[EL] What a Shock!

JBoppjr at aol.com JBoppjr at aol.com
Wed Apr 9 10:03:58 PDT 2014


Well then I will await your much larger work anxiously. I can raise  
questions about your posts and you defend yourself by citing "larger  works."
 
You have said repeatedly, when you occasionally respond to one of my posts, 
 that  "I'm not going to get into another long debate with you on the  
internet." I don't know if you think I am just not worthy of debating  you or 
you don't want to debate in public so others can evaluate your  arguments. Or 
perhaps you prefer just to express your opinions everyday but  are above 
defending them. The Oracles of Delphi felt the same  way.  Either way it is an 
odd brush off by someone with so many  opinions and one who so aggressively 
puts them out to the public. But I guess  some are just too good to be 
soiled by debate with us commoners.  
 
Oh, and by the way, just because I responded I am still "not going to get  
into another long debate with you on the internet."  How about a short  
debate instead? I have more lawsuits to work on. Jim Bopp
 
 
In a message dated 4/9/2014 11:18:12 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
rhasen at law.uci.edu writes:

Jim,
I'm not going to get into another long debate with you on  the internet. 
But depending upon how one defines the problem, the sky actually  is already 
falling, and the election of Obama does not prove that the system  is 
working.  I've made a number of points about the problem of  legislative skew in 
this piece 
(http://www.stanfordlawreview.org/print/article/lobbying-rent-seeking-and-constitution)  and I've begun work on a much larger work which will 
eventually respond to  these points.
Rick

On 4/9/14, 5:55 AM, _JBoppjr at aol.com_ (mailto:JBoppjr at aol.com)  wrote:


Regarding Rick's comment under "What a Shock!:"
 
P.S. Someone should collect all the statements from the  deregulationists 
who said getting rid of aggregate limits is no big deal and  it wouldn’t lead 
to multi-million dollar checks and the emergence of soft  money.
 
I would but my hard drive is already full of all the Chicken  Little claims 
of imminent doom by the campaign finance "reformers" after  almost every 
Court decision since Buckley. 
 
Just to mention one, Citizens United was decided in  2010.  The Chicken 
Littles said that corporations would own all the  politicians.  Obama was 
reelected in 2012.  Was he owned by  corporations?  Opps.  And the Chicken 
Littles have not even  apologized to Obama.  They just press on with more dire 
predictions.  Jim Bopp
 
 
In a message dated 4/8/2014 11:47:01 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, 
_rhasen at law.uci.edu_ (mailto:rhasen at law.uci.edu)  writes:



_Tom Edsall on McCutcheon_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60250)  
 
Posted on _April 8, 2014 8:27  pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60250)  
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)  

 
_Important NYT opinion column_ 
(http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/09/opinion/the-high-cost-of-free-speech.html?partner=rssnyt&emc=rss) . 
Tom links to my SCOTUSBlog post, “_Does the Chief Justice not Understand 
Politics, or  Does He Understand it all too Well?_ 
(http://www.scotusblog.com/2014/04/symposium-does-the-chief-justice-not-understand-politics-or-does-he-u
nderstand-it-all-too-well/) “ 
It’s not every day I’m called more cynical than Richard Posner. 
 
 
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60250&title=Tom%20Edsall%20on%20McCutcheon&description=) 


Posted  in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10) , 
_Supreme Court_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29)   
_“Miss. preparing to use new voter ID law”_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60247)   
 
Posted on _April 8, 2014 8:00  pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60247)  
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)  

 
_Gannett reports._ 
(http://www.clarionledger.com/article/20140408/NEWS01/304080033/Miss-preparing-use-new-voter-ID-law)  
 
 
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60247&title=“Miss.%20preparing%20to%20use%20new%20voter%20ID%20law”
&description=) 


Posted  in _election administration_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18) , 
_The Voting Wars_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60)   
_“Blacks and Early Voting, in Ohio and  Wisconsin”_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60245)  
 
Posted on _April 8, 2014 7:56  pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60245)  
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)  

 
_NYT letter to the editor_ 
(http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/09/opinion/blacks-and-early-voting-in-ohio-and-wisconsin.html?ref=opinion)  from NAACP Ohio 
and  Wisconsin leaders. 
 
