[EL] ELB News and Commentary 1/26/13
Rick Hasen
rhasen at law.uci.edu
Fri Jan 25 20:57:56 PST 2013
"GOP's Electoral Scheme Likely Illegal in Virginia"
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=46635>
Posted on January 25, 2013 8:54 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=46635>
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
I'm not so sure aboutthis
<http://tv.msnbc.com/2013/01/25/gops-electoral-vote-scheme-likely-illegal-in-virginia/>.
As I indicate in my new /Slate/ piece
<http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2013/01/republican_plans_for_electoral_college_reform_democrats_shouldn_t_worry.html>,
I think it is highly unlikely these plans get enacted.
And since I wrote the piecethe Va. governor and new key Senators
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/va-politics/va-bill-on-electoral-college-change-appears-headed-for-defeat/2013/01/25/75099d7e-6733-11e2-9e1b-07db1d2ccd5b_story.html>
have come out against it.
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D46635&title=%E2%80%9CGOP%E2%80%99s%20Electoral%20Scheme%20Likely%20Illegal%20in%20Virginia%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in electoral college <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=44> |
Comments Off
Watch Brennan Center Event on Voter Registration Modernization
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=46632>
Posted on January 25, 2013 8:49 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=46632>
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Here <http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=b6CZYxegRJk>.
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D46632&title=Watch%20Brennan%20Center%20Event%20on%20Voter%20Registration%20Modernization&description=>
Posted in election administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>,
The Voting Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>, voter registration
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=37> | Comments Off
"Secretary of State Connie Lawson's Insurance Policy"
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=46631>
Posted on January 25, 2013 8:48 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=46631>
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Hmm.
<http://www.advanceindiana.blogspot.com/2013/01/secretary-of-state-connie-lawsons.html>
<http://www.advanceindiana.blogspot.com/2013/01/secretary-of-state-connie-lawsons.html>
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D46631&title=%E2%80%9CSecretary%20of%20State%20Connie%20Lawson%E2%80%99s%20Insurance%20Policy%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in election administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18> |
Comments Off
"Montana, not California, shows the way on Citizens United"
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=46629>
Posted on January 25, 2013 8:47 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=46629>
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
David Wise oped
<http://www.mercurynews.com/opinion/ci_22437020/david-w-wise-montana-not-california-shows-way>.
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D46629&title=%E2%80%9CMontana%2C%20not%20California%2C%20shows%20the%20way%20on%20Citizens%20United%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10> |
Comments Off
"LDF Files Brief in Supreme Court, Mounting Vigorous Defense of the
Voting Rights Act's Constitutionality"
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=46626>
Posted on January 25, 2013 8:42 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=46626>
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Press release
<http://www.naacpldf.org/news/ldf-files-brief-supreme-court-mounting-vigorous-defense-voting-rights-acts-constitutionality>
and brief
<http://www.naacpldf.org/files/case_issue/12-96%20bs%20Earl%20Cunningham%20et%20al..pdf>.
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D46626&title=%E2%80%9CLDF%20Files%20Brief%20in%20Supreme%20Court%2C%20Mounting%20Vigorous%20Defense%20of%20the%20Voting%20Rights%20Act%E2%80%99s%20Constitutionality%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in Supreme Court <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>, Voting
Rights Act <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15> | Comments Off
"ALEC Has Opposed 'Popular Vote' Efforts Which Would Protect Against
Partisan Rigging of Electoral College"
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=46624>
Posted on January 25, 2013 8:40 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=46624>
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
See here
<http://www.prwatch.org/news/2013/01/11951/alec-has-opposed-popular-vote-efforts-which-would-protect-against-partisan-riggin>.
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D46624&title=%E2%80%9CALEC%20Has%20Opposed%20%E2%80%98Popular%20Vote%E2%80%99%20Efforts%20Which%20Would%20Protect%20Against%20Partisan%20Rigging%20of%20Electoral%20College%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in electoral college <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=44> |
Comments Off
"Organizing for Action means it's over... for awhile"
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=46622>
Posted on January 25, 2013 8:38 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=46622>
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Steve Hoersting <http://rightsolutions.org/2013/01/25/662/>: "What does
this mean? It doesn't just mean Team Obama is prepared, and deserves, to
lose /Danielcyzk/ and /McCutcheon,/ for whether they do or not doesn't
affect their strategy/./ It means the concerted movement for /federal/
campaign-finance reform is over... at least for awhile."
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D46622&title=%E2%80%9COrganizing%20for%20Action%20means%20it%E2%80%99s%20over%E2%80%A6%20for%20awhile%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>, tax law
and election law <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=22> | Comments Off
"Barack Obama's new 'grass-roots' group isn't quite"
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=46621>
Posted on January 25, 2013 8:36 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=46621>
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Politico reports
<http://www.politico.com/story/2013/01/barack-obamas-new-grassroots-group-tied-to-big-liberal-donors-corporations-86708.html>.
