[EL] ELB News and Commentary 11/17/14

Rick Hasen rhasen at law.uci.edu
Mon Nov 17 08:00:28 PST 2014


    "How the GOP used Twitter to stretch election laws"
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=68432>

Posted onNovember 17, 2014 7:48 am 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=68432>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Chris Moody 
<http://www.cnn.com/2014/11/17/politics/twitter-republicans-outside-groups/index.html>with 
the campaign finance coordination story of the season on CNN:

    Republicans and outside groups used anonymous Twitter accounts to
    share internal polling data ahead of the midterm elections, CNN has
    learned, a practice that raises questions about whether they
    violated campaign finance laws that prohibit coordination.

    The Twitter accounts were hidden in plain sight. The profiles were
    publicly available but meaningless without knowledge of how to find
    them and decode the information, according to a source with
    knowledge of the activities.

    The practice is the latest effort in the quest by political
    operatives to exploit the murky world of campaign finance laws at a
    time when limits on spending in politics are eroding and regulators
    are being defanged.

    The law says that outside groups, such as super PACs and
    non-profits, can spend freely on political causes as long as they
    don't coordinate their plans with campaigns. Sharing costly internal
    polls in private, for instance, could signal to the campaign
    committees where to focus precious time and resources.

    The groups behind the operation had a sense of humor about what they
    were doing. One Twitter account was named after Bruno Gianelli, a
    fictional character in /The West Wing /who pressed his colleagues to
    use ethically questionable "soft money" to fund campaigns.

    A typical tweet read:
    "CA-40/43-44/49-44/44-50/36-44/49-10/16/14-52-->49/476-10s." The
    source said posts like that --- which would look like gibberish to
    most people --- represented polling data for various House races.

    Posting the information on Twitter, which is technically public,
    could provide a convenient loophole to the law --- or could run
    afoul of it.

See also 
<http://www.cnn.com/video/?/video/politics/2014/11/14/moody-twitter-story.cnn&video_referrer=>the 
related video.

My first impression is that Ken Gross, quoted in the story, hits the key 
question:

    "If it truly requires some sort of Ovaltine decoder ring to make
    heads or tails of the information, then there certainly is the
    possibility that there was some pre-arrangement," Gross said. "Just
    making it public is not enough. You have to further meet the
    requirement of no pre-arrangement or coordination. But it is the
    burden of the government to demonstrate that.

I expect we will hear much more from this as other campaign finance 
reporters work on this story.

I would love to hear the back story of how Chris discovered this. Wow.

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D68432&title=%E2%80%9CHow%20the%20GOP%20used%20Twitter%20to%20stretch%20election%20laws%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>


    "US justices could toss legislative maps in AZ"
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=68430>

Posted onNovember 17, 2014 7:32 am 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=68430>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Thor's back 
<http://tucson.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/elections/us-justices-could-toss-legislative-maps-in-az/article_fc8be24e-dcfe-5497-9dac-4f58f3f212bc.html>.

(For newer blog readers, my earlierThor Hearne 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?s=%22thor+hearne%22&x=0&y=0>coverage.)

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D68430&title=%E2%80%9CUS%20justices%20could%20toss%20legislative%20maps%20in%20AZ%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted infraudulent fraud squad 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=8>,redistricting 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=6>


    "Voter ID laws: A microcosm of a divided America"
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=68428>

Posted onNovember 17, 2014 7:28 am 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=68428>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Aaron Blake 
writes<http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/11/17/voter-id-laws-a-microcosm-of-a-divided-america/>for 
WaPo.

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D68428&title=%E2%80%9CVoter%20ID%20laws%3A%20A%20microcosm%20of%20a%20divided%20America%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted inelection administration 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>,The Voting Wars 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>,voter id 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=9>


    "Nancy Pelosi: You Gotta Fight Cash with Cash"
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=68426>

Posted onNovember 17, 2014 7:26 am 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=68426>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Vogel 
<http://www.politico.com/story/2014/11/nancy-pelosi-donors-democracy-alliance-112916.html#ixzz3JIrPuEjf>for 
Politico.

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D68426&title=%E2%80%9CNancy%20Pelosi%3A%20You%20Gotta%20Fight%20Cash%20with%20Cash%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>


    "Why Did A Campaign Finance Reform Group Fall Short On Election
    Day?" <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=68424>

Posted onNovember 17, 2014 7:25 am 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=68424>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Larry Lessig sits down 
<http://www.npr.org/2014/11/15/364355101/why-did-a-campaign-finance-reform-group-fall-short-on-election-day>with 
Arun Rath on NPR's All Things Considered Weekend.

