[EL] Paz Harassment

Fri Aug 30 05:03:41 PDT 2013

In the Prop 8 litigation, we got affidavits or verified through newspaper  
articles over 250 incidents of harrassment of Prop 8 donors.  I don't  
remember a single one where the perpetrator was punished. Partially because in  
some instances the harrassment is legal -- like firing the person.

And what if the perpetrators were caught? The donor has paint on his  car 
and the perpetrator gets a $50 fine.  The donor is still discouraged  from 
donating again.  Jim  Bopp

In a message dated 8/29/2013 3:15:21 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
mmcdon at gmu.edu writes:

Do you have information that you wish to share with law enforcement that  
she is being targeted through disclosure of a campaign donation? 
Anyone who has been following what is happening on reddit and other social  
media these days wrt to say, the identity of the Boston  bombers, knows 
that campaign finance disclosure information is likely not  the source. 

============
Dr. Michael P. McDonald
Associate  Professor
George Mason University
4400 University Drive -  3F4
Fairfax, VA 22030-4444

phone:   703-993-4191  (office)
e-mail:   mmcdon at gmu.edu                
web:     _http://elections.gmu.edu_ (http://elections.gmu.edu/) 
twitter:  @ElectProject

____________________________________

From: Bill Maurer [wmaurer at ij.org]
Sent:  Thursday, August 29, 2013 2:40 PM
To: Michael P McDonald;  law-election at UCI.edu
Subject: RE: [EL] Paz  Harassment

Professor, I would say  she’s probably being harassed because she made a 
campaign donation—and  then the government made a whole bunch of information 
about her public that  she probably now wishes very much that they hadn’t.  I 
don’t really care  about the motivations of the harasser—what I care about 
is that the government  is helping harassment to occur and providing 
significant disincentives for  people (especially small donors who have a lot to 
lose if their union steward,  boss, neighbor, neighborhood identity thief, 
etc. read the disclosure reports)  to participate in the country’s political 
life.  And having a cop say,  “Wow, it’s a shame that happened” after the 
fact doesn’t fix that or make the  fact that the government is enabling this 
activity any less  problematic. 
And to the extent that  these are straw men, they are straw men accepted by 
the courts as a  justification for the disclosure of almost all political 
activity in this  country, regardless of how minute.  The fact that we on the 
side of  anonymity have to counter some fairly silly arguments only 
reflects the fact  that the courts have fully bought into those arguments.   

From:  law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu  
[mailto:law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu] On Behalf Of  Michael P McDonald
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 11:25  AM
To: law-election at UCI.edu
Subject: Re: [EL] Paz  Harassment

Do you guys ever  get tired of punching straw men? No one ever said there 
was no political  harassment and several people gave examples of it, myself 
included. The claim  was the harassment *for a campaign donation* was a rare 
thing, is terrible,  but when weighed against other democratic values should 
be properly handled  through law enforcement. I don't think Ms. Paz is 
being harassed for a  campaign donation.

============ 

Dr. Michael P.  McDonald
Associate Professor
George Mason University
4400 University  Drive - 3F4
Fairfax, VA 22030-4444

phone:   703-993-4191  (office)
e-mail:  _mmcdon at gmu.edu_ (mailto:mmcdon at gmu.edu)                 
web:     _http://elections.gmu.edu_ (http://elections.gmu.edu/) 
twitter:  @ElectProject

____________________________________

From: _law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu_ 
(mailto:law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu)   
[law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu] on behalf of Smith, Brad  [BSmith at law.capital.edu]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 2:03  PM
To: Bill Maurer; _law-election at UCI.edu_ (mailto:law-election at UCI.edu) 
Subject: Re: [EL] Paz  Harassment

Ah, so that  explains why the President has urged higher taxes on the 
wealthy - he's a  captive of his donor base of IRS agents! Thank goodness now we 
know. Had I  know this 10 months ago, it would certainly have influenced my 
vote, and  helped me make sense of the campaign.  

