[EL] ELB News and Commentary 8/15/13
Rick Hasen
rhasen at law.uci.edu
Wed Aug 14 21:28:29 PDT 2013
And Now the Attack on Student Voting in North Carolina...
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54418>
Posted on August 14, 2013 7:39 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54418>
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
The State
<http://www.thestate.com/2013/08/14/2920155/nc-elections-boards-move-to-curtail.html>:
Within hours of Gov. Pat McCrory signing a Republican-backed bill
this week making sweeping changes to the state's voting laws, local
elections boards in two college towns made moves that could make it
harder for students to vote.
The Watauga County Board of Elections voted Monday to eliminate an
early voting site and election-day polling precinct on the campus of
Appalachian State University.
The Pasquotank County Board of Elections on Tuesday barred an
Elizabeth City State University senior from running for city
council, ruling his on-campus address couldn't be used to establish
local residency. Following the decision, the head of the county's
Republican Party said he plans to challenge the voter registrations
of more students at the historically black university ahead of
upcoming elections.
Progressive Pulse
<http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2013/08/14/county-board-to-student-candidate-you-can-vote-for-now-but-you-cant-run-for-city-council/>:
As reported today in the Elizabeth City Daily Advance, the
Pasquotank County Board of Elections has taken the first step
towards a ruling that students living in a college dorm are not
permanent residents --- in this instance, for purposes of running
for City Council. But the residency requirements for a candidate are
the same as those for a voter.
When asked if he planned extensive challenges of student voters
following the city election, County GOP Chair Pete Gilbert, who
challenged the student-candidate's residency, said he planned to
"look at one-stop voters," but declined further comment on the matter.
Lovely.
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D54418&title=And%20Now%20the%20Attack%20on%20Student%20Voting%20in%20North%20Carolina%E2%80%A6&description=>
Posted in election administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>,
The Voting Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60> | Comments Off
"The Long Road Ahead for Voting Rights"
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54415>
Posted on August 14, 2013 3:37 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54415>
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
This item
<http://www.ncpolicywatch.com/2013/08/14/the-long-road-ahead-for-voting-rights/>
appears at NC Policy Watch.
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D54415&title=%E2%80%9CThe%20Long%20Road%20Ahead%20for%20Voting%20Rights%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in The Voting Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>, Voting
Rights Act <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15> | Comments Off
"Originalism: It's Not Just for Conservatives Anymore"
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54412>
Posted on August 14, 2013 2:55 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54412>
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Adam Winkler
<http://www.scotusblog.com/2013/08/originalism-its-not-just-for-conservatives-anymore/>
in SCOTUSBlog McCutcheon symposium talks of Lessig/Gans and Brennan
Center amicus briefs:
In some ways, the McCutcheon /amici/ highlight the limits of liberal
originalism. If the embrace of history is merely strategic, designed
to persuade one member of the Roberts Court's conservative majority
to vote for liberal outcomes (say, upholding aggregate contribution
limits), its impact is likely to be quite minimal. None of the
Justices is consistent in his or her use and reliance on history,
not even Justices Clarence Thomas and Scalia, the most prominent
proponents of originalism on the Court. The Justices' votes on a
wide range of significant constitutional issues can't be explained
by history, which one can see by looking no further back than June
of this year. Whatever led the Justices to rule the way they did in
/Fisher v. University of Texas/
<http://www.bloomberglaw.com/public/document/Fisher_v_Univ_of_Tex_at_Austin_No_11345_2013_BL_167358_118_FEP_Ca>
(affirmative action), /Shelby County v. Holder/
<http://www.bloomberglaw.com/public/document/Shelby_Cnty_v_Holder_No_1296_2013_BL_167707_US_June_25_2013_Court>
(voting rights), and /United States v. Windsor/
<http://www.bloomberglaw.com/public/document/United_States_v_Windsor_No_12307_2013_BL_168683_US_June_26_2013_C/1>
(marriage equality), it wasn't a commitment to the original public
meaning of the Constitution. Moreover, the Justices have ruled on
numerous campaign finance cases in the past and have well-defined
views of what qualifies as a constitutionally permissible motive for
government regulation of money in politics. None is likely to be
suddenly persuaded by these briefs -- or any others -- that the
Justices have been wrong all these years.
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D54412&title=%E2%80%9COriginalism%3A%20It%E2%80%99s%20Not%20Just%20for%20Conservatives%20Anymore%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>, Supreme
Court <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29> | Comments Off
"Burning the house to roast the pig: Can elections be saved by
banning political speech?" <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54410>
Posted on August 14, 2013 2:53 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54410>
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Bob Corn-Revere writes
<http://www.scotusblog.com/2013/08/burning-the-house-to-roast-the-pig-can-elections-be-saved-by-banning-political-speech/>
in SCOTUSBlog /McCutcheon/ symposium.
