[EL] Does Woodward Need Socialist Workers?

[Andy Kroll]

Here are the actual emails in question in re Woodward and the White House:

http://www.politico.com/story/2013/02/exclusive-the-woodward-sperling-emails-revealed-88226.html?hp=t1_3

Don't seem very threatening when put into context of the full exchange.


On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Steve Hoersting <hoersting at gmail.com>wrote:

>
> http://www.businessinsider.com/bob-woodward-obama-sequester-white-house-reporting-price-politics-2013-2
>
> Regrettably, the above article is par for the course (no pun intended).
> And I thought their targets couldn't get more American than Gibson Guitars.
>
> It occurs to me that businessman and woman inclined to fund right-leaning
> SuperPACs in the 2014 House races may have a strong potential to seek an
> exemption from compelled disclosure under *Socialist Workers. *
>
> This administration has not mellowed. This administration wants nothing
> more than to restore Pelosi as Speaker. I would not want to be operating a
> business of any scale while openly opposing the political party of this
> administration.
>
> --
> Stephen M. Hoersting
>
> _______________________________________________
> Law-election mailing list
> Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
> http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20130228/266a8685/attachment.html>