[EL] ELB News and Commentary 7/31/14

Rick Hasen rhasen at law.uci.edu
Wed Jul 30 20:45:28 PDT 2014


    Wisconsin Supreme Court Set to Issue Voter ID Ruling, Other Major
    Rulings, Thursday Morning--Could Moot Federal Case
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=63841>

Posted on July 30, 2014 8:36 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=63841>by 
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Milwaukee Journal Sentinel 
<http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/act-10-voter-id-same-sex-partner-issues-converge-thursday-b99320335z1-269071231.html>:

    Three bolts of legal lightning --- affecting union bargaining,
    election law and same-sex couples --- will finally come down
    Thursday morning in what promises to be a historic day for the
    Wisconsin Supreme Court.

    Set for release are long-awaited opinions on whether Gov. Scott
    Walker's labor law is constitutional, whether voters can be made to
    show photo IDs and whether the state can run a registry for same-sex
    partners. On the question of photo ID at the polls, the court is
    ruling on two consolidated lawsuits challenging the same law,
    meaning essentially four significant legal cases in all being
    decided Thursday.

The article says the voter id ruling won't be so significant because a 
federal court has already held the law unconstitutional and a violation 
of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.  But that federal court ruling, 
Frank  v. Walker, is a quite significant ruling on the meaning of the 
Voting Rights Act in vote denial cases. A state ruling striking down the 
id on state law grounds could moot the appeal in Frank v. Walker, 
meaning we will not get our first federal appellate ruling (this from 
the 7th Circuit) on the vote denial Section 2 issue.  and potentially 
even lead to an attempt to vacate the federal court opinion.  So 
tomorrow's ruling, if it does strike down the law, could have some 
national implications.

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D63841&title=Wisconsin%20Supreme%20Court%20Set%20to%20Issue%20Voter%20ID%20Ruling%2C%20Other%20Major%20Rulings%2C%20Thursday%20Morning%E2%80%93Could%20Moot%20Federal%20Case&description=>
Posted in election administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>, 
The Voting Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>, voter id 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=9>, Voting Rights Act 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15>


    Yahoo News Lists Major Donors to "No Labels"
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=63838>

Posted on July 30, 2014 4:46 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=63838>by 
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Much more interesting stuff in this Meredith Shiner report. 
<http://news.yahoo.com/no-labels--no-results--no-problem-212252637.html>

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D63838&title=Yahoo%20News%20Lists%20Major%20Donors%20to%20%E2%80%9CNo%20Labels%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>


    Daily Kos Diarist Criticizes MayDay PAC for Supporting What Diarist
    Terms Tea Party Candidate <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=63836>

Posted on July 30, 2014 3:40 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=63836>by 
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Here 
<http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/07/29/1317493/-Mayday-PAC-s-first-two-candidate-choices-Does-the-left-hand-know-what-the-right-hand-s-doing>.

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D63836&title=Daily%20Kos%20Diarist%20Criticizes%20MayDay%20PAC%20for%20Supporting%20What%20Diarist%20Terms%20Tea%20Party%20Candidate&description=>
Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>, 
campaigns <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>


    Three Democratic FEC Commisioners Release Statement on "Dark Money"
    in Relation to Commission Deadlock on Americans for Job Security,
    AAN <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=63833>

Posted on July 30, 2014 2:56 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=63833>by 
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

You can read it here <http://go.usa.gov/NcGB>.

UPDATE: Here <http://t.co/9xV3L2U6eJ> is the statement from the 
Republican commissioners.

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D63833&title=Three%20Democratic%20FEC%20Commisioners%20Release%20Statement%20on%20%E2%80%9CDark%20Money%E2%80%9D%20in%20Relation%20to%20Commission%20Deadlock%20on%20Americans%20for%20Job%20Security%2C%20AAN&description=>
Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>, federal 
election commission <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=24>


    "How the Republican Governors Association chose sides in Colorado's
    primary" <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=63831>

Posted on July 30, 2014 1:32 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=63831>by 
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Reid Wilson 
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/govbeat/wp/2014/07/30/how-the-republican-governors-association-chose-sides-in-colorados-primary/>: 
"Though it ostensibly stays neutral in primary elections, the Republican 
Governors Association appears to have played favorites in at least one 
contest this year, apparently financing outside spending against a 
well-known fellow Republican."

