[EL] Lessons from “Va. Republicans push re-drawn district map through Senate”
Richard Winger
richardwinger at yahoo.com
Tue Jan 22 07:57:59 PST 2013
If Virginia had procedures for a statewide referendum, the Democratic Party certainly would have the resources to put this new plan to a popular vote. But unfortunately Virginia doesn't have such procedures.
Richard Winger
415-922-9779
PO Box 470296, San Francisco Ca 94147
--- On Tue, 1/22/13, Samuel Bagenstos <sambagen at umich.edu> wrote:
From: Samuel Bagenstos <sambagen at umich.edu>
Subject: Re: [EL] Lessons from “Va. Republicans push re-drawn district map through Senate”
To: "Rob Richie" <rr at fairvote.org>
Cc: "Election Law" <Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu>
Date: Tuesday, January 22, 2013, 5:33 AM
A couple of questions about this:
1. Is there any publicly available information about the precise demographics of the new districts that would be created if the re-redistricting became law?
2. I have tended to share the concern expressed by Rick and others that it's hard to come up with a workable doctrine to prevent egregious political gerrymanders, even if lots of us would agree that some such gerrymanders raise serious constitutional concerns. Yet a re-redistricting like this, were it to go through, would probably set off lots of people's alarm bells (certainly on process, maybe -- though I'd like to know more -- on substance). For folks who think that courts should stay out of political gerrymandering questions, I'm interested to know what legitimate practices would be imperiled by a doctrine that, focusing on some mix of process and substance concerns, would permit folks to challenge gerrymanders like this (assuming that substantively the lockup effects are as Rob suggests). I will say that I've always been ambivalent about political gerrymandering claims and still am. But avoiding difficult judicial line drawing is not the
only important value.
Samuel R. BagenstosProfessor of LawUniversity of Michigan Law School625 S. State St.Ann Arbor, MI 48109sambagen at umich.eduhttp://www.law.umich.edu/FacultyBio/Pages/FacultyBio.aspx?FacID=sambagenhttp://disabilitylaw.blogspot.com/Twitter: @sbagen
On Jan 22, 2013, at 7:46 AM, Rob Richie wrote:
This news item from Rick underscores just how far we can expect efforts to manipulate our electoral rules might go in some states. Those who dismiss the potential of similar powergrabs to distort the Electoral College by going to congressional district allocation of electoral votes in Democratic-leaning swing states (like Virginia, Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin) simply aren't paying attention,.
In sum, without any warning, 20 Republican senators took advantage of an African American state senator being in DC for the inauguration on Martin Luther King Day to jam through a Republican gerrymander designed to ensure the state senate joins all the deep south state legislative chambers in being locked up for Republicans for the next generation. Excluding Maryland, which has its own politic dynamic locking it down for Democrats, the only southern legislative chambers still in Democratic control are one house in Kentucky and two in West Virginia, both states with relatively few African Americans. I would be stunned if any of the otehr legislative chambers flip back to Democrats in the next decade, and probably not for at least two -- meaning that a majority of the nation's African Americans live in a region where their preferred state legislative candidates are nearly guaranteed to be out of power for a long time.
How Gov. McDonnell responds to this move will be very telling.
Rob Richie
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:29 PM, Rick Hasen <rhasen at law.uci.edu> wrote:
“Va. Republicans push re-drawn district map
through Senate”
Posted on January 21, 2013 8:14
pm by Rick Hasen
WaPo:
“Senate Republicans pushed a re-drawn state political map past
flabbergasted Democrats on Monday, pulling off what would
amount to a mid-decade redistricting of Senate lines if the
plan gets approval from the House and governor and stands up
to anticipated legal challenges. The bill, approved 20 to 19,
would revamp the Senate map to concentrate minority voters in
a new Southside district and would change most, if not all,
existing district lines. Democrats, still scrambling Monday
night to figure out the impact, said they thought that the new
map would make at least five districts held by Democrats
heavily Republican. The map puts two sitting senators, R.
Creigh Deeds (D-Bath) and Emmett W. Hanger Jr. (R-Augusta),
into a single district.”TPM:
As mentioned earlier, seizing on the absence of a
Democratic senator who happens to be a veteran of the civil
rights movement and was in Washington, on Martin Luther
King, Jr. Day, for the second inauguration of the country’s
first black president, Republicans in the evenly split
Virginia state Senate pushed
through a surprise mid-decade redistricting plan to
try to gain decisive control of the body in the next
election.We’re not done yet.At the end of this wild day, the “Senate adjourned in
memory or (sic) General Thomas J. ‘Stonewall’ Jackson,”
according to the minutes
of the session. Jan. 21 is the Confederate general’s
birthday.
<share_save_171_16.png>
Posted
in redistricting
| Comments Off
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Respect for Every Vote and Every Voice"
Rob Richie
Executive Director
FairVote
6930 Carroll Avenue, Suite 610
Takoma Park, MD 20912
www.fairvote.org rr at fairvote.org
(301) 270-4616
Please support FairVote through action and tax-deductible donations -- see http://fairvote.org/donate. For federal employees, please consider a gift to us through the Combined Federal Campaign (FairVote's CFC number is 10132.) Thank you!
_______________________________________________
Law-election mailing list
Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
_______________________________________________
Law-election mailing list
Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20130122/7a4a4c7f/attachment.html>
View list directory