days out?
I can understand arguments against Citizens United, and why people disagree
with the decision, but I am constantly baffled by what seems to be the sheer
unwillingness to consider the probable consequences of Citizens United in
light of the law prior to 2010.
Bradley A. Smith
Josiah H. Blackmore II/Shirley M. Nault
Professor of Law
Capital University Law School
303 E. Broad St.
Columbus, OH 43215
614.236.6317
http://law.capital.edu/faculty/bios/bsmith.aspx
_____
From: law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu
[law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu] on behalf of Rick Hasen
[rhasen at law.uci.edu]
Sent: Saturday, August 03, 2013 1:56 PM
To: law-election at UCI.edu
Subject: [EL] ELB News and Commentary 8/3/13
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53956> "Citizens United poised to destroy
judicial impartiality"
Posted on <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53956> August 3, 2013 10:50 am by
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Former Montana Supreme Court Justice James C. Nelson, Supreme who dissented
(and was ultimately vindicated) by the United States Supreme Court in ATP v.
Bullock, has written this oped f
<http://missoulian.com/news/opinion/columnists/citizens-united-poised-to-des
troy-judicial-impartiality/article_2d25e012-fab8-11e2-833b-001a4bcf887a.html
> or the Missoulian.
[A}ccording to the Supreme Court, while contributions directly to a
candidate breed corruption, corporate expenditures on behalf of a candidate
do not have any such corruptive effect.
For those living in a parallel universe that nuance may make sense, but, in
reality it is a dichotomy grounded in utter fiction. Worse, this canard
presents a clear and present danger for the majority of states, like
Montana, where voters elect their judges and justices. Citizens United
applies to judicial elections, too. Make no mistake; its effects will
dominate judicial elections.
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%
3Fp%3D53956&title=%E2%80%9CCitizens%20United%20poised%20to%20destroy%20judic
ial%20impartiality%E2%80%9D&description=> Share
Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10> , judicial
elections <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=19> | Comments Off
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53953> "D.C. group not happy with how
Indiana handling complaint"
Posted on <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53953> August 3, 2013 10:46 am by
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
TribStar
<http://tribstar.com/news/x1664876769/D-C-group-not-happy-with-how-Indiana-h
andling-complaint> : "The Washington D.C. watchdog group that accused Terre
Haute attorney Jim Bopp Jr. of improperly benefiting from a not-for-profit
organization has gotten its first official response to one of its complaints
- and it's not happy."
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%
3Fp%3D53953&title=%E2%80%9CD.C.%20group%20not%20happy%20with%20how%20Indiana
%20handling%20complaint%E2%80%9D&description=> Share
Posted in Uncategorized <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1> | Comments Off
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53950> "Congress: Divided, discourteous _
taking a break"
Posted on <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53950> August 3, 2013 10:43 am by
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
AP's David Espo
<http://bigstory.ap.org/article/congress-divided-discourteous-taking-break-0
> : "The accomplishments are few, the chaos plentiful in the 113th Congress,
a discourteous model of divided government now beginning a five-week break."
More:
Legislation linking interest rates on student loans to the marketplace
passed, and, too, a bill to strengthen the government's response to crimes
against women. Two more measures sent recovery funds to the victims of
Superstorm Sandy.
Among the 18 other measures signed into law so far: one named a new span
over the Mississippi River as the Stan Musial Veterans Memorial Bridge,
after the late baseball legend. Another renamed a section of the tax code
after former Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison of Texas.
A third clarified the size of metal blanks to be used by the Baseball Hall
of Fame in minting gold and silver commemoratives: a diameter of .85 inches
in the case of $5 gold coins, and 1.5 inches for $1 silvers.
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%
3Fp%3D53950&title=%E2%80%9CCongress%3A%20Divided%2C%20discourteous%20_%20tak
ing%20a%20break%E2%80%9D&description=> Share
Posted in legislation and legislatures <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=27>
, political parties <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=25> , political
polarization <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=68> | Comments Off
Slate Gabfest Tackles Holder <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53948> 's Voting
Rights Gambit
Posted on <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53948> August 3, 2013 10:40 am by
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Here
<http://www.slate.com/articles/podcasts/gabfest/2013/08/the_gabfest_bradley_
manning_s_verdict_texas_and_the_future_of_the_voting.html> .