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D63831&title=%E2%80%9CHow%20the%20Republican%20Governors%20Association%20chose%20sides%20in%20Colorado%E2%80%99s%20primary%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>, 
campaigns <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>


    "Leaked Docs: How a Secret FreedomWorks Donor Sought a Return on Its
    'Investments'" <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=63829>

Posted on July 30, 2014 12:50 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=63829>by 
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Andy Kroll reports 
<http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2014/07/freedomworks-switzerland-richard-stephenson-matt-kibbe> 
for Mother Jones.

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D63829&title=%E2%80%9CLeaked%20Docs%3A%20How%20a%20Secret%20FreedomWorks%20Donor%20Sought%20a%20Return%20on%20Its%20%E2%80%98Investments%E2%80%99%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>


    DOJ Files Amicus Brief in Wisconsin Voter ID Case, Statement of
    Interest in Ohio Early Voting Case
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=63827>

Posted on July 30, 2014 12:34 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=63827>by 
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

DOJ Wisconsin Filing 
<http://www.scribd.com/doc/235474087/DOJ-Wisconsin-Filing>

DOJ Ohio Filing <http://www.scribd.com/doc/235474083/DOJ-Ohio-Filing>

Ryan Reilly 
<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/30/obama-voting-rights-ohio-wisconsin_n_5634804.html?utm_hp_ref=tw> 
HuffPo story.

    DOJ Press release:

    *ATTORNEY GENERAL HOLDER ANNOUNCES JUSTICE DEPARTMENT FILINGS IN
    VOTING RIGHTS CASES IN WISCONSIN AND OHIO*

    WASHINGTON -- Attorney General Eric Holder announced today that the
    Justice Department has submitted filings in voting rights cases in
    Wisconsin and Ohio.  The department's involvement in these two cases
    represents its latest steps to enforce the remaining parts of the
    Voting Rights Act against restrictive state laws, following up on
    the department's lawsuits last year against similar measures in
    Texas and North Carolina.

    In the Wisconsin case, the department filed an amicus brief in
    /Frank v. Walker/ and /LULAC v. Deininger/, supporting an earlier
    ruling by the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
    Wisconsin that struck down Wisconsin's strict photo voter
    identification requirement due to its effects on minority voters
    under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, and because it unduly
    burdens a substantial number of voters in violation of the
    Fourteenth Amendment.  In the Ohio case, the department filed a
    statement of interest in /NAACP v. Husted/, a challenge by a civil
    rights group to a state law curtailing early voting and same day
    registration.  The department's brief contests the state of Ohio's
    incorrect interpretation of the standards set forth by Section 2 of
    the Voting Rights Act.

    "These filings are necessary to confront the pernicious measures in
    Wisconsin and Ohio that would impose significant barriers to the
    most basic right of our democracy," said Attorney General Eric
    Holder.  "These two states' voting laws represent the latest,
    misguided attempts to fix a system that isn't broken.  These
    restrictive state laws threaten access to the ballot box.  The
    Justice Department will never shrink from our responsibility to
    protect the voting rights of every eligible American.  And we will
    keep using every available tool at our disposal to guard against all
    forms of discrimination, to prevent voter disenfranchisement, and to
    secure the rights of every citizen."

    In the amicus brief filed today in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
    Seventh Circuit, the department argues that the district court
    reached the correct decision by finding that Wisconsin's voter ID
    law, known as Act 23, violated the Fourteenth Amendment, because it
    imposes unjustified burdens on a significant number of voters, and
    violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, because it has a
    discriminatory result on African-American and Hispanic voters.  In
    addition to finding that Act 23 would result in minority voters
    having less opportunity to participate in the political process
    relative to other members of the electorate, the court found that
    the state's claimed interests in combating voter fraud and promoting
    electoral confidence did not justify the significant burdens Act 23
    imposes on substantial numbers of voters who lack a qualifying ID.

    In the statement of interest filed today in U.S. District Court for
    the Southern District of Ohio, the department makes clear that
    Section 2 prohibits the state of Ohio from imposing any voting
    qualification, prerequisite to voting, or any standard, practice or
    procedure that would result in the denial or abridgement of the
    right to vote on account of a person's race, color or membership in
    a language minority group.  The filing also makes clear that in its
    own filings in the case the state of Ohio has incorrectly
    interpreted its requirements under Section 2.  The department did
    not take a position on any of the other claims in the case.

