[EL] Detroit - Great Job

Wed Aug 7 09:14:43 PDT 2013

Hat's off to Detroit voters and election workers for yesterday's historic election. 44,000 plus voters marked their write in ballots perfectly. And the election workers efficiently went about their business to get them counted by 11. Great job, Detroit.

From: Rick Hasen [mailto:rhasen at law.uci.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 08:16 AM
To: law-election at UCI.edu <law-election at UCI.edu>
Subject: [EL] ELB News and Commentary 8/7/13

“Texas Fights New Voting Supervision”<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54072>
Posted on August 7, 2013 8:13 am<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54072> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Lyle Denniston<http://www.scotusblog.com/2013/08/texas-fights-new-voting-supervision/>:

Mounting a strong counter-attack to attempts by the Obama administration and others to give federal courts new powers of supervision over Texas voting laws, officials of the Lone Star State have told a three-judge district court in San Antonio that it cannot impose that regime at this stage, or at any point unless there is new proof of “rampant” racial bias in election procedures in the state.

In a fifty-four-page filing<http://sblog.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Texas-reply-on-Sec.-3-of-VRA-8-5-13.pdf> Monday evening, state officials cited the Supreme Court’s June 25 decision in Shelby County v. Holder<http://www.bloomberglaw.com/public/document/Shelby_Cnty_v_Holder_No_1296_2013_BL_167707_US_June_25_2013_Court/3>, and told the District Court that it “cannot impose preclearance on Texas while remaining faithful to Shelby County and the constitutional principles on which it relies.”  Preclearance obligations under the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the state contended, can now only be ordered if racial bias in voting in a state rises to the level of the “ever-changing discriminatory machinations that gave rise to the preclearance regime in the first place….Nothing remotely like that has occurred in modern-day Texas.”

The state thus is attempting to turn the new courthouse skirmish over a little-used section of the 1965 law — its Section 3 — into a constitutional battle with high stakes for the future of voting rights.  As the two sides have lined up on opposite interpretations of Section 3, there is now a very real prospect that the Supreme Court may one day have to clarify when a state may be required to get approval in Washington before it can put into effect any change in its election laws or methods.

Yup, it’s Holder’s big Texas-sized gambit.<http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNLJ.jsp?id=1202613130666&slreturn=20130707111234>

[cid:part8.02050801.06070509 at law.uci.edu]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D54072&title=%E2%80%9CTexas%20Fights%20New%20Voting%20Supervision%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in Supreme Court<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>, Voting Rights Act<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15> | Comments Off
“Wall Street Rules a Conundrum for Chris Christie”<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54069>
Posted on August 7, 2013 7:48 am<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54069> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Politico reports<http://www.politico.com/story/2013/08/chris-christie-wall-street-95256.html>.

[cid:part8.02050801.06070509 at law.uci.edu]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D54069&title=%E2%80%9CWall%20Street%20Rules%20a%20Conundrum%20for%20Chris%20Christie%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaign finance<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10> | Comments Off
Bauer-Ginsberg Commission Meeting in Denver Tomorrow<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54067>
Posted on August 7, 2013 7:47 am<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54067> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

View the agenda<https://www.supportthevoter.gov/2013/07/26/pcea-announces-public-meeting-on-thursday-august-8-2013/>.

Also upcoming i<https://www.supportthevoter.gov/2013/07/08/pcea-future-public-meeting-dates/>s a Sept. 4 meeting in Philadelphia and a Sept. 20 meeting in a city TBD in Ohio.

[cid:part8.02050801.06070509 at law.uci.edu]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D54067&title=Bauer-Ginsberg%20Commission%20Meeting%20in%20Denver%20Tomorrow&description=>
Posted in election administration<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18> | Comments Off
“Editorial: NARAL shouldn’t have exemption on donor disclosure”<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54062>
Posted on August 7, 2013 7:36 am<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54062> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Newsday:<http://www.newsday.com/opinion/editorial-naral-shouldn-t-have-exemption-on-donor-disclosure-1.5835247>

While it’s true that abortion is one of the most emotional and divisive political topics of our times, there’s no reason for the exemption abortion-rights lobbying group NARAL Pro-Choice New York has been granted that allows it to keep its donors secret.

Indeed<http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1948313>.

[cid:part8.02050801.06070509 at law.uci.edu]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D54062&title=%E2%80%9CEditorial%3A%20NARAL%20shouldn%E2%80%99t%20have%20exemption%20on%20donor%20disclosure%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaign finance<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10> | Comments Off
A Big Thank You to Dan Tokaji<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54059>
Posted on August 7, 2013 7:35 am<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54059> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

…for guest blogging while I was travelling.

Buy his book<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54034>!

[cid:part8.02050801.06070509 at law.uci.edu]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D54059&title=A%20Big%20Thank%20You%20to%20Dan%20Tokaji&description=>
Posted in Uncategorized<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1> | Comments Off
The EAC Marches On<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54056>
Posted on August 7, 2013 7:34 am<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54056> by Dan Tokaji<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=5>

The Election Assistance Commission continues to do business, even without commissioners, issuing this report<http://www.eac.gov/research/uocava_studies.aspx> on its 2012 UOCAVA Survey, and soliciting comments<http://www.eac.gov/research/election_administration_and_voting_survey.aspx> on its 2014 Election Administration and Voting Survey.  I wonder who the people beneath “Commissioners” on this org chart<http://www.eac.gov/about_the_eac/> report to?

[cid:part8.02050801.06070509 at law.uci.edu]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D54056&title=The%20EAC%20Marches%20On&description=>
Posted in election administration<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>, Election Assistance Commission<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=34> | Comments Off
Elections? There’s an App for That<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54053>
Posted on August 7, 2013 7:15 am<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54053> by Dan Tokaji<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=5>

The NYT reports here<http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/07/nyregion/registration-as-a-voter-to-be-easier-via-phone.html> on the NYC Votes app<http://www.nycvotes.org/faq> from the City’s Campaign Finance Board, designed “to make it easier to register to vote, give money and communicate with campaigns, all from the palm of your hand.”