By the way, Bill -  you're not much good at using the databases - I got to 
her street address in  25 seconds from the time I started looking, and it 
took me that long because I  kept hitting the "caps lock" key when I meant to 
hit the "tab" key. I'm  tempted to publish it here, because, like you say, 
it's probably not worth  worrying about, and it's important for people to 
know. Otherwise, we couldn't  be sure it was the right Holly Paz. Besides, most 
people making death threats  probably don't *really* plan to kill her, they 
just want to harass her a bit,  and a little harassment for someone is, 
well, like Justice Scalia and a few  others I could name always say, it's a 
small price to pay when the alternative  is not knowing which politicians are 
beholden to Holly Paz.  

Bradley A. Smith 
Josiah H. Blackmore II/Shirley M. Nault 
Professor of Law 
Capital University Law School 
303 E. Broad St. 
Columbus, OH 43215 
614.236.6317 
http://law.capital.edu/faculty/bios/bsmith.aspx

____________________________________

From: _law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu_ 
(mailto:law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu)   
[law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu] on behalf of Bill Maurer  [wmaurer at ij.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 1:32  PM
To: Rick Hasen; _law-election at UCI.edu_ (mailto:law-election at UCI.edu) 
Subject: Re: [EL] Paz  Harassment

I was wondering how  people got Ms. Paz’s private information so they could 
engage in the  harassment discussed in story, given that I imagine that 
most IRS officials  are not all that forthcoming about where they live.  Then I 
did a search  for her political donations and—Shazam!—there it was, at 
least what state and  city she lives in (had she given money in Washington 
state, her street address  would have been listed too).   
However, I’ve been told  repeatedly that using this information to harass 
people (i) doesn’t happen,  (ii) isn’t that bad anyway, and (iii) it’s the 
price of political courage, so  I guess it’s all okay.  Maybe she’ll be able 
to get an exemption from  reporting now that people have actually 
threatened to kill her, but that will  depend on whether a judge decides her fear is “
reasonable” in light of the  need to “follow the money” right up to where 
the yellow police tape  starts.   
Bill 

From:  _law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu_ 
(mailto:law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu)  
[mailto:law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu] On  Behalf Of Rick Hasen
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 9:42  PM
To: _law-election at UCI.edu_ (mailto:law-election at UCI.edu) 
Subject: [EL] ELB News and  Commentary 8/29/13

_“IRS official who  scrutinized conservative groups facing harassment, 
attorney says”_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54904)  

Posted on _August 28, 2013 9:38  pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54904)  
by _Rick  Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)  

_WaPo:_ 
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/irs-official-who-scrutinized-conservative-groups-facing-harassment-attorney-says/2013/08/28/50577962-0ff
6-11e3-bdf6-e4fc677d94a1_story.html)  
A top Internal Revenue Service official has faced harassment, including  
threatening telephone calls and visits to her home, after being singled out  
for criticism by Republicans, her lawyer alleges in a letter to  lawmakers. 
The official, _Holly Paz_ 
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/06/17/what-did-top-irs-official-holly-paz-tell-congressional-investigator
s-here-are-the-highlights/) , has been on administrative leave since June 
in  connection with _the controversy_ 
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/obama-denounces-reported-irs-targeting-of-conservative-groups/2013/05/13/a01
85644-bbdf-11e2-97d4-a479289a31f9_story.html)  over how the IRS scrutinized 
conservative  groups applying for tax-exempt status. Paz was involved in 
subjecting some  tea party groups to scrutiny and helped conduct an internal 
review of the  program, but has not been formally accused of wrongdoing.

(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54904&title=“
IRS%20official%20who%20scrutinized%20conservative%20groups%20facing%20harassment,%20attorney%20says”&description=) 

Posted in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10) ,  _tax 
law and election  law_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=22)  
_Tom Edsall Gets Major  Republican Strategists, Top U.S. Political 
Scientists to Weigh in On Chances  for Republicans to Capture Presidency in 2016_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54902)  

Posted on _August 28, 2013 9:34  pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54902)  
by _Rick  Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)  

_Important perspectives_ 
(http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/08/28/can-republicans-paint-the-white-house-red/?hp&_r=0) . 

