[EL] Disclosure costs through the lens of Mozilla and How I Met Your Mother

[John Tanner]

Let me put in a good word for Satan worshippers and Stalinists.  The issue
in such employment decisions should not be what one believes but how
unrestrained that belief is: whether the individual can see and accomplish
the organizational goals without regard to or, better, subordinating her
personal beliefs.  An excessive devotion to a worthy mainstream cause can
be destructive to the business.  To take a very extreme case, there
are/have been actual terrorists on the far fringes of environmental
movement.




On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 7:14 AM, Ilya Shapiro <IShapiro at cato.org> wrote:

>  Just joined the group and might as well strike while the iron is hot. In
> my latest Forbes column I argue that the Brendan Eich contretemps
> illustrates the folly of a disclose-at-all-costs regulatory regime:
>
>
> http://www.forbes.com/sites/ilyashapiro/2014/04/06/mozillas-ceo-showed-the-cost-of-disclosure-laws-by-crossing-the-satan-scherbatsky-line/
>
>  Cordially,
>
> Ilya Shapiro
> Senior Fellow in Constitutional Studies
> Cato Institute
> 1000 Mass. Ave. NW
> Washington, DC 20001
> Tel. 202-218-4600
> Cel. 202-577-1134
> www.cato.org/people/shapiro.html
> twitter.com/ishapiro
>
> _______________________________________________
> Law-election mailing list
> Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
> http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20140407/a2584c50/attachment.html>