[EL] Supreme Court Case Today Discusses Earlier Case Banning 501(c)(3) Lobbying and Elections Case

[Robbin Stewart]

* It is, however, a basic First Amendment principle that “freedom of speech
prohibits the government from telling people what they must say.” Rumsfeld
v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights, Inc., 547 U. S. 47, 61
(2006) (citing West Virginia Bd. of Ed. v. Barnette, 319 U. S. 624, *

*642 (1943), and Wooley v. Maynard, 430 U. S. 705, 717 (1977)). “At the
heart of the First Amendment lies the principle that each person should
decide for himself or herself the ideas and beliefs deserving of
expression, *

*consideration, and adherence. Agency for International Development v
Alliance for Open Society International, Inc, _ U.S. _ (6/20/2013)*

*
*

*Does this case have implications for disclaimer cases?*


On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Rick Hasen <rhasen at law.uci.edu> wrote:

>    <http://electionlawblog.org/>
>     Supreme Court Case Today Discusses Earlier Case Banning 501(c)(3)
> Lobbying and Elections Case <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=51876>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20130620/479c3843/attachment.html>