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%
3Fp%3D53948&title=Slate%20Gabfest%20Tackles%20Holder%E2%80%99s%20Voting%20Ri
ghts%20Gambit&description=> Share
Posted in Voting Rights Act <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15> | Comments
Off
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53945> "Judging the (un)productivity of the
113th Congress"
Posted on <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53945> August 2, 2013 8:09 pm by
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
WaPo reports
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/08/02/judging-the-unpro
ductivity-of-the-113th-congress/> .
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%
3Fp%3D53945&title=%E2%80%9CJudging%20the%20%28un%29productivity%20of%20the%2
0113th%20Congress%E2%80%9D&description=> Share
Posted in legislation and legislatures <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=27>
, political parties <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=25> , political
polarization <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=68> | Comments Off
Two from CLC <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53942>
Posted on <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53942> August 2, 2013 1:28 pm by
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Reform Groups Urge FEC Chair to Buck Partisan Political Pressure to
Undermine Enforcement
<http://www.campaignlegalcenter.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=articl
e&id=2207:august-2-2013-reform-groups-urge-fec-chair-to-buck-partisan-politi
cal-pressure-to-undermine-enforcement-&catid=63:legal-center-press-releases&
Itemid=61>
and
Watchdogs Urge FEC to Reject Democratic
<http://www.campaignlegalcenter.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=articl
e&id=2208:august-2-2013-watchdogs-urge-fec-to-reject-democratic-a-republican
-parties-request-to-use-recount-funds-as-slush-funds&catid=63:legal-center-p
ress-releases&Itemid=61> & Republican Parties' Request to Use "Recount
Funds" as Slush Funds
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%
3Fp%3D53942&title=Two%20from%20CLC&description=> Share
Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10> | Comments
Off
Can Democracies Ban <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53915> "Anti-Democratic"
Political Parties?
Posted on <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53915> August 2, 2013 12:08 pm by
Richard Pildes <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=7>
Though this blog usually focuses only on U.S. issues, I wanted to flag a
story in today's Wall Street Journal that might provoke the interest of many
readers (since the WSJ is behind a paywall, see here
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/bangladesh-court-disqualif
ies-largest-islamic-party-from-election/2013/08/01/1a405bfa-fa93-11e2-89f7-8
599e3f77a67_story.html> ). In Bangladesh, a court has barred the country's
largest Islamist political party from participating in upcoming elections
later this year or early next. Although the party, Jamaat-e-Islam (JI), is
relatively small, it could well be the tipping force in the struggle for
control of the govern between the two major political parties; JI aligns
with the opposition.
The court banned JI on the ground that the party's charter acknowledges the
"absolute power" of God and does not acknowledge the sovereignty of the
people of Bangladesh. This judicial action is a timely illustration of two
central issues in the post-World War II struggles over what "democracy"
means and entails. The first is the idea of "militant democracy," which is
the view that democracies can and should be militant in taking measures to
ensure the continued democratic nature of the state and to ban or contain
anti-democratic forces, including political parties. Though coined in 1937
by Karl Loewenstein, the idea caught on powerfully in Europe in the
aftermath of WWII. The second issue this recent court decision raises, of
course, is what role religiously-based political parties should be permitted
to play in democracies - an issue particularly acute right now in working
out the appropriate relationship between Islam and democracy, surely among
the most significant political issues of our era. The decision sounds
similar to earlier decisions of the Turkish Constitutional Court and the
European Court of Human Rights, which upheld bans on Islamist parties that
were judged to be anti-democratic. For a survey of these decisions, see
here. <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=935395>
Violent protests have been going on in the country since February, after the
International Crimes Tribunal Bangladesh sentenced leading figures in JI to
death or long sentences for their role in the country's 1971 war for
independence (see here
<http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/08/bangladesh-court-rules-jamaat-e-islami
-is-illegal-political-party.php> ), when JI aligned with Pakistan in
resisting the move for Bangladesh's independence. The country became a
democracy in 1991.
