[EL] McCullen v. Coakley

[Larry Levine]

And how about “free speech” areas fenced in blocks,  or miles, away from the facilities where national political party nominating conventions are held. I’ve long wondered why anyone would bother. The speech may be free but there’s no one there to listen. 

Larry

 

From: law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu [mailto:law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu] On Behalf Of Lorraine Minnite
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2014 7:38 PM
To: law-election at UCI.EDU
Subject: [EL] McCullen v. Coakley

 

Does anyone on the list have an opinion about how the Supreme Court's recent decision in McCullen v. Coakley might apply to state bans on "electioneering" within buffer zones around polling places on Election Day?  Happy to hear from you off-list, especially if this issue has already been discussed on the list (and I missed it).

 

Lori Minnite

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20140630/f4fb2500/attachment.html>