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D46621&title=%E2%80%9CBarack%20Obama%E2%80%99s%20new%20%E2%80%98grass-roots%E2%80%99%20group%20isn%E2%80%99t%20quite%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>, tax law
and election law <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=22> | Comments Off
"State Bar Association Calls for Modernization of New York's
Election System To Boost Voter Turnout"
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=46619>
Posted on January 25, 2013 8:34 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=46619>
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
See here
<http://readme.readmedia.com/State-Bar-Association-Calls-for-Modernization-of-New-Yorks-Election-System-To-Boost-Voter-Turnout/5387388>.
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D46619&title=%E2%80%9CState%20Bar%20Association%20Calls%20for%20Modernization%20of%20New%20York%E2%80%99s%20Election%20System%20To%20Boost%20Voter%20Turnout%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in election administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18> |
Comments Off
"The long past and perilous future of gaming the Electoral College
system" <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=46617>
Posted on January 25, 2013 8:33 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=46617>
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Joshua Spivak writes
<http://theweek.com/article/index/239271/the-long-past-and-perilous-future-of-gaming-the-electoral-college-system>.
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D46617&title=%E2%80%9CThe%20long%20past%20and%20perilous%20future%20of%20gaming%20the%20Electoral%20College%20system%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in electoral college <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=44> |
Comments Off
Federal District Court Upholds Minnesota Law Barring False Campaign
Speech in Ballot Measure Elections
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=46613>
Posted on January 25, 2013 8:31 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=46613>
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Today a federal district court issued this Order Granting Summary
Judgment
<http://electionlawblog.org/wp-content/uploads/Order-Granting-Summary-Judgment.pdf>
in the 281 Care Committee case which I've been following on the blog.
It is the first false campaign speech case I know of decided in light of
the Supreme Court's decision in U.S. v. Alvarez (the stolen valor case).
Inthis forthcoming Montana Law Review article
<http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2151618>, I consider
this case and more generally how /Alvarez/ affects the constitutionality
of laws barring false campaign speech.
I expect this case will be appealed again to the Eighth Circuit.
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D46613&title=Federal%20District%20Court%20Upholds%20Minnesota%20Law%20Barring%20False%20Campaign%20Speech%20in%20Ballot%20Measure%20Elections&description=>
Posted in campaigns <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59> | Comments Off
Briefs Available in Arizona Elections Clause Case
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=46610>
Posted on January 25, 2013 8:22 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=46610>
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Important case flying under the radar at SCOTUS. More about it when I
have time. In the meantime, here are the briefs, courtesy of the ABA
<http://www.americanbar.org/publications/preview_home/12-71.html>:
State of Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona
Docket No., 12-71
Arguement Date: TBD
QUESTION PRESENTED:
Did the court of appeals err 1) in creating a new, heightened preemption
test under Article I, Section 4, Clause 1 of the U.S. Constitution
("the Elections Clause") that is contrary to this Court's authority and
conflicts with other circuit court decisions, and 2) in holding that
under that test the National Voter Registration Act preempts an Arizona
law that requests persons who are registering to vote to show evidence
that they are eligible to vote?
source <http://www.supremecourt.gov/qp/12-00071qp.pdf>
Merit Briefs
* Brief for Petitioner Arizona
<http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publications/supreme_court_preview/briefs-v2/12-71_pet.pdf>
* Brief for Petitioners Twenty-Six County Recorders and County
Election Directors
<http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publications/supreme_court_preview/briefs-v2/12-71_26countyrecorders.pdf>
* Brief for Respondents Inter Tribal Council Of Arizona, Inc., League
Of Women Voters Of Arizona, Arizona Advocacy Network, Steve M.