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%
3Fp%3D53915&title=Can%20Democracies%20Ban%20%E2%80%9CAnti-Democratic%E2%80%9
D%20Political%20Parties%3F&description=> Share
Posted in political parties <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=25> | Comments
Off
Justice Scalia Ties Supreme Court Prisoner Release Decision to Gay Rights
Overreach: <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53933> "Power of the Black Robe"
Posted on <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53933> August 2, 2013 12:06 pm by
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>From today
<http://sblog.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Calif-prison-relea
se-order-8-2-13.pdf> 's dissent on the denial of a stay
<http://www.scotusblog.com/2013/08/no-delay-of-prisoner-release/> in the
California prisoner release case:
It appears to have become a standard ploy, when this Court vastly expands
the Power of the Black Robe, to hint at limitations that make it seem not so
bad. See, e.g., Lawrence v. Texas (Scalia J. dissenting); United States v.
Windsor (Scalia, J., dissenting). Comes the moment of truth, the hinted-at
limitation proves a sham. As for me, I adhere to my original view of this
terrible injunction. It goes beyond what the Prison Litigation Reform Act
allows, and beyond the power of the courts. I would grant the stay and
dissolve the injunction.
UPDATE: Interesting double entrendre
<https://twitter.com/JoshMBlackman/status/363380501253341184> in Scalia
dissent.
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%
3Fp%3D53933&title=Justice%20Scalia%20Ties%20Supreme%20Court%20Prisoner%20Rel
ease%20Decision%20to%20Gay%20Rights%20Overreach%3A%20%E2%80%9CPower%20of%20t
he%20Black%20Robe%E2%80%9D&description=> Share
Posted in Supreme Court <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29> | Comments Off
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53929> "House Committee Subpoenas Treasury
for Tax-Exempt Application Documents"
Posted on <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53929> August 2, 2013 11:29 am by
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Bloomberg BNA Breaking News: "House Oversight and Government Reform
Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) issued a subpoena Aug. 2 to
Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew to compel the production of various documents
the committee wants for its investigation into the Internal Revenue
Service's treatment of groups applying for tax-exempt status."
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%
3Fp%3D53929&title=%E2%80%9CHouse%20Committee%20Subpoenas%20Treasury%20for%20
Tax-Exempt%20Application%20Documents%E2%80%9D&description=> Share
Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10> , tax law
and election law <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=22> | Comments Off
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53926> "Leahy Eyes 'Nuclear Option' Threat
to Confirm Judges"
Posted on <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53926> August 2, 2013 11:13 am by
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
<http://blogs.rollcall.com/wgdb/leahy-nuclear-option-could-return-over-judge
s/> Roll Call reports.
<http://blogs.rollcall.com/wgdb/leahy-nuclear-option-could-return-over-judge
s/>
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%
3Fp%3D53926&title=%E2%80%9CLeahy%20Eyes%20%E2%80%98Nuclear%20Option%E2%80%99
%20Threat%20to%20Confirm%20Judges%E2%80%9D&description=> Share
Posted in legislation and legislatures <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=27>
, political parties <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=25> , political
polarization <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=68> | Comments Off
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53920> "North Carolina Voter ID Law Could
Lead To Increased Voter Intimidation, Harassment, Election Officials Fear"
Posted on <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53920> August 2, 2013 10:54 am by
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
HuffPo reports
<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/02/north-carolina-voter-intimidation_
n_3695657.html> .