(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54902&title=Tom%20Edsall%20Gets%20Major%20Republican%20Strategists,%20Top%20U.S.%
20Political%20Scientists%20to%20Weigh%20in%20On%20Chances%20for%20Republican
s%20to%20Capture%20Presidency%20in%202016&descript) 

Posted in _campaigns_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59)   
_“Obama: ‘We’re Not  Going To Wait For Congress’ To Act On Voting Rights 
Act”_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54900)  

Posted on _August 28, 2013 9:28  pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54900)  
by _Rick  Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)  

_Video_ 
(http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2013/08/28/obama_were_not_going_to_wait_for_congress_to_act_on_voting_rights_act.html)  from PBS News 
Hour interview. 

(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54900&title=“Obama:%20‘We’re%20Not%20Going%20To%20Wait%20For%20Congress’
%20To%20Act%20On%20Voting%20Rights%20Act”&description=) 

Posted in _Department of  Justice_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=26) , 
_The Voting Wars_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60) ,  _Voting Rights Act_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15)   
_“N.C. Lawmakers Meet  Raucous Crowd at Charlotte Forum”_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54898)  

Posted on _August 28, 2013 9:26  pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54898)  
by _Rick  Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)  

_The backlash begins._ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/N.C.%20lawmakers%20meet%20raucous%20crowd%20at%20Charlotte%20forum%20%20Read%20more%20here:%20http:/w
ww.charlotteobserver.com/2013/08/28/4271194/nc-lawmakers-meet-raucous-crowd.
html#storylink=cpy)  

(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54898&title=“N.C.%20Lawmakers%20Meet%20Raucous%20Crowd%20at%20Charlotte%20Forum”
&description=) 

Posted in _The Voting Wars_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60)   
_“The True Cost of  Free Voter I.D. in Texas”_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54896)  

Posted on _August 28, 2013 9:17  pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54896)  
by _Rick  Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)  

_This interesting item_ 
(http://texaselectionlaw.wordpress.com/2013/07/25/the-true-cost-of-free-voter-i-d-in-texas/)  (and many other interesting 
items)  appear at the new “Texas Election Law Blog.” The blog is _written  by_ 
(http://texaselectionlaw.wordpress.com/about/)  “Joseph Kulhavy – I am a 
licensed attorney in the State of Texas, and  from October 6, 2004 until July 
2, 2013, I was a staff attorney with the  Elections Division, Texas Secretary 
of State.” 
Keep an eye here. 

(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54896&title=“The%20True%20Cost%20of%20Free%20Voter%20I.D.%20in%20Texas”
&description=) 

Posted in _The Voting Wars_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60) ,  _voter 
id_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=9) , _Voting Rights Act_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15)   
_Other Goings-On in  Texas Since The Supreme Court Killed Voting Rights Act 
Section 5  Preclearance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54892)  

Posted on _August 28, 2013 9:11  pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54892)  
by _Rick  Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)  

_In Pasadena, TX:_ 
(http://txredistricting.org/post/58935159956/pasadena-redistricting-moves-draw-questions)  “the City of Pasadena in southeast Harris 
 County voted 5-4 to place a proposition on the November 2013 ballot that, 
if  approved by voters, would change the city’s current 8 single member 
district  system of electing members of the city council to a 6-2 system 
featuring two  at large members_._ 
(http://txredistricting.org/post/58935159956/pasadena-redistricting-moves-draw-questions)  State Sen. Sylvia Garcia, MALDEF, 
and the Houston  Chronicle have all expressed concerns that the move would 
dilute the  voting strength of the city’s rapidly growing Hispanic 
population.” 
In _Galveston, TX: _ 
(http://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/houston-texas/houston/article/Galveston-County-may-run-afoul-of-Voting-Rights-4747681.php) “
Galveston County commissioners have slashed  the number of justice of the 
peace and constable districts a year after the  U.S. Justice Department 
blocked a similar plan as discriminatory.” 
Yeah, the e_nd of preclearance matters_ 
(http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2013/08/north_carolina_s_speedy_vote_suppression_
tactics_show_exactly_why_the_voting.html) .  And for those like _James 
Taranto _ 
(http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324108204579024942693167698.html) who say the Court didn’t really kill Section  5, only the 
preclearance provision of section 4, I debunk that claim in my  APSA paper (which I’
m presenting tomorrow), _Shelby County and the Illusion of Minimalism._ 
(http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2291612)  

(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54892&title=Other%20Goings-On%20in%20Texas%20Since%20The%20Supreme%20Court%20Kill
ed%20Voting%20Rights%20Act%20Section%205%20Preclearance&description=) 

Posted in _Supreme Court_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29) , _Voting 
Rights Act_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15)   
_Eric Wang on  McCutcheon_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54890)  

Posted on _August 28, 2013 9:00  pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54890)  
by _Rick  Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)  

_Here_ 
(http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/aug/28/wang-cutting-the-price-tag-off-free-speech/) , in the Washington Times. 