Gallardo, League Of United Latin American Citizens Arizona, and Hopi
Tribe
<http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publications/supreme_court_preview/briefs-v2/12-71_resp.pdf>
* Brief for Gonzalez Respondents
<http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publications/supreme_court_preview/briefs-v2/12-71_resp_gonzalez.pdf>
Amicus Briefs
* Brief for Alabama, Georgia, Kansas, Michigan, Oklahoma, and Texas in
Support of Petitioners
<http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publications/supreme_court_preview/briefs-v2/12-71_pet_amcu_agkmot.pdf>
* Brief for the American Civil Rights Union and 12 Civil Rights
Lawyers in Support of Petitioners
<http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publications/supreme_court_preview/briefs-v2/12-71_pet_amcu_aclu-etal.pdf>
* Brief for the American Unity Legal Defense Fund in Support of
Petitioners
<http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publications/supreme_court_preview/briefs-v2/12-71_pet_amcu_auld.pdf>
* Brief for Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence in Support of
Petitioners
<http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publications/supreme_court_preview/briefs-v2/12-71_pet_amcu_ccj.pdf>
* Brief for Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense Fund, Inc., in
Support of Petitioners
<http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publications/supreme_court_preview/briefs-v2/12-71_pet_amcu_eagleforum.pdf>
* Brief for Kris W. Kobach, Kansas Secretary of State in Support of
Petitioners
<http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publications/supreme_court_preview/briefs-v2/12-71_pet_amcu_kobach.pdf>
* Brief for Landmark Legal Foundation in Support of Petitioners
<http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publications/supreme_court_preview/briefs-v2/12-71_pet_amcu_llf.pdf>
* Brief for Members of Congress in Support of Petitioners
<http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publications/supreme_court_preview/briefs-v2/12-71_pet_amcu_congress.pdf>
* Brief for Mountain States Legal Foundation in Support of Petitioners
<http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publications/supreme_court_preview/briefs-v2/12-71_pet_amcu_mslf.pdf>
* Brief for State Senator Russell Pearce in Support of Petitioners
<http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publications/supreme_court_preview/briefs-v2/12-71_pet_amcu_sen-pearce.pdf>
* Brief for Community Voter Registration Organizations in Support of
Respondents
<http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publications/supreme_court_preview/briefs-v2/12-71_resp_amcu_cvro.pdf>
* Brief for Constitutional Law Professors in Support of Respondents
<http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publications/supreme_court_preview/briefs-v2/12-71_resp_amcu_conlawprof.pdf>
* Brief for Election Administrators in Support of Respondents
<http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publications/supreme_court_preview/briefs-v2/12-71_resp_amcu_electionadmin.pdf>
* Brief for the League of Women Voters in Support of Respondents
<http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publications/supreme_court_preview/briefs-v2/12-71_resp_amcu_lwv.pdf>
* Brief for Members of Congress in Support of Respondents
<http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publications/supreme_court_preview/briefs-v2/12-71_resp_amcu_congress.pdf>
* Brief for NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc., The
Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, and the
Anti-Defamation League in Support of Respondents
<http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publications/supreme_court_preview/briefs-v2/12-71_resp_amcu_naacp-etal.pdf>
* Brief for Overseas Vote Foundation, Federation of American Women's
Clubs Overseas, American Citizens Abroad, Military Spouses of
Michigan, and Arizona Students' Assocation in Support of Respondents
<http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publications/supreme_court_preview/briefs-v2/12-71_resp_amcu_ovf-etal.pdf>
* Brief for the United States in Support of Respondents
<http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publications/supreme_court_preview/briefs-v2/12-71_resp_amcu_US.pdf>
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D46610&title=Briefs%20Available%20in%20Arizona%20Elections%20Clause%20Case&description=>
Posted in Supreme Court <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>, voter
registration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=37> | Comments Off
"Facts And Myths About The Supreme Court Challenge To The Voting
Rights Act" <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=46607>
Posted on January 25, 2013 8:12 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=46607>
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
This item
<http://mediamatters.org/research/2013/01/25/facts-and-myths-about-the-supreme-court-challen/192388>
appears at Media Matters.
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D46607&title=%E2%80%9CFacts%20And%20Myths%20About%20The%20Supreme%20Court%20Challenge%20To%20The%20Voting%20Rights%20Act%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in Supreme Court <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>, Voting
Rights Act <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15> | Comments Off
"FEC Deadlock on 501(c)(4) Fund Raising Will Not Be Reconsidered,
Agency Says" <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=46604>
Posted on January 25, 2013 8:09 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=46604>
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Bloomberg BNA
<http://news.bna.com/mpdm/MPDMWB/split_display.adp?fedfid=29405487&vname=mpebulallissues&jd=a0d6e0f0y2&split=0>:
"The Federal Election Commission will leave intact a deadlocked legal
ruling about whether a nonprofit corporation can engage in joint
fund-raising activity with an FEC-regulated political action committee,
according to a Jan. 22 letter from the FEC. Last year, the FEC
commissioners deadlocked along party lines on an advisory opinion (AO
2012-25) requested by the American Future Fund. The Republican-leaning
organization was one of a several so-called Section 501(c)(4) groups
that together spent tens of millions of dollars on political ads and
other activities in the 2012 campaign season."
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D46604&title=%E2%80%9CFEC%20Deadlock%20on%20501%28c%29%284%29%20Fund%20Raising%20Will%20Not%20Be%20Reconsidered%2C%20Agency%20Says%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>, tax law
and election law <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=22> | Comments Off
"'Hello, quid. Where's the pro quo?'"
