[EL] ELB News and Commentary 10/21/14
Rick Hasen
rhasen at law.uci.edu
Mon Oct 20 20:06:21 PDT 2014
WI AG Gives Up on Voter ID for This Election
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67185>
Posted onOctober 20, 2014 7:58 pm
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67185>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
/Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel/
<http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/in-person-absentee-voting-kicks-in-today-in-wisconsin-b99374488z1-279798652.html>:
As early voting started, Wisconsin Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen
indicated he would no longer attempt to put a voter ID requirement
in place for the election.
Van Hollen spent the last week and a half looking at ways to
reinstate the ID requirement for this election after the U.S.
Supreme Court blocked the measure. He has now dropped that idea.
"We do not expect to have voter ID in place for the November
election, which is unfortunate as it is a constitutional piece of
common-sense legislation that is overwhelmingly supported by the
people of Wisconsin," Van Hollen spokeswoman Dana Brueck said Monday
via email.
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D67185&title=WI%20AG%20Gives%20Up%20on%20Voter%20ID%20for%20This%20Election&description=>
Posted inelection administration
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>,The Voting Wars
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>,voter id
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=9>
"How I ended up starring in a Citizens United film"
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67183>
Posted onOctober 20, 2014 7:53 pm
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67183>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Seth Masket:
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2014/10/20/how-i-ended-up-starring-in-a-citizens-united-film/>
I was initially approached back in July by a filmmaker named Jason
Meath, who explained that he was doing a documentary on Colorado
politics and wanted to ask me some questions on campaign spending
and demographic shifts in the state. As these are issues I've
researched and taught, I happily granted the interview. My
university's communications office signed off on it, and I even
checked out the filmmaker's Web site
<http://www.jasonkillianmeath.com/> to look at some of his past
work. Everything seemed fine. The questions seemed perfectly neutral
in tone, and I thought my answers came off well. I heard nothing
more about this for months.
A few weeks ago, I was informed that Citizens United was putting
together a film concerning the gubernatorial race in Colorado. I was
also informed that I was in it. This was rather stunning to me. I
suspected that this might have stemmed from the earlier Meath
interview, but I couldn't be sure, and my e-mails to the filmmaker
went unanswered. Only last week did I learn that that interview was
one of many used in the making of "Rocky Mountain Heist."
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D67183&title=%E2%80%9CHow%20I%20ended%20up%20starring%20in%20a%20Citizens%20United%20film%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>,campaigns
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>
"Editorial: In voter ID ruling, justices side with more obstacles at
the polls" <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67181>
Posted onOctober 20, 2014 7:50 pm
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67181>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
/Dallas Morning News /editorial.
<http://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/editorials/20141020-editorial-in-voter-id-ruling-justices-side-with-more-obstacles-at-the-polls.ece>
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D67181&title=%E2%80%9CEditorial%3A%20In%20voter%20ID%20ruling%2C%20justices%20side%20with%20more%20obstacles%20at%20the%20polls%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted inelection administration
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>,Supreme Court
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>,The Voting Wars
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>,voter id
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=9>,Voting Rights Act
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15>
"Records at odds with voter fraud probe claim"
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67179>
Posted onOctober 20, 2014 7:47 pm
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67179>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
News
<http://www.11alive.com/story/news/politics/2014/10/20/politics-georgia-voter-fraud-kemp/17631187/>from
Georgia:
Documents obtained from Secretary of State Brian Kemp's office
appear to contradict Kemp's claim that a voter fraud probe was based
on numerous complaints from counties across Georgia.
For weeks, Democrats have hinted that Secretary of State Brian Kemp
is trying to keep newly registered Democrats off the voters rolls.
Kemp, a Republican, makes no apologies for investigating the New
Georgia Project --- which has focused on registering
Democratic-leaning minority voters. Last week, Kemp said again that
reports of potential voter fraud led to the probe.
"I know it's up over a hundred now. May have been more like 125?
complaints, Kemp said.
But records obtained by 11Alive News tell a different story.
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D67179&title=%E2%80%9CRecords%20at%20odds%20with%20voter%20fraud%20probe%20claim%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted inelection administration
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>,fraudulent fraud squad
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=8>,The Voting Wars
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>,voter registration
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=37>,Voting Rights Act
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15>
Listen to My Interview with Madeline Brand on Texas Voter ID and
Justice Ginsburg's Dissent <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67177>
Posted onOctober 20, 2014 5:19 pm
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67177>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Here at KCRW's Press Play,
<http://www.kcrw.com/news-culture/shows/press-play-with-madeleine-brand/voter-id-laws-the-truth-about-andy-kaufman-and-rating-the-ratings#seg-the-truth-about-andy-kaufman>discussing
my recent Slate column, Dawn Patrol: Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's
critically important 5 a.m. wake-up call on voting rights
<http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2014/10/ginsburg_s_dissent_in_texas_voter_id_law_supreme_court_order.html>.