    "The United States Department of Justice today affirms its clear
    position that, under Wisconsin's Act 23, minority voters have less
    opportunity to participate in the political process," said James L.
    Santelle, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of
    Wisconsin.  "The amicus brief that we are filing not only supports
    the trial court's findings but also reflects the department's
    continuing focus on ensuring that the franchise remains fully
    available to all qualified voters."

    "Wisconsin's proud history is one of expanding the opportunity to
    vote," said John W. Vaudreuil, United States Attorney for the
    Western District of Wisconsin.  "I'm honored to file this brief with
    the United States Department of Justice seeking to ensure that this
    great Wisconsin tradition is reaffirmed, and that every Wisconsin
    citizen has an equal opportunity to participate in democracy."

    "This office remains committed to preserving the rights of every
    Ohio voter," said Steven M. Dettelbach, United States Attorney for
    the Northern District of Ohio.  "Making sure that courts continue to
    carefully examine voting restrictions, such as the ones recently
    imposed in this state, is an important part of that effort."

    In the year since the Supreme Court struck down the coverage formula
    that determined which jurisdictions were subject to preclearance
    under the Voting Rights Act in /Shelby v. Holder/, Section 2 of the
    Voting Rights Act remains one of the department's most powerful
    tools to protect voting rights.  Last year the department used
    Section 2 to file two lawsuits against the state of Texas to stop
    the newly enacted discriminatory voter ID law and and to obtain a
    ruling that the state engaged in intentional discrimination in
    adopting its 2011 redistricting plans.  In North Carolina, the
    department used Section 2 to sue to stop a number of provisions in
    an election law that imposes strict voter ID requirements, restricts
    early voting, eliminates same-day registration and refuses to count
    otherwise valid provisional ballots cast in the wrong precinct.  The
    suit alleges that the challenged law was motivated by a racially
    discriminatory purpose and will result in African-American voters
    having less opportunity than other citizens to participate in the
    political process.  All three cases are ongoing.

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D63827&title=DOJ%20Files%20Amicus%20Brief%20in%20Wisconsin%20Voter%20ID%20Case%2C%20Statement%20of%20Interest%20in%20Ohio%20Early%20Voting%20Case&description=>
Posted in The Voting Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>, Voting 
Rights Act <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15>


    "Hood calls out 'political blogger' in pay-to-lie scheme"
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=63825>

Posted on July 30, 2014 12:10 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=63825>by 
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Clarion Ledger 
<http://www.clarionledger.com/story/dailyledes/2014/07/30/jim-hood-political-blogger/13363041/>:

    Attorney General Jim Hood
    <http://www.clarionledger.com/search/Jim%20Hood/> said his office is
    investigating whether a "political blogger" paid a Meridian man to
    lie about a vote-buying scheme.

    During his speech at the Neshoba County Fair, Hood called for more
    civility and integrity in political races and pointed to the
    Republican primary for U.S. Senate as being out of control. He said
    a "political blogger" paid a self-described pastor to lie about
    being asked to pay people to vote and that things like that do
    nothing to help political discourse.

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D63825&title=%E2%80%9CHood%20calls%20out%20%E2%80%98political%20blogger%E2%80%99%20in%20pay-to-lie%20scheme%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in chicanery <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=12>, vote buying 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=43>


    Irony Dept: Group Exposing Names of Signers of Anti-Gay Petition are
    Themselves Staying Anonymous Citing Fears of Harassment
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=63823>

Posted on July 30, 2014 11:58 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=63823>by 
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

You can't make this stuff up.

Chris Geidner 
<http://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/mystery-campaign-publishes-names-addresses-of-opponents-of-l>:

    In a twist, the people behind the website, HEROpetition.com, are
    themselves remaining anonymous. A person responding to an inquiry
    made to the email address provided on the website, HEROpetition.com,
    told BuzzFeed Tuesday night that they "aren't identifying people
    associated with the website to protect our personal safety."

    The domain name was registered on July 3 through Domains By Proxy, a
    service whose purpose is to mask the identity of a person purchasing
    a web domain. The person or people making the petitions available to
    all defended their anonymity.

    "The personal safety risks to the people who run this site are far
    greater than the risk to any one individual among tens of thousand
    who signed the petition," the person responding to inquires made at
    the website's email address wrote to BuzzFeed. "[S]ome people claim
    they will be the victims of harassment because of this site, but
    some of them have no problem coming after the folks on this side.
    People who have spoken out publicly in favor of HERO are already
    facing threats against their jobs."