(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54890&title=Eric%20Wang%20on%20McCutcheon&description=) 

Posted in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10)   
_“Black Republicans  try to appropriate Martin Luther King”_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54888)  

Posted on _August 28, 2013 8:56  pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54888)  
by _Rick  Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)  

And apparently they _don’t suppor_ 
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/dana-milbank-black-republicans-try-to-appropriate-martin-luther-king/2013/08/
26/2eb47d18-0e99-11e3-bdf6-e4fc677d94a1_story.html) t fixing the Voting 
Rights Act: 
A similar response greeted Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner (R-Wis.), who  criticized 
_the Supreme Court decision_ 
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/supreme-court-stops-use-of-key-part-of-voting-rights-act/2013/06/25/26888528-dda5-1
1e2-b197-f248b21f94c4_story.html)  that invalidated part of the  Voting 
Rights Act and vowed to repair the law so that it is “impervious to  another 
challenge that will be filed by the usual suspects. I’m with you on  that.” 
The light applause suggested that most of those in attendance were  not with 
him.

(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54888&title=“
Black%20Republicans%20try%20to%20appropriate%20Martin%20Luther%20King”&description=) 

Posted in _Voting Rights Act_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15)   
_“Sorority offered  free drinks to members to vote in Tuscaloosa City Board 
of Education race”_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54886)   

Posted on _August 28, 2013 8:54  pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54886)  
by _Rick  Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)  

_The Birmingham News reports. (h/t Political  Wire)_ 
(http://politicalwire.com/archives/2013/08/28/sorority_girls_offered_free_drinks_to_vote.html#.Uh6P
QVbh_mE.twitter)  
Offering payments or incentives for voting is illegal in federal  
elections.  It is also illegal in some states.  (It is illegal in  all states to pay 
someone to vote for or against a candidate or  ballot measure.) 
More on this in my article, _Vote Buying. _ 
(http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=257564)  

(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54886&title=“
Sorority%20offered%20free%20drinks%20to%20members%20to%20vote%20in%20Tuscaloosa%20City%20Board%20of%20Education%20race”&description=) 

Posted in _vote buying_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=43)   
_“Colorado: Campaign  Finance complaint filed against Morse opponent points 
to the hybrid nature of  recalls”_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54884)  

Posted on _August 28, 2013 10:13  am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54884) 
 by _Rick  Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)  

_This item_ 
(http://recallelections.blogspot.com/2013/08/colorado-campaign-finance-complaint.html)  appears at the Recall Elections Blog. 

(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54884&title=“
Colorado:%20Campaign%20Finance%20complaint%20filed%20against%20Morse%20opponent%20points%20to%20the%20hybrid%20nature%20of%20recalls”
&description=) 

Posted in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10) ,  
_recall elections_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=11)   
_“What Today’s  Journalists Can Learn From MLK Coverage; In 1963, 
newspapers tried to present  ‘both sides’ of the civil rights struggle. Modern 
reporters should know better  — but when it comes to voting rights, they often 
make the same mistake.”_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54882)   

Posted on _August 28, 2013 10:11  am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54882) 
 by _Rick  Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)  

_Andrew Cohen writes_ 
(http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2013/08/what-todays-journalists-can-learn-from-mlk-coverage/278095/)  for The 
Atlantic. 

(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54882&title=“What%20Today’
s%20Journalists%20Can%20Learn%20From%20MLK%20Coverage;%20In%201963,%20newspapers%20tried%20to%20present%20‘both%20sides’
%20of%20the%20civil%20right) 

Posted in _The Voting Wars_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60)   
_“Republicans Admit  Voter ID Laws Are Aimed at Democratic Voters”_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54880)  

Posted on _August 28, 2013 9:17  am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54880)  
by _Rick  Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)  

_Jamelle Bouie writes_ 
(http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/08/28/republicans-admit-voter-id-laws-are-aimed-at-democratic-voters.html?utm_source=
feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+thedailybe
ast/politics+(The+Daily+Beast+-+Politics))  for The Daily Beast. 