 
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60245&title=“Blacks%20and%20Early%20Voting,%20in%20Ohio%20and%20Wisconsin”
&description=) 


Posted  in _election administration_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18) , 
_The Voting Wars_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60) , _voter 
registration_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=37)   
_NYT Letters to the Editor on David Brooks  McCutcheon Column_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60243)  
 
Posted on _April 8, 2014 7:55  pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60243)  
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)  

 
_Here._ 
(http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/09/opinion/money-politics-and-the-justices.html?ref=opinion)  
 
 
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60243&title=NYT%20Letters%20to%20the%20Editor%20on%20David%20Brooks%20McCutcheon%
20Column&description=) 


Posted  in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10) , 
_Supreme Court_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29)   
_How Low Will Dick Morris Go?_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60241)  
 
Posted on _April 8, 2014 7:53  pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60241)  
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)  

 
_This low._ 
(http://thehill.com/opinion/dick-morris/203019-dick-morris-investigate-2012-vote-fraud)  
Didn’t realize he was a member of the fraudulent fraud squad. 
 
 
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60241&title=How%20Low%20Will%20Dick%20Morris%20Go?&description=) 


Posted  in _fraudulent fraud squad_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=8) , 
_The Voting Wars_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60)   
_What a Shock!: “John Roberts Gets the Parties  Started”_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60239)  
 
Posted on _April 8, 2014 7:43  pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60239)  
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)  

 
_Politico reports:_ 
(http://www.politico.com/story/2014/04/john-roberts-supreme-court-mccutcheon-republican-party-105503.html)  
Insiders are dreaming up how to maximize a recent Supreme Court  ruling 
that frees up some big donors to give even more. 
A prominent idea: create a new class of donors who  contribute a total of 
six- or seven-figures to each of three party  committees and spread cash to 
endangered lawmakers. In exchange, the  big-money givers would get something 
of an “all access pass” that comes  with perks from the big three national 
committees, like face time with  top officials.
Of course Roberts told us that this wouldn’t happen, or that the FEC  or 
Congress would easily fix it.
_Yeah right._ 
(http://www.scotusblog.com/2014/04/symposium-does-the-chief-justice-not-understand-politics-or-does-he-understand-it-all-too-well/) 
And don’t delude yourselves. Many Democratic party operatives are  
delighted with McCutcheon.
P.S. Someone should collect all the statements from the  deregulationists 
who said getting rid of aggregate limits is no big deal  and it wouldn’t lead 
to multi-million dollar checks and the emergence of  soft money.
 
 
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60239&title=What%20a%20Shock!:%20“John%20Roberts%20Gets%20the%20Parties%20Started
”&description=) 


Posted  in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10) , 
_Supreme Court_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29)   
_Two Panels on Voting Rights May 2 at LA Law Library  as Part of Law Week_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60236)  
 
Posted on _April 8, 2014 7:00  pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60236)  
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)  

 
Looking forward to participating in this: 
 (http://electionlawblog.org/wp-content/uploads/Law_Week_Flyer_Friday.png)  
 
 
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60236&title=Two%20Panels%20on%20Voting%20Rights%20May%202%20at%20LA%20Law%20Libra
ry%20as%20Part%20of%20Law%20Week&description=) 


Posted  in _voting_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=31) , _Voting Rights 
Act_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15)   
_“Government Brief Cites McCutcheon Case In  Defending FEC’s Requirements 
for PACs”_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60234)  
 
Posted on _April 8, 2014 6:51  pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60234)  
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)  

 
_Bloomberg BNA_ 
(http://news.bna.com/mpdm/MPDMWB/split_display.adp?fedfid=44415475&vname=mpebulallissues&jd=a0e8w1u4z2&split=0) : “Supreme Court 
precedents,  including the court’s most recent campaign finance ruling in 
McCutcheon v.  Fed. Election Comm’n, consistently have supported requirements for 
public  disclosure of campaign money, government attorneys argued in a _brief_ 
(http://www.fec.gov/law/litigation/freespeech_fec_opp_brief.pdf)  filed 
with the high court  (Free Speech v. FEC, U.S., No. 13-772, brief filed 4/4/14).
” 
 
 
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60234&title=“
Government%20Brief%20Cites%20McCutcheon%20Case%20In%20Defending%20FEC’s%20Requirements%20for%20PACs”&description=) 


Posted  in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10) , 
_Supreme Court_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29)   
_“How to Clean Up American Elections”_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60232)   
 
Posted on _April 8, 2014 6:46  pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60232)  
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)  

 
_Ganesh Sitaraman writes_ 
(http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/04/clean-up-elections-with-peoples-pledge-105492.html#.U0SlbMeT6N8)  for 
Politico. 
 
 
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60232&title=“How%20to%20Clean%20Up%20American%20Elections”&description=) 


Posted  in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10) , 
_Supreme Court_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29)   
_“RNC chairman: Strike down all contribution  limits”_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60230)  
 
Posted on _April 8, 2014 6:44  pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60230)  
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)  

 
_That’s _ 
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2014/04/08/rnc-chairman-strike-down-all-contribution-limits/) more like it. 
 