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D68424&title=%E2%80%9CWhy%20Did%20A%20Campaign%20Finance%20Reform%20Group%20Fall%20Short%20On%20Election%20Day%3F%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>


    "Two Charged in Campaign Finance Case; De Blasio Aide Backs Out of
    Speaking With Special Prosecutor" <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=68422>

Posted onNovember 17, 2014 7:21 am 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=68422>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

WSJ 
<http://online.wsj.com/articles/two-charged-in-campaign-finance-case-1416017209>:

    Since 2012, Mr. Adler has been investigating the Working Families
    Party's relationship with Data & Field Services, a corporation
    formed by the left-leaning party to provide its candidates with
    get-out-the-vote staffing and expertise.

    Investigators are looking at whether the for-profit firm charged
    significantly lower fees than is typical for such services,
    potentially providing an unfair advantage to favored candidates.

    According to a criminal complaint, David Thomas, who served as
    treasurer in Councilwoman Debi Rose's 2009 campaign, and Ms. Rose's
    campaign have been charged with grand larceny in the third degree
    and a variety of other charges. David Jones, a political consultant,
    was charged with grand larceny in the third degree.

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D68422&title=%E2%80%9CTwo%20Charged%20in%20Campaign%20Finance%20Case%3B%20De%20Blasio%20Aide%20Backs%20Out%20of%20Speaking%20With%20Special%20Prosecutor%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>,chicanery 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=12>


    Bauer Doesn't Like Linda Greenhouse's Comparison of ACA Case to Bush
    v. Gore <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=68420>

Posted onNovember 17, 2014 7:16 am 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=68420>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Read. 
<http://www.moresoftmoneyhardlaw.com/2014/11/bush-v-gore-bad-hair-days-court/>

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D68420&title=Bauer%20Doesn%E2%80%99t%20Like%20Linda%20Greenhouse%E2%80%99s%20Comparison%20of%20ACA%20Case%20to%20Bush%20v.%20Gore&description=>
Posted inBush v. Gore reflections 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=5>,Supreme Court 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>


    "Edward Fitzpatrick: Gorbea weighs in on voter ID, mail ballots,
    trailblazing" <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=68417>

Posted onNovember 16, 2014 7:50 pm 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=68417>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

News 
<http://www.providencejournal.com/writers/edward-fitzpatrick/20141115-edward-fitzpatrick-gorbea-weighs-in-on-voter-id-mail-ballots-trailblazing.ece>from 
Rhode Island.

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D68417&title=%E2%80%9CEdward%20Fitzpatrick%3A%20Gorbea%20weighs%20in%20on%20voter%20ID%2C%20mail%20ballots%2C%20trailblazing%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted inelection administration 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>,The Voting Wars 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>


    "In Alabama, Still Segregating Voters by Race"
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=68415>

Posted onNovember 16, 2014 7:50 pm 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=68415>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Jost on Justice 
<http://jostonjustice.blogspot.com/2014/11/in-alabama-still-segregating-voters-by.html>.

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D68415&title=%E2%80%9CIn%20Alabama%2C%20Still%20Segregating%20Voters%20by%20Race%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted inUncategorized <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1>


    "Invest in Smarter Government" <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=68411>

Posted onNovember 15, 2014 2:35 pm 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=68411>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Lee 
Drutman<http://www.cato.org/publications/conference-paper/invest-smarter-government>for 
Cato:

    Congressional offices are thus stretched thin. They lack resources
    to develop and execute policies. What this means is that to get its
    work done, Congress has to rely significantly on lobbyists
    representing some very narrow interests, primarily large
    corporations and business associations who tend to benefit from the
    status quo. It's hard to get anything done in Washington if you
    don't have significant help from outside lobbyists, anyway.
    Lobbyists play essential roles in shepherding legislation through
    --- drafting and vetting laws, building coalitions, and ensuring
    widespread support.11

    By my count (looking at disbursement data), the Senate spent $490
    million on compensation, and the House spends $876 million, a total
    of $1.37 billion, in 2013. If this seems like a lot of money,
    consider that it is 0.03% of the total federal budget of $3.6
    trillion. It is also less than half of the $3.24 billion spent on
    direct lobbying in 2013 (which itself is probably less than half of
    the money actually spent on lobbying). Since the Republicans took
    control of the House in January 2011, they've cut committee staffs
    by 20 percent. Congress is being run on the cheap.

