[EL] Gov. McCrory errs on costs of voter preregistration Re: ELB News and Commentary 8/14/13
Rob Richie
rr at fairvote.org
Tue Aug 13 21:55:26 PDT 2013
Gov. McCrory is wrong about voter pre-registration for 16- and 17-year-olds
being costly. Here is an analysis of it that we did based on interviews,
including with election officials in North Carolina:
http://www.fairvote.org/the-low-cost-of-voter-preregistration/<http://www.fairvote.org/the-low-cost-of-voter-preregistration/#.Ugr9AtJwfzg>
In fact there's an argument that efficient registration of young adults in
fact saves costs down the line, as it spreads out new registrations farther
from the busyness of elections -- less need for trying to process a flood
of registrations close to an election, having more provisional ballots,
etc..
Of course the governor can make stuff up about the legislation because the
legislature didn't hold hearings on several key elements of it --
including, I believe, eliminating a preregistration program that had passed
with bipartisan support and that even Florida had left intact in its
anti-voting bill in 2011.
- Rob Richie, FairVote
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:24 AM, Rick Hasen <rhasen at law.uci.edu> wrote:
> “McCrory defends Voter ID bill in NPR interview”<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54361>
> Posted on August 13, 2013 9:17 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54361> by Rick
> Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> WNCN<http://www.wncn.com/story/23128013/mccrory-defends-voter-id-bill-in-npr-interview>
> :
>
> McCrory went on the offensive on the “Here and Now” program<http://hereandnow.wbur.org/>,
> which aired Tuesday afternoon. He called some of the NAACP’s criticisms of
> the law “totally false” and said preregistering high school students to
> vote was costly. He also said there were “no statistics” to back those who
> say the new law benefits Republicans and hurts Democrats.
>
> Here is a summary of what McCrory said….
>
> My favorite is his response that it is too expensive to pre-register 16-
> and 17-year-olds to vote. Really great civics lesson there.
> [image: Share]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D54361&title=%E2%80%9CMcCrory%20defends%20Voter%20ID%20bill%20in%20NPR%20interview%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in election administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>, fraudulent
> fraud squad <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=8>, The Voting Wars<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>
> | Comments Off
> “Report argues for lifting ban on politics from the pulpit”<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54358>
> Posted on August 13, 2013 9:03 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54358> by Rick
> Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> WaPo<http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/report-argues-for-lifting-ban-on-politics-from-the-pulpit/2013/08/13/57aab53e-0449-11e3-88d6-d5795fab4637_story.html>
> :
>
> Even as polls show Americans broadly oppose electioneering from the pulpit<http://www.pewforum.org/2012/07/26/section-2-religion-and-politics/>,
> a new report by a group of faith leaders working closely with Capitol Hill
> argues for ending the decades-old ban on explicit clergy endorsements.
>
> The report<http://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/documents/local/report-on-clergy-political-endorsements/549/>being given Wednesday to Sen. Charles E. Grassley — the Iowa Republican
> whose office for years has been probing potential abuses by tax-exempt
> groups — comes as the ban has become a culture-war flashpoint.
>
>
> [image: Share]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D54358&title=%E2%80%9CReport%20argues%20for%20lifting%20ban%20on%20politics%20from%20the%20pulpit%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in campaigns <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>, tax law and
> election law <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=22> | Comments Off
> “Why is Voter ID So Popular?” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54355>
> Posted on August 13, 2013 8:59 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54355> by Rick
> Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> Catherine Engelbrecht<http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/08/13/Why-is-Voter-ID-So-Popular>of True the Vote at Breitbart: “Why is this popular voter ID so
> ‘controversial’? It makes the jobs of political operatives that prey on a
> weak system more difficult. It also proves the privileged northeastern
> academics’ racial generalizations are wrong.”
> [image: Share]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D54355&title=%E2%80%9CWhy%20is%20Voter%20ID%20So%20Popular%3F%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in fraudulent fraud squad <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=8>, The
> Voting Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60> | Comments Off
> “The Real Price of Congress’s Gridlock”<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54352>
> Posted on August 13, 2013 8:53 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54352> by Rick
> Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> Robert Reich NYT oped<http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/14/opinion/the-real-price-of-congresss-gridlock.html?ref=politics>
> :
>
> Congress’s paralysis has also encouraged the Supreme Court to enter the
> political fray. Normally the judicial activism of recent years could be
> checked by Congressional action. But not now. Justice Anthony M. Kennedy’s
> opinion for the majority in the 2010 Citizens United case, which struck
> down limits on corporate campaign contributions, rested partly on the
> presumption that Congress would require corporations to disclose their
> political expenditures. But no bill requiring full disclosure has stood a
> chance of making it through the quagmire.
