[EL] before Frank v Walker (Oct 9 2014), when is the last time US Supreme Court reversed a lower court and expanded voting rights?
Flavio Komuves
fkomuves at optonline.net
Sun Oct 19 15:47:57 PDT 2014
Richard, you ask a very interesting question. Accepting your view of Inter Tribal Council, the other only case since 1997 I see meeting your criteria is Rice v. Cayetano (2000).
This message may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message please delete it and notify me at 609-216-5014. Flavio Komuves
Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S™III, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
<div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Richard Winger <richardwinger at yahoo.com> </div><div>Date:10/19/2014 15:20 (GMT-05:00) </div><div>To: law-election at uci.edu </div><div>Subject: [EL] before Frank v Walker (Oct 9 2014), when is the last time US Supreme Court reversed a lower court and expanded voting rights? </div><div>
</div>On Oct 9, 2014, the US Supreme Court reversed the 7th circuit and said the Wisconsin govt photo-ID requirement should not be in effect for the Nov 4, 2014 election. I am trying to remember the last time the US Supreme Court reversed a lower court and expanded voting rights. By "voting rights", I mean the ability of individuals to register to vote, or to cast a ballot, or to run for office. In 1995 the US Supreme Court expanded the list of people who can run for office in US Term Limits v Thornton. In 1997 in Chandler v Miller the Court struck down a law requiring candidates for state office to get tested for illegal drugs.
Are those the last two times the US Supreme Court reversed a lower court in the direction of more protection for voters or candidates?? What am I forgetting?
I don't think Arizona v Inter Tribal Council of Arizona (2013) counts, because the opinion set forth a road map for Kansas and Arizona to force the federal government to alter the federal voter registration postcard so as to give those two states what they want. In effect the court punted, and we are still waiting to see the outcome in the 10th circuit.
Richard Winger
415-922-9779
PO Box 470296, San Francisco Ca 94147
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20141019/c36101e2/attachment.html>
View list directory