    Here's what I would do with my wave of the magic wand. I would
    triple the amount the Congress spends on staff (keeping it still at
    just under 0.1% of the total federal budget). I'd also concentrate
    that spending in the policy committees. I'd give those committees
    the resources to be leading institutions for expertise on the issues
    on which they deal. I'd also give these committees the resources to
    hire their own experts --- economists, lawyers, consultants,
    etc.12 But I'd also make sure that these committees were not
    explicitly partisan. Rather than Republicans and Democrats having
    separate committee staffs, have one committee staff of professionals
    and experts. Staff could be a mix of political leanings. But let
    them be one team, where they argue and hash out ideas together.

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D68411&title=%E2%80%9CInvest%20in%20Smarter%20Government%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted inlegislation and legislatures 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=27>,lobbying 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=28>


    "Low voter turnout eases ballot-measure requirement"
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=68409>

Posted onNovember 15, 2014 8:02 am 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=68409>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

SacBee 
<http://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article3942159.html>:

    Got a ballot measure for 2016? You're in luck.

    Ballot initiatives two years from now will need about 30 percent
    fewer qualifying signatures than they did this year, according to
    the political-consulting types at Sacramento's Redwood Pacific
    Public Affairs.

    The reason: abysmal turnout for the Nov. 4 election. California
    requires valid signatures equal to 8 percent of the most recent
    gubernatorial vote to qualify a constitutional amendment for the
    ballot, 5 percent for regular laws and veto referenda.

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D68409&title=%E2%80%9CLow%20voter%20turnout%20eases%20ballot-measure%20requirement%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted inballot access <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=46>,direct 
democracy <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=62>


    "California officials ponder all-mail voting"
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=68407>

Posted onNovember 15, 2014 8:01 am 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=68407>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

SacBee reports 
<http://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/election/article3943892.html>.

    While some opponents believe all-mail elections open the door to
    voter fraud, academics and voting-rights advocates worry an all-mail
    statewide voting system would further disenfranchise young people,
    residents at the lower end of the socio-economic ladder and those
    whose native language is not English..

    Every election, many ballots go uncounted, including those that are
    filled out incorrectly, missing valid signatures or simply mailed in
    too late. Research out of UC Davis shows that nearly 3percent of the
    vote-by-mail ballots received -- or roughly 91,000 -- in the June
    primary election were not counted. It was 1percent, or 69,000
    ballots, in the 2012 general election.

    "California has one of the highest uncounted mail-ballot counts in
    the nation," said Kim Alexander, founder and president of the
    California Voter Foundation. "At a time when civic participation is
    in decline, I think it's important to nurture the voting process as
    much as we can, which means operating polling places and keeping
    voting a visible, public act rather than something people only do in
    the privacy of their homes."

    Other experts doubt moving to all-mail would indeed speed up the
    counting process. Much of the lag time is attributable to the large
    number of ballots that pour into county elections offices in the
    final days and hours.

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D68407&title=%E2%80%9CCalifornia%20officials%20ponder%20all-mail%20voting%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted inabsentee ballots <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=53>,election 
administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>


    "The test to textualism in King v. Burwell: A Reply to Abbe Gluck"
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=68403>

Posted onNovember 15, 2014 7:49 am 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=68403>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Looking forward 
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2014/11/12/the-test-to-textualism-in-king-v-burwell-a-reply-to-abbe-gluck/>to 
digging into Jonathan Adler's analysis, and I hope Abbe Gluck will respond.

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D68403&title=%E2%80%9CThe%20test%20to%20textualism%20in%20King%20v.%20Burwell%3A%20A%20Reply%20to%20Abbe%20Gluck%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted instatutory interpretation 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=21>,Supreme Court 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>


    "For Democrats, Turnout Efforts Look Successful (Though Not
    Elections)" <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=68401>

Posted onNovember 15, 2014 7:44 am 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=68401>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

NYT's The UpShot 
<http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/15/upshot/evaluating-the-success-of-democratic-get-out-the-vote-efforts.html?ref=politics&abt=0002&abg=0>looks 
at some turnout data, including data on North Carolina early voting. 
That's particularly important because there is controversy over whether 
the early voting changes made in that state decreased turnout or not.