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D54410&title=%E2%80%9CBurning%20the%20house%20to%20roast%20the%20pig%3A%20Can%20elections%20be%20saved%20by%20banning%20political%20speech%3F%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in Uncategorized <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1> | Comments Off
"Campaign Lies Are Common, But Are They Actionable?"
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54404>
Posted on August 14, 2013 1:06 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54404>
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Marcia Coyle writes
<http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleSCI.jsp?id=1202615481907&kw=Campaign%20Lies%20Are%20Common%2C%20But%20Are%20They%20Actionable%3F&et=editorial&bu=National%20Law%20Journal&cn=20130814&src=EMC-Email&pt=Supreme%20Court%20Brief%20Headlines&slreturn=20130714155032>
for NLJ: "Everybody lies, particularly in political campaigns, says the
cynical voter. But should laws restricting speech challenged as
untruthful get First Amendment scrutiny? A national pro-life advocacy
group would answer yes, and is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to clear
the way for a constitutional challenge to an Ohio law criminalizing
false statements in political campaigns."
I've addressed the issues of the constitutionality of limits on campaign
lies after /US v. Alvarez/ inA Constitutional Right to Lie in Campaigns
and Elections? <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2151618>
I will post the cert petition in Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus
<http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/13-193.htm>
when I can find it.
This is one I will watch carefully, and one where I might actually be on
the same side as Mike Carvin. We'll see when I read the petition.
UPDATE: Here
<http://electionlawblog.org/wp-content/uploads/SBA_Cert_Petition.pdf> is
the cert. petition, which I look forward to reading.
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D54404&title=%E2%80%9CCampaign%20Lies%20Are%20Common%2C%20But%20Are%20They%20Actionable%3F%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaigns <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59> | Comments Off
"Rand Paul: No 'objective evidence' African Americans are prevented
from voting" <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54401>
Posted on August 14, 2013 12:54 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54401>
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
WaPo reports.
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/08/14/rand-paul-no-objective-evidence-african-americans-are-prevented-from-voting/>
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D54401&title=%E2%80%9CRand%20Paul%3A%20No%20%E2%80%98objective%20evidence%E2%80%99%20African%20Americans%20are%20prevented%20from%20voting%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in election administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>,
The Voting Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>, Voting Rights Act
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15> | Comments Off
"Unease at Clinton Foundation Over Finances and Ambitions"
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54398>
Posted on August 14, 2013 11:53 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54398>
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Must-read
<http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/14/us/politics/unease-at-clinton-foundation-over-finances-and-ambitions.html?hp>
Nick Confessore and Amy Chozick NYT extensive A1 article.
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D54398&title=%E2%80%9CUnease%20at%20Clinton%20Foundation%20Over%20Finances%20and%20Ambitions%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in conflict of interest laws <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=20>
| Comments Off
"The Call for Internet Voting Gets Louder"
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54395>
Posted on August 14, 2013 10:53 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54395>
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Brian Newby, Election Commissioner in Johnson County, Kansas, writes
<http://www.internetevolution.com/author.asp?section_id=3330&doc_id=266693&>.
I argue in Chapter 5 of /The Voting Wars
<http://www.amazon.com/Voting-Wars-Florida-Election-Meltdown/dp/0300182031/ref=sr_1_cc_2?s=aps&ie=UTF8&qid=1329286945&sr=1-2-catcorr>/
that Internet Voting at this time would be a huge mistake.
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D54395&title=%E2%80%9CThe%20Call%20for%20Internet%20Voting%20Gets%20Louder%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in internet voting <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=49>, The
Voting Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>, voting technology
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=40> | Comments Off
"Santorum accused of illegally steering $1 million donation to super
PAC" <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54392>
Posted on August 14, 2013 10:48 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54392>
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
WaPo
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/08/14/santorum-accused-of-illegally-steering-1-million-donation-to-super-pac/>:
A campaign finance watchdog has filed a complaint against former GOP
presidential candidate Rick Santorum, referring to reports that
Santorum or his campaign may have illegally urged a donor to donate
$1 million to a super PAC supporting Santorum.
The donor, energy executive William Dore, in a recent interview
<http://reporting.sunlightfoundation.com/2013/1-million-dinner-when-big-donor-bill-dore-meets-rick-santorum/>
said he approached Santorum about giving his campaign $1 million. He
initially said Santorum urged him to instead give the money to the
super PAC, Red White and Blue Fund, which can accept unlimited
donations. Santorum's campaign is subject to much lower contribution
limits and could not accept such a donation.
Dore later recanted, saying it was Santorum's staff who directed him
to give to the super PAC.
