[EL] stay in John Doe case/contempt for Lois Lerner/more news

Rick Hasen rhasen at law.uci.edu
Wed May 7 17:53:04 PDT 2014


    Breaking: 7th Circuit Issues Stay in Wisconsin John Doe Case
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=61310>

Posted on May 7, 2014 5:51 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=61310>by 
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Via the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel 
<http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/halt-to-john-doe-probe-lifts-obstacle-to-scott-walker-re-election-bid-b99264574z1-258293621.html>, 
you can find the unanimous order of a three judge 7th Circuit panel 
(Wood, Bauer and Easterbrook) at this link 
<http://media.jrn.com/documents/courtdecision.pdf>.

I am completely unsurprised by this stay order, once I heard 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=61292> (a) that the judge well may have 
been acting in excess of his jurisdiction; and (b) the judge order the 
destruction of evidence while the case was up on a /preliminary 
injunction. /Here's what the appellate court wrote:

    Whether or not the district court determines that the appeal is
    frivolous, the portions of the injunction that require defendants to
    return or destroy documents will remain stayed as long as
    proceedings continue in this court. Compliance with those portions
    of the injunction could moot some or all of the issues on appeal.
    Whether or not any pre-injunction order is appealable, the
    preliminary injunction is itself open to appeal under 28 U.S.C.
    §1292(a). It would be inappropriate to implement the injunction in a
    manner that effectively prevents appellate review. Plaintiffs'
    interests, pending the review authorized by §1292, can be protected
    if defendants hold the information in confidence and not use it.

I wouldn't read too much into the overall merits of the case. But 
suffice it to say that when a district court pulls stuff like this, it 
is a big red flag in the appellate court.

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D61310&title=Breaking%3A%207th%20Circuit%20Issues%20Stay%20in%20Wisconsin%20John%20Doe%20Case&description=>
Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>, 
chicanery <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=12>


    "Split Definitive: How Party Polarization Turned the Supreme Court
    into a Partisan Court" <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=61308>

Posted on May 7, 2014 5:27 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=61308>by 
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Neal Devins and Larry Baum have posted this draft 
<http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2432111>on SSRN.  
Here is the abstract:

    Starting in 2010 the Supreme Court has divided into two partisan
    ideological blocs, with all the Court's Democratic appointees on the
    liberal side and its Republican appointees on the conservative side.
    Correspondingly, since 1990 there has been a dramatic increase in
    the ideological gap between Democratic and Republican appointees. In
    this article we make use of original empirical research to establish
    that this partisan division is unprecedented in the Court's history,
    and we undertake a systematic analysis of how it came about. We show
    that it is linked to growing partisan polarization among political
    elites, polarization that has shaped the Court in multiple ways. The
    sorting of elites into the two parties on the basis of ideology has
    greatly reduced the numbers of conservative Democrats and liberal
    Republicans who might be selected as Justices. The same sorting has
    prompted presidents --- for the first time ever --- to make ideology
    the dominant factor in appointing Justices.

    Finally, political elites that tended to lean in a
    moderate-to-liberal direction during the 1960s through much of the
    1980s have become far more polarized along ideological lines. As we
    show through original research on the voting patterns of Justices
    over the past forty years, Justices who once might have been drawn
    toward moderation are increasingly reinforced in their liberal or
    conservative orientations. One key reason is that the rise of the
    conservative legal network has worked against the "drift" of
    Republican appointees toward more moderate positions that was common
    a few decades ago. This analysis indicates that the current partisan
    division on the Court is not a temporary phenomenon; rather, it is
    likely to continue as long as the current partisan polarization
    continues.

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D61308&title=%E2%80%9CSplit%20Definitive%3A%20How%20Party%20Polarization%20Turned%20the%20Supreme%20Court%20into%20a%20Partisan%20Court%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in political parties <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=25>, 
political polarization <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=68>, Supreme 
Court <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>


    "Judge refuses to stay order over voter citizenship"
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=61306>

Posted on May 7, 2014 5:25 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=61306>by 
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

AP 
<http://ksn.com/2014/05/07/judge-refuses-to-stay-order-over-voter-citizenship/>: 
"A federal judge in Wichita has refused to stay his order for federal 
election officials to immediately enforce Kansas and Arizona laws 
requiring new voters to document their U.S. citizenship."

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D61306&title=%E2%80%9CJudge%20refuses%20to%20stay%20order%20over%20voter%20citizenship%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in election administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>, 
Election Assistance Commission <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=34>, 
NVRA (motor voter) <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=33>, voter 
registration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=37>


    "A Federal Judge Just Called an End to Scott Walker's Recall Probe;
    It's the latest example of Wisconsin politics playing out in the
    courts." <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=61304>

Posted on May 7, 2014 5:23 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=61304>by 
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

/National Journal /reports. 
<http://www.nationaljournal.com/politics/a-federal-judge-just-called-an-end-to-scott-walker-s-recall-probe-20140507>

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D61304&title=%E2%80%9CA%20Federal%20Judge%20Just%20Called%20an%20End%20to%20Scott%20Walker%E2%80%99s%20Recall%20Probe%3B%20It%E2%80%99s%20the%20latest%20example%20of%20Wisconsin%20politics%20playing%20out%20in%20the%20courts.%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>


    American Idol Overtime <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=61302>

Posted on May 7, 2014 5:15 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=61302>by 
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Roll Call 
<http://atr.rollcall.com/clay-aiken-primary-election-north-carolina-fate-may-not-be-known-for-several-days/>: 
"The Democratic House primary between "American Idol" runner-up Clay 
Aiken and former North Carolina Commerce Secretary Keith Crisco remained 
too close to call 
<http://atr.rollcall.com/clay-aiken-congress-primary-north-carolina-results/?dcz=> 
following Tuesday's primary. With 100 percent of precincts reporting, 
Aiken leads Crisco by 372 votes, according to The Associated Press."