>
> The court’s decision this summer in Shelby County v. Holder handed
> Congress the task of coming up with a new, updated formula for deciding
> which states and localities need permission from the Justice Department,
> under the Voting Rights Act, to make changes to their election processes.
> But legislative paralysis makes the passage of any new formula highly
> unlikely. Seen in this light, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr.’s deciding
> vote last year to uphold the Affordable Care Act probably reflected his
> reasonable fear that the court would otherwise be viewed, not unfairly, as
> just another political battleground.
>
> This is a theme I’ve explored<http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2130190>
> .
> [image: Share]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D54352&title=%E2%80%9CThe%20Real%20Price%20of%20Congress%E2%80%99s%20Gridlock%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in political parties <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=25>, political
> polarization <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=68>, Supreme Court<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>
> | Comments Off
> Anti-VRA Rhetoric Used in 1965 and Today<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54349>
> Posted on August 13, 2013 8:40 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54349> by Spencer
> Overton <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=17>
>
> Here’s video <http://www.nbcnews.com/id/49263362/vp/52199227#52730283> of
> my spot on Karen Finney’s MSNBC show “Disrupt<http://www.nbcnews.com/id/49263362/vp/52199227#52730283>”
> with Nia-Malika Henderson.
>
> The anti-VRA arguments that transcend time: voting protections are
> unnecessary, promoting voting rights stokes racial division, voting
> protections infringe on the 10th Amendment, and voting restrictions advance
> electoral integrity. Here’s an overview<http://mediamatters.org/blog/2013/08/06/48-years-later-conservatives-are-making-the-sam/195243>that draws from Professor Keith Finley’s book “Delaying
> the Dream: Southern Senators and the Fight Against Civil Rights<http://www.amazon.com/Delaying-Dream-Southern-Senators-1938-1965/dp/0807137111>
> .”
>
> I’ve listed some differences between 1965 and now at spenceroverton.com(some of which support enhanced voting protections now).
>
> Thoughts on NC soon.
> [image: Share]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D54349&title=Anti-VRA%20Rhetoric%20Used%20in%201965%20and%20Today&description=>
> Posted in Uncategorized <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1> | Comments
> Off
> “North Carolina’s Attack on Voting Rights”<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54346>
> Posted on August 13, 2013 8:31 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54346> by Rick
> Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> The Daily Beast reports<http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/08/13/north-carolina-s-attack-on-voting-rights.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+thedailybeast%2Fpolitics+%28The+Daily+Beast+-+Politics%29>
> .
> [image: Share]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D54346&title=%E2%80%9CNorth%20Carolina%E2%80%99s%20Attack%20on%20Voting%20Rights%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in election administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>, The
> Voting Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60> | Comments Off
> “Fox59 Exclusive: Charlie White Claims Carl Brizzi is at Fault for
> Voter Fraud Conviction” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54341>
> Posted on August 13, 2013 8:03 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54341> by Rick
> Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> See here<http://fox59.com/2013/08/13/fox59-exclusive-charlie-white-claims-carl-brizzi-is-at-fault-for-voter-fraud-conviction/#axzz2buAfcvo7>
> .
> [image: Share]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D54341&title=%E2%80%9CFox59%20Exclusive%3A%20Charlie%20White%20Claims%20Carl%20Brizzi%20is%20at%20Fault%20for%20Voter%20Fraud%20Conviction%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in SOS White <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=13> | Comments Off
> “Kay Hagan Seeks Federal Review Of North Carolina Voting Law”<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54338>
> Posted on August 13, 2013 8:00 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54338> by Rick
> Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> Reuters reports<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/13/kay-hagan-north-carolina-voting-law_n_3751235.html?ncid=edlinkusaolp00000003>
> .
> [image: Share]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D54338&title=%E2%80%9CKay%20Hagan%20Seeks%20Federal%20Review%20Of%20North%20Carolina%20Voting%20Law%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in Department of Justice <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=26>, election
> administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>, The Voting Wars<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>,
> voter registration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=37>, Voting Rights Act<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15>
> | Comments Off
> Video of My Segment on North Carolina Voting on “All in With Chris
> Hayes” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54335>
> Posted on August 13, 2013 7:44 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54335> by Rick
> Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> Watch Chris <http://video.msnbc.msn.com/all-in-/52749510#52749510> with
> Susan Myrick, Rev. William Barber, and me.