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D67177&title=Listen%20to%20My%20Interview%20with%20Madeline%20Brand%20on%20Texas%20Voter%20ID%20and%20Justice%20Ginsburg%E2%80%99s%20Dissent&description=>
Posted inelection administration
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>,Supreme Court
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>,The Voting Wars
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>,voter id
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=9>,Voting Rights Act
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15>
"How the Supreme Court Made a Mess of Our Voting System"
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67175>
Posted onOctober 20, 2014 5:14 pm
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67175>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Michael Waldman Politico oped.
<http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/10/supreme-court-voting-rights-112026.html>
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D67175&title=%E2%80%9CHow%20the%20Supreme%20Court%20Made%20a%20Mess%20of%20Our%20Voting%20System%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted inelection administration
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>,Supreme Court
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>,The Voting Wars
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>,voter id
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=9>
President Obama Talks Voting Rights and Fraud With Jeffrey Toobin
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67173>
Posted onOctober 20, 2014 5:05 pm
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67173>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
A part ofthis fascinating New Yorker piece
<http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/10/27/obama-brief>:
The subject of voting rights has largely been thrust upon Obama by a
conservative judiciary. "You look at something like the Voting
Rights Act, which was uncontroversial from a legal point of view
among both Republicans and Democrats ten, fifteen, twenty years
ago," Obama told me. "The ruling that struck down key provisions of
the Voting Rights Act would have been considered a fairly radical
step, but it's a step that the Supreme Court took." He was referring
to the Shelby County decision, of 2013, which invalidated the
portion of the law that required Justice Department review of
electoral changes, mostly in Southern states.
In response, Obama offered a modulated criticism. As he put it, "The
fact that the Supreme Court didn't seem to internalize evidence
where state election officials or politicians are pretty unabashed
in saying we want to keep certain folks from voting, where you have
voter-I.D. laws that clearly make it harder for certain folks to
vote, despite the fact that there is no actual evidence of
fraud---not just a little evidence of fraud but no evidence---as
every mathematical assessment, statistical assessment that's been
done shows, it's a pretext for wanting to shape the franchise for
partisan advantage. The fact that that doesn't seem to have gone
into the Court's reasoning I think makes it an ultimately flawed
decision."
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D67173&title=President%20Obama%20Talks%20Voting%20Rights%20and%20Fraud%20With%20Jeffrey%20Toobin&description=>
Posted inDepartment of Justice
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=26>,election administration
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>,Supreme Court
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>,The Voting Wars
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>,voter id
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=9>,Voting Rights Act
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15>
"Colorado Dems: We Caught James O'Keefe and His Friends Trying to
Bait Us Into Approving Voter Fraud"
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67171>
Posted onOctober 20, 2014 4:43 pm
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67171>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Andy Kroll reports
<http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2014/10/colorado-dems-james-okeefe>for
Mother Jones.
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D67171&title=%E2%80%9CColorado%20Dems%3A%20We%20Caught%20James%20O%E2%80%99Keefe%20and%20His%20Friends%20Trying%20to%20Bait%20Us%20Into%20Approving%20Voter%20Fraud%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted infraudulent fraud squad <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=8>,The
Voting Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>
Pa. Supreme Court Justice Temporarily Removed by His Collleagues in
Ongoing Scandal <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67168>
Posted onOctober 20, 2014 4:35 pm
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67168>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
This story
<https://s3.amazonaws.com/s3.documentcloud.org/documents/1340940/pa-supreme-court-removal-order.pdf>will
only get bigger.
MORE <https://twitter.com/chrisgeidner/status/524343495528427521>from
Chris Geidner.
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D67168&title=Pa.%20Supreme%20Court%20Justice%20Temporarily%20Removed%20by%20His%20Collleagues%20in%20Ongoing%20Scandal&description=>
Posted inUncategorized <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1>
"ARIZONA AG RACE: National Republican AG Group Goes Dark, Outraises
Democratic Counterpart More Than 4:1 In 3rd Quarter; Explains 6:1
Difference In Arizona Spending (#50ShadesOfDarkMoney)"
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67166>
Posted onOctober 20, 2014 4:25 pm
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67166>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Arizona's Politics
<http://arizonaspolitics.blogspot.com/2014/10/arizona-ag-race-national-republican-ag.html>:
In the Arizona Attorney General's race, the national Republican 527
organization is outspending the Democrats' by more than 6:1. Dark
money contributed mightily to that discrepancy, as RAGA raised 4
times as much money as DAGA in the 3rd quarter.
