[EL] Duplicate registration compact

[Justin Riemer]

To my recollection, FL does not share social security number data with
other states for the matching process. Either state law does not permit it,
they choose not to share it, or it may not be info the voter provides on
the application. SSN info is an important part of the matching process. I'm
just guessing but that issue may have something to do with FL's departure.

My understanding is that Oregon left to join ERIC. ERIC is fantastic. Some
states do both, some do neither, and some do one or the other.

As the Bauer-Ginsbeg (PCEA) report concluded, Crosscheck is plenty
reliable, particularly for those who share SSN information which are most
states involved. It is what states make of it and certainly not the
boogeyman portrayed by many. I still have a hard time getting my head
around why a program that has blue, red, and purple states involved is so
maligned. I suspect its more of a political attack than anything else.


On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Edward Still <still at votelaw.com> wrote:

> Thanks to everyone. It was Oregon AND Florida.
>
>
> Edward Still
> Edward Still Law Firm LLC
> 130 Wildwood Parkway STE 108-304
> Birmingham AL 35209
> 205-320-2882
> still at votelaw.com
> www.votelaw.com/blog
> www.edwardstill.com
> www.linkedin.com/in/edwardstill <http://www.linkedin.com/edwardstill>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>> Law-election mailing listLaw-election at department-lists.uci.eduhttp://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Law-election mailing list
> Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
> http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20140418/86c9ebfd/attachment.html>