 (
http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60230&title=“RNC%20chairman:%20Strike%20down%20all%20contribution%20limits”
&description=) 


Posted  in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10) , 
_Supreme Court_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29)   
_“Stay issued on subpoenas in NC election law case  “_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60228)  
 
Posted on _April 8, 2014 1:31  pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60228)  
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)  

 
_AP reports._ 
(http://www.news-record.com/news/north_carolina_ap/article_451dc9df-0dcb-58c2-9fb5-8b87ed1d86b9.html)  
 
 
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60228&title=“Stay%20issued%20on%20subpoenas%20in%20NC%20election%20law%20case%20“
&description=) 


Posted  in _The Voting Wars_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60)   
_“The Hounding of Brendan Eich Gives New Cover to  Defenders of Dark Money”
_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60226)  
 
Posted on _April 8, 2014 1:30  pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60226)  
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)  

 
_Important piece_ 
(http://www.newrepublic.com/article/117307/brendan-eichs-resignation-mozilla-gives-new-cover-dark-money)  from Alec MacGillis. 
 
 
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60226&title=“
The%20Hounding%20of%20Brendan%20Eich%20Gives%20New%20Cover%20to%20Defenders%20of%20Dark%20Money”&description=) 


Posted  in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10) , 
_Supreme Court_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29)   
_“McConnell Doubts Individual Campaign Finance  Limits Will Go Away”_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60224)  
 
Posted on _April 8, 2014 1:20  pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60224)  
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)  

 
_Roll Call reports_ 
(http://blogs.rollcall.com/wgdb/mcconnell-doubts-individual-campaign-finance-limits-will-go-away/) .  I don’t think he’s the  only 
one calling the shots on this though. 
 
 
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60224&title=“
McConnell%20Doubts%20Individual%20Campaign%20Finance%20Limits%20Will%20Go%20Away”&description=) 


Posted  in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10) , 
_Supreme Court_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29)   
_Demos Explainer on McCutcheon_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60222)  
 
Posted on _April 8, 2014 1:03  pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60222)  
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)  

 
_Guide for the Perplexed._ 
(http://www.demos.org/publication/what-mccutcheon-v-fec)  
 
 
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60222&title=Demos%20Explainer%20on%20McCutcheon&description=) 


Posted  in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10) , 
_Supreme Court_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29)   
_“Judge Rules Delaware Disclosure Law  Unconstitutional”_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60220)  
 
Posted on _April 8, 2014 12:58  pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60220)  
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)  

 
_CCP: _ 
(http://www.campaignfreedom.org/2014/04/08/judge-rules-delaware-disclosure-law-unconstitutional/) “A federal court today _issued an order_ 
(http://www.campaignfreedom.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/SLR-Order-08apr20141.p
df)  _barring enforcement_ 
(http://www.campaignfreedom.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Order-Granting-MPI.pdf)  of a recently adopted  Delaware law that 
would have forced a group that publishes non-partisan  voter guides to 
violate its members’ privacy.” 
 
 
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60220&title=“Judge%20Rules%20Delaware%20Disclosure%20Law%20Unconstitutional”
&description=) 


Posted  in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10)   
_“Rich People Will Always Beat Campaign Finance  Restrictions”_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60218)  
 
Posted on _April 8, 2014 12:55  pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60218)  
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)  

 
_Steve Chapman _ 
(http://reason.com/archives/2014/04/07/rich-people-will-always-beat-campaign-fi) writes for Reason. 
 
 
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60218&title=“
Rich%20People%20Will%20Always%20Beat%20Campaign%20Finance%20Restrictions”&description=) 


Posted  in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10) , 
_Supreme Court_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29)   
_“Shelby and Section 3: Pulling the Voting Rights  Act’s Pocket Trigger to 
Protect Voting Rights after Shelby County v.  Holder”_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60216)  
 
Posted on _April 8, 2014 12:51  pm_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60216)  
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)  

 
Paul Wiley has posted_ this draft student note_ 
(http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2421605)  on SSRN (forthcoming,  Washington and Lee 
Law Review).  Here is the abstract: 
The Supreme Court’s decision in Shelby County v. Holder presents  voting 
rights advocates with a difficult challenge: finding an effective  substitute 
for the preclearance regime struck down by the Court. The  best possible 
alternative may live within the Voting Rights Act itself  in Section 3(c)’s “
pocket trigger.” Section 3(c) permits a federal court  to retain jurisdiction 
and preclear a jurisdiction’s changes to its  voting procedures upon a 
finding of a constitutional violation. By  relating more closely to current 
conditions in a specific locality,  Section 3(c) preclearance avoids many of the 
problems the Court  identified in NAMUDNO and Shelby County. 
This Note analyzes the history of Voting Rights Act litigation and  
suggests a more expansive use of Section 3(c) preclearance to continue  federal 
oversight of election procedures.
 