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%
3Fp%3D53920&title=%E2%80%9CNorth%20Carolina%20Voter%20ID%20Law%20Could%20Lea
d%20To%20Increased%20Voter%20Intimidation%2C%20Harassment%2C%20Election%20Of
ficials%20Fear%E2%80%9D&description=> Share
Posted in The Voting Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60> , Voting
Rights Act <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15> | Comments Off
Stewart Baker Mea Culpa <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53917>
Posted on <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53917> August 2, 2013 10:49 am by
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Wow
<http://www.volokh.com/2013/08/01/did-the-president-win-re-election-by-viola
ting-the-computer-fraud-and-abuse-act/> . Stewart Baker crosses out most of
his post yesterday (about which I <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53843> and
others
<http://www.volokh.com/2013/08/01/obama-probably-did-not-win-the-2012-electi
on-by-violating-the-computer-fraud-and-abuse-act/> were critical
<http://www.volokh.com/2013/08/01/no-the-obama-campaign-didnt-violate-the-co
mputer-fraud-and-abuse-act/> ) and adds the following:
CORRECTION/UPDATE: Having talked in some detail with folks at Facebook, I've
concluded that this post was just wrong, and I owe an apology to both
Facebook and the Obama campaign, not to mention the co-bloggers and readers
who joined the fray. Facebook's terms of service do say all the things that
I and Michael Vatis's post quoted - they prohibit password sharing and the
soliciting of password sharing and so on. But it turns out that Facebook
also maintains Facebook Platform, whose rules permit users to grant app
developers access to their user data, including a user's list of friends.
The Obama campaign created an app that adapted this platform to its turnout
goals, and it did so within the rules set by Facebook. Because the program
was authorized by Facebook, it was also authorized under the Computer Fraud
and Abuse Act. I've deleted the bulk of the post but left it up so that any
links to the original post will come to this correction.
Maybe next time he should be more careful not to insinuate without some
evidence that a presidential candidate was colluding with the Justice
Department to engage in illegal activity to get the candidate illegally
elected.
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%
3Fp%3D53917&title=Stewart%20Baker%20Mea%20Culpa&description=> Share
Posted in Uncategorized <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1> | Comments Off
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53912> "The slow deaths of presidential
super PACs"
Posted on <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53912> August 2, 2013 9:21 am by
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
CPI reports
<http://www.publicintegrity.org/2013/08/02/13119/slow-deaths-presidential-su
per-pacs> .
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%
3Fp%3D53912&title=%E2%80%9CThe%20slow%20deaths%20of%20presidential%20super%2
0PACs%E2%80%9D&description=> Share
Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10> | Comments
Off
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53905> "The Obligation of Members of
Congress to Consider Constitutionality While Deliberating and Voting: The
Deficiencies of House Rule XII and a Proposed Rule for the United States
Senate"
Posted on <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53905> August 2, 2013 9:01 am by
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Former Senator Russ Feingold has posted this draft
<http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2296716> on SSRN. Here
is the abstract:
Most scholarly attention on constitutional interpretation is focused on the
judicial branch and the role of the judiciary in our system of separation of
powers. Nonetheless constitutional interpretation should not take place
solely in the courts. Rather, history suggests our Framers envisioned that
members of Congress, as well as the President and the Courts, would have an
independent and important role to play in interpreting our Constitution. Yet
this obligation has eroded such that House Speaker John Boehner, with the
support of the Tea Party and his House colleagues, called for a "sea change"
in the way the House of Representatives operates, with "a closer adherence
to the U.S. Constitution," and amended House Rule XII to require members of
Congress who introduce bills or joint resolutions to provide a
Constitutional Authority Statement (CAS) outlining Congress's authority to
adopt the bill or joint resolution.
This Essay identifies, explains, and critically explores four key
deficiencies in House's Rule in light of the history of constitutional
interpretation in Congress, the incentives of members of Congress, and the
realities of the legislative process. While the House's Rule represents an
important step in improving the quality of constitutional deliberation in
Congress, it is unnecessarily bureaucratic, underinclusive, fails to capture
the importance of constitutional interpretation for all members of Congress,
not just the introducers of legislation; and most importantly, reflects a
severely limited notion of what constitutional issues need to be considered
in voting on legislation by completely ignoring constitutional infirmities
involving individual rights, civil liberties, and any other potential
constitutional issue aside from merely Congress's authority.