(/See accompanying article "BREAKING: APS Semi-Openly Places $425k
Bet On Arizona Attorney General Race...Red <http://bit.ly/AZp997>"/)
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D67166&title=%E2%80%9CARIZONA%20AG%20RACE%3A%20National%20Republican%20AG%20Group%20Goes%20Dark%2C%20Outraises%20Democratic%20Counterpart%20More%20Than%204%3A1%20In%203rd%20Quarter%3B%20Explains%206%3A1%20Difference%20In%20Arizona%20Spending%20%28%2350ShadesOfDarkMoney%29%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>
"Statement of Vice Chair Ann M. Ravel Encouraging Public Comments to
Increase Disclosure and Address Corruption in the Political Process"
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67164>
Posted onOctober 20, 2014 4:03 pm
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67164>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Via email:
Statement of Vice Chair Ann M. Ravel Encouraging Public Comments to
Increase Disclosure and Address Corruption in the Political Process
For the first time in more than a decade, the Commission is now
accepting wide-ranging public comment on issues fundamental to
campaign finance --- including disclosure and corruption in the
political process. Between now and January 15, 2015, citizens from
across the political spectrum are invited to express their views,
submit proposed policy solutions, and otherwise formally participate
in the Commission's policymaking process. Then, on February 11,
2015, the Commission will convene a public hearing where commenters
will have an opportunity to speak directly to the Commission.
The Commission is asking what rules it should implement to address
corruption and increase disclosure in the political process. For
example, how should the Commission improve its rules on public
disclosure, earmarking, joint fundraising committees, and committee
affiliation? Are there any other regulatory changes the Commission
should make to prevent the circumvention of contribution limits or
the concealment of the sources of those contributions? There may be
solutions to these problems that have not yet been considered, or
the Commission might look to states like California and Maryland,
which have been working on new approaches. We need to hear from the
public on these and other issues of consequence to campaign finance
and our democracy.
As a public agency, the Commission has an obligation to directly
engage the public in a constructive dialogue concerning the impact
of its policymaking on our democracy. But for far too long, the
Commission has been closed off, mired in gridlock, and uninterested
in meaningful public input. So this new comment period and the
public hearing to follow are major steps toward openness and direct
public engagement. And they are the direct result of the compromise
rulemaking package the Commission approved on October 9.
To me, allowing an opportunity for the public to participate in the
Commission's policymaking was especially important --- and long
overdue --- given the growing public concern about undisclosed
spending flooding the American political process. An estimated $4
billion will be spent during this year's mid-term election, with
$700 million or more in anonymous spending. Outside spending by
groups that hide their donors increased from just $5 million in 2006
to more than $300 million in 2012. Despite this dramatic increase,
declining levels of public trust, and growing cynicism about the
political process, the Commission has ignored --- until now ---
public views about, for example, how to strengthen its disclosure
rules so that voters know who is behind the messages intended to
influence their votes.
That is why every citizen who cares about the future of our
democracy should make his or her voice heard during the current
comment period. Submit comments and join us for the public hearing
in February. We need to hear from you.
Here's how to submit written comments and testify at the public hearing:
Online: http://sers.fec.gov/forces/addcomments.htm?pid=93617
Paper: Federal Election Commission
Attn.: Amy L. Rothstein, Assistant General Counsel
999 E Street, NW
Washington, DC 20463
Be Sure to
Include: Each commenter's full name and postal address
Deadline for
Comments: January 15, 2015
To Testify at
the Hearing: File a written comment by January 15, 2015, that
includes a request to testify at the public hearing.
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D67164&title=%E2%80%9CStatement%20of%20Vice%20Chair%20Ann%20M.%20Ravel%20Encouraging%20Public%20Comments%20to%20Increase%20Disclosure%20and%20Address%20Corruption%20in%20the%20Political%20Process%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>,federal
election commission <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=24>
Colorado SOS Gives Advisory Opinion to Citizens United on Disclosure
Issue <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67161>
Posted onOctober 20, 2014 3:59 pm
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67161>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Here
<http://electionlawblog.org/wp-content/uploads/Citizens-United-Advisory-Opinion-10162014.pdf>.
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D67161&title=Colorado%20SOS%20Gives%20Advisory%20Opinion%20to%20Citizens%20United%20on%20Disclosure%20Issue&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>
Get Your "True the Vote 2014 Poll Watcher Training Guide"
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67159>
Posted onOctober 20, 2014 3:57 pm
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67159>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Here <http://www.truethevote.org/poll-watcher-training>.
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D67159&title=Get%20Your%20%E2%80%9CTrue%20the%20Vote%202014%20Poll%20Watcher%20Training%20Guide%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted infraudulent fraud squad <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=8>,The
Voting Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>
"Ginsburg Explains Saturday Surprise on Texas Voting Law"
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67157>
Posted onOctober 20, 2014 3:52 pm
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67157>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Tony Mauro writes
<http://www.nationallawjournal.com/supremecourtbrief/home/id=1202673994408/Ginsburg-Explains-Saturday-Surprise-on-Texas-Voting-Law?mcode=1202615432992&curindex=1&back=NLJ>for
NLJ.
