[EL] Fwd: Op-ed Supreme Court Winners and Losers

[Derek Muller]

Re *McCullen v. Coakley*: "it was clear that there was a bitter divide
between the five-man conservative side and the liberal bloc, which included
the three female justices, as to how much protection would ultimately be
allowed for clinic visitors."

I confess that, among other things, I don't exactly understand this
description about *McCullen*, in which Chief Justice Roberts wrote the
majority opinion, joined by Justices Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and
Kagan; in which Justice Scalia wrote an opinion concurring in the judgment,
joined by Justices Kennedy and Thomas; and in which Justice Alito wrote a
separate opinion concurring in the judgment.


On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Frank Askin <faskin at kinoy.rutgers.edu>
wrote:

> my op ed from today's Star-Ledger. FRANK
>
> ----- Forwarded Message -----
> From: "Janet Donohue" <jdonohue at kinoy.rutgers.edu>
> To: askin at kinoy-new.rutgers.edu
> Sent: Tuesday, July 8, 2014 11:16:05 AM
> Subject: Op-ed
>
>
>
> --
>
> Janet Donohue
> Director of Communications
> Rutgers School of Law–Newark
> 123 Washington Street
> Newark, NJ 07102-3026
> t: 973-353-5553
> f: 973-353-1717
> jdonohue at kinoy.rutgers.edu
>
> www.law.newark.rutgers.edu
> http://www.facebook.com/RutgersLawNewark
> http://twitter.com/RULawNewark
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Law-election mailing list
> Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
> http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20140708/19c82425/attachment-0001.html>