To address these concerns, the Essay offers a proposed rule for adoption in
the United States Senate. The Proposed Rule requires a Constitutional
Authority Statement for all legislation - not just bills or joint
resolutions - but only when that legislation will actually receive a vote.
Furthermore, the Proposed Rule makes it clear that all members of Congress -
not just the introducer - have an individual obligation to consider the
constitutionality of legislation on which they vote. Finally, the Proposed
Senate Rule requires a CAS include not just information about Congress's
Article I authority to enact a bill, but also address other possible
countervailing constitutional issues like individual liberties.
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%
3Fp%3D53905&title=%E2%80%9CThe%20Obligation%20of%20Members%20of%20Congress%2
0to%20Consider%20Constitutionality%20While%20Deliberating%20and%20Voting%3A%
20The%20Deficiencies%20of%20House%20Rule%20XII%20and%20a%20Prop> Share
Posted in legislation and legislatures <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=27>
| Comments Off
The Law of Democracy: 2013 Supplement <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53886>
Posted on <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53886> August 2, 2013 8:54 am by
Richard Pildes <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=7>
How many books thank both Barack Obama and John Yoo? I know of one - and it
might well be the only one:
<http://www.westacademic.com/Professors/ProductDetails.aspx?productid=178125
&tab=1> The Law of Democracy: Legal Structure of the Political Process.
Back in the mid-1990s, when we were working on the first edition, Barack
Obama was a mere state senator and law professor at the University of
Chicago Law School; John Yoo was a professor at the University of
California, Berkeley School of Law. Both taught from the materials and
provided us significant substantive analysis and commentary. Some others
thanked in the First Edition (1998), who were not well known at the time -
indeed, many were law students - but have since gone on to became major
academic or public-policy figures include Lani Guinier (Harvard Law);
Sherrilyn Ifill (now President and Director-Counsel of the NAACP LDF); Daryl
Levinson (NYU Law); Nate Persily (Stanford Law); Jeff Fisher (Co-Director,
Stanford Supreme Court Litigation Clinic); Tom Goldstein (the lawyer who
created and runs SCOTUS Blog). If I left anyone out, assume it's because I
considered you already well known back in 1998. . .or you worked on later
editions.
I thought of all this when I looked through the book while getting ready to
post a notice about the 2013 Supplement to last year's Fourth Edition now
being available. One of the most gratifying aspects of creating this
casebook has been the amazing people we have had a chance to work with along
the way. As for the 2013 Supplement, suffice it to say it covers all the
important developments that need to be covered, and more, and that it's
available from Foundation Press for immediate download here.
<https://updateweb.thomsonwest.com/pub/cc?_ri_=X0Gzc2X%3DWQpglLjHJlTQGi4TsB7
RfuEmtOmlrEzaYpg3wfNpfzbfqrza1tTBuHs7RVXtpKX%3DSRRDUSDWS&_ei_=ErnqQQciIpy-rH
XQoqyVvZNYTlsza9wGQvzEbXsSlL0VPhwvaNvc2kN-LKZ3B56c00jViGVHVf5ucdiOL345z-KhgO
xK4MbijufSbm3D9TYbiFJFUU9WNkQ66bXGuUNh2MQB.>
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%
3Fp%3D53886&title=The%20Law%20of%20Democracy%3A%20%202013%20Supplement&descr
iption=> Share
Posted in election law and constitutional law
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=55> , pedagogy
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=23> , Uncategorized
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1> | Comments Off
--
Rick Hasen
Chancellor's Professor of Law and Political Science
UC Irvine School of Law
401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000
Irvine, CA 92697-8000
949.824.3072 - office
949.824.0495 - fax
rhasen at law.uci.edu
hhttp://www.law.uci.edu/faculty/full-time/hasen/
http://electionlawblog.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20130803/99005705/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20130803/99005705/attachment.png>
View list directory