[EL] Question about reporting on 2012 election voting

[Richard Winger]

One of the assertions below is that Obama was credited with 100% of the vote in some precincts in Wood County, Ohio.  After reading this e-mail, I went to the Wood County, Ohio Board of Elections, and found the results by precinct.  The county web page says the county has 97 precincts.  Obama's best precinct showed him getting 75% of the vote, and his worst had him at 28%.  It seemed like a fairly standard distribution, over the 97 precincts.  The vote in the county as a whole was close between Obama and Romney.

If all the assertions in the list below are so easily debunked, the list itself is highly suspect.

The list makes reference to "Ohio County" but doesn't say what state.  West Virginia has a county named Ohio County so I assume the reference is to Ohio County, West Virginia.  But just the fact that the list makes reference to "Ohio County" and doesn't even name the state shows how careless it is.

Richard Winger

415-922-9779

PO Box 470296, San Francisco Ca 94147

--- On Sun, 1/6/13, Trevor Potter <tpotter at capdale.com> wrote:

From: Trevor Potter <tpotter at capdale.com>
Subject: [EL] Question about reporting on 2012 election voting
To: 
Cc: law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
Date: Sunday, January 6, 2013, 8:04 PM

I received the email below from a (usually rational)  friend, who wrote asking if I thought it was true. Does anyone know if such allegations are widespread, who is disseminating them, and whether they have recived press coverage or been subject to analysis/rebuttal?
 
Thanks
 
Trevor Potter
 
The Numbers Are Now Talking 

    

Very Interesting !!


Sometimes you just cannot argue with the numbers. The USA has bigger problems on their hands other than who was elected President. 

>From Bill O'Reilly's message board: 

Most everyone suspected fraud, but these numbers prove it and our government and media refuse to do anything about it.

As each state reported their final election details, the evidence of voter fraud is astounding. Massive voter fraud has been reported in areas of OH and FL, with PA, WI and VA, all are deploying personnel to investigate election results.

Here are just a few examples of what has surfaced with much more to come.

* In 59 voting districts in the Philadelphia region, Obama received 100% of the votes with not even a single vote recorded for
Romney. (A mathematical and statistical impossibility).

* In 21 districts in Wood County Ohio, Obama received 100% of the votes where GOP inspectors were illegally removed from their
polling locations - and not one single vote was recorded for Romney. (Another statistical impossibility).

* In Wood County Ohio, 106,258 voted in a county with only 98,213 eligible voters.

* In St. Lucie County, FL, there were 175,574 registered eligible voters but 247,713 votes were cast.

* The National SEAL Museum, a polling location in St. Lucie County, FL had a 158% voter turnout.

* Palm Beach County, FL had a 141% voter turnout.

* In Ohio County, Obama won by 108% of the total number of eligible voters.

NOTE: Obama won in every state that did not require a Photo ID and lost in every state that did require a Photo ID in order to vote.

Imagine that! 


<- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ->
To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS,
we inform you that, unless specifically indicated otherwise,
any tax advice contained in this communication (including any
attachments) was not intended or written to be used, and
cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax-related
penalties under the Internal Revenue Code, or (ii)  promoting,
marketing, or recommending to another party any tax-related
matter addressed herein. 
 
This message is for the use of the intended recipient only.  It is
from a law firm and may contain information that is privileged and
confidential.  If you are not the intended recipient any disclosure,
copying, future distribution, or use of this communication is
prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error, please
advise us by return e-mail, or if you have received this communication
by fax advise us by telephone and delete/destroy the document.
<-->


_______________________________________________
Law-election mailing list
Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20130106/92dd1932/attachment.html>