Perhaps Aiken would have had more of a "Colbert bump" if he would have 
broken out in song 
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/05/01/clay-aiken-on-singing-sabbatical-during-campaign-for-congress-video/>.

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D61302&title=American%20Idol%20Overtime&description=>
Posted in campaigns <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>


    "Judge rewrites description of Nevada voter measure"
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=61300>

Posted on May 7, 2014 5:06 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=61300>by 
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

LVRJ 
<http://www.reviewjournal.com/news/crime-courts/judge-rewrites-description-nevada-voter-measure>: 
"A state judge Wednesday rewrote a description that details the effect 
of a voter photo identification initiative backed by conservative 
activist Sharron Angle."

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D61300&title=%E2%80%9CJudge%20rewrites%20description%20of%20Nevada%20voter%20measure%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in direct democracy <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=62>, 
election administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>, The Voting 
Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>, voter id 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=9>


    "House Holds Ex-I.R.S. Official in Contempt in Tea Party Case"
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=61298>

Posted on May 7, 2014 4:26 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=61298>by 
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

NYT 
<http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/08/us/gop-to-open-assault-on-white-house-over-irs-and-benghazi.html?ref=politics>:

    The House voted Wednesday to hold in contempt Lois Lerner, a former
    Internal Revenue Service official who is the focus of multiple
    investigations into whether the agency targeted President Obama's
    opponents. The vote gives a politically charged issue new prominence
    in an election year.

    In a contentious debate before the vote, Republicans made
    allegations of a Watergate-style inside job to cover up high crimes
    that helped steal a presidential election. Democrats invoked former
    Senator Joseph R. McCarthy and delusions of widespread conspiracy.

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D61298&title=%E2%80%9CHouse%20Holds%20Ex-I.R.S.%20Official%20in%20Contempt%20in%20Tea%20Party%20Case%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in tax law and election law <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=22>


    Weiser and Norden Respond to Tom Edsall Column on Campaign Finance
    and Voting Rights <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=61296>

Posted on May 7, 2014 3:46 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=61296>by 
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Here 
<http://www.brennancenter.org/blog/scotuss-inconsistent-treatment-voting-and-campaign-finance>.

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D61296&title=Weiser%20and%20Norden%20Respond%20to%20Tom%20Edsall%20Column%20on%20Campaign%20Finance%20and%20Voting%20Rights&description=>
Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>, Supreme 
Court <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>, Voting Rights Act 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15>


    "Judge Orders Restoration of Voting Rights for Tens of Thousands of
    Californians" <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=61294>

Posted on May 7, 2014 2:58 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=61294>by 
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Press release 
<http://www.aclusandiego.org/judge-orders-restoration-voting-rights-tens-thousands-californians/>:

    An Alameda County Superior Court judge today ruled that Secretary of
    State Debra Bowen illegally stripped tens of thousands of people of
    their voting rights two years ago. His ruling said people on Post
    Release Community Supervision (PRCS) and mandatory supervision under
    California's Criminal Justice Realignment Act are eligible to vote.

    "Today's ruling is a victory for California's democracy," said
    Michael Risher, staff attorney with the ACLU of Northern California.
    "By following the plain language of our state's voting laws, the
    court's ruling will help ensure that in California, one of the
    nation's most fundamental rights -- the right to vote -- will be
    protected and not restricted."

    In his ruling
    <http://cdn.aclusandiego.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Scott-v-Bowen-ORDER.pdf>,
    Superior Court Judge Evelio Grillo said the fact that the California
    legislature passed the Realignment Act with the legislative goal of
    better facilitating the reintegration of people with felony
    convictions back into society suggests legislators would have wanted
    people on PRCS and mandatory supervision to retain their right to
    vote, writing that "the plain language of the statute suggests that
    the integration of adult felons into society would be facilitated by
    allowing" these individuals to vote.

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D61294&title=%E2%80%9CJudge%20Orders%20Restoration%20of%20Voting%20Rights%20for%20Tens%20of%20Thousands%20of%20Californians%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in felon voting <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=66>

-- 
Rick Hasen
Chancellor's Professor of Law and Political Science
UC Irvine School of Law
401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000
Irvine, CA 92697-8000
949.824.3072 - office
949.824.0495 - fax
rhasen at law.uci.edu
http://www.law.uci.edu/faculty/full-time/hasen/
http://electionlawblog.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20140507/96ab3467/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20140507/96ab3467/attachment.png>


View list directory