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D67157&title=%E2%80%9CGinsburg%20Explains%20Saturday%20Surprise%20on%20Texas%20Voting%20Law%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted inSupreme Court <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>,The Voting
Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>,voter id
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=9>,Voting Rights Act
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15>
"Silicon Valley CEOs Get A Warm Washington Welcome To Politics"
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67154>
Posted onOctober 20, 2014 1:10 pm
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67154>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
HuffPo
<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/10/20/mayday-pac-upton_n_6016028.html?utm_hp_ref=tw>:
"According to people familiar with the situation, committee staff
director and former super lobbyist
<http://www.opensecrets.org/revolving/rev_summary.php?id=10981> Gary
Andres personally has been calling the CEOs of major Silicon Valley tech
companies, hammering them for coming after Upton and spooking Mayday's
donors, who worry their companies will get rougher treatment when and if
Upton survives."
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D67154&title=%E2%80%9CSilicon%20Valley%20CEOs%20Get%20A%20Warm%20Washington%20Welcome%20To%20Politics%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>
Set to Be on KCRW's Press Play With Madeline Brand Talking SCOTUS
and Texas Voter ID <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67152>
Posted onOctober 20, 2014 11:31 am
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67152>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
You should be able tolisten here
<http://www.kcrw.com/news-culture/shows/press-play-with-madeleine-brand>right
at noon Pacific.
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D67152&title=Set%20to%20Be%20on%20KCRW%E2%80%99s%20Press%20Play%20With%20Madeline%20Brand%20Talking%20SCOTUS%20and%20Texas%20Voter%20ID&description=>
Posted inSupreme Court <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>,The Voting
Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>
Two from Ari Berman on Voting Rights
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67150>
Posted onOctober 20, 2014 11:03 am
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67150>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
The GOP is Winning the War on Voting
<http://www.thenation.com/article/182233/gop-winning-war-voting#>
The Supreme Court Eviscerates the Voting Rights Act in Texas Voter ID
Decision
<http://www.thenation.com/blog/183561/supreme-court-eviscerates-voting-rights-act-texas-voter-id-decision>
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D67150&title=Two%20from%20Ari%20Berman%20on%20Voting%20Rights&description=>
Posted inSupreme Court <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>,The Voting
Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>,voter id
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=9>,Voting Rights Act
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15>
"Laws in the 21st Century Thursday, Oct. 23, 2 p.m. EDT CSG eCademy"
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67147>
Posted onOctober 20, 2014 9:36 am
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67147>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Webinar: <http://www.csg.org/events/webinar/default.aspx#VotingLaws>
Voting Laws in the 21st Century
Thursday, Oct. 23, 2 p.m. EDT
CSG eCademy
Register now!
<https://www2.gotomeeting.com/register/886890634>
With less than a month before the Nov. 4 midterm
elections, voting laws in eight states are being
challenged in state and federal courts, often going all
the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. These recent court
challenges are due, for the most part, to varying state
interpretations of two Supreme Court decisions in recent
years. In 2008, the high court ruling in Crawford v.
Marion County Election Board upheld an Indiana law
requiring voters to provide photo IDs at the polls on
Election Day. The high court's 2013 ruling in Shelby
County v. Holder blocked two provisions of the Voting
Rights Act: Section 5, which required select states and
local governments to obtain federal preclearance before
implementing any changes to their voting laws or
practices; and Section 4(b), which contained the
coverage formula that determined which select
jurisdictions were subjected to preclearance based on
its voting discrimination history. This eCademy session
will shed light on several recent voting law challenges
across the country and how these cases may impact the
states in November and beyond.
Presenters:
Rick Hasen
Professor of Law and Political Science
University of California at Irvine
Full bio >>
<http://www.csg.org/events/webinar/documents/Hasenbio.pdf>
Dan Tokaji
Constitutional Law Professor
Moritz College of Law, The Ohio State University
Full bio >>
<http://www.csg.org/events/webinar/documents/Tokajibio.pdf>
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D67147&title=%E2%80%9CLaws%20in%20the%2021st%20Century%20Thursday%2C%20Oct.%2023%2C%202%20p.m.%20EDT%20CSG%20eCademy%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted inSupreme Court <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>,The Voting
Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>
--
Rick Hasen
Chancellor's Professor of Law and Political Science
UC Irvine School of Law
401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000
Irvine, CA 92697-8000
949.824.3072 - office
949.824.0495 - fax
rhasen at law.uci.edu
http://www.law.uci.edu/faculty/full-time/hasen/
http://electionlawblog.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20141020/84ba9f30/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20141020/84ba9f30/attachment.png>
View list directory