[cid:part8.02050801.06070509 at law.uci.edu]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D54053&title=Elections%3F%20There%E2%80%99s%20an%20App%20for%20That&description=>
Posted in campaign finance<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>, voter registration<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=37>, voting technology<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=40> | Comments Off
Write-in Candidates Get Majority of Votes in Detroit Mayoral Primary<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54050>
Posted on August 7, 2013 7:05 am<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54050> by Dan Tokaji<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=5>

Write-in candidates received 52% of the vote<http://www.politico.com/story/2013/08/detroit-mayor-primary-write-in-votes-95274.html> in yesterday’s primary, with Mike Duggan the top write-in candidate, after having been knocked off the ballot due to a residency issue. He’ll face Sheriff Benny Napoleon<http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/07/us/detroit-mayoral-primary.html?_r=0> in the run-off election.

[cid:part8.02050801.06070509 at law.uci.edu]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D54050&title=Write-in%20Candidates%20Get%20Majority%20of%20Votes%20in%20Detroit%20Mayoral%20Primary&description=>
Posted in ballot access<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=46> | Comments Off
“Organizing for Action Pitches Help for Democrats”<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54047>
Posted on August 7, 2013 6:49 am<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54047> by Dan Tokaji<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=5>

Politico reports<http://www.politico.com/story/2013/08/organizing-for-action-democrats-michelle-nunn-95237.html?hp=f2> that “Organizing for Action is looking to help Georgia Senate candidate Michelle Nunn,  marking the first time that President Barack Obama’s political arm has  explicitly crossed into Democratic politics,”  while OFA spokeswoman Katie Hogan claims: “Organizing for Action does not participate in electoral politics. We are not  partisan.”

[cid:part8.02050801.06070509 at law.uci.edu]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D54047&title=%E2%80%9COrganizing%20for%20Action%20Pitches%20Help%20for%20Democrats%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaign finance<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10> | Comments Off
Lisa Manheim on “Redistricting Litigation and the Delegation of Democratic Design”<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54044>
Posted on August 6, 2013 12:26 pm<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54044> by Dan Tokaji<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=5>

Lisa Manheim of University of Washington<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=51509> has posted this article<http://ssrn.com/abstract=2292123> on SSRN.  Here’s the abstract:

The power to redraw electoral lines is the power to design elections. Enormous significance therefore attaches to any delegation of redistricting authority. Yet in every jurisdiction in the country, the power to redistrict has been delegated to a varied collection of actors whose participation largely has escaped academic attention. They are as ubiquitous as they are overlooked: they are the redistricting litigants. These actors’ participation in the process leads to a startling form of redistricting. Though the majority of these litigants are not elected, appointed, or in any way vetted by the electorate at large, they are empowered to affect electoral lines in deliberate and politically consequential ways; to affect the rights of non-parties without providing class-action protections or other defenses; and to exploit a procedural regime that, due to the time pressures of the election cycle, becomes warped in ways that give litigants significant leverage to advance their own agendas. These features reflect a regime developed not through deliberate design, but rather through the accidental effects of judicial intervention. This Article responds to the persistent gap in the literature by revealing the unacknowledged power of redistricting litigants. It identifies the concerns their participation raises with respect to the outcomes, efficiency, and legitimacy of the redistricting process, and it concludes with a discussion of targeted reforms. These reforms include institutional adjustments meant to reduce reliance on litigants and procedural changes meant to give greater voice to non-parties.

[cid:part8.02050801.06070509 at law.uci.edu]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D54044&title=Lisa%20Manheim%20on%20%E2%80%9CRedistricting%20Litigation%20and%20the%20Delegation%20of%20Democratic%20Design%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in redistricting<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=6> | Comments Off
Could NC Be Covered Under Section 3?<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54041>
Posted on August 6, 2013 12:18 pm<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54041> by Dan Tokaji<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=5>

HuffPost explores the possibility here<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/06/north-carolina-voting-law_n_3713411.html?ncid=edlinkusaolp00000003&ir=Politics>.

[cid:part8.02050801.06070509 at law.uci.edu]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D54041&title=Could%20NC%20Be%20Covered%20Under%20Section%203%3F&description=>
Posted in Voting Rights Act<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15> | Comments Off
“Republican Says E-mails Could Mean FEC-IRS Collusion”<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54038>
Posted on August 6, 2013 12:11 pm<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54038> by Dan Tokaji<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=5>

CNN reports<http://www.cnn.com/2013/08/05/politics/irs-fec-controversy/index.html?hpt=hp_t3>:  “The vice chairman of the Federal Election Commission [Don McGahn] told CNN on Monday he has seen numerous undisclosed e-mails between FEC staffers and the Internal Revenue Service that raise new questions about potential collusion between the two federal agencies in the alleged targeting of conservative political groups.”

[cid:part8.02050801.06070509 at law.uci.edu]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D54038&title=%E2%80%9CRepublican%20Says%20E-mails%20Could%20Mean%20FEC-IRS%20Collusion%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaign finance<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10> | Comments Off

--
Rick Hasen
Chancellor's Professor of Law and Political Science
UC Irvine School of Law
401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000
Irvine, CA 92697-8000
949.824.3072 - office
949.824.0495 - fax
rhasen at law.uci.edu<mailto:rhasen at law.uci.edu>
hhttp://www.law.uci.edu/faculty/full-time/hasen/
http://electionlawblog.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20130807/978d728b/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: share_save_171_16.png
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20130807/978d728b/attachment.png>