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=46601>
Posted on January 25, 2013 8:00 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=46601>
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
With all the focus on today's DC Circuit recess appointment decision
<http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/26/business/court-rejects-recess-appointments-to-labor-board.html?pagewanted=1>,
it is easy to miss its other decision today in the Abramoff-related U.S.
v Kevin Ring
<http://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/C037775BBF3665CA85257AFE00556AE6/$file/11-3100-1417085.pdf>
case. As BLT reports, it raises interesting questions about campaign
contributions a bribes, the illegal gratuity statute, and the
relationship of lobbying activity to the First Amendment. Here's an
interesting snippet from the opinion:
Testimony about Ring's lawful campaign contributions gave jurors a
window into the way in which lobbyists like Ring gain influence with
public officials. One witness explained the role of campaign
contributions in Abramoff's lobbying practices with a particularly
striking metaphor:
Q: Did you ever lobby with campaign contributions?
A: Yes.
Q: How did you do that?
A: Campaign contributions are a little bit different than, for lack
of a better term, things of value. I viewed campaign contributions
as sort of the ante in a poker game. It's the price of being
involved in the game. We worked---we worked aggressively to raise
money and we liked to do it.
Q: What do you mean by that, you viewed campaign contributions as
the ante in a poker game?
A: Yeah, it's a seat at the table. That's all. That's all it is.
Trial Tr. 10/28/10 PM 21:9--20. In other words, under the
government's theory of the case, campaign contributions gave the
lobbyists access to public officials. Without such evidence, a jury
might wonder why an official would sacrifice his integrity for a few
Wizards tickets. Perhaps even more significantly, the contribution
testimony amounted to strong modus operandi evidence that
demonstrated Ring's transactional relationship with officials and
the manner in which he pursued his clients' political aims. That
Ring rewarded "good soldier[s]" with campaign contributions, for
example, perhaps suggests that he put other things of value to
similar use.
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D46601&title=%E2%80%9C%E2%80%98Hello%2C%20quid.%20Where%E2%80%99s%20the%20pro%20quo%3F%E2%80%99%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in bribery <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=54>, campaign finance
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>, chicanery
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=12>, legislation and legislatures
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=27>, lobbying
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=28> | Comments Off
"Democrats, Don't Freak Out! Why fears that Republicans will
gerrymander the Electoral College are overblown"
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=46598>
Posted on January 25, 2013 1:36 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=46598>
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Slate has published my new commentary
<http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2013/01/republican_plans_for_electoral_college_reform_democrats_shouldn_t_worry.html>.
It begins:
Sound the alarm! Democrats are on high alert! Josh Marshall calls it
a big, big deal
<http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2013/01/this_is_a_big_big_deal.php?ref=fpblg>.
Eric Kleefeld says
<https://twitter.com/EricKleefeld/status/294596342507008002> if the
blueprint were in place last November, the GOP would have "stolen
2012 for Mitt Romney." Steve Benen of the Maddow Blog
<http://maddowblog.msnbc.com/_news/2013/01/24/16677359-if-you-cant-win-elections-rig-them>
calls it a "democracy-crushing scheme" showing that "the will of the
voters and the consent of the governed are now antiquated concepts
that Republicans no longer value."
They're all talking about potential plans to change the method for
electing the president in states like Virginia, Wisconsin, and
Pennsylvania---states that have Republican legislatures and
governors but voted for Obama in 2012. Instead of awarding all of
the state's Electoral College votes to the presidential candidate
getting the most votes in each of these states, under the proposed
plans most of the Electoral College votes would be awarded to the
winner in each congressional district---and thanks to Republican
gerrymandering of those districts, such a scheme would be a windfall
for Republicans.
This plan would be deeply concerning if Republicans were really
going to enact it. But the same self-interest that is leading
Republicans to consider this move is also going to lead most of them
to abandon it almost everywhere. The Great Democratic Freak-out is
unjustified. But it is not without its usefulness, because it
reminds wavering Republicans what they will face if they go down the
road of unilateral Electoral College reform.
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D46598&title=%E2%80%9CDemocrats%2C%20Don%E2%80%99t%20Freak%20Out%21%20Why%20fears%20that%20Republicans%20will%20gerrymander%20the%20Electoral%20College%20are%20overblown%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in electoral college <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=44> |
Comments Off
--
Rick Hasen
Chancellor's Professor of Law and Political Science
UC Irvine School of Law
401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000
Irvine, CA 92697-8000
949.824.3072 - office
949.824.0495 - fax
rhasen at law.uci.edu
http://law.uci.edu/faculty/page1_r_hasen.html
http://electionlawblog.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20130125/57b26170/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20130125/57b26170/attachment.png>
View list directory