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D68401&title=%E2%80%9CFor%20Democrats%2C%20Turnout%20Efforts%20Look%20Successful%20%28Though%20Not%20Elections%29%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted inelection administration 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>,The Voting Wars 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>,voting 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=31>,Voting Rights Act 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15>


    Palast Suggests GOP Voter Purges Helped Republicans Win CO, NC
    Senate Race, KSGOV <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=68399>

Posted onNovember 15, 2014 7:36 am 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=68399>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Here 
<http://america.aljazeera.com/blogs/scrutineer/2014/11/14/voter-purges-alteruspoliticalmap.html>in 
Al Jazeera. I'vesuggested using caution 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67882>with Palast's claims, and from what 
I hear caution remains in order.

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D68399&title=Palast%20Suggests%20GOP%20Voter%20Purges%20Helped%20Republicans%20Win%20CO%2C%20NC%20Senate%20Race%2C%20KSGOV&description=>
Posted inelection administration 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>,The Voting Wars 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>


    How Rand Paul Might Run for President and KYSEN Reelection
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=68397>

Posted onNovember 14, 2014 9:24 pm 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=68397>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

TPM. 
<http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/rand-paul-run-president-and-re-election>

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D68397&title=How%20Rand%20Paul%20Might%20Run%20for%20President%20and%20KYSEN%20Reelection&description=>
Posted inUncategorized <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1>


    "Republican lawmaker proposes splitting Michigan's electoral votes
    in presidential elections" <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=68395>

Posted onNovember 14, 2014 9:20 pm 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=68395>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

WaPo reports. 
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/govbeat/wp/2014/11/14/republican-lawmaker-proposes-splitting-michigans-electoral-votes-in-presidential-elections/>\

Time to dust off my2013 Slate piece 
<http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2013/01/republican_plans_for_electoral_college_reform_democrats_shouldn_t_worry.html>, 
/Democrats, Don't Freak Out! Why fears that Republicans will gerrymander 
the Electoral College are overblown./

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D68395&title=%E2%80%9CRepublican%20lawmaker%20proposes%20splitting%20Michigan%E2%80%99s%20electoral%20votes%20in%20presidential%20elections%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted inelectoral college <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=44>


    "Ben Suarez sentenced to 15 months in prison"
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=68393>

Posted onNovember 14, 2014 3:10 pm 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=68393>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

See here <http://www.cantonrep.com/article/20141114/NEWS/141119541>.

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D68393&title=%E2%80%9CBen%20Suarez%20sentenced%20to%2015%20months%20in%20prison%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted inUncategorized <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1>


    "Impact of Texas voter ID law unclear"
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=68390>

Posted onNovember 14, 2014 1:59 pm 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=68390>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

The Houston Chronicle reports. 
<http://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/houston-texas/houston/article/Numbers-confirm-Election-Day-apathy-Voters-5888353.php>

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D68390&title=%E2%80%9CImpact%20of%20Texas%20voter%20ID%20law%20unclear%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted inelection administration 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>,The Voting Wars 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>,voter id 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=9>,Voting Rights Act 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15>


    "Hispanic Voters File Lawsuit Against Pasadena And Its Voting
    Districts" <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=68388>

Posted onNovember 14, 2014 1:38 pm 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=68388>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Houston Public Media 
<http://www.houstonpublicmedia.org/news/hispanic-voters-file-lawsuit-against-pasadena-voting-districts/>on 
anew lawsuit. <http://www.houstonpublicmedia.org/files/4026/> MALDEF is 
seeking Pasadena [corrected] "bail in" under Section 3 of the Voting 
Rights Act.

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D68388&title=%E2%80%9CHispanic%20Voters%20File%20Lawsuit%20Against%20Pasadena%20And%20Its%20Voting%20Districts%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted inVoting Rights Act <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15>


    "Fifth Circuit Reverses Lower Court and Restores Mississippi
    Disclosure Requirements" <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=68384>

Posted onNovember 14, 2014 1:35 pm 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=68384>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Release 
<http://www.campaignlegalcenter.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2697:november-14-2014-fifth-circuit-reverses-lower-court-and-restores-mississippi-disclosure-requirements&catid=63:legal-center-press-releases&Itemid=61>: 
"Today, in/Justice v. Hosemann/, the United States Court of Appeals for 
the Fifth Circuitreversed 
<http://www.campaignlegalcenter.org/images/Justice_v_Hosemann_Opinion_11-14-14.pdf>a 
trial court ruling that had struck down several Mississippi disclosure 
requirements as applied to certain individuals and groups engaged in 
ballot measure advocacy.  The Campaign Legal Center had filed 
an/amicus/brief and later a supplemental letter brief in the case urging 
this result."