The Campaign Legal Center, in its complaint
<http://www.campaignlegalcenter.org/images/CLC_D21_v_Santorum_FEC_Complaint_8-14-13.pdf>,
notes that campaign finance law allows candidates to solicit
donations to super PACs, but those solicitations are subject to the
same contribution limits as their campaigns. So while Santorum's
campaign could tell Dore to contribute a maximum of $5,000 to the
super PAC, it cannot urge him to donate $1 million to it.
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D54392&title=%E2%80%9CSantorum%20accused%20of%20illegally%20steering%20%241%20million%20donation%20to%20super%20PAC%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10> |
Comments Off
"Jesse Jackson Jr. Sentenced to 30 Months in Prison"
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54390>
Posted on August 14, 2013 10:47 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54390>
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
NBC News reports
<http://www.nbcmiami.com/news/national-international/Jesse-Sandi-Jackson-Sentenced-Wednesday-219542771.html?_osource=SocialFlowTwt_MIBrand>.
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D54390&title=%E2%80%9CJesse%20Jackson%20Jr.%20Sentenced%20to%2030%20Months%20in%20Prison%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>,
campaigns <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>, chicanery
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=12> | Comments Off
Local NC ABC Station Examines Whether Gov. McCrory Doesn't
Understand the Voting Law He Signed
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54385>
Posted on August 14, 2013 9:57 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54385>
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Watch. <http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/video?id=9205181>
The governor apparently keeps saying that ALL polling places will be
open during the early voting period, which is clearly NOT what the new
voting law requires. Such a change would cost millions of dollars and
would require lots and lots of poll workers.
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D54385&title=Local%20NC%20ABC%20Station%20Examines%20Whether%20Gov.%20McCrory%20Doesn%E2%80%99t%20Understand%20the%20Voting%20Law%20He%20Signed&description=>
Posted in The Voting Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60> |
Comments Off
Ari Berman Asks the Three Crucial Questions About North Carolina's
Voting Law <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54381>
Posted on August 14, 2013 9:20 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54381>
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Here
<http://www.thenation.com/blog/175761/national-fight-over-voter-suppression-north-carolina#axzz2bnBkUmSj>:
1. Will Section 2 be enough? (My answer is likely no
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54296>, at least for most of the law).
2. Will North Carolina get bailed in under Section 3? (My answer is
likely no <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54296>, absentsome smoking gun
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54367> of intentional
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54118>racial discrimination).
3. Will there be a public backlash against the law? (My answer is that
it could well happen
<http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/07/24/will-the-gop-s-north-carolina-end-run-backfire.html>,
but there are no guarantees).
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D54381&title=Ari%20Berman%20Asks%20the%20Three%20Crucial%20Questions%20About%20North%20Carolina%E2%80%99s%20Voting%20Law&description=>
Posted in election administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>,
The Voting Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>, voter id
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=9>, Voting Rights Act
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15> | Comments Off
Unpacking NC Governor's Talking Points
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54379>
Posted on August 14, 2013 9:10 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54379>
by Spencer Overton <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=17>
In defending North Carolina's new photo ID requirement, Republican
Governor Pat McCrory claims "[t]hirty-four states currently require some
sort of identification, and so we're doing what the majority of states
are doing right now throughout the United States of America." He
mentions "34 states" six times during this "Here and Now" interview
<http://hereandnow.wbur.org/2013/08/13/voter-id-mccrory>.
Most of these states, however, allow voters who lack valid photo
identification to cast a ballot that will be counted if they can
establish their identity through other means, such as a paycheck or
signature match.
According to this National Conference of State Legislatures chart
<http://www.ncsl.org/legislatures-elections/elections/voter-id.aspx>,
only four states currently have in effect "strict photo ID" laws that
resemble North Carolina's new law, with another six states having strict
photo ID laws that are "not yet in effect" (some due to litigation).
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D54379&title=Unpacking%20NC%20Governor%E2%80%99s%20Talking%20Points&description=>
Posted in Uncategorized <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1> | Comments Off
"Editorial: Fair Elections and Double Standards"
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54374>
Posted on August 14, 2013 7:38 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54374>
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Cincinnati Enquirer:
<http://news.cincinnati.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/201308132333/EDIT/308130112>
The decision not to prosecute Hamilton County voters who had
registered using addresses that weren't their residences seems on
its face like a reasonable one. But in light of the recent five-year
sentence handed down to a poll worker convicted of voter fraud, it's
imperative that officials strive to treat all cases of voter
impropriety with the same standards.The 85 voters who registered
using ineligible addresses may or may not have known that doing so
is a felony. They include more than a dozen police officers who
registered using the police stations where they work, apparently in
an attempt to keep their home addresses from becoming public knowledge.
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D54374&title=%E2%80%9CEditorial%3A%20Fair%20Elections%20and%20Double%20Standards%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in chicanery <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=12>, election
administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>, The Voting Wars
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60> | Comments Off
"Voting Problems Prompt Retraining of Poll Workers"
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54372>
Posted on August 14, 2013 7:36 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54372>
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
The /Cincinnati Enquirer /reports.