(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54880&title=“
Republicans%20Admit%20Voter%20ID%20Laws%20Are%20Aimed%20at%20Democratic%20Voters”&description=) 

Posted in _The Voting Wars_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60)   
_“King’s Deferred  ‘Dream’ of Democracy”_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54878)  

Posted on _August 28, 2013 8:56  am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54878)  
by _Rick  Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)  

_Janai Nelson writes_ 
(http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2013/08/27/kings-deferred-dream-of-democracy/)  for Reuters Opinion. 

(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54878&title=“King’s%20Deferred%20‘Dream’%20of%20Democracy”&description=) 

Posted in _Voting Rights Act_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15)   
_An Open Letter to  Jonathan Tobin on Voter Fraud Allegations_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54875)  

Posted on _August 28, 2013 8:32  am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54875)  
by _Rick  Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)  

Mr Tobin, 
Is it possible for you to stop the _bait and switch_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=48568) ?  No one I know who has studied this issue says there’s no 
voter fraud (hence,  the misleading title of your piece: _Are You Sure There’
s No Voter Fraud_ 
(http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2013/08/27/are-you-sure-theres-no-voter-fraud-voter-id-detroi/) ?). It happens,  especially with 
absentee ballots. 
Instead, the claim is that there’s almost no voter impersonation fraud—the 
 main type of fraud a voter id law would be designed to prevent.  For my  
book The Voting Wars I tried to find a single instance where an  election was 
thrown into question _since 1980_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=42150)  by 
 such fraud. I _could not find_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=19560)  a  
single example. I found lots of examples of absentee ballot fraud, and  
election officials committing fraud. But because impersonation fraud is such a  
dumb and inefficient way to steal an election, it is unsurprising that it  
doesn’t happen.  You offer no such examples in your writing; just  innuendo. 
And please don’t tell me that this fraud is both widespread and impossible  
to detect (to paraphrase Colin Powell’s recent remarks). There’s not a 
_single credible  academic_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=42251)  who would 
agree. We have some _comparative numbers  from News21_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=48568)  on prosecutions for these kinds of crimes. Absentee ballot  
fraud is a real problem. Impersonation fraud is negligible. There’s no 
reason  to believe that impersonation fraud would be harder to catch. In fact, 
because  it would involve a lot of people going to polling places claiming to 
be  someone else, it would be easier to catch. 
So spare me the unsubstantiated allegations. And if you are really serious  
that voter fraud is a major problem, let’s see you get behind and advocate 
for  the elimination of no excuse absentee balloting before you attack 
phantom  targets. 
Sincerely, 
Rick Hasen 

(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=54875&title=An%20Open%20Letter%20to%20Jonathan%20Tobin%20on%20Voter%20Fraud%20All
egations&description=) 

Posted in _fraudulent fraud  squad_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=8) , 
_The Voting Wars_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60)   
-- 
Rick Hasen
Chancellor's Professor of Law and Political Science
UC Irvine School of Law
401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000
Irvine, CA 92697-8000
949.824.3072 - office
949.824.0495 - fax
_rhasen at law.uci.edu_ (mailto:rhasen at law.uci.edu) 
http://www.law.uci.edu/faculty/full-time/hasen/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20130830/24d69dfb/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20130830/24d69dfb/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20130830/24d69dfb/attachment-0001.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20130830/24d69dfb/attachment-0002.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20130830/24d69dfb/attachment-0003.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20130830/24d69dfb/attachment-0004.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20130830/24d69dfb/attachment-0005.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20130830/24d69dfb/attachment-0006.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20130830/24d69dfb/attachment-0007.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20130830/24d69dfb/attachment-0008.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20130830/24d69dfb/attachment-0009.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20130830/24d69dfb/attachment-0010.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20130830/24d69dfb/attachment-0011.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20130830/24d69dfb/attachment-0012.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20130830/24d69dfb/attachment-0013.bin>