[EL] House candidate Carr’s campaign drops ball on required finance filing
David A. Holtzman
David at HoltzmanLaw.com
Sun Jul 27 21:05:38 PDT 2014
Thanks, all.
The LA Times article says “House Ethics rules” require the filing.But
now I know, thanks to Joseph and Craig, it’s really federal law that
requires the filing.I’ve submitted a correction to the paper through its
web form.
The definition of “candidate” used in the federal law here (raising or
spending $5,000 or more, or letting someone do that on your behalf) [2
U.S.C. § 431(2)] could be useful for limiting who can participate in
future candidate forums.
I think there were 18 people on the ballot in the primary here
(California’s 33rd C.D.), and 16 or 17 of them were on the stage at a
forum I went to.Only 10 of them filed the disclosures at issue (find
their forms at http://clerk.house.gov/public_disc/financial-search.aspx
), although another one filed a convenient form saying he was exempt
(http://clerk.house.gov/public_disc/financial-pdfs/2013/8213545.pdf).
- dah
On 7/27/2014 3:23 PM, Craig Holman wrote:
> Joseph explained it well. Federal law requires House candidates to
> file with the Clerk, Senate candidates with the Senate Secretary, and
> presidential candidates with OGE, which is then enforced by DOJ. It is
> an invaluable disclosure law for voters to discern conflicts of
> interest, and it mandates such disclosures for federal employees as
> well, not just candidates. The congressional offices and OGE are the
> administrative agencies. I just want to add the cite:
>
> 5 USC app., section 101 et seq.
>
>
> Craig Holman, Ph.D.
> Government Affairs Lobbyist
> Public Citizen
> 215 Pennsylvania Avenue SE
> Washington, D.C. 20003
> T-(202) 454-5182
> C-(202) 905-7413
> F-(202) 547-7392
> Holman at aol.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joseph E. Sandler <sandler at sandlerreiff.com>
> To: David A. Holtzman <David at HoltzmanLaw.com>; Election Law
> <Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu>
> Sent: Sun, Jul 27, 2014 9:31 am
> Subject: Re: [EL] House candidate Carr’s campaign drops ball on
> required finance filing
>
> David
> The requirement for a candidate for US House to file a personal
> financial disclosure report is not imposed by the Rules of the House
> but by the Ethics in Government Act--the federal statute. While that
> statute confers certain authority on the House Ethics Committee to
> review the reports and implement the reporting requirements, the
> authority to enforce the law against a candidate lies with the US
> Department of Justice--not the House Ethics Committee which as you
> correctly surmise, has no jurisdiction to impose penalties on persons
> that are not currently Members of Congress or employees of Congress.
> Joseph E. Sandler
> Sandler, Reiff, Lamb, Rosenstein & Birkenstock P.C.
> 1025 Vermont Avenue, N.W. Suite 300
> Washington, D.C. 20005
> Tel: (202) 479-1111
> Fax: (202) 479-1115
> Cell: (202) 607-0700
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu
> <mailto:law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu>
> [law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu
> <mailto:law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu>] On Behalf Of
> David A. Holtzman [David at HoltzmanLaw.com <mailto:David at HoltzmanLaw.com>]
> *Sent:* Saturday, July 26, 2014 9:26 PM
> *To:* Election Law
> *Subject:* Re: [EL] House candidate Carr’s campaign drops ball on
> required finance filing
>
> How can the House, simply by its own rule, constitutionally require a
> non-member to file an ethics statement?
> Can it really collect a late fee?
> Even if the guy loses?
> (The guy is a Republican running against a party-endorsed Democrat for
> Rep. Waxman's seat.)
> (And the Congress for which he's running isn't the current one whose
> House adopted the rule.)
>
>>
>> “House candidate Carr’s campaign drops ball on required finance
>> filing” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=63732>
>>
>> Posted on July 24, 2014 9:28 pm
>> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=63732>by Rick Hasen
>> <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>> LAT.
>> <http://www.latimes.com/local/political/la-me-pc-carr-late-filing-20140724-story.html>
>
>
> --
> David A. Holtzman, M.P.H., J.D.
> david at holtzmanlaw.com
> Notice: This email (including any files transmitted with it) may be
> confidential, for use only by intended recipients. If you are not an
> intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this email
> to an intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email
> in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or
> copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received
> this email in error, please immediately notify the sender and discard
> all copies.
> _______________________________________________
> Law-election mailing list
> Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu <mailto:Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu>
> http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
>
> --
> David A. Holtzman, M.P.H., J.D.
> david at holtzmanlaw.com
>
> Notice: This email (including any files transmitted with it) may be
> confidential, for use only by intended recipients. If you are not an
> intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this email
> to an intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email
> in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or
> copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received
> this email in error, please immediately notify the sender and discard
> all copies.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20140727/eee043a8/attachment.html>
View list directory