Institute for Justice release:

    "In America, you shouldn't need lawyers and accountants in order to
    speak about politics, all you should need is an opinion," said IJ
    Attorney Paul Avelar. "But Mississippi insists on keeping laws on
    the books that don't benefit the public---they only impose onerous
    burdens on speech and scare ordinary Americans away from political
    engagement, resulting in less speech."

    The plaintiffs have until November 28 to seek rehearing by the full
    5th Circuit, or until February 12 to seek review by the U.S. Supreme
    Court.

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D68384&title=%E2%80%9CFifth%20Circuit%20Reverses%20Lower%20Court%20and%20Restores%20Mississippi%20Disclosure%20Requirements%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>


    "Texas Matters: Could Texas Be 'Bailed In' The VRA?"
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=68382>

Posted onNovember 14, 2014 1:31 pm 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=68382>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

TPR reports. <http://tpr.org/post/texas-matters-could-texas-be-bailed-vra>

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D68382&title=%E2%80%9CTexas%20Matters%3A%20Could%20Texas%20Be%20%E2%80%98Bailed%20In%E2%80%99%20The%20VRA%3F%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted inDepartment of Justice <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=26>,The 
Voting Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>,Voting Rights Act 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15>


    AZ Supreme Court Issues Opinion Explaining Exclusion of Local
    Candidate from Ballot <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=68380>

Posted onNovember 14, 2014 11:55 am 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=68380>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

See here. 
<http://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2014/CV140240.pdf>

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D68380&title=AZ%20Supreme%20Court%20Issues%20Opinion%20Explaining%20Exclusion%20of%20Local%20Candidate%20from%20Ballot&description=>
Posted inballot access <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=46>,voting 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=31>


    Listen to Oral Argument Audio in SCOTUS Alabama Redistricting Case
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=68378>

Posted onNovember 14, 2014 11:16 am 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=68378>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

The Court has now posted ithere 
<http://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/audio/2014/13-895>.

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D68378&title=Listen%20to%20Oral%20Argument%20Audio%20in%20SCOTUS%20Alabama%20Redistricting%20Case&description=>
Posted inredistricting <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=6>,Supreme Court 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>,Voting Rights Act 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15>


    "Guest Blog: Janai Nelson, Race Reasoning in Alabama Redistricting:
    A View from the Supreme Court" <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=68376>

Posted onNovember 14, 2014 9:57 am 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=68376>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Here 
<http://hamilton-griffin.com/guest-blog-janai-nelson-race-reasoning-in-alabama-redistricting-a-view-from-the-supreme-court/>:

    If ultimately forced to draw a new plan in the current
    post-/Shelby/ world, Alabama would no longer have Section 5 to rely
    on---for better or worse. Instead, it would have to take account of
    the Voting Rights Act's other anti-discrimination weapon, Section 2,
    which prohibits any voting law that results in vote dilution or
    denial on account of race---and, of course, the constitution. Near
    the close of the argument, Justice Alito alluded to this possibility
    by querying how Section 2 might factor in to the drawing of a new
    plan. Undoubtedly, we should expect any new plan that might arise
    from this case to find its way before the Court for a reprise of
    similar quandaries around race, partisanship, and power.  That plan,
    like this one, should be viewed in the context of Alabama's unending
    wily schemes to minimize minority voting power, including using
    false claims to protect it.

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D68376&title=%E2%80%9CGuest%20Blog%3A%20Janai%20Nelson%2C%20Race%20Reasoning%20in%20Alabama%20Redistricting%3A%20A%20View%20from%20the%20Supreme%20Court%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted inredistricting <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=6>,Supreme Court 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>,Voting Rights Act 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15>


-- 
Rick Hasen
Chancellor's Professor of Law and Political Science
UC Irvine School of Law
401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000
Irvine, CA 92697-8000
949.824.3072 - office
949.824.0495 - fax
rhasen at law.uci.edu
http://www.law.uci.edu/faculty/full-time/hasen/
http://electionlawblog.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20141117/2a5828c1/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20141117/2a5828c1/attachment.png>


View list directory