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D63823&title=Irony%20Dept%3A%20Group%20Exposing%20Names%20of%20Signers%20of%20Anti-Gay%20Petition%20are%20Themselves%20Staying%20Anonymous%20Citing%20Fears%20of%20Harassment&description=>
Posted in direct democracy <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=62>


    In Personal Email, Lois Lerner Called Conservatives "Assholes"
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=63821>

Posted on July 30, 2014 10:26 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=63821>by 
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

WSJ 
<http://online.wsj.com/articles/gop-says-lerner-email-shows-bias-against-conservatives-1406739923?mod=rss_US_News>:

    A newly discovered email
    <http://waysandmeans.house.gov/uploadedfiles/lerner_email_a.pdf>
    shows that former Internal Revenue Service official Lois Lerner once
    referred to conservatives as "---holes," according to new documents
    released by House Republicans.

    In the November 2012 email exchange, apparently with a friend or
    family member, Ms. Lerner also suggests that conservatives could
    threaten the nation's future, saying, "So we don't need to worry
    about alien teRrorists [sic]. It's our own crazies that will take us
    down."

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D63821&title=In%20Personal%20Email%2C%20Lois%20Lerner%20Called%20Conservatives%20%E2%80%9CAssholes%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in tax law and election law <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=22>


    "Motor voter problems mean delays at polls"
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=63819>

Posted on July 30, 2014 9:41 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=63819>by 
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

USA Today reports 
<http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2014/07/29/motor-voter-states-dmv/12752595/> 
(via Doug Chapin 
<http://blog.lib.umn.edu/cspg/electionacademy/2014/07/usa_today_motor_voter_problems.php>).

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D63819&title=%E2%80%9CMotor%20voter%20problems%20mean%20delays%20at%20polls%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in election administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>, 
NVRA (motor voter) <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=33>


    "Dark Money Groups Dominate Independent Spending in House Toss-Up
    Races" <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=63817>

Posted on July 30, 2014 9:22 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=63817>by 
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Brennan Center report 
<http://www.brennancenter.org/analysis/election-spending-2014-13-toss-house-districts>.

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D63817&title=%E2%80%9CDark%20Money%20Groups%20Dominate%20Independent%20Spending%20in%20House%20Toss-Up%20Races%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>


    "K Street's elite mini-mega donors have blown beyond" Beyond
    Aggregate Limits Struck in McCutcheon
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=63815>

Posted on July 30, 2014 7:43 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=63815>by 
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Roll Call reports. 
<http://blogs.rollcall.com/beltway-insiders/k-street-files-mini-mega-donors-dominate-downtown-giving/?dcz=>

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D63815&title=%E2%80%9CK%20Street%E2%80%99s%20elite%20mini-mega%20donors%20have%20blown%20beyond%E2%80%9D%20Beyond%20Aggregate%20Limits%20Struck%20in%20McCutcheon&description=>
Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>


    "High Court again asked to intervene in state judicial elections"
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=63812>

Posted on July 30, 2014 7:33 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=63812>by 
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Ron Collins blogs 
<http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2014/07/fan-25-first-amendment-news-high-court-again-asked-to-intervene-in-state-judicial-elections.html#more-89342>.

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D63812&title=%E2%80%9CHigh%20Court%20again%20asked%20to%20intervene%20in%20state%20judicial%20elections%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in judicial elections <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=19>


    "Koch-backed seniors group low-balling election spending?"
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=63810>

Posted on July 30, 2014 7:32 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=63810>by 
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

CPI reports. 
<http://www.publicintegrity.org/2014/07/30/15163/koch-backed-seniors-group-low-balling-election-spending>

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D63810&title=%E2%80%9CKoch-backed%20seniors%20group%20low-balling%20election%20spending%3F%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>



-- 
Rick Hasen
Chancellor's Professor of Law and Political Science
UC Irvine School of Law
401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000
Irvine, CA 92697-8000
949.824.3072 - office
949.824.0495 - fax
rhasen at law.uci.edu
http://www.law.uci.edu/faculty/full-time/hasen/
http://electionlawblog.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20140730/f8caabb8/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20140730/f8caabb8/attachment.png>


View list directory