> [image: Share]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D54335&title=Video%20of%20My%20Segment%20on%20North%20Carolina%20Voting%20on%20%E2%80%9CAll%20in%20With%20Chris%20Hayes%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in election administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>, The
> Voting Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>, Voting Rights Act<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15>
> | Comments Off
> “McCrory hopelessly confused about elections bill he signed”<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54332>
> Posted on August 13, 2013 3:04 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54332> by Rick
> Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> See here.<http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2013/08/13/mccrory-hopelessly-confused-about-elections-bill-he-signed/>
> [image: Share]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D54332&title=%E2%80%9CMcCrory%20hopelessly%20confused%20about%20elections%20bill%20he%20signed%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in Uncategorized <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1> | Comments
> Off
> “The Voting Wars Will Outlive the Obama Presidency”<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54328>
> Posted on August 13, 2013 1:42 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54328> by Rick
> Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> Alec MacGillis writes<http://www.newrepublic.com/article/114293/voter-suppression-efforts-will-outlive-obama>for
> *The New Republic.*
> [image: Share]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D54328&title=%E2%80%9CThe%20Voting%20Wars%20Will%20Outlive%20the%20Obama%20Presidency%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in election administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>, The
> Voting Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60> | Comments Off
> Scheduled to Be on “All In” with Chris Hayes Today at 8 PM Eastern/5
> Pacific <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54325>
> Posted on August 13, 2013 1:22 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54325> by Rick
> Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> Talking about North Carolina’s new voting law and lawsuits.
>
> As always these appearances are subject to last minute change.
>
> Details<http://tv.msnbc.com/2013/08/13/all-in-agenda-the-woman-behind-orange-is-the-new-black/>
> .
> [image: Share]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D54325&title=Scheduled%20to%20Be%20on%20%E2%80%9CAll%20In%E2%80%9D%20with%20Chris%20Hayes%20Today%20at%208%20PM%20Eastern%2F5%20Pacific&description=>
> Posted in Uncategorized <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1> | Comments
> Off
> Read the NAACP Federal Complaint Against Harsh New North Carolina
> Voting Law <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54321>
> Posted on August 13, 2013 12:50 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54321>
> by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> Here<http://thenation.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/NAACP_v_McCrorry_Complaint.pdf>.
> This one challenges a number of provisions of the law, including voter id,
> the end of same-day voter registration, the cutback in early voting days,
> and other provisions under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and under the
> 14th and 15th Amendments.
> [image: Share]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D54321&title=Read%20the%20NAACP%20Federal%20Complaint%20Against%20Harsh%20New%20North%20Carolina%20Voting%20Law&description=>
> Posted in election administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>, The
> Voting Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>, voter id<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=9>,
> Voting Rights Act <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15> | Comments Off
> Read the State Court Complaint Filed Against North Carolina’s Tough
> Voting Law <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54318>
> Posted on August 13, 2013 12:46 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54318>
> by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> Here<http://www.southerncoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Currie-v-NC.pdf>,
> via Ari Berman. This particular suit challenges only the voter id provision
> and only under various parts of the state constitution.
> [image: Share]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D54318&title=Read%20the%20State%20Court%20Complaint%20Filed%20Against%20North%20Carolina%E2%80%99s%20Tough%20Voting%20Law&description=>
> Posted in The Voting Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>, voter id<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=9>
> | Comments Off
> NYT Profile of Rep. John Lewis, and Right to Restore Voting Rights Act<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54315>
> Posted on August 13, 2013 11:29 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54315>
> by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> An uphill battle.<http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/14/us/politics/50-years-later-fighting-the-same-civil-rights-battle.html?pagewanted=1&hp>
> [image: Share]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D54315&title=NYT%20Profile%20of%20Rep.%20John%20Lewis%2C%20and%20Right%20to%20Restore%20Voting%20Rights%20Act&description=>
> Posted in Voting Rights Act <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15> | Comments
> Off
> Australia’s Compulsory Voting, Short Campaign Season Get the Daily Show
> Treatment <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54312>
> Posted on August 13, 2013 9:09 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54312> by Rick
> Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> Watch<http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/mon-august-12-2013/down-undercision-2013---that-s-not-a-campaign---this--is-a-campaign>
> .