 
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60216&title=“Shelby%20and%20Section%203:%20Pulling%20the%20Voting%20Rights%20Act’
s%20Pocket%20Trigger%20to%20Protect%20Voting%20Rights%20after%20Shelby%20Cou
nty%20v.%20Holder”&description=) 


Posted  in _Supreme Court_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29) , _Voting 
Rights Act_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15) , _VRAA_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=81)  
_All My McCutcheon Commentary in One Place_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60214)   
 
Posted on _April 8, 2014 10:47  am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60214)  
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)  

 
_Courtesy_ (http://www.law.uci.edu/news/faculty/hasen_040214.html)  of 
@UCILaw: 
    *   _The Guardian_ 
(http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/apr/08/supreme-court-fight-for-voting-rights)   
    *   _Daily Journal (PDF)_ 
(http://www.law.uci.edu/news/in-the-news/2014/djournal_hasen_040814.pdf)   
    *   _Reuters_ 
(http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2014/04/07/opening-the-political-money-chutes/)   
    *   _SCOTUSBlog_ 
(http://www.scotusblog.com/2014/04/symposium-does-the-chief-justice-not-understand-politics-or-does-he-understand-it-all-too-well/)
   
    *   _Slate_ (http://slate.me/1oqLlN0)  
 
 
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60214&title=All%20My%20McCutcheon%20Commentary%20in%20One%20Place&description=) 


Posted  in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10) , 
_Supreme Court_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29)   
_“McCutcheon and Corruption in America”_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60212)   
 
Posted on _April 8, 2014 9:13  am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60212)  
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)  

 
_Harvard University Press blog_ 
(http://harvardpress.typepad.com/hup_publicity/2014/04/mccutcheon-and-corruption-in-america-zephyr-teachout.html) : 
In _Corruption in America: From  Benjamin Franklin’s Snuff Box to Citizens 
United_ (http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674050402) , 
Teachout  reminds us that the particularly demanding notion of corruption  
represented by that early gifts rule is central to American law and  democracy. 
This notion of corruption, she explains, is not limited to  the blatant bribes 
and explicit quid pro quo to which Chief Justice  Roberts referred in this 
week’s _McCutcheon v. FEC_ 
(http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/mccutcheon-v-federal-election-commission/)   ruling, and Justice Kennedy in 
_Citizens United_ 
(http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/citizens-united-v-federal-election-commission/)  before  that. The foundational American 
understanding of corruption encompassed  emotional, internal, psychological 
relationships in an effort to protect  the morality of interactions between 
official representatives of  government and private parties, foreign parties, or 
other  politicians.
 
 
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60212&title=“McCutcheon%20and%20Corruption%20in%20America”&description=) 


Posted  in _campaign finance_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10) , 
_Supreme Court_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29)   
_Marty Lederman Goes Into the Weeds on Standing and  Ripeness Issues in 
Susan B. Anthony False Speech SCOTUS Case_ 
(http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60210)   
 
Posted on _April 8, 2014 9:00  am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60210)  
by _Rick Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)  

 
_A very helpful primer_ 
(http://www.scotusblog.com/2014/04/dewine-v-dewine-with-the-united-states-somewhere-in-between/) , at SCOTUSBlog. 
 
 
(http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=60210&title=Marty%20Lederman%20Goes%20Into%20the%20Weeds%20on%20Standing%20and%20
Ripeness%20Issues%20in%20Susan%20B.%20Anthony%20False%20Speech%20SCOTUS%20Ca
se&description=) 


Posted  in _campaigns_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59) , _Supreme 
Court_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29)   


-- 

Rick Hasen

Chancellor's Professor of Law and Political Science

UC Irvine School of Law

401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000

Irvine, CA 92697-8000

949.824.3072 - office

949.824.0495 - fax

rhasen at law.uci.edu

http://www.law.uci.edu/faculty/full-time/hasen/

http://electionlawblog.org


_______________________________________________
Law-election  mailing  list
Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election



-- 

Rick Hasen

Chancellor's Professor of Law and Political Science

UC Irvine School of Law

401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000

Irvine, CA 92697-8000

949.824.3072 - office

949.824.0495 - fax

rhasen at law.uci.edu

http://www.law.uci.edu/faculty/full-time/hasen/

http://electionlawblog.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20140409/dd992bc8/attachment.html>


View list directory