[EL] WARNING: SNARK AHEAD RE: Supreme Court and campaign finance

[JBoppjr at aol.com]

Because the Buckley Court limited campaign related speech to only express  
advocacy and the resulting issue speech still criticized politicians.  How  
soon we forget!  Jim Bopp
 
 
In a message dated 7/1/2014 4:23:20 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
mmcdon at gmu.edu writes:

Interesting theory, but how do you explain the fact that Congress  passed 
BCRA after three consecutive cycles of incumbent reelection rates of  96% or 
higher? 



Mark  Schmitt
202/246-2350
gchat  or Skype: schmitt.mark
twitter: mschmitt9  




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20140702/88c6a58d/attachment.html>