> [image: Share]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D54312&title=Australia%E2%80%99s%20Compulsory%20Voting%2C%20Short%20Campaign%20Season%20Get%20the%20Daily%20Show%20Treatment&description=>
> Posted in campaigns <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>, voting<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=31>
> | Comments Off
> “ACLU Threatens Legal Action if Kansas Fails to Comply With Federal
> Voting Law” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54309>
> Posted on August 13, 2013 8:59 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54309> by Rick
> Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> NVRA claims<http://www.aclu.org/voting-rights/aclu-threatens-legal-action-if-kansas-fails-comply-federal-voting-law>
> .
> [image: Share]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D54309&title=%E2%80%9CACLU%20Threatens%20Legal%20Action%20if%20Kansas%20Fails%20to%20Comply%20With%20Federal%20Voting%20Law%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in NVRA (motor voter) <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=33>, The
> Voting Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>, voter registration<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=37>
> | Comments Off
> “Race at Center of North Carolina Voting Law Battle”<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54306>
> Posted on August 13, 2013 8:22 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54306> by Rick
> Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> ABC News reports<http://abcnews.go.com/ABC_Univision/Politics/race-center-north-carolina-voting-law-battle/story?id=19946195>
> .
> [image: Share]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D54306&title=%E2%80%9CRace%20at%20Center%20of%20North%20Carolina%20Voting%20Law%20Battle%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in election administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>, The
> Voting Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>, voter id<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=9>
> | Comments Off
> “Gov. Pat McCrory: Why I signed the Voter ID/election reform bill” and
> Why the Governor is Wrong <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54302>
> Posted on August 13, 2013 7:49 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54302> by Rick
> Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> He calls
> <http://www.newsobserver.com/2013/08/12/3102124/gov-pat-mccrory-why-i-signed-the.html>the
> voter id requirement “non-burdensome.”
>
> For most people that’s true, but not for all. And put the other parts of
> the law together, <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54296> and there is a
> large burden on some voters and at least a small burden on many voters.
>
> As far as “how would we know” if in-person voter impersonation fraud is a
> big problem, we know it is not. Believe me, we know.<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=48568>
>
> Today’s an auspicious day for the paperback release<http://www.amazon.com/The-Voting-Wars-Election-Meltdown/dp/0300198248/ref=tmm_pap_title_0?ie=UTF8&qid=1329286945&sr=1-2-catcorr>of The
> Voting Wars <http://thevotingwars.com/>. I advise the governor to read
> Chapter 2, the Fraudulent Fraud Squad.
>
>
> [image: Share]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D54302&title=%E2%80%9CGov.%20Pat%20McCrory%3A%20Why%20I%20signed%20the%20Voter%20ID%2Felection%20reform%20bill%E2%80%9D%20and%20Why%20the%20Governor%20is%20Wrong&description=>
> Posted in election administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>, fraudulent
> fraud squad <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=8>, The Voting Wars<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>,
> voter id <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=9> | Comments Off
> Bauer on Chemerinsky, Justice Stevens, and the Contribution-Expenditure
> Distinction <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54299>
> Posted on August 13, 2013 7:28 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54299> by Rick
> Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> Here.<http://www.moresoftmoneyhardlaw.com/2013/08/the-courts-struggle-to-define-speech-interests-justice-stevens-on-money-as-property/>
> [image: Share]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D54299&title=Bauer%20on%20Chemerinsky%2C%20Justice%20Stevens%2C%20and%20the%20Contribution-Expenditure%20Distinction&description=>
> Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10> | Comments
> Off
>
> --
> Rick Hasen
> Chancellor's Professor of Law and Political Science
> UC Irvine School of Law
> 401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000
> Irvine, CA 92697-8000949.824.3072 - office949.824.0495 - faxrhasen at law.uci.eduhttp://www.law.uci.edu/faculty/full-time/hasen/http://electionlawblog.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Law-election mailing list
> Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
> http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
>
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Respect for Every Vote and Every Voice"
Rob Richie
Executive Director
FairVote
6930 Carroll Avenue, Suite 610
Takoma Park, MD 20912
www.fairvote.org <http://www.fairvote.org> rr at fairvote.org
(301) 270-4616
Please support FairVote through action and tax-deductible donations -- see
http://fairvote.org/donate. For federal employees, please consider a gift
to us through the Combined Federal Campaign (FairVote's CFC number is
10132.) Thank you!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20130814/8314d66a/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20130814/8314d66a/attachment.png>
View list directory