<http://news.cincinnati.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/201308140522/NEWS010602/308140034>
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D54372&title=%E2%80%9CVoting%20Problems%20Prompt%20Retraining%20of%20Poll%20Workers%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in election administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18> |
Comments Off
"Sunnyside election could come down to 1 vote"
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54370>
Posted on August 14, 2013 7:35 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54370>
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
KIMA <http://www.kimatv.com/news/local/One-vote--219500521.html>:
An election that's been too close to call looks like it could come
down to one vote. The race is for Sunnyside City Council. That power
is in the hands of a man who turned in his ballot without his signature.
One vote that could make the difference. It belongs to Frank Gallardo.
"I lost my letter," said Frank. "I don't know where it is you know.
I lost my little paper to vote."
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D54370&title=%E2%80%9CSunnyside%20election%20could%20come%20down%20to%201%20vote%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in election administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>,
voting <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=31> | Comments Off
What's Motivating the North Carolina Legislature? Philosophical
Difference or Power Grab? <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54367>
Posted on August 14, 2013 7:33 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54367>
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Preregistration of 16 and 17 year olds can save money. FairVote crunches
<http://www.fairvote.org/the-low-cost-of-voter-preregistration/#.UguSvVOE43Z>
the numbers.
So why did North Carolina end preregistration:
The reason the North Carolina law is getting so much national attention
is that it rolls into a single law all of the recent tools we have seen
which make it harder to register and to vote. I've said it's the
toughest voting law we've seen seen enactment of the 1965 Voting rights
Act And many components of the law cannot plausibly be justified on
efficiency, anti-fraud, or voter confidence grounds. And the combination
of cutbacks in early voting, end of same day voter registration,
implementation of poll workers, and tightening of provisional ballot
rules could well lead to long lines at the polls.
Sit down with some of the law's supporters and the honest ones will have
to concede that it will make it harder for some folks to register and
vote. They will then need to fall back on the position that it is
justifiable to make it harder for some people to register and vote.
Listen to Susan Myrick on yesterday's All in With Chris
<http://video.msnbc.msn.com/all-in-/52749510#52749510>and you will hear
her say that voters have 50 days to vote (I guess that's including the
absentee period) and therefore they have enough opportunities to vote
under the new law.
So what if it is harder for (some) people to vote?
That's a different world view
<http://www.sacbee.com/2012/11/03/4958430/republicans-have-pursued-election.html>
than one which says that voting is about the sharing of political power
among political equals and we should remove impediments impediments to
voting which serve no valid anti-fraud or efficiency purpose.
More nefariously, the law is motivated by naked partisan purpose. On the
preregistration, if young people tend to vote Democratic, this is a way
to make it harder for new voters to vote for Democratic candidates.
And while the preregistration requirement likely is not motivated by
racial animus, it will be interesting to see whether the cumulative
impact of these voting rules on minority voters leads any court to
conclude that they were motivated by an unconstitutional racial purpose.
As I've said, that will likely require some evidence in discovery of a
racial motivation. (Without proof of such a motivation, it will be
impossible to get North Carolina recovered through the "bail in"
procedures of Section 3 of the Voting Rights Act.)
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D54367&title=What%E2%80%99s%20Motivating%20the%20North%20Carolina%20Legislature%3F%20Philosophical%20Difference%20or%20Power%20Grab%3F&description=>
Posted in election administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>,
The Voting Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60> | Comments Off
"North Carolinians Fear the End of the Middle Way"
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54365>
Posted on August 14, 2013 7:22 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54365>
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
A-1 NYT
<http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/14/us/north-carolinians-fear-the-end-of-a-middle-way.html?hp&_r=1&>.
AlsoAaron Blake
<http://d1ej5r2t2cu524.cloudfront.net/aablake/the-fix-swing-state-gop-governors-seek-to-wrangle-aggressive-gop-legislatures/562133-www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/08/13/gop-governors-and-legislatures-divided-by-a-common-party/?c=70c29f69-a6fa-4999-b6b8-86a2c7233198>:
Swing-state GOP governors seek to wrangle aggressive GOP legislatures
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D54365&title=%E2%80%9CNorth%20Carolinians%20Fear%20the%20End%20of%20the%20Middle%20Way%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in political parties <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=25>,
political polarization <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=68>, The Voting
Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60> | Comments Off
--
Rick Hasen
Chancellor's Professor of Law and Political Science
UC Irvine School of Law
401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000
Irvine, CA 92697-8000
949.824.3072 - office
949.824.0495 - fax
rhasen at law.uci.edu
http://www.law.uci.edu/faculty/full-time/hasen/
http://electionlawblog.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20130814/b49919c9/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20130814/b49919c9/attachment.png>
View list directory